[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Opinion on the art style used in Armchair Historian's history videos?
>>
>>6847420
wario nose
>>
>>6847420
in the animations of soldiers who shoot in these videos it's too simple compared to its style and a lot of animation its reuse


but the drawing in the tumbnails are nice
>>
>>6847420
>tumblr nose
>>
>>6847420
It's shit why
>>
its alright
>>
For some reason, it's making me think of board games like Catan.
>>
>>6847420
I say it's fine but I rather meh about his videos



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.