[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 744008.jpg (35 KB, 316x500)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
What would the training and selection have been like for Women serving in the SAS in Northern Ireland for undercover surveillance and reconnaissance?
Would they have been actual SAS or just attached from whatever regular service they were picked from?
Would they have gone through the full training course or something abreviated for Northern Ireland?
>>
Pick up a book instead of spamming the catalog with inane questions all the fucking time
>>
>>64460424
Anon this book is available at the usual places for free, you could find it out for yourself very easily.
>>
>>64460424
Bunda
>>
>>64460424
Would, hard.
>>
>>64460424
It would have been the same as it is today. Imaginary.
>>
>>64460424
>Lust provoking image
>Irrelevant time-wasting question
You know damned well that undercover surveillance and recon wouldn't require a full ride through SAS selection.
In fact picking up too many habits from the military would make a person stand out while undercover. Whatever training they had would be more about fighting to get out alive in case shit went down.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.