>Makes your tanks and armored vehicles obsolete>Makes your navy ships obsolete>Makes artillery, your so called god of warfare obsolete>Will replace fighterjets, and whole air force fleets too
>>62933176you are lame
>>62933196Why? warfare always change, ww4 will be fully computerized.Sadly the only thing that will never get replaced are the men and women being sent to the grinder
>>62933176>Can't be used in storms>A literal plastic toy>Air-time of 25 minutes>Can easily be dealt with by a competent military
>>62933242And you don't believe MIC's won't try to upgrade drones to face those obstacles?
Not even Ukraine says that drones are a replacement for everything you listed. But is another tool to improve the effectiveness of existing systems/units. The answer isn't to build a goofy drone force but to attach every combat unit a specialist drone operator.
>>62933301Because it's the beggining, just give it a couple of decades, and there will be drone operated bombers in massive quantities
>>62933176If you mean small quadcopters, then lolnopeIf you mean unmanned platforms in general then the things making certain types of tanks, planes and ships obsolete will just be unmanned tanks, planes and ships.
>>62933438>Because it's the beggining, just give it a couple of decades, and there will be drone operated bombers in massive quantitiesYou don't know shit, just stfu and stop making useless threads
>>62933449>will just be unmanned tanksMore like these babes
>>62933251The thing with drones is that the energy density in lithium batteries are still pretty shit for military purposes. It will always be a fragile toy. The only reason it works against slavs is because they're incompetent as fuck.
>>62933617The war in Ukraine proved everyone was retarded
>>62933176I want a future where jamming is so universal, that even electricity is knocked out, and we're back to fighting with swords and cannon.
>>62933242uh how so?You drop a million or so over the enemy from you missiles, each one can explode.Your fucked and your infrastructure is fucked.
>>62933897What the fuck are you even trying to say.
>>62933897>Got perfectly functional high-yield missiles>"Nah let's instead waste the payload space by cramping it full of shitty low-yield slow af plastic toys because papa's musky crotch said 'jone gud'"
>>62933897and wheres the drone to drop the drones onto the enemy country?
>>62933176You can stop a drone swarm by jamming their comms with an EA-18G Growler, this is a platform that is 15 years old already. Not that it matters because drones are limited by their range and unable to do many things.The idea that drones will make everything obsolete is a midwit take.Yes we will have drone swarms, and they will be used situationally but they won't replace everything.And they have weak points, the tech isn't there yet.
>>62933932are growlers really only 15 years old? what did we use before then?
>>62934102the Prowler.
>>62933176I don't think this little plastic toy will hold up well against 40mm airburst munitions.
>>62933176Why didn't they work against Israel then?
>>62933852"The tiniest the better" will become the new motto in the future
>>62933176They dominate so hard on the cost front. APS systems, drone jammers, GROWLERS, all a lot more expensive than a chinese plastic toy with a grenade. Only solution I can imagine with cost-parity is a dude with buckshot shooting them like skeets
>>62933617It's not even just about batteries, aerodynamic drag is disproportionately worse the smaller and lighter the aircraft is.
If only it could make niggerfaggots like OP obsolete too.
I don't think any of your meme arrows are correct.
>>62933176flying aircraft carrier when?
>oh no, drones>let's jam them>UVB-76 goes offline for long enough>nukes autolaunchi love the future
>>62935594Drones Carriers will definitely be real, but they might be called motherships
>>62933176Artillery still kills the most albeit although it
>>62933438>bombersLmao. We already have predator drones.
>>62933176>Makes your trains and armored cars obsolete>Makes your navy ships obsolete>Makes artillery, your so called god of warfare obsolete>Will replace observation balloons, and whole zeppelin fleets too
>>62936231Well, they technically did all of that, drones will just make it faster
>UavJammers>CableMachinegun range, Shootijg airbust grenade will kill the wire>AiPic rel
>>62936330Jamming is going to force everyone to start using charcoal again
>j-just jam it browhy do you people assume the drone cannot function autonomously from within its Faraday cage>b-but the antennayes, nobody has ever developed any sort of concept of a limiting device for electronics. i sure hope this doesn't blow the fuse in your brainfucking hell you could probably airgap the actual antenna input if you wanted to be autistic about it (thanks, photons!)
>>62936278Until those concepts modernized and countermeasures were actually made, then biplanes became worthless, which lead to even newer more deadlier aircraft and so on and so forth.
>>62936492I wonder how countermeasures against massive swarm of drones might look likeRefined cope cages, more jamming, or another swarm of droned
>>62937172We already have one
>made in chinayeah, when they take back taiwan you'll change your faggot tone. means you'll have to get a big boy job and pay $700 for real optics because your $100 "just gud enough" ones will be sanctioned as well
>>62933176>AMERIKATEK is so advanced that our toys make the world's top non American militaries' entire philosophy of war irrelevant>This means anything about how American can, or should, make warRC planes are only a threat to primitives. We let our children play with them for fun.
>>62936397>why do you people assume the drone cannot function autonomously from within its Faraday cageEvery single time an AI has been tested for live combat it has been a fucking disaster. Half the time they attack their own side, and the other half they attack trees and shadows that are "99% confirmed enemy combatant"
>>62938618Made in china, but designed by white people
>>62938618>when they take back taiwanIf
>>62933196adapt or die loser
>>62933242>one drone costs about as much as a rifleoh no you shot down 17/18 of my drones and I managed to take down your flying coffin worth $100 mils kek
>>62933242>Can easily be dealt with by a competent militarySo the US military is incompetent?: https://www.twz.com/air/drone-incursions-over-usaf-bases-in-uk-enter-second-week
>>62933176Endgame for drone warfare is nanobots inside everyone's body and around infrastructure. If you don't do what the person in charge of it tells you to do they can kill anybody anywhere at any time
>>62944887that's totalitarianism not war
Could big surface ships theoretically just turn up the juice on their radars and fry drones?
>>62944912I was talking about on a geopolitcal standpoint, not controlling populations. "Russia stop invading Ukraine." "No." (all Russian government top officials die, or all Russian military who cross a defined gps line drop dead)
>>62933176>Drone unit just got overrun and massacred in Syria by light infantryOh no! Drone bros our response???
>>62933438Nuclear weapons would legitimately be the only defense, have to wipe the entire sky, emp from it helps too.
>>62933176What these needs are QI wireless chargers. Have them land on a strip/pad with inductive chargers or magnetic resonance chargers and be able to hop from location to location. The country needs to build them like they build post office or EV charging stations. Or maybe EV charging stations of the future will offer wireless charging stations for autonomous drones. Then they could roam for hundreds of miles to go scout and kill if necessary.
>>62936107predator drones are expensive. 20 mil for a single one (MQ-1) with all the necessary tech. mass producing thousands of quadcopters and attatching them with some IED would be cheaper and unstopable while the predator could get destroyed by some jet or whoever.only problem atm is that you would need a single drone operator for every quad so its not possible for now
>>62933196westoid MIC's on suicide watch^>>62933242cant wait untill toy drone swarms attack energy infrastructure >"b.buut we..we intercepted 20/6790078!"PIC RELATE>it ends all current naval doctrine everywhere, instantlythis yellow shitmarine, and others like it have instantly voided out the totality of western naval doctrine,there is no debatethere nothing further to talk aboutthe future of all naval operations are fucking loitering, sleeping or submerged dronesthats itits over
>>62933176>obsoleteCan drones hold ground? Nope.
>>62933242>Can easily be dealt with by a competent militarylmao the cope
>>62933176The only reason small drones were so effective for so long in Ukraine was because it was novel. Now it's just a known tactic. Jamming will stop small drone like quadracopters unless you do the fiber optic line thing they are doing now, but that limits range and effectiveness.
>>62949117>Jamming will stop small drone like quadracopters unless you do the fiber optic lineYou have no fucking idea what are talking about
>>62938601Sure Epirus says that it works , but where is the proof that it does against drones not specifically used in their own marketing.
>>62933176Tesla coil type weapon system might be an option also lasers could workthe affective kill radius for modern grenades is 15 meters if you can prevent drone slop before that your golden.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS2y2QqLdhchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS2y2QqLdhc
>>62933932I guess it depends on the drone. Like a remote controlled F-18 would have enough kVA onboard to have a decent hybrid gps, large power output antenna and so forth. Similar with globalhawks or other "big" drones.Your bargain bin fpv doesn't have the juice to go through jamming or run a couple laser gyros to be spoof resistant. I also don't think drone or UAV is a fitting term. In my mind pic related is basically a higher fidelity TOW missile. Which is completely different from some skynet type surveillance drone that can measure if you mowed your lawn this week.
>>62944871>this nigga thinks garrison life is like combat conditions
