>shoot micro autoloader, can barely get a grip and its tough to be accurate even at close ranges>shoot a snub revolver, basically the same size, can shoot it accurately and can get a full grip on itHow is this possible? The grips are basically the same length, the revolver ones are even thinner yet i can get a nice solid grip on them while the autoloader is a pain to try to get both hands on
>>64506325>micro autoloaderSuch as?>snub revolver, basically the same sizeSnubs are on the larger size of the micro 9 class, let alone true micros like pocket .380s. With a J frame you get a whole extra inch of real estate for your palm on the backstrap vs with a micro 9 for example. Pic related.
I think the revolver is moving less in your hand
>>64506325Depends on the weight, steel frame snubs are comfy with 38 wadcutters but the same ammo in an airweight fucking sucksPost guns btw
>>64506641>>64506531>lc9s>lcp(original series)>gx4>shield plusVs>model 360>model 60>lcr .38
>>645067339mm has more recoil than 38 special
>>64506822How about .357 fagnum, which ive shot out of the model 60 and the 360. Lower tier shit just blazer brass 158 grain jhps but still, in the 60 it was very managable of course in the scandium 360 it sucked donkey balls tho
>>64506325A little secret anon, a well loaded colt 1851 in 36 is more accurate at 50 yards than a glock 17 in 9mm, we've devolved. They both make the same size hole.
>>64506822I doubt that since autoloaders have the ability to spread out the recoil impulse through the entire cycling time.
