How do I get hired to draw for Google?
>>6666790be a diversity hire somewhere
>>6666790I think these "artists" pay Google to use their works and not the other way around.
>>6666790If you don’t already know someone decently high up the ladder then just give up. “Making it” is about how good you are at networking and literally nothing else.
>>6666790Wait what? Is this a real google doodle?No way they used the meme tranny flag
>>6666803Go to google right now
>>6666805Sorry, not American. Nothing here
>>6666805:(
>>6666790I don't give a shit about what you're talking about, it just triggered me because it reminded me about some classmates who focused on minorities and made their entire brand about that subject and they were the most smug of the bunch.I just refuse to think people are this stupid, I have a "they know you know they know" kinda feel about them, no one can be that fucking entitled or tone deaf about the perks you get above everyone else for playing along with that farce.But ultimately, they won, they live rent free in my head, and I'm a faggot for seething and writing about this in here, well I'll still seethe, can't help it.
>>6666803There’s nothing wrong with the flag.
>>6666807Damn, only americans have to see this slop? It’s this https://www.google.com/doodles/barbara-may-camerons-69th-birthday
>>6666812The fuck are you on about, dude?
>>6666817Where did you get lost? I hate people that do this kind of inclusive art or make it their entire identity, and I will never believe they're doing it in good faith, anything else?
>>6666815>only americans have to see this slop?Yeah. Probably because she's American activist and noone outside the US knows who she is.
>>6666813Wrong
>>6666922Lying and resentment of the innocent are sins, anon.
>>6666928So is Pride
>>6666790>virtual signaling to pedophilesGlad I stopped using (((Jewgle))) a long time ago
>>6666790You have to be a talentless low iq nonwhite willing to follow orders like a slave
>>6667595>signaling to pedophiles>watches tranime Hang yourself you pedo troon
holy shit, it’s the porn game guy, town something
>>6666938It’s really not if you know about the Bible and Christianity beyond a surface level depth.Doesn’t matter, though, the whole “groomer/pedo” thing is just projection from the right, and always has been.
>>6668406>It’s really notYes it is. Cope.
>>6668574Whatever you say, groomer.
>>6666790Are u black, trans and inclusive?If not apply elsewhere
>>6669000>projecting troon
DOODLE FOR GOOGLEhttps://doodles.google.com/d4g/vote/Vote bros
>>6668406>the whole “groomer/pedo” thing is just projection from the right, and always has been.John Money, the psychologist who first popularized the concept of "gender identy," was an actual groomer/pedo.
>>6669751The vast majority of modern pedos are right wing and it’s not even up for debate.Ever notice how all the loudest voices against trans/non-binary people are horny for middle schoolers, like Matt Walsh, Dershowitz, Trump, Gaetz, Crowder, etc. etc. Every right wing acccusation is a confession, and the only reason you’re pushing the “groomer” narrative is to redirect attention away from the fact that you’re the real child rapists we should be concerned with.For fuck’s sake, there’s a thread frequently on the front page of this very board dedicated to honing anonynonce’s skills drawing illustrated CP. If you actually gave a shit about pedophilia you’d start by cleaning your own house.>>6669108Sorry you got called out, pedophile, but you can’t just accuse someone else of projecting when your entire movement is objectively, 100% based of projection.
>>6669933I have about 15k followers between pixiv and baraag, and I do a bit of loli art from time to time. From what I'm able to observe, just about everyone with extreme views, independent of their political leaning, also tends to be a sexual deviant. However, I'm more certain that trannies are consistently also pedos than I am conservitard ecelebs are actually closet pedos. Honestly, I feel just about everyone is a sucker for teenage cunny.
>>6666813>There’s nothing wrong with the flag.Mixing Race/Ethnicity with sexual orientation and gender identity in one big pot is extremely stupid, even if you're into all that stuff politically.It makes no sense and it's restricted to US racial demographics.On top of that, very large swaths of Black/Hispanic communities are extremely homophobic in the first place, so pretending like they're all one big team, makes no sense.Finally, even among minorities, there's a lot of racial tension (plenty of Mexicans racist against blacks and so on).Not dissimilar to trying to expand the LGBTQAYaddayadda+ thing to include people that hate each other.The congregation of all these characteristics under a single umbrella is just to maximize political leverage, but this is stretched to the point of losing any potential meaning.
>>6666803They literally made the pride flag woke.
>>6669933
>>6670598Kek, funny how >>6669933 uses the same line as the guy in picrel.>Every right wing acccusation is a confessionAlden, is that you?
>>6666928I think it goes beyond "the innocent" when we're encouraging kids to become permanent medical patients, subsidize elective surgeries from taxpayers and ignore people's sexual boundaries to satisfy somebody's narcissism.
>>6670598Zamn, even browner than I expected from his pfp
>>6671170>>6670598Jesus Fucking Christ. Every single time LMAO
>>6666790simple, be a nigger faggot.congratz OP, enjoy your new doodler job at google!
>>6668348
>>6669933>Ever notice how all the loudest voices against trans/non-binary people are horny for middle schoolers, like Matt Walsh, Dershowitz, Trump, Gaetz, Crowder, etc. etc. There are literally millions of people who are as opposed to trannies as the public figures you mentioned. The idea that gender and sex are identical is the consensus opinion of all mankind. The idea that homosexuality is immoral is the consensus opinion of all mankind. Even in modern, liberal, Western countries there isn't a firm consensus that "trans women" are women.
>>6666790>>6668348the design looks like it's ripped off from summertime saga
>>6671170>>6670598the face matches with the tendency
>>6666839No one in the US knows who she is either
>>6666813That's not the flag that woman fought for. If she knew that the LGB community got hijacked by trannies that goes after kids and mutilates them she would have burned the new flag herself.
>>6671170>>6670598Man, fuck this guy. Honestly though, using gotchas like this is weak because a lot of republicans also diddle little boys. What we need is a bipartisan group that fights this shit. The only one I know is gaysagainstgroomers but a lot of republicans would rather die than ally with a gay to counter pedophiles. About time the gays call out the pedos in their community.
>>6666790The rainbow is shit, it is the decomposition of light, the message is so obvious and the assholes in the gay community talk about union and it is the opposite that flag represents dissuasion
>>6666790Pay google or know the right people to owe favors to.As for the rest of the comment section...Left has pedos.Right has pedos.Both need to do some house cleaning.Both are throwing rocks at each other while the leaders are banking off the ad revenue from the drama.The left is obsessed over white people.The right is obsessed over the impact of oddballs.Both needlessly hate each other instead of working together to actually solve problems.The gender drama is just people that need their personality to be externalized, otherwise they enter a child's temper tantrum. Because someone keeps educating people that appearance is everything, and that their personality is fully interconnected with what they wear and how they look and which baby-making organ they carry.Too much self-obsession!!!
>>6672113Yes, there are conservative/Republican diddlers. However, the context here is that leftists want to talk to preschool and young elementary school kids about transgenderism, encourage them to transition without telling their parents, take them to drag shows, show them books about gay kids giving each other blow jobs, etc. and threw a hissy fit when Florida passed what was honestly a barely adequate measure against them doing so in the public schools. The difference is that grooming is not official Republican policy, however shitty individual Republicans might be (and I don’t like that party, either, but at least it isn’t promoting sexual mutilation of children, so there’s that going for it).
>>6672149I support republicans on banning of all the sexual shit and telling kids they're trans without contacting their parents. I saw a lot of sus shit going on even among my cousins and I'm sick of it. What I'm worried about is that Republicans swinging too hard and missing the point entirely. I'm not okay with little kids getting sex ed but it should still at least be in the middle school curriculum. Middle school girls need to understand what their body can do because they can get pregnant at a very early age. There has been cases that a girl around that age was tricked by a groomer because they didn't understand their biology. Little boys need to know that it's okay to dress in a feminine way too without changing their sex. And that no, drag queens are not the kind of feminine men that they should emulate. I just feel like both sides can be so extreme sometimes and I'm torn. I'm definitely mostly on the republican's side on this topic though. I don't want my little girl cousins missing out on a scholarship because a tranny took her spot for "inclusivity" or whatever that shit is.
>>6672127Symbolism is subjective. You can take virtually anything and construe it to be good or bad based on subjective reasoning. I see your perspective, the rainbow flag is a bad design because it represents decomposition of light. That's one way to look at it, from a negative perspective, because we associate the word "decompose" with things like death or rotting. Can you see the other possible perspectives though? Here's a way to look at it from the opposite perspective. White light is made up of all the colors existing together. The flag shows all these colors existing together. It's showing everything that exists in light, it's including all of it. You can say they're technically separated, but then you zoom out your perspective a little bit and see that they're still all existing peacefully on the flag together as a whole. They're all connected by being included on the flag. The flag itself can represent the light, and seeing all the colors lets us more clearly visualize everything that composes light, which helps us realize we're all connected as humans.
>>6672113All politicians, regardless of what colored team they belong to, need to have their heads put on pikes.
>>6672177when something is literal there are no secondary interpretations, the decomposition of light through the prism is a scientific fact, it has no free interpretations.From the lgbt perspective there is talk of "social deconstruction", it seems to me that the one who does not understand progressive symbolism is you.
>>6672930You're interpreting "decomposition" as a negative thing. That is a subjective interpretation. The decomposition of light is not a good or bad thing, it's you who gives that meaning.The colors all existing together and being included together on the flag is also a literal fact. The subjective interpretation of this fact can be positive.>it seems to me that the one who does not understand progressive symbolism is you.Don't be so jaded, anon. I never implied you didn't understand anything, just that you had a different interpretation. I invited you to see things from another perspective.
>>6672107Seething faggot
>>6673940I'd rather be an honest faggot than a delusional tranny or a closeted faggot. Go dilate.
>>6666790>not a single white male in pic>no one calls them racist
>>6675275it's 2023if u are white male ur automatically a racist
>>6675284I meant no one calls google racist for excluding white males.White men should rise up and start #WhitePower movement or something.
>>6673797Taking the bad to make it look good like raping children is not subject to perceptions, it is negative from any point of view, the game of progressivism on perception is ridiculous, do you want to cover the sun with a finger so that people don't see it? go ahead, but I warn you that all the people in the sunlight are looking at you wondering: what is that idiot doing pointing his finger at the sky?
>>6666790Be trans
>>6669933Shouldn't you be showing your snatch to some kids at a story time reading or something faggot?
>>6675342There is no objective fact of the universe that says that "decomposition of light" is an inherently bad thing. This is your own subjective interpretation. You see the word "decomposition" and your brain interprets that as negative. Where is the universal fact that "decomposition" is always bad? Is it written in the constellations of the stars?In fact, decomposition is often good. A tree falls in the forest and it's decomposed by fungus, bacteria, and invertebrates. The decomposition of the tree supports many organisms. Then, the nutrients that were in the tree become available for new living plants to use. It's an important process. You are made up of decomposed things, and you wouldn't exist if decomposition didn't happen.Also, you use the word "deconstruction" earlier. The word sounds similar to "destruction" so you probably are judging it as negative based on this alone. But if you actually looked into it you'd know that deconstruction just means literary analysis. I think your judgement is very clouded by bias right now. It's not allowing you to see other possibilities, and in fact it's skewing your own perception to be further from reality. This will be my last reply to you, but I hope you have a nice weekend anon.
>>6675342>raping children is negative from any point of viewThis feels a bit optimistic. Any REASONABLE point of view maybe.
>>6675717WTF??? to decompose is to mess up to separate something that is already composed, don't give me your puns for mass idiots, asshole
