Previous: >>4337069
>>4379958Who is the source for this?And the one I'm reposting from the previous thread rnThey're fantastic quality. Also I'm melting for the milf hnggg
>>4379962Model is Faye Rampton. Artist is Bigphish.
>>4379880My supervisor at my job is actually sort of cute (at least, from the mask up). I have a few pictures of her from when my department took group pictures, and I wouldn't mind making her giant, but I feel like it's not a good idea to see my supervisor in a "fetish" way.
>>4379973>I wouldn't mind making her giantI mind. You know what giant women do to the world, right?
>>4379975They conquer it? That wouldn't be so bad.
>>4380007The world would become a post-apocalyptic hellscape where we have to scavenge for food while avoiding becoming food ourselves. It'd be a nightmare.
>>4379973>but I feel like it's not a good idea to see my supervisor in a "fetish" way.Why not? She'd be able to dominate you in more ways than one. Perform poorly at work, and she might keep taking a few inches off your height as punishment. She might even keep you at half-size for a day, so you'd have to run around trying to perform errands for her. Perform really poorly, and you might just end up in her shoes for a time. Just don't fuck up so bad that you end up in a "firing" position.
>>4379973Do it anon
>>4379973I mean you just have to be a professional about it. Surely you can have a separation between what you do in the privacy of your home and how you conduct yourself in public.
Ding-ding-ding! Since we got a new giantess thread on /hr/, you unlocked some OG collages of mine.
That's it for now. Keep up the good discussion, quality pics, and hot stories to unlock more!
>>4380022>>4380271I just feel like if I'm looking at a giantess collage of her consistently, I'll see her differently when I'm at my job. I mean, I would still act professionally and all that, but I feel like it would screw up my mind.
>>4381530Is it different than imagining her in lingerie? Its just another way of seeing a woman in a sexual way
>>4381530It's too late for you anon, you've already started flirting with the idea. Next time you see her adjusting her shoe, you're going to be imagining yourself stuck inside. When you see her stirring a cup of coffee in the break room, she's dropped you in and is bullying you with the spoon. Rummaging for something in a bag? It's you. Adjusting a bra strap? You're stuffed inside. She's your workplace sizey dommyfu now. (I'm sorry, it's just too fun to tease about this sort of stuff.)
>>4381372I really like this one, the size and aesthetic of the girl are great. I love me some city-building-sized girl-next-door stuff. That said, the lighting and contrast blending is pretty off between the girl and the background. So I was in the mood to be a bit cheeky, and had a go at a bit of a remaster. Hopefully this doesn't come across as too much of an assholish move against the original collager, I'm having a go because I like the original pic so much.
goddamn why is it so hard to find "At street level looking up" pictures that are good for collages? I have half a mind to get on a train and go downtown Toronto to take reference pictures myself
>>4381678You've lowered the values of her face too much - look at how bright the street is
>>4381932Why don't you? I don't make collages, but if I did, I'd probably take my own photos for it.
>>4381979Busy moving house. But not busy enough to visit the Yuja Wang thread and decide to make her into a giantess
I can't tell if this thread is hilarious or sad.
>>4381540>>4381541Honestly, I'm just worried I'll start developing feelings for her or something, even though she's older than me and is probably not single. I did have a dream a few days ago where I was at my job and talking to her about work stuff when she physically pressed herself against me but acted as though she didn't do anything weird. Thanks for reading my blog.
>>4382150What's wrong with the thread, I ask knowing you'll never come back to respond?
>>4382165I'd try not to sexualize your boss, that's just good advice in general but that shit happens all the time. You're lucky you're not that guy on /k/ who relized that his aunt looks like lee-enfield from girls frontline and now he can't vist her without getting aroused kek
>>4382185Yeah, I think it's pretty common for someone to think their boss or coworker or whatever is attractive, just don't be weird about it. Do not tell her, do not act on it, do not be a weirdo about it. Keep the workplace professional and respectful.
>>4382185>>4382186Yeah, that's why I don't want to turn my supervisor into a giantess. But I don't mind doing it with my female co-workers since I don't find them attractive in the same way that I find my supervisor attractive. It's just weird because before my dream, I only thought of my supervisor as cute, and nothing else. It's after my dream that I'm worried I'll lust after her or something.
>>4382235Just don't take her facebook pics and collage them. That's a step too far, and some of you guys actually do it.
>>4382236I'm not going to collage her because I don't want to screw my mind up any more than it already is.>That's a step too farHow so? It would still just be a picture of her.
>>4382237>How so? It would still just be a picture of her.No, because to people like us, it's explicitly porn. You may think that a photoshopped picture of a clothed woman standing in a city nothing offensive, but it only has one purpose and you know exactly what that purpose is. Don't turn photos of people you know into fetish porn. Just use your imagination.
>>4382238So, are you saying that using a picture of her from a department group picture isn't porn but that using a Facebook picture that she's in is porn?
>>4382240Taking photos of her and explicitly turning them into fetish porn is pretty weird, bro.
>>4382244Maybe it's just me, but I've always preferred using girls who I know in collages than girls who I don't know. I think I enjoy collages with girls who I know simply because I know them.
>>4382236>>4382238>>4382244I mean, kinda, but you're being too black and white with it. It's probably "weird", but it's "weird" in the same way that fapping to bikini pics of your crush from some beach album on Facebook is "weird". If it's something you do occasionally for a bit of personal enjoyment, and it doesn't cause problems for you or anyone else, it's probably perfectly fine. But if it starts bleeding into your IRL relationships, you've got a problem. Nobody is as introspective as they'd like to think they are, but I think most people are self-aware enough to know when they're taking things too far.What you do in the privacy of your own home, in a way that doesn't affect others, is probably fine. Just don't be a dumbass with it.
>>4382184Some people probably can't stand the idea that others may like things they don't like.
>>4382306To be fair, we do look super weird from the outside. Best to just ignore the drive-by JAQing off.
guys help, I saw a giantess video a month ago or so about a teacher who had to watch over a shrunken student taking an exam on her desk, she quickly forgets about and starts talking shit about tiny people while the student falls into her shoes, she then notices the student is missing and walks away. Does anyone know the name of the video?
>>4382314Everyone is going to think something is weird. I browse /d/ for the giantess threads sometimes, and I think that 90% of the threads there are weird. But I don't feel the need to assert my opinion in those threads. As long as you're not into something that's illegal or that hurts someone else, who cares?
>>4382841Remember when Dodger came across Docop's DA page and got a kick out of "celebrities sitting on cities"
>>4382843Remember when Dodger was relevant? Neither do I.
>>4382843What was that about?
>>4382841>>4382843>>4382851Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCU750AS_-o&t=500s
Do you think May minds the fact that we photoshop her as a rampaging giantess or do you think she only cares when the credit card details don't come through?
>>4382869Who's May
>>4382871The girl in this >>4382869She's a cosplayer/model and many creators from DA or other places have made photoshops or drawings of her as a giantess. She responded to some of them saying she thinks it's cool (I can't remember the exact words).
Tried to mix photo and render with... mixed success. Lot of potential if ever I could make that pipeline work.>>4382844Dodger is relevant because of docop.
>>4382947The fact that she's cool with it blows my mind. I figured that most girls would be creeped out.
>>4382984she did say back in 2017 on pic related>I didn't know about these kind of concept and it's very interesting! Also "Kaiju Lady actually sounds very coolshe probably looks at it like fanart but I wouldn't show it to her on twitter. Because she only uses any and all social media to promote her products (respect the grindset)
>>4382869>>4383151May is cute, but I've never been very successful when looking for source material of her to use. I don't know her business model, but I guess she keeps almost all of her pics behind a paywall, and only releases a select few on social media? Without asking for anyone to post stuff from behind her paywall, does anyone have an imgur or google drive or something with a collection of good collagable material?
>>4383151Heh, turns out she even retweeted a bunch of giantess fan art of herself:https://twitter.com/TehHanku/status/1277001674738020358
>So which city should we destroy next?>how about the one where all these dumb helicopters are comming from?>agreedmade this because canonically may 1st is Kongou's birthday and also becuase May>>4383241her older stuff on deviantart has more quality then the previews she posts on her socials. >>4383151 is an older one from deviantart. Artists also get around this by upscaling pictures like >>4382869
>>4382185Source on that pic?
>>4383405a fashion shoot with valerie van der graaf from 2012(?) appropriately tiltled "Goddesszilla" i have no idea what they were selling but there's 4 more pics in the set that i'll dump
>>4383424
>>4383425
>>4383427and that's all she wrote
>>4383428I wonder if she was harassed by vorefags like the 90 foot babe girl
>>4383424reject collages, take the dioramapill
>>4383464Now we're talking.
>>4383470It's the whole arrogance/inconsiderateness of women who break the rules for pics that does it for me, and that can't be replicated with giantess photoshoots/pranzo stuff (also lessens my guilt in using it as fetish stuff). It doesn't help that 95% of the rule-breakers for miniature-parks/dioramas happen to be women, must be a pattern or something.Truly women are sent to us by g-d to test our faith and patience!
>>4383464I don't remember the first time i found a Gens' Labo video on youtube in all it's 360p quality but it blew my mind (among other things)
>>4383484
>>4383483For me, it's the intention and the feeling a woman gets from actually interacting with the environment. A woman in a diorama/model city/toys will always be better than a collage of a woman who was very obviously NOT posing for a giantess picture.
>>4383430funny enough i'm starting to see fetishists in comments of some of the pics I scrap. It's the usual "would you be OK with me editing pic to make you look like a giant in a city?" though since they're mostly Slavic tourists (Slavs cant seem to comprehend 'do not touch/cross' rules) who can't speak English they're ignored. How a collage-boomer looks at a diorama pic and thinks a collage edit is necessary is beyond me>>4383503>A woman in a diorama/model city/toys will always be better than a collage of a woman who was very obviously NOT posing for a giantess picture.I wonder if the models themselves for professional-shoots like in pic-related are familiar with this fetish. Gotta give it the agencies though, as there's already been a steady trickle of gts stuff in music-vids past 3 years.
>>4383424>>4383425>>4383427>>4383428Great stuff, thank you
>>4383464More
Imagine how many people are crushed just from her head and hair
>>4382417Yo... Who made this one?
If you guys got to hang out with a giant girl for a day, what activities would you do with her?
This movie came out.
>>4383673depends on the size, if she is as huge as your picture she would crush me accidentally I'm sure
Lads...
what's the appeal?
>>4384298Fuck off.
>>4384298there's lots of reasons. it's a very verstile fetish. you could like the dynamic between small and giant people, you could like the giant ladies to eat people, to crush people, barefeet, with converse, sandals, high heels, boots or whatever other footwear, or maybe her tearing through a city like godzilla,or to just be gentle and try to be a normal person dispite being huge, maybe it's just the thought of powerful women that appeals to you or maybe you just like it as a form of art. Take your pick why and enjoy the ride because you're here forever
>>4384313He's not coming back, he doesn't care, he's shitposting. How bored are you that you'd try to give a reply to a "what's the appeal" post? They're never serious. They never will be.
>>4384316meh, gives me an excuse to profess my love for big ladies and to post another one from my collection
>>4383713Where can I see it?
>>4384327Trust me, you don't want to.
>>4384328It’s that bad :/
>>4384329It might be the worst one I've ever seen. Way worse than Giantess Attack. But if you really want to see it, it's on Amazon Prime.
>>4384330Holy shit it’s bad. We are truly doomed.
>>4384362Nah. If I can get a kickstarter going for maybe 25k, I'll deliver the giantess movie everyone wants. Except the shrinkfags.
>>4384003What if she could secure you on her shoulder so that you wouldn't accidentally fall off?
>>4383673Die, probably. Giant women literally only want one thing and it's disgusting.
>>4384411I think my leg would need some kind of harness. Or just put one of my leg inside her t-shirt. I would be scared otherwise>https://velvet.hu/gumicukor/2015/07/24/horvath_eva_egy_melltartotlan_oriasno/Daily reminder that there is a Hungarian sizefag who is making collages of local celebrities and usually he sends to them. It was even in online media that the girl on the picture really love his collages.
>>4384671There are a few "graphic artists" on Instagram who are clearly giantess fans, but who sprinkle it in among "regular" artwork for plausible deniability. They've had fair bit of success in getting the occasional celebrity like and/or story feature. Gabriele_soi, for example, has had some of his giantess edits liked and story'd by Dua Lipa.
>>4383424this reminds me of a webm i saw but it was with a snake
>>4386487>>4386289Eva Elfie should be mega or giga sized.
>>4386634Agreed
>>4386634>>4386803Forgot the image
>>4386995Just some friendly advice, feathering your model doesn't make her blend in better, it just makes her look like a non-corporeal entity.
>>4385415Gonna need some more Daisy, docop.
>>4386291Who is that?
>>4387099Shiftymine
>>4379952can someone please remove the shitty looking dead guy
>>4387163No. In fact we need more.
>>4387168its okay I realized I could just crop it, have a blessed day gorefag
>>4387107Humbly look towards the stars in hope of more with her, even though I know good enough source material is nearly nonexistant
>>4387168YES more big ladies smushing small people
>>4387036Non-corporeal entities can be pretty hot, though.
Do y'all fantasize bout women you know/see as giantesses, the same way you'd think "Damn she's hot I wonder what she looks like naked"?
>>4388142No. I don't remember the last time I even wondered what someone hot looked like naked.
>>4388142Do people really think "Damn she hot I wonder what she looks like naked"? Am I the odd one out?
>>4388220Not anymore. It's a pretty old school thing.
>>4388924heels are the best for smashing cities
>>4389023That's fucking hot.
>>4389023>>4389024All thats left is to chew them all up
>>4389031That's even fucking hotter.
>>4389041Based hardvore fan
>>4389042Love me some hard vore. Underrated scenario: When a giantess commands people or smaller giantesses to feed her panicked humans. Place them directly on her tongue or teeth. Diamonds.
>>4389016Top shit, lad
>>4381372ol crimson chin over here
>>4390303Giantess acting as islands is a badass concept no pun intended
>>4390705
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afiNWat9s1Ygloom was 'pen name' of Betty Marion White Ludden >>4383637
Kinda wanna do more, but it's impossible to find the full set for this, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>4392947That is superb work, Anon. Excellent.
>>4392947you have to give us some tutorials, man.
>>4392947Have you ever considered collaging....someone else?
>>4393006Yeah would like seeing this quality collage with others too
>>4393001Hope you like hours-long mumble rambling. For real though, maybe I will>>4393006You're onto something, didn't consider this
How much baby batter have you spilled to Katelyn over her long career? In either gallons or liters.
>>4393039Why did they poorly cut out like 1/3 of her thighs?
>>4393066I asked you a question first.
Do you guys think it's weird to collage girls who you personally know, with or without their knowledge?
>>4393194To me, its as "weird" as imagining girls you know in average sexual fantasies, which pretty much what everyone does. But because I see it as applying the sexual kink to the medium...its the same idea, just tweaked for the kink
>>4392947This is high quality work! Nice job!>>4393194This whole thing is weird, anon. As long as you're not rubbing them in the person's face or uploading those personal collages online, you're probably fine. Keep it private, and don't be dumb with it.
>>4393013Most of all, I'd like to know how you manage hair and see how you do it
>>4393578Noted. Not that I fool proof technique, but it won't hurt to show. Until then, it's just a mix of pen tool / mask and select. Smudge tool with 2-3 px size and 70-95 % strength works good for painting in hair.
>>4392947>>4393638Incredible work! Is that skyscraper leaning against the other taken somewhere from the same background, or did you find it elsewhere? What kind of filters are you using at the end of the process? I'm especially clueless when it comes to that kind of stuff. As for tutorials, maybe write basic concepts as greentext and expand from there? Though I know you mean about rambling, someone could make a pretty long video alone just covering the subject of matching models with backgrounds.>>4393006Not sure if you're conflating this anon with me (and/or other anons that have made May collages in these threads). I usually post a few in these threads, but this anon is on another level, I'm definitely taking notes.
>>4393791Gonna need greenpicturebooks for this. The part of the picture you see is cropped pretty bigly to get the composition I want. There's tons of more skyscrapers in the original high resolution pic, which is where they're from. Really useful, better than crawling the internet for other materials to find something that matches.The stuff at the end is various color correction and levels/curves adjustments on multiple layers with various blending modes. Look up camera raw. Hard to explain, so that's gonna have to wait.At the very least im gonna write a pdf or something.Anyway, need to stop the spam. Big ladies, amirite?
>>4393857Is there anywhere we can see all of your past collages? These are great.
>>4393857>Really useful, better than crawling the internet for other materials to find something that matchesTotally, that way you bypass most of the lighting and color correction issues you'd have looking elsewhere. That technique is especially useful for cars if you can find them in the background at an interactable scale.I'll definitely have to look up what you mean for the effects you do at the end. I use GIMP so there aren't adjustment layers to work with, so I'll need to practice a good workaround (which will probably be duplicating layers even more than I do already).>>4394073There's his dA: https://www.deviantart.com/diccardand twitter:https://twitter.com/a_right_dick
>>4394073>>4394140Oh its the artist formerly known as I-A-R-D. Sup. Just want to say please make more art like "Cliche clothing does cliche thing" & "In the Summertime". They are by far my favorite collages of yours and among the best in the whole genre. That is all.
>>4394149Ah, a fellow giga enjoyer
Look out, Brie Larson is destroying the city! And she's still shilling NFTs!
>>4394149pls yes>>4394805pls no
>>4394808Let Brie eat you.
>>4394805>>4394809Based Big Brie!
i like to lurk in these threads as my own personal YLYL on /hr/ aaaaa shes so tall me so small im gonna coooooom lmfao
>>4394921Sick bait, fellow sizefag.
>>4394921Congrats on your low self-esteem, man. Whatever degenerate shit you're into must be pretty bad to make you want to compensate in this way.
shuddup and post big ladies
>>4394149
>>4394149>>4395067
>>4394805Oh my god! That's horrifying! That's so cruel! I'm shocked at Brie's disregard for the world around her!And to top it all off; she's destroying a city too!
>>4395088I can't believe this is how our world ends, I'm so distraught. What if she makes us her little men and slaves? It's so terrible!
Oops, accidentally spilled some more growth potion on Brie. Sorry humanity, I'm such a goofball sometimes.>>4393001>>4393791I've written some pages on shadows and lighting. >https://drive.google.com/file/d/13oxWbAk-gfSk_nAEyCiwONyjMyv1m_cr/view?usp=sharing Gonna do post effects next - which is where I desperately try to fix my terrible blending skills by slathering filters on top.
>>4395428That's good stuff man. A lot of things I wish I would have known when I started collaging but had to figure out over time. Glad you're compiling it and taking the time to write this out.
>>4395641Thanks. If you got any ideas for sections or comments on structure/how clear it is, feel free to gimmie.
>>4396032does she still make new videos?
>>4396354She does! She released one last week.
>>4396364Wake me up when she's a proper milf
>>4396369She is one already! She's does lactation videos and everything!
>>4396377Honestly, it's kind of wild to think about just how long I've been fapping to Katelyn. Over 15 years.
>>4396364Katelyn has some really hot models featured on her site too.
Are there any decent wallpapers for giantesses sitting on buildings?
>>4396836??
>>4396848I mean are there any good wallpapers that are suitable for putting a girl in a sitting position on a building? I've been having trouble finding decent ones online.
>>4396852sitting how? because this is sitting on buildings
>>4396857Oh, I mean sitting as though she's using a building as a chair.
>>4396870How about this?
>>4396902I'm looking for good background images to use, not a collage. A girl who I know sent me a picture of herself sitting on a bench, and I was going to use it in a collage.
Is this what you guys wanted all along?https://mobile.twitter.com/reverseothello/status/1526393340153024512
>>4396967Yes.
>>4396967yikes!
>>4379946it's always growth, here's shrinking content?
>>4396921Finding backgrounds for sitting positions can be very challenging. You have to find pics with structures that line up with the models position that agrees with the overall perspective of the picture, on top of having lighting and other aspects match. Depending on how overhead the angle is in your model pic, you're gonna have a hard time finding what you're looking for. I posted a collection of BGs here before, maybe they'll help:https://imgur.com/a/SFsA8zbYou can try googling terms like "rooftop" to get that slight overhead angle you're looking for, but like I said it depends. There's a goldilocks range of city pics photographers take that work before you're out of luck (it's a similar issue for pics looking up at models at a shallow angle, or ones where shadows are at 270° towards the viewer, people just don't take those kinds of pics of cities). Try nature settings too, mountains and hillsides have more variety of angles that might work. >>4397225As someone that generally prefers shrink over growth, shrink collages don't translate that well. You really have to scour for good pics to use for shrunken people, since it's typically stock photos with blown out lighting. That's assuming they're at a scale that's particularly noticeable. Otherwise the people aren't more than glorified dots on the screen, like in your pic (which honestly doesn't even look good, the contrast and sharpness on them is too high, the dust on my computer screen looks more convincing). Even if you make the pic look good it just doesn't pop out like a proper giantess collage, which has more room for composition and other dynamics.
Finally, a giant Momokun.
>>4394133Do you have this image before putting the city in? I want to try something
>>4397301I found a decent background for my purpose, so thanks! My standards are pretty low (or really, my skills in making giantess collages are really rudimentary), so I'm generally OK with just sticking a girl in a city, making her big, and calling it a day. But if you can recommend any tutorials on how to make good collages, I'd definitely check them out.
>>4383673It would probably be my gf and we are both into vore, so I'd be screwed.
https://twitter.com/Colossalcollage/status/1528208181146419200HE'S DONE IT AGAIN
>>4400731The sound those final ten seconds are so dreadful. Love it. wish it were me
>>4400731Cant view without a twitter account, what is it?
