/arg/ but we don't discuss guns apparently editionPreviously>>64272967
URGIIIIIII but why did they stick with a govt barrel instead of the socom?
>>64274705Wasn't necessary
>>64274705you wouldn't understand
oh
apparently if you can shoot fletch out of your ar pistol it no longer requires a tax stamp
>>64274713pretty sure that's a Jesse James build, Alex Jones just owns it
>>64274713Is that your rifle or actually Alex jones' gun
>>64274719You can do that with every ar pistol. This is just "you can shoulder your braces" all over again not that I'm really complaining I just hope they permanently end this nfa bullshit
>>64274724SHALL NOT INFRINGE ON MUH NFA
>>64274720>Jesse James
>>64274726REEEEEEEEEEE end it NOW imma extreeeeeemin
>>64274721Not mine I just find it funny
>>64274734Oh okay. I do not like it but honestly I see the vision. It doesn't offend me
>>64274709>>64274711But they picked the one barrel that has all its weight on the end where it doesn’t help… maybe they know something I dont
>>64274745>where it doesn't helpthis is how they keep us in the dark. Have you ever wondered what's out there? Beyond the gas port? I think there's something out there. I want to believeMy most controversial political belief is I think government profile is fine, maybe even good.
Mini-14?
Opinions on ultra shorty setups?
>>64274735Pls don’t span off topic. This is for ar discussion only.
>>64274728the Monster Garage guy, he's big into "custom guns" (tarted up 1911's and AR's)
>>64274755Fine I understand but GOOD? Studies must be done on this
>>64274759I am a BIG fan heheheheh but yeah they're very good, basically as reliable as milspec insofar as cycling
>>64274759Theres 3 options that make sense to me: loud retard roomclearing with 30 cal, Not a fan of CTE subsonic pcc, or a 300 BO with a QD can so you can do both.
>>64274759Under 10" and you should just go 300blk
>>64274735Maybe it was part of the dog fucker's plan?>>64274755>I think government profile is fine, maybe even goodLMAO, no. It was the lightest barrel profile in production so it made sense to pair it with the slimmed down guard already incompatible with an M203 launcher
>>64274771LWRC, LMT, or KAK? >>64274773>>6427477210.3" 5.56 is pretty dope IMO
>>64274764Nice but I worry that name is an albatross around his neck which I assume is tatted>>64274768I agree. There's honestly gotta be literature on it from the time it was being worked out that explains the rationale. It might hint at being onto to something Webm related is gov profile but also for >>64274759to see the aforementioned cycling
>>64274783>>64274780My only experience with LMT is a friend. He likes his. I don't know much beyond that.I have a lwrc on the main lower that takes the majority of the abuse and has never ever ever ever even hinted at doing something odd. It's solid. I preemptively upped the buffer weight but not on account of needing it but more just future proofing.KAK on my second favorite rifle and runs great and again never had issues EXCEPT with a particularly gassy bcg on an upper it wasn't mated to it didn't cycle reliably on full auto. Any other bcg worked fine so hard to blame the kak for that. They're both perfect desu but the kak's recoil feels a little bit punchier hence it's on the second favorite
>>64274791>I have a lwrc on the main lowerMy negro amigo
>>64274780Those other two webms had the lwrc lower, this is the kak
>>64274780Shorter 5.56s feel more like a logostical compromise to me. Nothing wrong, but you cant control pressure/noise like you can with pccs or 300bo. I prefer my sbrs to not be gassy and poppy.
>>64274795We're also surefire schlong buddies :DAnd 10.3 buddies!! ::::Ddd
>>64274780This is the kak lower actually>>64274783I don't remember on some of these. Like this webm.
Okay I will stop for now. I just can't emphasize enough they're gtg, there are plenty of buffer weights for either too enjoy
>>64274777>lightest barrel profile in productionuhhh when? You remember the original barrel profile for M16's was what we call pencils, right?what?
>>64274802I'm also Miami Vice 90 rounder bro from the other day The LWRC PDW/Colt combo is not happy with the super safety but I think that's a fitment issue I can resolve >>64274801Genuinely not bad on my Colt 6945 or LMT MRP upper. The Colt absolutely requires the gas buster when suppressed though.The LMT is piston driven and is really endearing me to SSP for short ass 5.56 builds. >Unfortunately, it's also an LMT, which means it's a massive piece of shit.
>>64274826>super safetyI wish I could help you man, pastebin supposes there is some bolt velocity dependant reliability thing but I obviously have no experience.
>>6427478010.3 isn't shorter than 10
>>64274835Okay, fair. I have two 8" 300's and I guess I agree. I also never shoot them though, I'd rather just grab the MP5
>>64274809Kak makes lowers? What’s their rollmark? An ebt card?
>>64274848I meant the lower with a kak on it.
>>64274822>the original barrel profileYou mean the one that the Military stopped procuring decades ago? 14.5 government was the logistically expedient choice. The superior choice above both pencil and government would require a new NSN so they just didn't
>>64274848I think he's talking about the KAK CQC buffer weight/spring/tube combohttps://kakindustry.com/mini-milspec-ar15-buffer-tube-kit-with-micro-m4-stock-carbine/
>>64274854Okay. So you think it was just good ENOUGH. I but I bet the reason the government keeps ordering more is because it's good
>>64274860Yeah what if it’s good?
>>64274860Make no mistake, I think the Bendy Bill's a piece of shit but contemporary warfare is too fake and gay for it to matter either way
>>64274858Hell yeah. I want that too. Need to find an amd65 adapter though.
>>64274877Okay okay>>64274873Yeah what if :)
Assuming I don't have any thing that requires zeroing like a LAM, is there any reason to buy a monolithic upper?
>>64274920No
>>64274920not really, no
>>64274920I guess you could mount a red dot really far forward as a meme?
>>64274945That would be neat.
>>64274920Maybe for clip on, but the mounts and alignment for those probably add enough tolerance stacking you're close to traditional quality rail tolerances anyway
>Nothing better than regular well made clamp on mlok>nothing better than well made gov profile>nothing better than well made DIThe urgi will be on mars.>>64274955This will not
>>64274945>look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power
>Forward Controls Designs
>>64274974Uciw chads, when will we break off our shackles?
>>64274989I like their safety. And trigger guard. And mag release button. And bolt catch
>>64274795Now this is a powerful foot capable of bringing me to orgasm
>Control Designs Forward
>>64275000checked and same
>>64274968>g$ shill can't find anyone to fight with so he picks the tard wranglerI will never buy a geissele product, don't worry
>>64275027I wasn't picking a fight but it felt right to say that. it felt true
>>64275042I guess it boils down to whether the urgi cam path or the xcr takedown hole BTFOs first
>>64274920You don’t need a monolithic upper for a LAM
>>64275055calm down liberal it's called dark humor
>>64274989Reddit ass gun
