This site needs a board or two for science and politics that displays every user's iq score and nationality next to their alias. The high-iq chuds are at least respectable and the high-iq schizos are usually awesome enough for me to tolerate their ramblings. Would greatly effect how I argue with different people, though it might cause the chuddier characters to neglect intelligent discussion in favor of boasting about their supposed superiority to opposition.
>>216754943>wanting usernames>>>reddit
>>216754943>>>/sci/>>>/pol/
>>216754943I have been thinking a lot about the survival strategies and radiation/spread pattern of gut bacteria and microbiome, you could say to some extent the most beneficial biome for gut bacteria is not any specific habitat as those mostly change.In such a way gut biomes, if intended to spread, should operate by moving through feces, animals practice cropophagia to tune in their gut biome, and this way, th genes of the microbiomes that benefit the most the spread of the host species, and the host species that produce the moat vectors of reproduction, will be favoured.This way animals get an easy, rapidly adaptable way to fit their energetic needs and inclusively, change their morphology as result of rapid metabolic changes and avaliable energy.The state of the gut biome this way represents the survival strategy, abundance and periodacal cycle of the general biome.In some points may be better for survival limit the access of enabled species to spread.Thus reducing heritability
>>216757578This way for example, in places with a huge climatic stake and adaptational load required to spread animal populations, The bacterial fllora may prefer to be hostile to outsiders, benefiting animals that produce dry feces thus dificulting their reproduction and spreadAnd viceversa.Given that such a rapid spread and disruption may alter the homeostasis of the system leading the particular populations and ecosystems of dry adapted intestinal flora obsolete, of wiping the pooulations, destroying a chain in the ecological cycle. Which might remain vacant upon a subsequent adaptative pressure and oportunity favoured by the ecological factors surge.Ecosystems -too- face evolutionary pressures, and mantain homeostasis
>>216757701The more resilent a organism or system is, ultimately, the bigger must be the change in avaliable energySo just like an inmune reaction, the more resilence presents a system to change the more reactionary it is, certain ecosystems favour more revolutionary, thus, accelerated, thus, more efficient systems, and other favours those more reactionary, thus, closer to the antique and more true, and thus, in correct order or hierachy.
