Did you know George Washington was 6'2
>>216327116No.Because he was 6' from head to toe according to his own letter to his tailor.But I guess he was insecure like every other American and had to put two inches on the auditioning profile.>As I have sent you my measure once or twice I presume you can be at no loss for want of one1 but I think you have generally sent my Cloaths too short & sometimes too tight for which Reason I think it necessary again to mention that I am full Six feet high which may be a good direction to you as to the length and as I am not at all inclind to be corpulent you might easily come at my size even if your measure of me shoud be lost—let the Breeches be made long.https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/02-08-02-0073
Basedmarck was actually 6'2"
>>216327116The ideal height difference to be honest
>>216327116No he’s 6’20”https://youtu.be/sbRom1Rz8OA?si=36Kj6KkxIg_0KtIc
>>216327116That is the ideal height difference between men and women. That's why I exclusively fuck peruvian girls.
>>216327466
>>216327482He was probably just barely over 6ft. Bitches obsess over muh height' but can't tell the difference because they're all midgets, so everything over 5'9" to them is tall.
>>216327116no but i knew immanuel kant was 5'2
