Emily Ratajkowski
and some soles
>>4733011She took the call
>>4733051>>4733056Mm I love her belly button.
feet goddesscaptcha: WAOWS
>>4733068>>4733067I don't normally like hyper pretty women but fuck those feet and heels are making my mouth water
>>4733070She might have the best pair of any celebrity. Literally perfect soles (see >>4733021).
>>4733021>>4733068>>4733070>>4733072>>4733075Imagine the smell here
post her pusybutthole
>>4733058Gross.Get help.
Would use as a cum dump, nothing more.
>>4733011Lip injections were a mistake. Literally looks like a clown with those balloon lips. I can go to the ghetto if I want to see monkey lips
can you believe she's a milf now?
>>4733539I can because she used to look much hotter, before having a kid
>>4733194yeah she got them in her childhoodretard
>>4733849>>4733850>>4733852ummmmmmm
>>4733684>the dumbfuck doesn't see the lips changing volume in every pici hope you bleed to death after darnell rapes your asshole, gorilla lover.
>>4733539Not enough. Need more white babies from Emrata
>>4735302there's definitely a higher res one available, but I'm not sure whereit's Treats! Magazine issue #2 - Emily Ratajkowski by Tony Duran (editorial)does somebody have access to the digital version of that issue?
>>4735367I have been trying to find high res images of all her treats magazines but it looks like all the old archives were posted on unstable image hosts and have now been deleted.
>>4735707have this 6600x5090 one thenit's a real bitch that image hosts just delete images like that.I'm contemplating buying the digital edition of Treats! 2 just for this photoshoot, but I'm not sure if the specific picture I want is an outtake or not
>>4735710Oh nice, thanks. To be honest I'm not too familiar with the magazine so I wouldn't know whether it's an outtake or not. Their Patreon has outtakes for issue #3 but not #2 sadly.
>>4735302Manages to find a pdf of the magazine, albeit low quality, and this image is in it on pg. 180.
>>4735717just checked, the picture I'm looking for is definitely an outtakeI can't even post it here because it's too low quality
>>4735739
>>4735740that's my favourite out of the three
need more preggo emily
>>4735742No we don't
>>4735767not even the same anon or monitoring the thread but what kind of homo response? never in my life have i heard shit like this
>>4733011hideous bogged slut
>>4735774Preggo tits are nice but most people aren't into giant pregnant bellies. Take your mommy issues somewhere else, you tards are almost as annoying as the feet and BBC people
>>4733058some guy got to lick it in a movie she did with jessie from breaking bad
>>4735787most people arent into disgusting plastic lips either so take this shit thread elsewhere
>>4735850>come to EmRata thread>be pissed about lip filler/hr/ stands for Highly Retarded it seems
>>4733852>braaaauuuoooppprrppp
>>4735862last time I saw a picture of her was like 10 years ago, and the only thing I could remember was her big breasts
>>4735850I'm not the OP of the thread, retard
>>4735741LARGE BROWN BUTTHOLE
>>4735886she has incredibly enticing nipples
>>4735302>>4735367>>4735707I have what I believe to be the full set, as it was posted on a now-defunct blog, which usually had the best quality of shoots like this. The resolution is only 3300x2550, but the compression quality is better than these (95 vs 80). I'll post them here. Going by the filenames, this is 1/15,I believe the print and digital versions of the magazine had slight differences. I don't seem to have scans of the print version currently..>>4735710This is the first time I've seen a picture from this set with a resolution this high. Quick searches of TinEye and Yandex didn't turn up any others. Is it possibly an AI upscale?
2/15
3/15
4/15
5/15
6/15
7/15
8/15
9/15
10/15
11/15
12/15
13/15
14/15
15/15 for completeness.This image has an odd history. AFAIK, it was not in the print version of the magazine. The first hint of its existence was a low-res preview, which head been censored by placing a lowercase "t" (for treats) over her pudenda. This was later used as the base for a similarly low-res fake. The high-res, real uncensored photo, as seen ITT, only turned up in the wild several years later.
>>4736211it might very well be (probably is), I don't know for sure. I only posted it because it looks better to me than the 3300 oneI believe you do have the complete set from Treats! 2picrel is the specific picture I'm looking for, and it's a confirmed outtake, and I believe, the best from that whole shoot.it's a shitty AI upscale, sorry in advance, the picture I have can't be posted here
Absolutely desperate to know what that pussy feels like
>>47363461/2I had to upscale these before posting them but there are two more outtakes as well as the one you posted.
2/2
>>4736346> I only posted it because it looks better to me than the 3300 oneYou're not wrong. If it is an upscale, it's a good one.In trying to figure out why yours is 6600x5090, rather than the expected 6600x5100 from a 200% upscale, I determined that the missing ten lines seem to correspond to the thin black border at the top of the 3300x2550 version, which has apparently been cropped out of the larger image. #11 in the set has a similar black border at the bottom, but it is absent from the others. A 6600x5100 version also exists, but I've only seen it as a webp.>picrel is the specific picture I'm looking for, and it's a confirmed outtakeAh, yeah. I think I've seen that before, but only in lower res. I thought at the time that it might just be a cropped screencap from the video of the shoot. Interesting if it's an actual outtake.
>>4736866I further edited the supposed upscale - converted it from webp to jpg and removed the black line at the top (and a bit more, the black part wasn't exactly 10 pixels, probably because of the upscaling)honestly, you might be right about it being a still from a BTS video, I did find info that would support this idea. i wonder if the video is available at least in 4K.I believe it's an outtake only because of an old reddit post (and I really want to believe that the picture is available in some absurd resolution somewhere)
Bump.
>>4740890
>>4740892
What I would do for 1 night with her...
>>4741026probably around $500 within a years time
>>4741026The best 26 seconds of your life...
