[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: figure.png (1.23 MB, 1898x1048)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB PNG
In my head I can see what he's saying, use the marks to guide your eye down parts of the body to focus on the action of the figure and there's a certain "flow" to the figure. Hampton says something similar too in his book.

However in practice whenever I try to do this nothing looks right, everything looks out of proportion or it looks like a bunch of scribbles. I have a far easier time just drawing the figures with as few lines as possible. Granted that also ends up stiffening the figure

Am I missing something here? Should I just practice with the latter until I'm more comfortable with anatomy and proportions, then do the former? Or is that a trap, and should I just grind my way with the former until something clicks?
>>
post your work NIGGER



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.