Somehow, nobody died
>>62886630Because lancet fucking sucks
>>62886671It only has a 1, 3, or 5 kg warhead.
>>62886630Pity.
>>62886630Video?
>>62886630>Somehow, nobody diedreallythat's an implessive HE charge thenalso what are those mounts, APKWS?
>>62886630shaped charge warhead?
>62886736This is like the 5th or 6th time this image has been posted with no link or embedded webm.OP is a giant faggot. Post link or webm or gtfo.
Where the fuck are you dumb niggers coming from where you don't know how to post a .gif, .webm or even a fucking link? Go away and don't come back.
>>62886630valgear has taught me that fragmentation is extremely unreliable and random.
The only place I can find it is on a pro-Turkey instagram account.
Yeah it's definitely a fake. Something like this would be paraded all over by russists. Earliest mention I can find is on russian military propaganda site where that image was taken from. Even they can't cough up any video footage of it.Here's the laughable site: https://en.topwar.ru/253863-pokazany-kadry-momenta-popadanija-lanceta-po-legkoj-rszo-vsu.html
>>62887982It was posted by Ukrainian telegram a week ago with "Nobody was harmed" comment.>biggest zigger victory of October is Ukrainian content posted by Ukrainians from 2+ months ago spammed by rushitsReally makes you think. I even had it reposted by 89IQ vatnig retard in our local chat.
>>62888032real incident with recon uav video if you check zig channels for it. "one light 300” was the initial rumor from our side, meaning one WIA in non critical condition. that aligns with what the zig video shows, which is one dismount squirming a bit after impact while everyone else successfully scatters.>the picwildly fake viral photo for clicks (imho), until proven otherwise. just... look at it, with ya eyeballs.
>>62886680still strange how wildly inconsistent they are. I've seen a succesful hit completely total a szuzana but other times you'd get more damage with fireworks
>>62888462Might be an accuracy issue. The extent of damage depends on where you hit (especially whether you hit any ammo)
>>62886671Here's some personal experience right from the middle of the government district in Kyiv in February-March 2022: there were multiple Zala Aero-KUB drones (more or less russia's own Sheeit drones) launched at the government buildings, pretty much every single one of them either:- fell by itself and didn't detonate;- hit the target and didn't detonate;- or got shot down using assault rifles, fell and didn't detonate;And yes, they had warheads on them, with actual explosives and shit.
>>62888486What's the technology to penetrate? Does it purely rely on secondaries?
>>62886630Possibly, but the launcher his is mission killed if nothing else. I doubt even a lancet is as impotent as to bounce of a truck like that.
