>IS THAT A REPRODUCTION OF A WORSE VERSION OF THE CURRENT RUN OF GUNS?!?!>FOR ALMOST DOUBLE THE PRICE OF THE CURRENT RUN OF GUNS?!?!>AND WITH SHITTY ASS GAY ENGRAVINGS ALL OVER IT SAYING HOW ITS AN ANNIVERSARY REPRODUCTION AND NOT AN ORIGINAL?!?!?!>WHERE CAN I BUY 5???Why does even the gun world have shitty remasters? I thought it was just movies and vidya doing superfluous money grabs to nostalgic retards
you can get a better version of the same gun for less than half the cost. everything coming out of beretta factories in the US and Italy (and turkey) is shit now.
>>64497722>Why does even the gun world have shitty remasters?Money, anon. Boomers love nostalgia bait slop and things marketed as collectible or "desirable"
>nostalgic retardsThat's why
>>64497722Take your meds, schizo.
>>64497783This. Their two years as a POG makes them get all warm and fuzzy for the handgun they carried.
>>64497722I feel like GLOCK was the only one to get their remaster right, which I suppose is fitting since they've just been reiterating one thing forever. Of course GLOCK also released the version with the gay watch which was dumb as all hell so it's not like it was perfect.
>>64497784exactly nobody is buying the repro 92sb for the joy of owning or shooting it
>>64497815To be fair it does just say "playing with" which is exactly why I bought an 84BB but I suppose what you're getting at is that people are buying them as investments which is probably a fair assessment.
>>64497808Now they're killing their whole product line to make an ugly ass Hi-Point looking thing so they can keep selling guns in Commiefornia and all the other blue shitholes. Stunning. Brave.
>>64497722It’s a collector’s item.
>>64497868Is anything at all actually confirmed at this point?
>>64497883Like they're going to just come out and admit it. Come on, man...
>>64497891So no. California's BS is probably going to result in some nonsense but real life is bad enough without you making up shit to get mad about.
>>64497831I'm probably wrong but I'm pretty I've already seen people trying to flip them. Also I got rid my 85FS because I can only afford to shoot cheep .380 and we kept getting spritzed in the face with unburnt powder; blowbacks blow.
>>64497970>blowbacks blowYeah I'm with you there. I put about 100 rounds through my 84BB and I think that's all it'll ever see from me since it's shockingly unpleasant to shoot. I know it functions and that's enough.
>>64497722Sig Saar bitches stay losing
>>64497722Its for people that actually give a shit about the gun and brand. Besides they'll only be made in limited quantities so they'll retain their value.You do realize you can't separate the product from the brand?
Look, I get that a lot of people still (2025) see the 92 as iconic. It was a great handgun for its era (and the mega-grift was bolstered by its U.S. mil adoption as M9, but ok sure I get that as well)Get a Px4 though. Get with the times
>>64497722You’re fucking retarded and gay Bitching about Beretta celebrating the 50 year anniversary of the 92 and the 500th documented year of their operational history. Beretta is turning 500 fucking years old and you’re bitching about them releasing a tastefully polished reproduction.I’m probably going to buy one.
>>64498233>mega-grift was bolstered by its U.S. mil adoption as M9It was 100% fine. They at least tested each gun that time around unlike the XM17 MHS trials.
>>64498233>Get a Px4make them in metal kike
>>64497722It could be worse - it's not as vomit-inducing as the CZ 75 anniversary guns
Holy fuck theyre turning 500 next year
>>64498260Not calling into question the nature of adoption or trials (yes the XM17 = atrocity), they were fine; agreed. It passed and did wellWas referring more to 'The Legend'*TM of 'The Legendary M9' post-1985 as the U.S. mil service pistolOverdone. SorryI view it as a combination of the 1985-86-87-88-89 U.S. mil adoption years, and the year 1987 'Lethal Weapon' movie (along with some other 80s-era movies that prominently featured 92FS including Inox/stainless). Pop culture mega-grift and mil service adoption grift, in tandem. during 80s
>>64498266>in metalchecked, Beretta 8000now also sold by Stoeger (using Beretta tooling) as the Cougarthis is the predecessor to Px4 using same action
>>64498273oldest and best gun company on earth, I wish their guns were better but they're good enough.
>>64498276The main issues were because of shit mags and later on people said m9s were pieces of shit because they were using frames that had round counts in the 10,000s. It's probably Beretta's most successful product and it's the oldest gun company in the world. So I have no idea why fags are bitching about the anniversary model.
>>64498301I'm not 'bitching', just pointing out that the 92's "legend" waa-oowww handgun status is overdone.(Yes you are correct that even the M9's service record, for the post-80s desert wars in which it was exclusively and widely deployed, is less than stellar; further illustrating my point)>most successful productPrimarily due to the 1985 U.S. mil procurement in vast numbers. Pistol itself has been superseded by Beretta's own (8000 and) Px4 which is a much better firearm, period.RE: Anniversary that's great and I love my Berettas. Some of the finest guns of all time
>>64498318>Primarily due to the 1985 U.S. mil procurement in vast numbers.US law enforcement too. The Border Patrol adopting the 92 Brigadier was like the largest law enforcement single procurement of a firearm ever, the economy of scale made Brigadiers cheaper than normal 92s for a while from what I read
>>64498337>9296*
>>64497941>making up shitWrong.https://youtu.be/Xh1s6wfHgyk?si=aHWNFiJVp4za_Mxo
>>64498337Good point, had forgotten about that
>>64498318So you say the legend is inflated due to large military purchases while denigrating their reliability due to those same militaries buying the cheapest dogshit magazines they could find.
>>64498318>which is a much better firearmwhy
>>64497868>make an ugly ass Hi-Point looking thing>>64498348>https://youtu.be/Xh1s6wfHgyk?si=aHWNFiJVp4za_Mxo>2 minutes 10 seconds>"they did say that the externals of the pistol are going to remain the sameYeah, making up shit.
>>64498361>denigrating? there were other problems with (pistol itself and) the magazines besides the procured-ones being "cheapos"I just dc about the M9, can't gaf about itThat the U.S. mil / border patrol mass adopted it in the mid-eighties ok fine then. Whatevermeaninless to meMaybe it means more to (You)>inflated due to large military purchasesOther reasons besides solely that were stated and explained in my upthread posts
>>64498446Rotating barrel lock-delay action, for oneMore accurateDesigned from paper (both the all-metal predecessor 8000, and successor Px4) for the .40 Smith & Wesson cartridge
>>64498285What the fuck is this? Did the slide shift in the fixture while it was being machined?
>>64498661It's called the Brigadier. It's a fatter heavier slide.
>>64498484>More accuratesource
>>64497722>worse versionhow?
>>64497722>WORSE VERSIONGod I hate zoomers>everything coming out of beretta factories in Italy is shit nowNope, the retardation is uncoupled from the age in this specimen.
>>64500324>zoomerszoomer here, I love my Beretta 92 to death
What do you wear at the range usually?https://berettagalleryusa.com/collections/men
>>64498693Anyone who's shot both
>>64501381Have you tried any of the m9a1-a4 or just the 92fs?
>>64501528(why would that matter) The Px4 is a more modern and accurate design than the 1950-vintage 92
>>64498484Personally I feel the 92 is more accurate since I can go buy a Bar Sto barrel and match fit it to my frame while little to zero aftermarket PX4 barrels exist. Theoretically the PX4 probably has a more consistent lock up and maybe a mechanical accuracy advantage since the barrel doesn’t move vertically but I wouldn’t necessarily say the PX4 is more accurate. I like my PX4s and carry them while I don’t carry a 92
>>64501551>since I can go buyok keep buyingSorry anon. Px4 is a superior and newer design(also fwiw: I fucking *hate* the Langdon-trigger-Faggots that $#@m the /hg/ handgun threads, and dgaf about Langdon who can go fuck himself)
>>64501597Do you even shoot guns? Are you anti ammo buying?
>>64497722In 20 years you'll want some shitty commemorative gen 3 glock for $5000 and see the light. Will i get one of these, hell no, it hat limited special edition shit because its a get it while you can thing. Im not going to jump through fucking hoops for a gun. Just make a year long run so anyone who wants one can get one not just scalper fags that will end up selling fakes anyway.
>>64497722THIS IS WHY YOU GET YOU A SMITH AND WESSON LIKE I DID ... YOU SHOULDNT WANT THAT EUROCRAP !!! THANK THE LORD I LEFT THE MARINES BEFORE THEY ADOPTED THAT SISSY GUN :laughing:-Richard Johnson USMC 1969-70 Semper Fi!USPIS 1970-2010 God bless our postal inspectors!
>>64501611Fuck (You) #$@mmer Cancer of this board.back to (You)r containment general
>>64498285*Best shotgun company on earthIronic that they started with smoothbores and that's still their specialty, everything else they've made is mediocre as fuck
>>64501627The Model 38 was excellent. I've had the opportunity to shoot one and I agree with the consensus that it's the best SMG of the war, though I have yet to try a Suomi or an Owen so those may win out
>>64501624Seethe
>>64501653(You) /hg/ /arg/ are the Terminal Filth Disease that has *DESTROYED* this forum /k/ Weapons
>>64498475No. Glock has said publicly they are changing the guts so urban youths affected by socioeconomic factors can't install switches. But you're right; I'm "making shit up."
>>64501653
>>64501627You are both retarded and gay.
>>64497796pretty muchthe most grotesque ironic and bizarre RodSerling variant of this, to me, are tards 'nostalgic' for the 1980s
>>64501923
>>64501647I have tried the Suomi, it's pretty badassThe MP40 too but it loses by virtue of having such hard to load mags, at least you can load Suomi mags without a tool
>>64501923>Glock has said publicly they are changing the gutsYeah I know. Everyone knows. You should know that I know because I mentioned "California's BS" yesterday. The bit that I quoted was you making up shit about how they're uglifying the upcoming guns, which is ironically the one thing they've confirmed they aren't changing per your video. Beyond that nobody knows anything so quit being a fag.
>>64498484>It's better because .40 short and homosexual Anon that's why she's a fat bitch and they didn't sell well
>>64501624>>64501667I would argue you're the reason discourse is terrible since you refuse to post guns, post complete nonsense about how the PX4 is so great despite you not posting any proof of owning one and then disparaging the only reason the PX4 has any relevance today. Langdon Tactical.
>>64502771Back to (You)r shillcontainment topic Cancer-plebbitard-FBboomerStop destroying /k/ Weapons with each new spew
>>64502771>Langdon TacticalHandgunning pistolero-ism is far from what the entirety of what firearms, or /k/ Weapons, is aboutIn fact to some riflemen handguns are a fucking Joke.
>>64502799I can’t carry a rifle around all day and unless it’s your patrol rifle, rifles mean fuck all to the day to day use. The obsession with the handgun is a very American thing.
>>64497780>TFW no "GF"...
>>64500324assraped beretta bitch. assraped by turk parts no less
I already have the better beretta.
>>64497722hideous
>>64502967no turk parts in any of my berettas
>>64502973>frame safety Yikes!
This thread is still going?
>>64505255why should it end
>>64501627>ShotgunsBrutally mogged by mossberg>PistolsBrutally mogged by Glock, S&W, Walther>RiflesMogged by literally everyone
