So... what do you think /ic/?
also sorry for bad quality
>>3851204I find this work menacing/playful because of the way the reductive quality of the spatial relationships notates the essentially transitional quality.
>>3851209on ig its fine due to resolution
>>3851204p cool.Would fix the "tattoos" to make them look less slapped on.
this aesthetic has been played out so goddamn hard we're not in 2016