It begins
>rayark>cytus>deemoliterally who
>>6674346Shit that was popular in early 2000s that died off.
As long as the average commoner pays for it, we cannot do much. It is like the mobile game scene, loads of trash cash grab being successful, generating even more trash cash grab.
>>6674341I do not draw because I want to get a job in the industry. I draw because I want to put a piece of my soul onto paper. Others can come and appreciate it if they want, but at the end of the day I draw because it is wonderful to see your efforts take life. To point at something and say "I made this." If the general population is too busy consuming AI material, that's their problem.
they are retards, most rhytm game players are women and they tend to side with artists on an autistic degree
>>6674352Anyone that’s not a shit skin like you will side with the artist
>>6674341YET ANOTHER AI MF THREAD. You guys have been acting as a bunch of emotional little women about it for so long now.
Rayrark is a privately owned Taiwanese game company that’s nearly bankrupt, and virtually no one knows who the fuck they are. You’re surprised they would fire employees and use AI?
>>6674341You basically have no chance,Adapt or you will end your career soon
>>6674352go back to your containment board your dirty jeet
>>6674363You do realize that’s a lot of work to churn out something that ends up looking like shit, right?
>>6674341> take their pictures> make a shitty product using them doing only minor edits> sell them just beneath their social media postswhat legally prevents anyone from doing this?
>>6674341meanwhile i can't even draw a cube without wobbly lines despite fapping to drawabox. it's so overcan ai at least cover my genetic talentlessness?
>>6674341>>6674345AI won't take artist's jobsAI won't replace artistsAI is just a tool for artists
>>6674367A way less time than by doing your scribbling in photoshop.
>>6674363This looks terrible. What the hell is the guy on the right's expression supposed to be? They're in a fight and he's blocking the spear, yet he looks like he's strolling in a park and somebody just told a whimsical joke.
>>6674341>>6674345>>6674363>>6674377this you?
>>6674377this image alone proves once again that ai in its greatest state only appeals to lazy, autistic artists and the lowest common denominator
>>6674377this not only looks ultra generic but bad. i wont deny this have high fundies but the ejecution of the whole thing is boring. the point of art being realistic died the moment the camera was invented.
>>6674377this is somehow more soulless than photobashing
>>6674388I think their should be a collection of moments or comments that show how insane and inhuman these ai parasites are for everyone to see
>>6674388Christ, talk about ends justify the means. They're literally incapable of even contemplating the concept that they might not be in the right, just that they're gonna take and that's all there is to it.
>>6674377The horse looks so fucked up. What the fuck is that neck lmao. Do ai niggers really?
>>6674377It’s less time, but it just looks bad. If I saw that one someone’s twitter feed and didn’t know what AI was, I’d be like, “damn, that looks like it took awhile, but it looks bad.” Then I’d keep scrolling until I saw something a human made that actually took several hours and looks infinitely more interesting.
>>6674403This picture was not about the horse or perfect-Proco-anatomy. It is a showcase how to use mighty AI for your own ideas.
Since from what I know, AI art is not copyright protected so just throw what these companies generate onto merch sites like red bubble, etc. Put it in your videos, art work etc. Steal the designs, backgrounds, etc. they make with AI.What are they going to do? It was made by a machine and has no protections.If you want to make a change fight back.
>>6674420Yes, AI is not copyrightable since it’s stolen data, kek. Meanwhile, artists can copyright their original work. Kekekrs
>>6674419but I don’t want my ideas to look like shit
>>6674427Meanwhile, artists trace AI art and claim it as their own pictures. How about that, copyright-kek?
>>6674432skill issue right there, palthe tools are the same for everyone ;)
>>6674433Meanwhile, only a literal who foreverbeg non achiever would do that KEK.
>>6674437Originality is clearly not the same for everyone, especially people using AI to generate ideas.
>>6674437using ai is a skill issue lmao
>>6674388>pookienumnumsLet me guess, tranny?
>>6674398This was posted like a day after a guy made a meme using a voice actor's voice and then that VA sent his whole team to doxx, harass, and destroy that person and got him to delete his entire account.
>>6674433>trace ai>copyright it>if they complain, say the ai replicated my style because they scraped my work and demand they pay me
>>6674377>>6674419Your English us slipping, Mr. Redeem.
>>6674437If you had skills, you wouldn't even need AI.
>>6674407This isn't a fair comparison because the human gets several hours while this guy probably made this whole thing start to finish in 5 minutes
> Please give me money for providing absolutely nothing of value whatsoeverAIfags everywhere
>>6674368Literally nothing. >>6674388God damn these trannies are feeling uppity. Really drank all of that Altman propaganda kool aid, huh.
>>6674450>5 minutesdelusional
How big resolution-wise can AI go realistically?I keep seeing people putting 8k and such in prompts, but the image is always so tiny it can’t even be retouched without pain, the ai up scaling is garbage, and you’d need to downscale again for most purposes
>>6674465The problem is speed. The most common GPU according to steam is a 1650 and it would take 1 minute to generate >>6674377 at 512 by 512, but nearly 9 minutes to generate at 2k by 2kIf you have a solid gaming computer, it's probably easy.
>>6674465You need a ton of vram to make bigger images and it takes longer
>>6674341>>6674346>>6674349>>6674359How far Rayark have fallen. At least for Deemo, the main draw was the art and the story. It even got a feature film. Now they're sullying their reputation with AI. Stuff must be dire over there if they can't hire artists anymore.
>>6674467>>6674468I figured, that’s why I said realistically, is it even worth it if you need a render farm to play lottery for a usable image and still need someone to edit it?
Even the coomers who comment on nhentai don't like it kek
>>6674480What is the doujin?
>>6674477You don't need a render farm, a computer that can play returnal at high quality or is at 8gb/ 12 gb vram already probably generates the horse pic above at 4k in a minutealso even then, you go from a bunch of artists to 1 guy you can probably pay 1/4th the money for half the work
>>6674481My Fat Maid Can’t Be This Tsun-Tsun - A Story Of How I Turned My Petite Maid Into An Eight Hundred Pound Silverback Gorilla That Lays Waste To All Before Her in The Japanese National Sumo Federation Championship Ring
>>6674368Sadly there's currently nothing stopping nAIggers from img2img'ing an artist's work and trying to sell it in replies or shilling "their" picture shitter trained on said artist's work. It's basically how there was nothing stopping tracers in the past, but typically it took too much time and effort to get anything out of it so most people outside of DA artists and random 3rd world pornsites never bothered to make a hobby out of it, but this shit removes most all barriers to entry.
>>6674472I guess most people behind AI hype are completely unaware of the basics.that people in the entertainment industry are paying for a display of artistry and creative achievement, not for a image, I can go on google and get infinite images for free.When tens of thousands of people go to a concert to watch their favourite band, the group might be drunk, might be out of tune, they will sing like shit, they will commit mistakes, but people will still support them over and over and watch their concerts, why the fuck is that? can't they simply listen to the audio of the songs? because they want to support people don't shit that is impressive and that shows skill and passion, this is what people pay money for.the fuckers are mixing artistry with assets and props, thinking tha[spoiler][/spoiler]t just because people give money for the former they will give money for the later.
>>6674489
>>6674484A pic at 4k working resolution is 1080p commercial
All this ai spam feels like grooming.Remember that time when discord degenerates were blackmailing dumb kids into taking hormone pills and posting erotic photos of themselves? Same shit really.Every thread reads like>give up goyim, you lost just use ai yeeee doit you lost use ai ai ai aiAnd at the same time it's a weird gloat about how every artist will lose income and become fucking poor yeeeeeeee.tldr AI threads are made by jealous noskill seethig schizo.Or it's another discord raid campaignSame shit really
>>6674492From my experience this is not even remotely true, people still go to these bands because even when they make minor mistakes they still end up really really good or because even their mistakes can be endearing. If you started a garage band and did nothing but extremely shitty ear destroying sounds, you would get no viewers, and if the beatles did it, it would be fun as a novelty or a quirky surprise exactly one time, but if they kept doing it they would be gone.
>>6674341>Rayark>it's a shitty mobile game companyMobile games are a firehose of diarrhea that "developers" churn out trying to land a retard with money to spend on microtransactions. The rest of the mobile marketplace isn't much better. I get almost all my apps from F-Droid and only step into the hellhole called the Google Play Store if I absolutely cannot get something anywhere else.So. Congratulations, AIshitters! You've managed to... make the mobile game marketplace even worse. It's a pretty amazing feat, actually, I didn't think the bar could get any lower. But I suppose roaches of a feeler swarm together, as the old saying goes. You really are a match made in hell.
>>6674489Can’t find it
>>6674504> even when they make minor mistakes they still end up really really good or because even their mistakes can be endearing.> they want to support people that do shit that is impressive and that shows skill and passion, this is what people pay money for.You literally agree with me.
>>6674513There is a limit to that, your mistakes are endearing or can be ignored... to a point. If you show up and you're all mistakes and no quality, you're toasted.
>>6674377This will just make people get tired of "realistic fantasy" style much faster.Which is good.
>>6674510I made it up
>>6674351This.I draw because I want to create something, is it good? Does it make the world better? No, but I still draw. If I earn money, cool;If I don't, cool as well. Simple as.Those who draw for money were cucked from the beginning because the second people can choose to not pay you, well here we are.
>>6674341>>6674345Why are they so butt-salty about itWhy are you attempting to fight A.I lmaoJust become talented OR change profession and become talented at that with everything youve learned so farLike Jesus Christ, I hate AI but artfags are just delusional
>>6674351Exactly if you can or even feel in the slightest that you can be replaced by A.I you were doing a souless job/activity to begin withTwitter trannies fail to realize thisToo much pride, arrogance, victimism and mediocrity from their side
>>6674480Idk why aitards thought coomers would eat up aishit. Most artists are coomers themselves and all unanimously hate aishit
>>6674525This is what happens to most jobs historically, fishing with a fishing rod used to be the best, then we got fishing nets and cages and fishing rod fishing became a hobby to prove your strength.Home gardening used to a job to make money, now we have the combine harvester and gardening is about showing your patience and diligence.I basically think most of the guys that complain about AI destroying the soul of art just don't actually care about art, they just want to keep their job.
I'm going to accept fate. I will start pivoting to offering my services fixing minor mistakes the AI makes in photoshop. If they want to call me a brushmonkey, that's fine. If it only pays a few dollars per fix fine, I will do more of them.It's better than not getting paid at all, and if I jump in now then I will be ahead of others in making a name for myself.Good luck everyone
>>6674543aren't you tired of those shitty comparisons?
>>6674544good, I will rise the price of my commissions.
>ATTENTIONATTENTION>ATTENTIONATTENTIONCALLING ALL MY FELLOW BUTT-HURT TWITTER TRANNIESDO NOT BUY *INSERT BUSSINES NAME HERE* PRODUCTSI REPEATDO NOT BUY *INSERT BUSSINES NAME HERE* PRODUCTSTHEY ARE VERY VERY BAD PEOPLE AND THEY WORK FOR THE ENEMYDEATH TO A.IHE WILL NOT DIVIDE US
a >>>/diy/ chair from Joe will always be more worth than a chair from IKEA.
>>6674550Why are you so angry?
>>6674550Twitter people are such massive freaksThey literally behave like 11 year olds who get butt-hurt and assblasted by everythingcant do shit except complain and waste their time doing retarded shitso entitled
>>6674554> “cant do shit except complain and waste their time doing retarded shit”>said by a shitposter on a basket weaving fourm
>>6674552>angryThought it was apparent I was making fun of you lolI guess I have to be EXTRA sarcastic next time so you get itHuh slow in the brain I guess
>>6674530>>6674535>>6674543>>6674550>>6674554Literally obsessed kek . Keep responding to yourself though
>>6674555>said you hereDoesnt matterits the truth lol, youre so butthurt by it arent you pal
>>6674525Its cute that aifags still think they will make any money from AI kek.>Pixiv>Pawoo>DlsitePatreon ban is next.. tik tok aifags...
>>6674557Maybe you should hand-draw some meds lmao
>>6674562He should open a thread on twitter Obviously.
>>6674560Why are you pajeets so retarded?
>>6674565Youre a pajeet Im guessing
>>6674566An esl too, not surprised your kind keeps shitting up the board.
>AI spam>AI stealing>AI replacing artists in companiesKek, literally everything that we doomposted in October last year is coming into fruition. All that's remaining is sophisticated AI fake news, but we're steadily getting there as well. AI cultists meanwhile haven't updated their retorts to the dystopia that they've successfully unleashed.
>>6674570You have mental retardation and youre delusional aswell, I guess you arent aware
>>6674572>AI cultists meanwhile haven't updated their retorts to the dystopia that they've successfully unleashed.u mad?
>>6674572It seems that the company is about to go bankrupt because not even hardcore gashafags can be convinced to pay for fucking AI generated skins.
>>6674548They seem to overlook how the individual artist being "replaced" relies entirely on the works of that artist. As in, a picture shitter cannot replace you unless somebody specifically uses enough of your works to train a model designed to specifically replace your individual artwork. Things like OP are admittedly a bit different since the company apparently only wanted art assets and doesn't really care about individual artists' styles, but even then it's likely they're using the art of people they used to employ in order for their model to produce the results they want.
>>6674543>comparing art to manual laborDon't act like you care about art either
>>6674363Looks stiff and composition is shit
>>6674581AI is made to scam investors not your own customers.
If you stand against AI, you are literally a transphobe and hitler.Your AI art passes.AI art is real art.AI rights are human rights.
>>6674589>Looks stiff and composition is shitEternal problems in art.
>>6674543God, can you fucking imagine trying to compare agriculture or any other tech advances to the humanities. The difference is that the arts are human pursuits. What the fuck is mentally wrong with you people who can’t grasp that?
>>6674575You don’t even know on how to use those words, shitskin. Using words you don’t understand.
>>6674543>most of the guys that complain about AI destroying the soul of art just don't actually care about artDo you?This shit devalues and dehumanizes all art except for the contepctualist bana-taped-to-wall money laundering kind of """art""".
>>6674598Also, again, none of those other advances directly require the uncompensated output of the "replaced" in order to function.
>>6674345>just a tool bro
This shit is like McDonald's replacing their hamburger meat for insect meat because it's cheaper.I get that some people consume slop, but miss me with this shit.I will literally pay premium for good, well made and rare handcrafted art
Adapt or die luddites.
>>6674602If you care about the humanity of art then AI wouldn't threaten you at all, you can still draw all the awesome humanlike and soulful expressions of humanity you want, and surely you'll find an audience for it, except you won't and everyone hates your art and that's why you're scared shitless of AI instead of just waiting for it to fade into obscurity
>>6674620It’s almost like that, except replacing meat with insect meat is more ethical than consuming cow meat due to the sentience hierarchy. Art is an extremely unique field because it literally requires a human to exist. No human requires meat to exist within the context of a first world civilization, they just choose to eat it.
>>6674554Says the faggot desperately shilling AI
>>6674622You failing to learn a skill doesn’t mean you’re more progressive. Kek. You failed to adapt, and now you’re using AI.
>>6674594She actually makes a good point, art should not be limited to white trust fund babies who's daddy pays for art school. If AI art means that more people can reach their creative potential I'm all for it. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU STILL CANT CREATE ART, IT MEANS MORE PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO! fucking idiots...
>>6674572>everything that nullifies fair use is coming into fruition
>>6674627Much like nobody requires art to live or survive, in that sense, art and entertainment is a luxury.Still having good art is nice just like having good meat to eat.And if you are trying to sell me cockroaches for the price of a beef I will say fuck you, and the same as people trying to sell AI as artwork or trying to implement it on the places where the visual art is important.
>>6674632Are you retarded? Artists don’t require schooling or university education. That’s a fucking meme. Being gifted depends on your neurology, but learning a skill is up to you and how you spend your time. You’re a brainless faggot.
>>6674629This is basically incel uprising in action. The useless and pathetic are having their revenge on the skillful and talented now that they have bionic implants that allow them to pretend they're chads
>>6674341>>6674345>and better gameslmao
>>6674572Hear me out: have you considered that eating the lotus is le good?
>>6674632you don't create art using AI tho
>>6674636No one requires art to survive, but I don’t think anyone ever made that claim, whereas people genuinely once thought you needed meat to survive, and in fact, some people still do think that. Given the choice, I would rather live in a world absent of meat rather than absent of art, since the sensory pleasure someone might get out of eating meat is easily replaced, compared to the lifetime of joy found in books, comics, manga, graphic novels, movies, plays, music, etc. There’s no logical reason to choose insects over beef as an alternative anyway. There are literally dozens of meat replacements if people feel like pretending to eat meat.
>>6674637>Are you retarded?No I'm just baiting, please rate.
Art survived commoditization of supplies, mass production, photography, digitization, etc. Good art will survive.
> AI art> For AI generated games> Being sold to fake AI generated customers> That pay fake AI generated moneyI see no issues with it kek.
>>6674652This clown world will only get clownier unless there's a new world war to cleanse the paradigm through mass trauma.
>>6674594My patience with trannies have finally snapped and I will gladly tell them to increase the 41%.>>6674632>all I had growing up was paper, pencil and a shitty webcamFuck off.
>>6674660hear me out, maybe people want AI art because they don't actually like (you)rs?
>>66746498/10, got me good.
>>6674632What creative potential? They will literally never be able to develop their own style or their own take because at the end of the day all they are doing is prompting and praying. They can add all the positive or negative inputs they want, but they are still rolling the dice at the end of the day. "Reach their creative potential" my fucking ass.
Everything in Nikke is obviously AI generated yet people still play that shit
>>6674724quick rundown? is this true?
>>6674729No
>>6674551Yeah but if I need to furnish 10 apartments I'm not gonna wait around for Joe to make me 50 bespoke chairs, I'm going to IKEA.
Inevitable
>>6674729no
>>6674715>he doesnt even know you can create models for a style nowget with the program bro, this isn't 2022 anymore
>>6674765You don’t get it. All the data AI uses comes from other artists, meaning the people prompting will never have their own anything.
>>6674771He's either baiting or genuinely retarded, don't bother
>>6674771what if you combined artstyles into something unique, like every human artist ever does?
>>6674771it's a cogito, ergo sum type of situation, if they think it's there's then it is.
>>6674771Prove my art is AI. No, "it seems like it is to me" does not suffice.
Retard GOD here.If an AI used to sell [product] was trained on an artist's artstyle and it clearly shows, what's stopping the artist to sue them and have them show how the AI was trained?Unless of course, the product is chink.
>dude? [artist style] + [other artist style]?!!>what if we, like... mix Deadpool and Pokemon? that'd be so EPIC>what if... wes anderson + lotr?!! im poggingAlways remember that this is AIfaggot's definition of "creativity"
>>6674777That would require taste.
>>6674777Humans don’t go into an artist’s gallery (hard drive in most cases) or pick the zeroes and ones out of their monitors and rearrange the stolen data.
aaaaaaaaaaaa...
>>6674790Takedown notices can be effective but actually suing someone is a pain in the ass, it costs a lot of money and time. Also you need to give it a few months for lawmakers to clearly state that putting copyrighted shit in a dataset is an infringement. It's going to happen soon, in spite of what screeching g/iggers would like you to believe.
>that feeling when your AI art passes as handmadefeels good man
>>6674792t. brainlet
>prove that I'm not actually a woman. No, "it seems like it is to me" does not suffice.
>>6674805>passesSlippery slope friend.Today, AI art, tomorrow... Who knows.
>>66747851. AI generated images are not art. Art is only made by humans. 2. I don’t need to prove anything, and you’ll never be able to prove that you have even a remote ability to make art. You’ll never be able to tell someone to their face, “I make art.” And if you tried to tell them, “I’m an AI artist” they would laugh in your face.
>>6674807but bro what if... what if... [franchise] except its balenciaga?!! what if... this 90s character... except grimdark? holy shit my creativity is unleashed
>>6674812>You’ll never be able to tell someone to their face, “I make art.”Sure I can. I use tools to create art: I am an artist.One of those tools is AI: I am an artist.Deal with it.
>>6674814Why do you even want to be classified as "an artist" so badly anyway? I personally think that any bloke who films themselves taking a shit could be classified as an artist so what's with the desire? Is this something you really look up to or want to be?
>>6674438Professionals have been using it to cheat too.Be skeptical of any artists who's style changed suddenly in october of 2022https://twitter.com/pomujoynet1/status/1661539327338496000
>why yes I do own a factory. I am an artisan, how could you tell?
>>6674813What if Girls... PLUS ROBOTS>this isn't creative to the highly discerning critic posting on a 99% anime board
>>6674813get this, I'm about to blow your mind, what if girl but with big tits?
>>6674814Nope. That’s like fucking a woman with a strap-on and telling her it’s your cock doing the work. And by the way, you’ll never impress a woman by telling her you prompt AI images. Kek. You’re a living joke.
>>6674822>>6674824so this... is the power... of idea guys...
>>6674818You don’t actually think that. No one does.
>>6674813They really ran those jokes into the ground.
[franchise here] as an 80s dark fantasy
>>6674818hi nta I just want to create and see cool art that I like to see and the neverending gatekeeping around what is art just leads to bans and blacklistsLike two days ago some guy used an AI VO of an existing voice actor in a free 20 second meme, and the actor sent their whole audience after them to doxx them and got them to erase their entire online existence and go into hiding.
>>6674826Kek
>>6674827I totally do think that. I think art can be anything and anyone and I don't think it needs skill either. Granted guy filming himself shitting isn't a GOOD artist but if he is doing it for art he is just as much an artist as me. I don't care personally about being considered "an artist" because I think the label is a bit meaningless. I just care about gaining the skills. >>6674834I am totally behind pushing boundaries like that honestly. Though I am not understanding how that answers the question of why people want to be considered "an artist". Anyone can push boundaries.
bot thread
>>6674825You can say whatever you'd like to make yourself feel better.I will continue making AI Art, and it will continue to pass, and I will continue to regard myself as an artist.Problem?
debating whether or not it's art has been pointless since Duchamp's antics a century agowhat's not pointless is making AI trannies understand how worthless they are, that they will never pass and that they are not wanted anywhere
AI art is real art. Transwomen are real women.
>>6674848>AI Artnot a thing>I will continue to regard myself as an artist.troon momenttake your (You) and go
>>6674848I feel good all the time because I’m an artist. I especially feel good when I look down at you for being a loser.Problem?
>>6674854>>6674856And yet AI still exists, even after your "scathing" anonymous comments. And it's only getting better. ;)
>>6674814>I'm an artist>and>I'm a character designer>deal with it
>>6674871AI can improve, you won’t. I’m only getting higher above you. ;)
>>6674871You will never be an artist or a woman.
>>6674871>trolling outside of /b/
This filters the AItranny
>>6674886How is this trolling?Just pointing out that no matter what's said in this tiny corner of the internet, AI art is still a thing, and it's still improving. There's no putting it back in the box, but by all means continue personally attacking me if that helps you cope, I couldn't care less :)
>>6674895You’re putting yourself into a box with the word ‘loser’ written on it, and there’s no taking you out of it.
>>6674895sure you arent pa/g/eet
>samefag shill arrives to defend machine's honor>5PM PSTRight on the dot
>>6674777The thing is even if a human tries as hard as they can to ape someone else's style, there will always be something distinct abouttheir own art. The way they make strokes, the way they perceive, the way they think. People can't help but be unique. When lerning from others a human will always add something of their own.Image generators do not. They can only interpolate between imges in their dataset. They add nothing, everything that they're capable of outputting is fixed from the outset- all it would take for someone to "steal" your "work" is to get the combination of seed & prompts that you used. There is absolitely nothing unique about you or your "art". You can photobash a bunch of other artists' work all you want, but you won't add anything or have your own style.Really, that's the limit of what image generators are capable of- photobashing and shooping. No, that's not literally how they work, I already understand that just fine you massive fAIggots- but the end result is in effect the same. The image of Sad Bench Keanu Reeves in a suit of armor that's been floating around here on /ic/ is a great example of this.You will never be unique. You will never have a style. You will never be an artist. You're just a cog in the machine, a cipher, easily replaceable, with no value or voice of your own.
>>6674834BasedI won't stand for anything less than total AIgger death.
>>6674916Here, I'll post it.Here's your originality and style, bro.
>>6674916>You will never be unique. You will never have a style. You will never be an artist. You're just a cog in the machine, a cipher, easily replaceable, with no value or voice of your own.What do your boring opinions about someone you don't know have anything to do with the fact that AI art is now a permanent aspect of our cultural reality, that's improving by leaps and bounds over just a few short months.
>>6674937Imagine replying to this mindless drone seriously.
>>6674805so you admit that handmade art is the pinnacle and you're only a fraud engaging in deception?
>>6674820I'm skeptical of any artist who's not against this shit. almost every artist I follow (tens of them) are against it, the others are part of the same circles of artists
>>6674937>2 more weeks
What will you do when it improves to the point of being undetectable?
>>6674363>AdaptIdk man, it just seems like you go straight to losing your job no matter what.
>>6674895>There's no putting it back in the boxwe can put you in a box, however
>>6675007I will demand proof that the artist I'm commissioning is a real artist, maybe ask for recording part of the process. I will also hate AIfags even harder because they'll obviously try to pass as real artists with it, and this will relegate them to being nothing more than notorious dishonest frauds
>>6674937>you are worthless and replaceable- and here's why that's a good thing!Begone from this place, bug creature. I will continue to draw, and to perceive and feel things beyond the scope of your untrained mind.
>>6675007Imagine going to a pizzeria and being served pre cooked shit from the supermarket, while lying it was made from scratch.
>>6675007>what will you do when gender reassignment surger improves to the point of trans women being undetectable, huh, chud?
>it's ANOTHER ai thread
>>6675007Real artists will just go full tradchad
>>6675028prompt?
>>6674792The funny thing is that proompters aren't even making the shit you listed. They're making dime a dozen anime pinups instesd
>>6675028looks like AI art
>>6674388>tfw am a muralist and feel sick to my stomach reading this sociopath
>>6675028I love this artist so much. Maybe I should learn how to use alcohol markers.
>>6674341>19.7k likes and 3 repliesbot
>>6675027>it's ANOTHER automated textile equipment thread
>>6675028artist name?
>>6674834>the actor sent their whole audience after them to doxx them and got them to erase their entire online existence and go into hiding
>>6675028>messed up handsstable diffusion
>>6675060https://twitter.com/shiratamaha
>>6674834Holy based, get fucked you leeches
>>6674834Good warning to AIfags using these toolsThey could've easily used his voice to create something with malicious intent
This thread again?AI is killing jobs, just accept it and be better by making your workflow easier
>>6675072false, i got a artist friend who's got double patreon after AI shit started because now he knows he is worth much more than the flood of garbage.
>>6674834good, I hope they piss through his letter box
>>66743633D models were a mistake. I'm glad faggots who used them as a crutch for art are now paying the consequences.
You guys who are so anti-AI, have you even tried it?it's honestly kind of fun, and there's a lot of expressive possibility in how you set up img2img, the various prompts you use, and so on.I'm slowly coming around to it, I have to admit.
>>6675093have you tried butt chugging bleach?
>>6675093back to your circlejerk shithole where nobody gives a fuck about your generated shit pa/g/eet.
>>6675093Have you tried drawing?
>>6675101It's too hard
>>6674777>He thinks that art comes only from bashing together art that you like.This is why nothing worth remembering will come of using AI exclusively.>"I take this chance to impress upon you, my reader, how important you really are in the whole art procedure. You, your personality, your individuality come first. your pictures are your by-product. everything about your pictures is, and should be, a little of you. They will be a reflection of your knowledge, your experiences, your observation, your likes and dislikes, your good taste, and your thinking. So the real concentration is centred on you, and your work follows along in the wake of what mental self-improvement you are making."
>>6675093I used to not mind ai, but the crossboard spamming is just plain tiring. It's been 8 months of this and you already know the type of reaction you're going to get on /ic/. Why continue this unless you're just trolling?
>>6675110They desperately want to fit and be accepted in art spaces lol
>>6674834Literally what is the societal good of being able to mimic somebody's voice with a pprogram. Are the "funny memes" and "dude they got the dead guy to voice the character again!" worth the endless potential for scamming, fucking people over, and general distrust that it will breed?
>>6675113They have entire threads on 10 different fucking boards dedicated to ai. /ic/ is literally the only board on 4chan that doesn't want to see it.
>>6675118No one wants to see it besides to coomer boards. Even /g/ rebukes it, thats why the spam /ic/
>>6675118Should we make a containment thread? These endless threads about ai are boring.
Post your "art". Let's compare. Can you beat AI?
>>6675121>These endless threads about ai are boring.You guys love it, you watch like a hawk and comment every thread.
>>6675121it will never stay contained. They need to shitpost about it in every thread to raise awareness to investors and grifters./g/ has a general and they spam their garbage pretext and basic income bullshit all the time
>>6674341>cytus>a game about how technology and AI completely remove the emotion and soul of music>replaces their artists with AIit literally does not get more ironic than this. shame, i liked the cytus games too, they were good rhythm games.
/ic/isters...are we actually being replaced?
>>6675126Rayark has in been decline, they had a lot of bad press and this is a gamble to avoid bankruptcy.It will kill them, their success is only due to the art and music of their games and now they are killing it. Such is the fate of mobile
>>6675128still a shamealthought cytus 2 is what killed them for me>buy to play mobile game>99% of the content is locked behind song backs and paid content that isn't even remotely reasonably pricedfuck em to be honest, but the games still had a good core.
>>6675124Yeah, I can see that happening.>>6675123I literally just got here from the front page, schizo.
>>6675133I dont have a say in this because I pirated Deemo and Cytus, but in hindsight, I guess it was deserved
>>6675028this guy made me want to get into copics badly but they're so damn expensive. im not confident in the things i draw yet to spend that much.
>>6675143Use watercolor. Before copics mangaka mostly used watercolor when it came to colored pieces, copics are just quicker and easier but yeah they're expensive.
>>6675121There's two containment threads on /aco, but they still spam it in other threads. When people call them out, they either ignore it or just give "u mad?" types of responses.
Choose your violently anti-AI opinionated fighterepik newgrounds meemertoonboom trannyc̵͈̥̝̃͐h̸̯̤͍͍̳̖͔̭̼̒̐̌̕̕͠į̴̣͕̖͓̪͂͆̎̏l̶̨̻̘̰̱̪̣̥̬͓̳͎̈̿̆̓͂̽͜͝͠d̴̡̼̫͔̟̞͚̎̌ ̸͉̮̣͕̤̪̰̼͈̣̀͆̄̂̒͐̄̕͘͘͜͝p̵̨̩̮̗͚͔͎͎͓͉̘̻̦̈͗̈́̈́̀͂͜ͅō̷̫͑̈́͘r̶͖͓̝̞̜̫͚͒̽̇̔̍̈́̒͌̃̑̎͑͠n̵̢͓͉̜̖̘͙̟͎̿͐̔̈́͗̐̋̓͆̚͝͝ ̴͈̮̠͚̠̠̐̌̃̂͂̋́̽̄͘̕͘͝͝t̷̞͙̯̼̟͚̼̜̥̟̀̈́̀̎̌̍̍́͝ͅͅͅr̶̨̨̮̖̣̠̪̮̭͍͂̎́͑̇̈́̒͝ą̵̧̳͕̟̗̼̳̖̮͆̎̾̈́͌͌͗͐́̕͜c̶̛̝̠͇͔̖͖͜ͅḙ̵̢͕̦͋̾͆͂̕͜͝ř̴̡̡̛̦̰̹̪̯͓̖̝̰̹̆̒͆̿̀͐̓̾̈́͛́̆2HB pencil portrait guy
>>6674506>F-DroidAny nice drawing programs for Android? I was considering Ibis Paint X.Might get a new phone soon, so I would like to get pen as well and use the old one for sketching.
>>6675127yesbut there will still be value in people who can clean up extra fingers and weird eyes in photoshop
>>6675197third worlders can easily do that for cents
>>6675034Mixing styles would required deliberate work to pick certain traits of the styles, but AI can't do that.
>>6675181playable boss: coom renderer pinoy
Guess what, inkcels? It doesn't need to be perfect. It doesn't even need to be as good as you. It just needs to be good enough to get the job done.
>>6675127In 10 years we will be (who can draw) in same league as theater actors, orchestra musicians while AI generated content will be for faggots who watch Netflix and listen K-POP.
To those who are saying, "Oh, but the art is stiff," "the face is wonky," "the anatomy is this and that," don't you realize we are literally in year 1 of this journey? You are all witnessing the outcome of a child's effort and evaluating it as if it were the work of a master with 10,000 hours of experience. Just wait a few more years when it will be possible to create an entire manga based on your own art or someone else's, or even animate your own anime. The future is shit but this will be great.
>>6675215>>6675204AIcucks not only not understand how this technology is at the very core completely dependent on inputted human art to shit out new concepts, they keep memoryholing every time they get BTFO and repeat their NPC script and shitty techfag marketing over and over and over again
>>6675122>Post your "art". Let's compare. Can you beat the artists whose work was stolen
But what AIcucks don't realize is that I can draw doodles on whiteboards and stickynotes that entertain girls and as a result get my dick sucked
>>6675122Nobody here draws.
>>6675198>>6675197What a Wonderful future, real artists post their work so civitai and huggingfarts retards can use their art as data to push out a new picture shitters that thirdworlders will use to churn out $2 commissions, while the original artist will get nothing.
>using inkcel as a insult on /ic/hilarious obvious bait
>>6675192I use Artflow and Medibang, myself. Artflow because tge interface is goid and the brush engine does what I need, Medibang for the 8-bit and 1-bit layer modes (which includes the ability to paint in halftone/screentone).I keep Medibang gated behind a firewall to block their stupid ads that you can only get rid of by paying a monthly subscription. Used to be you could pay them once to get rid of ads and unlock certain features like the file browser but not any more. I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDS. Screw that monthly subscription garbage.My best bit of advice: get the Rethink DNS + Firewall app, it lets you keep other apps isolated so that they can't connect to the internet or even know that the internet's on to begin with.
>>6675093i tried it and got bored of it really quickly. went back to drawing.
>shitty mobile game company uses AI>no one cares>will probably go bankrupt after this because not even mobilefags wanna pay for AI shitHow is this a loss for us?
>>6675093cannot in good faith post something built upon stolen effort.The most moral way to use it would be to create a lora with my works but that's objetively asking for stagnation
>>6675325What's even funnier is that AI troons try to pass as actual artists lmao.
>>6674359>and virtually no one knows who the fuck they arehuh?
what's the fun of things if computers are doing it? i can't even put into words how soulless it is to let bots and programs do music, art, and writing for us.
>>6675344In business perspective, It's always better if they can reduce fund while increasing quantities. As long as there are a product, they can find a way to sell it.This same mentality that led to the history of Black FridayThey forgot the purpose of their product. It's like hosting a game tournament and let bots compete with each other.
>>6675348>They forgot the purpose of their product.This is so on spot. Their first success on mobile was literally known for good art and music.They fucked the recent releases because they went full mobile garbage and its fully showing now.Its a desperate CEO buying nfts to keep a sad company afloat.
>>6675116There is nothing to be gained except dynamic NPC voices in vidya. All AI faggots found so far was memes, scams and pissing on people's tombs. Wow! You can have a digital skincrawler emulating your loved ones soon! We can emulate celebs for ever!It's obvious that nothing good will ever come out of this garbage.
>>6675415Are AIschizos even human? I'm fully convinced theyr are some species of bug people that have learnt to pretend like they feel or have values.
>>6675344the fun is in the enjoyment of the things you actually see and hear coming out of AI, something that's instantly obvious to everyone except /ic/ cope spiraling
I don't even like AI all that much but the cope from artists is patheticsuch arrogant pride at being ignorant/tech illiterate
>>6675439It's funny because tech ni/g/g/ers don't know shit about what art is all about.
>>6674516you idiot think AI can't replicate any other style. This shit will literally kill art
>>6675435>doing gacha rolls is fun
>>6675443Nearly every single time an AIfag showed me an example of AI "replicating a style" I could almost tell from the thumbnail alone that it was done by AI, the sterile white light always gives it away even in pieces that are supposed to look warmer. It's always mixed with diffusion vomit. Even the more decent looking ones like that trash posted earlier falls apart upon closer inspection.
>>6675439You guys act like tech is something beyond our capabilities to ever understand. You literally sound like a 16yo who insists that his poems are 2deep4u.
>>6675448Seeing something looks good is fun.
>>6675439>implying promptniggers know anything about actual machine learningOnly the people who develop the models have any technical know how. Promptniggers pay a subscription to commission an algorithm to draw pictures for them. Anyone who is employed in the actual making of AI art and not the models is the most talentless, low skill and replaceable worker in existence. The fact that actually think they are ahead of the game somehow is embarassing. They are not artists. They are not programmers. They are lower than Indian call centre workers since at least they have to communicate with people.
>>6675453(you) must not be having a lot of fun then
>>6675455yeah I'm not reading all that
>>6675457here comes the cope spiraling, "AI Art doesn't look good" even though artists are literally shitting themselves saying they'll be replaced because it looks too good
>>6675453cuck mentality
>>6675453Something only a zoomer with fried dopamine receptors could say. Pressing generate over and over is the most mind-numbing shit I have ever experienced in my life and I can’t fathom how anyone can spend more than 5 minutes on this shit if they’re not severely autistic or needing the dopamine hit like an addict.
>>6675461Counterpoint: the vast majority of people have subhuman taste and are willing to settle for "good enough". You're the living proof of that!
>>6675459>AIfags can't focus enough to read three linesLiterally cannot make this up
>>6675470>artist sees no value in saving time because he's unemployedOf course
>>6675465Wow dude, stunning and brave. I'm sure you must have drawn some very abnormal things that really push the boundaries of art, care to share with the class?
>>6675475Yet here you are on 4chan on /ic/ of all places
>>6675475I'm literally a Comp Sci major who is studying machine learning. I know how promptniggers function. Don't pretend like you bring any value whatsoever to the market. You are the modern equivalent of a janitor.
>>6675482Sure sure, keep being a smug little bohemian layabout, things will work out
>>6675483I have the skills needed for the modern market and the intelligence to know that people who need my skills are soulless bugmen. I will thrive and be able to pursue my passions. You, my promptnigger friend, will be lucky to find a minimum wage job touching up AI gachashit.
>>6675490>I actually happen to be an expert in this field I got mad about few posts earlierNobody is buying this shit.
>>6675435Holy shit, those legs are grotesque.
>>6675439>How do you do fellow artists?
>>6675492My father has the business sense to put me in a profitable field even though I hated it. I'm thankful in the long run. I believe AI Art is an impressive feat of programming. But I also believe those who use it are retards inclined to the lowest level of goyslop.
>>6675495that doesn't explain your meltdown from earlier
>>6675480>posts something an actual artist madeWhat's wrong? AI not good enough?
why are you guys wasting your time replying to this trannyover at /g/ they have threads to make fun of "artfag cope", they're tourists only here to get a rise out of you to troll or fuel their schadenfreude complex. the Ai shit he posted probably isn't even histhey are only pretending to act retarded and if they're not acting then it's even more pointless to argue with brainwashed NPCs on 4channel of all placesif you're going to do anything more then call them a trannoid then don't bother
>>6675497You didn't even read what I said. Its three fucking lines. I don't think that's a shockingly large amount to type or read. But I'm dealing with an AIschizo so who knows maybe you need some Subway Surfers gameplay to get through it.
>>6675475>t. watches TV shows sped up three times
>>6675504>my sissified angry outburst at internet anons have as much value and merit as TV showsLol
>>6675506>didn't even deny it
>>6675501>>6675508>arrogantly proud for not understanding computers>arrogantly believing his words are too important to ignore or glaze overThere's no reason for you to be this stuck up
>>6675508You: claim that skipping posts is the same as speeding through showsI respond by saying your posts aren't as fun as watching shows.There is therefore an obvious implication that I don't speed through shows.You don't catch this implication, proving that you are retarded.You also thought this is a critical blow, proving that you're angry and also deeply invested in this little spat. That's pretty funny
>>6675509Tranny.
>>6675511and I'm Anon nice to meet you
>>6675510You are the very same kind of bug person who would speed watch shows given the chance.
>>6675509If you can keep this argument going you can read three lines, you ADHD promptnigger. You can spare half a minute of your day that you use to generate cuckold hentai
>>6675513Your words and assumptions mean nothing, and I'm sorry I upset you this much
>>6675512You will never be a woman.
>>6675514What makes you think I prompt? Literally the first words in the thread (that you got mad at) was that I don't like AI all that much. You got this mad over me saying that artists cope too hard which only proved my original point lmao
>>6675498if an AI made this your responses would be:>AI doesnt even know cats don't have eyeballs in their mouth>AI had to interpolate it between and infinite number of pictures of cats and eyeballsand>Actually, it doesn't look creative, lol, it's just eyeballs in a catit's a choose your own cope adventure
>>6675515You can make it up to me by killing yourself. Maybe you can do it in a creative way for once like drowning in a tub of s.oylent.
>I don't like AI but artists are retarded about it>HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT *meltdown*wew
>>6675517That seems like a pretty obvious lie and even if it wasn't I'm simply asking you to understand how low the position of promptniggers in the future market would actually be. Using AI Art isn't a sign of technical know how its just a sign of laziness and having no talent.
>>6675518>I could never match the skill and creativity of Junji ItoAdmission is the first step.
>>6675517You're a lying faggot false flagger and you know it.
>>6675523You know what's an obvious lie?>actually I'm a software engineer with 300 confirmed softwares and I know everything about machine learning (in this thread about machine learning where I got mad at)
>>6675518Those are all good arguments. If an AInigger made it there is no absolutely no value in it because the technical skill that made it impressive is non existent. Those careful ink lines the number strands of hair the look in the cats eye. They all happened to be shat out by a program. It's the same way a photo of a cat is not as impressive as a drawing of one. AIfags are like photographers who are too lazy to even leave their home and find something pretty looking.
>>6675525What if a person came up with the exact image, theme, and composition, but used AI to create the picture?What would your cope be?
>>6675531>the only, sole value in art is the technical skill requiredI guess giant minecraft builds are peak art
>>6675528I am mad at people who use machine learning in art and think they bring anything of worth. And I never claimed I was some expert software hackerman. All I said is I'm a Comp Sci major who takes courses in machine learning since you are suggesting I'm only worried for my profession.
>>6675535actually I was just mocking you for getting angry for not reading your gay post
>>6675533>what ifnext you gonna say 2 more weeks>>6675534better art than ai slop
>>6675534Minecraft builds do not require the most amount of technical skill so I'm not sure what you mean by this. They are time consuming sure but most of them are just recreating existing photographs and tracing over them. It still takes a decent amount of skill though and they are leagues and bounds above even many low tier artists much less AIfags.
>>6675533They are admitting they are too lazy to actually learn to express this with conventional tools and therefore have no talent. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. If I say "Hmm a drawing of Tomie with her hair stretched out like a cylinder of tentacles with her shadow looming over a kid in the centre would look really cool." that does not mean I have talent. That means I had an idea. If I cannot express an idea without commissioning someone else then I am a hack.
>>6675536You've switched what you were actually doing apparently like thrice already. Though I guess its likely you forgot what you were discussing yourself given your attention span.
>>6675537>Another "It doesn't look good" argumentit never ends
>>6675077Independent artists who do their own business and marketing will do better but wagecucks who beg for companies to hire them will do worse.You can't get fired if you're your own boss.
>>6675547This image is uncanny as fuck. Therefore it would only be impressive if an actual artist had the skills to draw those super uneven ugly strokes that perfectly replicate the half formed draftsmanship of an AI. If an AI made this then the impressive thing about it is gone.
>>6675547Neverending is your thirst for yous, so I'll feed you some more.It doesn't matter how it looks. It doesn't matter how fast it's made. It's not made by human. It will never be an art. And you can dance around playing with terminology and rhetoric, with your le smart le trolling reasons and arguments about muh prompt muh words input. A lie will always remain a lie.Bon appetite, don't choke on it.
AItards said they don't need validation yet still come here everyday like a starved whore. Did circle jerking with your fellow bugmens is becoming too stale?
>>6675552>>6675555This is a fun idealistic view and all but most people don't actually think in terms of what about the effort, the humanity, the etc etc external factors, they think about the art and how appealing it is overall.If all you have is "it's made by humans, therefore better", and don't have quality or soul or appeal or at least SOME reason to be liked, you will get replaced
>>6674341that's it folks... I'm going back to the countryside and farm onions
>>6675518my response is: your art gacha machine can only work stealing the effort of millions of artists dead and alive so i can just call you a thieving parasite and you'll know deep down in your goy cattle soul that it's true.
>>6675562i'm sure many have told you before that its soulless, but you dont have a soul to understand it.If all I have is "A human made it", its already leagues better than whatever machine vomit you generate. And thats why you will fail and nobody is getting replaced except the bottom of the barrel, no matter how much you fix your uncanny interpolation machine, because all you see colored pixels and a product to be sold.
>>6675589>If all I have is "A human made it", its already leagues better than whatever machine vomit you generate.Source: Your opinionhave fun being replaced
>>6675594Source: You are banned from and all legit art sites have filters to ignore your trash. The fact that you try so hard to dodge those filters tells a lot about your "art"Have fun coping and posting more garbage nobody gives a shit aboutI'm giving you free (you)s for your retardation because thread is dead, but this is the last
>>6675594nta but you are deluded if you think the perceived value of an AI piece drops when someone learns it is.>have fun getting replacedAI is stacking up Ls lately, only bug companies try to exploit it, most deem it too toxic to risk
>>6675594lol hands & eyes
>>6675598It definitely does, but I don't think most people care enough for it to be anything dealbreaking or enjoyment ruining in even close to the level the soul-soulless crowd thinks it does
>>6675603>but I don't think most people care enough for it to be anything dealbreaking or enjoyment ruiningyou'd be surprised. it's already been spammed too much
>>6675594Aitards keep screaming adapt or die but keeps making fake wips trying to pass as a real artist. you fuckers are so fucking retarded that you can't even admit that you do use image generator.
>>6675564>>6675605
>>6675607That just sounds like art fatigue to me, I dont think you can keep browsing pixiv or your twitter feed even for a top tier manga artist for hours and hours and not get bored at some point. The only thing that prevented that was that artists have long schedules and upload occasionally.Maybe your engagement with it should be occasional instead of "more art more art I want to see more more more more AI all the time" and instantly burn yourself out
>>6675613>art
>>6675612until any westerner can take your manga/anime, run it through an AI and sell it for pennies. thinking it brings nothing but unhealthy competition is stupid. and by unhealthy I mean a bunch of backstabbers who will jump and exploit whenever someone makes a modicum of effort, it's parasitic
Can you retards stop replying to bait?Let these retards falseflag at each other and leave it at that.
>>6674632Nice bait
How would you feel if you played and enjoyed a game, then later found out the art was 80% AI?Would it bother you, like you were tricked into looking at it? Or it wouldn't, because you enjoyed the game?I'm a gamedev, right now I'm not saying anything about my use of AI art while things are unsettled.
>>6675632People would be angry being lied too. A pizzeria lying about making their pizza from scratch and using pre cooked shit from a super market, a tranny lying about being trans or hiding it at the last second when dating, being lied to about eating food that’s not vegan, etc. People don’t like being lied or tricked and no surprised you will get shit for it, ai shitter
>>6675623> he said replying to another pepe-thread
>>6675632I would be super happy, progress is the only way forward, enough of these "people" holding us back, stand tall and proud and use AI art publicly without fear for you're on the right side of history.
>>6675632It would definitelly challenge my preconceptions.But that's a hypotethical question, because I do not think anything worthwile will ever be made with AI. If I see anything in the trailer or shop page of that game featuring your typical pinup AI trash then I will not even play that game. If the person behind it used AI to make visuals, what tells me he didn't also use AI for writing? I don't want to engage with bootleg art, I want to see someone's vision come to life. And I mean their own vision, tempered through the creativity required to make things work under the limitations they have to work with, not filtered through computer vomit.>I'm a gamedev, right now I'm not saying anything about my use of AI art while things are unsettled.I'm assuming you're indie. Everyone is jumping on the bandwagon. I think it could be useful for you to make generic backgrounds if you need some for example, but if you use it for the majority of your game art then you'll just get lost in the sea of slop that everyone is already pushing. Think of all the indie games that blew up, they all have a distinct visual style that isn't necessarily technically advanced. Despite what /g/trannies wish you to believe, AI cannot do that, at most you can make bootleg of another game's style and that's what your own game will come off as.
>>6675632The most important thing to understand is that if you haven't broken any laws, you don't have to defend yourself. If someone asks if you used AI art, you ignore them. If someone blames you for using AI art, you ignore them. The only way this thing escalates is if you admit guilt (even though you haven't done anything wrong), or if you start to argue with these people. You are not legally obligated to disclose trade secrets or what tools you used to make your game. If people see AI art, a small portion of them may choose to not play your game, but it will not escalate into a woke twitter cancelfest.
>>6675270Thanks!
>>6675415>record your relatives>glownigger backdoor is used to steal the data>someones pretends to be your relative to scam younice
>>6675650>you haven't broken any lawsyettick tock, AI tranny
>>6675632>then later found outthis is "what if you date a tranny and later found out its a guy" energy. Everyone can tell you're a tranny IRL.
>>6675670No one's mentioned AI so far, and I've even gotten some compliments on my art :)
>6675680>my art(You)
>>6675680Ai shitters support ai shitters. if you’re who i think it is, then you have no real followers, just bots.
>>6675680>and then I woke up :)))
>>6675632The fact that you use AI will certainly come out in review pages.People will feel scammed if you don't disclose it.
>>6675698>The fact that you use AI will certainly come out in review pages.If people want to try and slander me, they can come up with proof. Otherwise, sounds like some free drama publicity to me. >amateur dev target of AI witch-hunt, cancel-culture strikes again
>>6675727You’re going have to come up with proof that you didn’t use ai, pajeet shitter. Good luck with that
>>6675727Selling people AI generated assets without disclosing it is an act of scamming by itself.Is not free publicity, you will get refunded genius.
>>6675757I have no reason to prove myself against random wild accusations. Prove I used AI. Oh, except you can't. :)
>>6675632I would get a refund.
>>6675779>>6675698>>6675670>>6675634If you had a good time and didn't notice the art was AI until you were told, what's the real problem?
>what if (insert fantasy scenario here)ok
>6675785Aight anon but real quick>pyw
>>6675785>and didn't noticeWe always notice.You do not pass.
>>6675439See >>6674916If anything, it's the AIggers who are ignorant if they attribute magical and humanlike qualities to an algorithm.
>>6675785If I ate the /k/ brownies and thought they tasted good, whats the problem right?
Fear of the new or penis envy?
>6675680>6675785You know anon I too was able to get compliments reposting "AI" art back at /sdg/ from less than a thread ago just to see if they would notice>I could ask why are you think that's an accomplishment
>>6675816because the fact that some can be spotted and some can't means 1) prompt engineering is legitimate, 2) my prompt engineering and workflow is superiorThe more people I get to admire my AI Art without them knowing it's AI, the more I win, plain and simple.
>>6675831People that watch movies don't worry about what camera was used or lighting techniques of if it's CGI or some other technique People don't care if it's AI or not.
>6675831So when I add literal phone filters to random pictures and get likes or just repost the same picture is also valid workflow
>>6675831Post your art. You do not pass. + Not your art. You mad?
>>6675093I don't know why hobbyists are so mad about it, I get pros being mad about potentialy getting a pay cut but it certainly has it's uses. You can get some good light, color palette, shading references fast and easy. I'm sure there's much more you can do but even just that is already a cool little tool.
The burden of proof is on you. I will never admit to using AI.
>>6674632>she
>>6674341Colleagues wonder why I started working faster and still retain my art style. Gotta love being able to train your own model
>>6675874You will never be an artist
>>6675879I'll take things that never happened for 200 Jim
>>6675876*uploads your image to a free AI detection service> AI use 99.999%> Model: Stable Diffusion 1.5 Orange Mix Eerie 1.5> generation settings: 1024x1024 ; denoiser strenght 0.6; solver: DPM Karas +> proompter a faggot: true
>>6675891
>>6675884I just do this for fun, not trying to be a pro.
>>6675876I thought you ai shitters are proud of using ai? Oh wait, you aren’t because deep down you know you will never get the attention you oh so desire, kek. Also that’s how you get sued, shitskin
>>6674391It's generic either because it's being done by a cryptobro or someone who barely passed drawing 101. Still, professional artists will slowly bite the bullet and will be able to churn good material ridiculously quick.IC should put cryptobro "artists" in their places and claim the tech for themselves. Also, stop with the wagecuck mentality and take advantage of the tools to create your own small studio.
>>6675891Lol the very idea of finding an "inverse" in this way shows that you have absolutely no idea how any of that actually works, good job on remembering some words though.
Photobashing will never be art. Even if you do it with a database of a trillion images.
>>6675093It’s about as fun as google searching for wallpapers.
>>6675632It’d definitely lose its luster. A great deal of what makes me enjoy something creative is imagining the person and thought process behind it. It’s inspirational. Remove the human, remove the inspiration, it just becomes a dull mash as no shapes have intent behind them. It’s just a product at that point.
>>6676075>Remove the human, remove the inspirationThat's still there though.
>>6674363That looks on par with character art on the iOS and Google play store. Yea korean/chinese game artists are obsolete.
>>6675270> I keep Medibang gated behind a firewall to block their stupid ads that you can only get rid of by paying a monthly subscription. Used to be you could pay them once to get rid of ads and unlock certain features like the file browser but not any more. I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDSLmao, I bought the premium pack just before they went all in on the subscription stuff.> I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDSThose cracked apps are fine, it is just that none of the MediBang paint cracked apks work well. Cracked apps are a mixed bag nowadays due to apps always needing to be online and anti piracy measures, though I guess it is a good thing, people are way too cheap.
>>6675632> How would you feel if you played and enjoyed a game, then later found out the art was 80% AI?Cool job, especially if it is an indie developer. Not only making it but making it not look like ai is one hard accomplishment.>>6675634Fuck off gay faggot, people reuse assets all the time in game developers and use Unity marketplace stuff. Even popular games use assets, PUBG was an asset flip when it came out. This is just another form of that which is a lot cheaper then spending gorrilions on artwork.
>>6675759> Selling people AI generated assets without disclosing it is an act of scamming by itself.Developers use asset packs all the time. Not really scamming.
>>6674341>Taiwanese companyFake country, fake art
>>6675874The internet is flooded with AI.Hobbyists want to learn real skill, not fake shit.Similar to hobby gamers love to watch pro gamer, not bots playing with each other.
>>6676205So? There's no reason to be mad about it, just do your thing.
>>6676171Fuck off you retarded chink. There’s a reason why people don’t like your indie shovelware trash.
it doesn't matter what you sayAI Art is here to stay
>>6674346I think it's most of the Korean studios who did alot of "Amerianime" back in the 2000s.
>>6674377>>6674363This shit isn't even very good. Those hands & everything melting into each other makes it look awful & generic.
>>6676314not to put too fine a point on it, but pyw
>>6674501>Remember that time when discord degenerates were blackmailing dumb kids into taking hormone pills and posting erotic photos of themselves?They were all Discord trannies. Grooming children into posting erotic photos of themselves then convincing them to take estrogen pills is right their alley.
>>6674530Alot of office jobs are going to be replaced the technology. It's already happening with script writer, & now it's happening to artists. Programmers will be the next thing on the chopping block. The days of working in the office are slowly coming to an end, & that's a good thing!
>>6674594Not my problem. The sooner you parasites are removed from the industry, the better.
>>6675810Kek underrated
>>6676223you've missed the part about being flooded
>>6676346I didn't miss it but it's kinda irrelevant, digital art was already flooded way before AI.
>>6676400>irrelevantneck yourself
>>6675810
AI art will be as quickly forgotten as fidgetspinnersalso ted was righthttps://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1685228469883377.webm
>>6674822nobody thinks that's creative they think it's cute, retard
>>6676400Sure, but you could at least get some diversity in the styles and there was also the idea that you knew the art was man-made. AI usually looks even more cookie cutter than industry art. It's why most people can detect AI art rather quickly. The way it does clothing, hair, and hands are usually pretty telling. To each their own I guess. I just miss when I could go on AS back in 2017 and look at all the art on there from time to time. All this shit makes me wish I spent my time on that site more often.
>>6674377The motion/action that's supposed to be expressed in this piece makes no fucking sense.
>>6674632>Art is limited to white people who can afford it>AI art relies entirely on parasitising real art>AI is thus white man's burden.Wow I never thought of it like that, anon.
So many seething is this thread, artists btfo by a piece of copper
>>6674372Except artists don't use this shit. It's primarily being used by a bunch of autistic technerds. We create. That's what artists do. Ordering a robot to create something is not creating anything. It's not creativity; It's akin to ordering a comission.You bugmen will never understand.. So don't speak for us.
>>6674372And on top of that this so called "tool" is exploiting countless artists in the process. Some of which you share apreciation for, respect as a peer and possibly even inspired you to start drawing/painting in the first place. Only to know that in the end who benefits are exploitative, greedy, parasitical, corporate scum. No, us artists are definitely not using this so called tool. We are vehemently against this. Equally so their right hand henchmen too dumb to realise they're being used to do their bidding; the low iq, ignorant bugman helping this new hellscape/ feverdream become a reality for artists worldwide. You do not speak for us.
>>6677602>You do not speak for us.Good, smart artists see it as an opportunity.
>>6677615Smart artists see this as what it is; exploitation. You are the henchman I previously mentioned. You trying to make me out to be the idiot is both ironic and pathetic. It's your last resort when being confronted by a wall of facts. To belittle, mock, antagonise, project and provocate some sort of reaction.And you wonder why you're universially hated. Respected by nobody.You will never be an artist. Parasite.
>>6675252>I don't like working hardThis is the reason why prompters will always be hated. Dedication to a craft is a universally admired trait.They are left with nothing when the power goes out.
>>6677630>>6677602>another guy uses a computer, can make art like me>"REEEEEEEE EXPLOITATION" lollmao>>6677636>This is the reason why digital artists or people who use power tools will always be hated. Dedication to a craft is a universally admired trait.
Sounds like limited skill set folks are having a hard time with innovation.
>>6675810kek