Can we have an anatomy general thread? And can someone show me what's going on with her ribcage/abs/pelvis?
wdym? She's just leaning back a little.
>>6839753Gross penis bump and no tits. Definitely a dude
>>6839760that's her cloaca you fucking retard.
>>6839753What do you mean by "what's going on?" You want someone to draw a skeleton over her?>>6839760Trannies WISH they looked like this. That bulge? Let me introduce to you a wonderful thing called the pubic mound.
>>6839757A. The pelvis I’m picturing/drawing seems all fucked up & huge because the landmarks are so wide out. B. Idk what’s going on with the upper abs, is the bottom of her ribcage really that high and the top-abs that wide? Usually in diagrams the ribcage hangs out like a ledge a bit over the top abs.C. I’m lost when it comes to the obliques
She just has mommy hips. Something like this
>>6839793That's her greater trochanter you retard.
>>6839753Its photoshop you 12 year old
>>6839797The things I circled in pink? 100% that's not her greater trochanter. That's illiac crest for sure.>>6839802Even if it's photoshop it looks anatomically correct, just exaggerated like anime.
>>6839796Ischia & pubis too low & too small.
>>6839813honestly doesn't matter if it helps you visualize it
>>6839753Is there more of this red head?
>>6839793In the third image, the form circled in purple on the left side is not the ASIS/pelvic point. From the bottom of the rib cage, the outline flares out with the external oblique. The next change of angle, which occurs well above the circled form, is where the external oblique meets the iliac crest. The pelvic point would be a little ways inside the outline and slightly below the vertex of this angle.So what is that protrusion you circled? My guess is it's part of her underwear.Unlike what you see in many anatomical illustrations, there isn't actually much space between the rib cage and pelvis. Typically, from the lower margin of the rib cage to the top of the iliac crest in back is not more than 1/4 head. Try placing one finger at the bottom of your own costal arch, and another finger on your pelvic point of the same side, and you'll see that even the distance in front is much, much smaller than what you have in your skeleton overlay.
>>6840938There's no way that's just her underwear, it's way too sharp and it's not mirrored on the other side. Do a draw-thru
>>6839753I think that bottom most noticable bump on the left side might be the head of her femur sticking out a somehow, if you find both of her external obliques and where they end you can see what I think is her underwear lines right above her illiac crests and then on her left her gluteus minimus and medius are relaxed leaving that part concave before jutting out again with her femoral head and on her right her gluteus are more rounded and the whole pelvis is tilted slightly to the right and down leading to that area looking a little weird
>>6840966The femur head is too well covered by the glutes & quads to ever stick out like that, especially in front.
>>6840893her name is literally on the pic
>>6841197I know it's not her literal femur peeking through you dumbass but it's caused by the head of her femur no doubt.
>>6841804>>6841808Anyone have the full image pack of her? I love short haired cuties...
>>6839760ITT a retard discovers the pubic mound.
>>6841804Anon, it's clearly her ASIS, what are you circling here?From her shitter page: note image 0008.jpg especially - you can see where you would palpate her ASIS clearly on the right and how "high" it is (close to her navel)You can also see this same shadow relationship in your reference. Curvy thigh shadow tapering as it approaches pelvis, sudden straightening out as it approaches ASIS, which is again surprisingly close to the belly button
>>6839793it's "wide out" cause she's a chick you dumb nigger
>>6842028Is her pelvis just tilted waaay the fuck forward? Wish someone gud would do a draw-over
>>6841829https://www.mediafire.com/file/5dbutla7jilds2e/31944509714_a17a8f7a54_b.zip/fileI have a low res version.
Folks would nitpick the shit out of a perfect drawing of this woman. I can see it now
>>6842387oh wow, thanks anon!
Anon has never seen a woman
Are there any free or cheap anatomy tutorial videos that go into everything properly (skeleton, muscles and so on)? I've found some that claim to be a series or whatever on youtube but they're always incomplete. I'm an autist who needs someone talking at me and talking me through it or i cant pay attention and get burnt out, so stuff like manga materials' patreon doesn't cut it.
>>68497903d4medical complete anatomy is $70/year. Just do it
>>6849805Never heard of it but will give it a look, thank you
>>6839753Is the russian troon ???
>>6850211not a troon, bone structure too female
>>6850211>>6839760Proof that you assholes are dumb as fucking rocks.
>>6840954>>6842028>>6842345That bump is way too low to be ASIS. I don't draw on the computer, and picrel was drawn with a mouse, so it's rough, but should get the idea across.
>>6851997>That bump is way too low to be ASIS.It's really not and you're overthinking it. If it looks like the thing, assume it is the thing. And it looks exactly like the thing, pic relatedYou see almost exactly the same proportional ratio in ribcage:waist:asis. Note also, the slight pelvic tilt in this reference and the apparent/possible tilt in OP reference complicating the issue furtherUltimately this whole argument is retarded because the reference is ambiguous and likely photoshopped, and you should always study unambiguous, preferably nude subjects. This shit will never matter in practice, it's more important to grasp the basic idea
>>6852039One more comparison showing how much the pelvis and torso can vary even among women. This is why you should study nude as much as possible, and avoid heavily shopped and airbrushed twitter coom art.
>>6852039I agree that it's important to study from photos that haven't been manipulated. It wasn't until you mentioned "likely photoshopped" that I took note of the girl's extended arm. The forearm appears too long. I believe, in a sense, we are both right. The bump IS her ASIS, but it is lower than possible due to the body having been elongated unnaturally in Photoshop.Yes, there is variation in body types but never that much space between ribcage and pelvis. Also, in the girl at left, note that on the stretched side of her body the pelvis tucks under toward the midline, which is natural. In OP's girl, the "stretched" side protrudes outward from the midline.TLDR: Stop using these stupid coomer insta-thots for your anatomical studies. They are most likely photoshopped and run through AI filters. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised seeing this on a site that constantly runs ads for ridiculous sex toys and AI porn generators. They know the audience!