Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
Gal Gadot thread>>3901388
Any shots of her sexy back in WW84?
Not mine but fan art
>>3951719Cleopatra was white.
>>3953082sad little manchild
>>3953082She was a mix of Greek and Egyptian, so she was likely olive skinned.
>>3953082Well caucasian anyway.
>>3953082> Cleopatra was white.She wouldn't be considered white by modern standards. Definitely not black either, despite the bullshit that some fuckwits have been pushing in Ebony magazine. Her known genealogy is Greek and Persian. Contemporary depictions describe an olive skinned, dark haird, dark eyed woman with a big hooked nose (streamlined in Roman and other later depictions). By today's standard's she'd be called "brown", "Arab", or "mixed".
>>3953453Olive skin isn't "brown", it's not a particular shade but denotes a small spectrum. Gal is actually olive skinned. She can very plausably play Cleopatra, although Gal is undoubtedly more attractive.We don't know the exact shade of Cleopatra was, but we have over a hundred portraits of Egyptian people from more or less around her time. I'll post of a couple of them next that show how different the shades can be, even though they are both considered olive skin.>Her known genealogy is Greek and PersianShe was not of Persian decent (where did you get this from) and Persians don't look like Arabs anyway because they aren't Arabs.This Persian thing sounds like some bs you read on Wikipedia.https://blog.oup.com/2010/12/cleopatra-2/
>>3953500>lighter
>>3953501>darker
Bust of Cleopatra made between 46 and 44 BC during her visits to Rome. One could assume she saw it and since she was very, VERY good friends with Caesar you would assume it's pretty good. Because if it wasn't she could just ask Caesar to remove the sculptor's head.
>>3953500> She was not of Persian decent (where did you get this from)Cleopatra VII's exact genalogy is hard to pin down, but inclusion of Persian heritage is far from controversial. Even your own source states a pure Hellenic heritage as a possibility, not a certainty. I'm not sure why you're so offended by a possibility that's as widely accepted in the historical community a pure Hellenic origin.> and Persians don't look like Arabs anyway because they aren't Arabs.These days people confuse Persians with Arabs - they get lumped together because of similar phenotype and the modern propensity to lable the entire "Middle East" as Arab, despite both Arab and Persian people's protestation. Have you never noticed this? And my point was about what she would be labelled today.>>3953501>>3953502>>3953965Those three are some of the later depictions I refered to. The paintings are from over 100 years after her death. The sculpture is a little closer to contemporary. Created either near the end of her life or after her death, by sculptors relying on descriptions given to them rather than first-hand knowledge of their own, performed within the cultural traditions of their time which included hiding "blemishes" and Romanising the features of friendly figures. You'll note that contemporary Egyptian coinage depicts a more prominent aquiline nose, while the Roman sculpture simply enlarges a Roman nose.
>>3954123Cleopatra VII died in 30bc. A sculpture made in 44 - 42 bc was well before she died. Since she traveled to Rome many times during her life she probably saw it.
>>3953172She most likely did not have a drop of Egyptian blood in herThe Ptolemaic dynasty were Macedonian Greek and followed the Egyptian pharaonic practice of royal incest
>>3954136Ah, you're right. I thought that was one of the late-life/post-death commemorative sculptures, but I reverse image searched and confirmed it was made in her lifetime.>>3954276>She most likely did not have a drop of Egyptian blood in herThis is likely true.> The Ptolemaic dynasty were Macedonian Greek and followed the Egyptian pharaonic practice of royal incestThis is not quite so cut and dry. Some generations did practise traditional incest. Others took partners from fellow rulers elsewhere, mostly in the Hellenic world. There's some writings that indicate at least some of the family were Egyptian or from other peoples living in the Kingdom (via concubines, so it's unliklely any who who had claim to the throne were of Egyptian heritage). There's some theories that Cleopatra herself may be descended from one of these concubines, but they're fairly controversial and not well supported.
>>3953965By today's standards that is not a very attractive woman.
This is now a Gal Gadot thread.
Wakanda Forever
>>3956092I need those long toes wrapped around my cock.
>>3951719>>3953082>>3953083>>3953172>>3953216>>3953453>>3953500>>3953501>>3953502>>3953965>>3954123>>3954479Greeks, Hellenes, and even most Egyptian Dynasties were Indo-European. Does it really fucking matter which one it was? Bitch was obviously caucasoid and likely white too.
>>3956186Awesome isn't it.
>>3956186lol
>>3956428
>>3957570
>>3959134
https://sys.4chan.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.worthpoint.com%2Fworthopedia%2Fgal-gadot-signed-autographed-screen-1872622591
Imagine there's no heaven
>>3954875This is literally a Gal Gadot thread retard
>>3966858Fantastic.
>>3967915Dude get back on your meds and find a thread more to you liking ... kys
>>3953172Greek or Egyptian, she wasn't Israeli for sure
>>3974741>>3974743Stunning pics, thanks for all of your posts
>>3974921You are very welcome.
>>3979227
>>3980742>>3980743Cute!
Gal gadot is So Hot.... AND sexy Any feet pics of our gal ?
>>3983469
>>3983510
>>3983511
>>3983512>>3983511>>3983510Nice
>>3984503
>>3985035I NEED to rest my head on her smooth chest and listen to her sultry voice.
>>3985698She's So beautiful
>>3986835>mfw
>>3986843Candid reaction. She was being given a gift by a friend.
>>3986835>invisible sandwich
>>3988102fucking basednow a bbc version?
>>3988102Utter crap
>>3988406i got you bro.
>>3988102>>3988572U make them?
>>3956179>Indo-Europeanis a language>>3956179>caucasoid and likely whitetwo words that mean totally different things to different people (and mean WAY too much to certain 4chan incels), so arguing over it is pretty useless
Keep your filthy fakes in threads dedicated to FAKES. Or, just go back to /b/ where you'll find other people like yourself. This thread is dedicated to legit pictures of Gal Gadot in life, in theater, goofing around. Thank you.
Gal Gadot/Wonder Woman fan art
>>3988892
>>3988894
>>3988899
>>3988786Nice
>>3988102>>3988572absolutely fucking baaaseeeddd
>>3988796Because he's a homosexual who dreams of sucking cock and getting facials.
>>3988990Is this a mating call? Because it's working.
>>3989598>>3989600>>3989604>>3989602Cute
Gal gadot megahttps://mega.nz/folder/t0JziALS#VGBcYRtGbGdA0dBNO49pmw
Hot
>>3989953>>3989951Cute
Guys please start uploading her Fakes mmmm
>>3989912you don't have enough fakes of her :(
We don't need or want fakes. The real thing is hot enough.
>>3990354>>3990356She's a Big girl
>>3990724She's a big Gal
>>3991471For u
Any ww pics?
>>3992392
>>3992753
>>3992756
>>3992761
>>3992768
>>3992776
>>3992781
>>3992782
>>3992786
>>3992786>>3992788Nice
>>3992788
>>3993425
>>3993426
I want Gal Gadot to lick my butthole. And I don't even really like that shit
>>3993603>>3993603i need more pics of her in this dress
>>3993770
>>3993770See >>3952826
>>39937753 kike in 1 picture
>>3994483Actually no.
>>3996260
>>3996262
Best thread
>>3954875Is that her nipple I spot there?
>>3988989>>3988990oh fuck im gonna cum now
>>3997776I thought so at first also but there are at least a couple of images where her nipples are visible under a shirt and they are really dark. I don't see that in this picture.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/morgansloss1/gal-gadot-pregnancy-announcement
Why was her new preggo pic removed?
>>4001387At a guess it's because her kids were in the picture. Posted a pic of her at a beach with her oldest daughter once. Jannies removed it and I got a one day suspension. Only thing I could think of to cause it was that a kid was in the pic.
I heard there was fap leaks of her
>>4001640Fakes
>>4000432i nutted inside her
>>4001563do you know where to find the old pic?
>>4003164Pretty sure this is the pic, minus the daughter. I don't remember where it came from originally.
>>4003368if only she had slightly more ass...
>>4003368no it was a recent pic of her pregnant with her husband and kids
>>4003808You can find it here >>4000432 I think
>>3995220yes!
>>3988989the only time she wears any kind of hosiery. her legs are nice as hell but she never does that it seems. shame
>>3988989mmmm yes!
>>4002580What the heck?
