Will AI ever be able to make guns look right?
Perhaps not.But it will be able tofuck yamudda.
>>64576340Yeah
>>64576331AI fucks up any sort of technical details because it doesn't understand how things actually work. It's the same with cars, trains, etc. It gets the basic shape right but little details are never correct. It might draw an "engine" but the belt routing won't make sense, hose routing is totally illogical. Sometimes its fuckups actually end up working well in the end...
>>64576364fuck yamudda
LMAO never tried this OP.>Please generate a lifelike image of an anti-armor rocket launcher with a helical drum magazine of rockets. Weapon should be resting on an opened foam case and there should be a military patch near it with an badger on it.
>>64576331I can't wait for the AI industry to implode. AI combined with the third world having access to the internet has been disastrous for global communications>>64576403Looks like a chinese knockoff of a TF2 weapon
>>64576379yeah i think to the people on this board ai generated gun pics will never look convincing but to someone who doesn't know anything about guns maybe it's better
>>64576403rip ya a new one
>>64576403A bit better on this but I would have to coach it further for it to actually make sense. Still I can see the usefulness in some sort of initial prototyping as an artist I guess.
>>64576434Icons for any sort of game or program will never have to be made by a human again but anything elaborate where functions of items must make sense requires at least some doctoring.
>>64576331no. any progress will be muted by censorship and banned.
>>64576331AI can only copy information that it has encountered, it can't understand context in any meaningful way. It's why AI is so unreliable and often wrong.
>>64576522That's a gross simplification. Retards like you sit on the opposite end of the spectrum as those pretending LLM's are going to bring AGI. It's not copying info, it's evaluating all trained data (most of the internet right now) and seeing what the most common output is. If it sees a jap girl squatting over a shitter it'll guess that she's about to star in a new /gif/ scat webm. This can be helpful but ultimately it lacks agency and motivation to build and improve iteratively upon itself.
>>64576531>it's evaluating all trained data (most of the internet right now) and seeing what the most common output is.That's called "copying". It's just a plagiarism machine.
>>64576538a plagiarism with a puritan karen on the otherside making sure you don't have TOO much fun.
>>64576331AI programmers are leftists.The concept of firearms are at it's core ideologically, philosophically, politically & physically opposite to leftists.
>>64576379>>64576403This is why I fucking hate AI "art" so much, especially the porn. People think uncanny valley faces/smooth skin are bad? How about when you're right about to cum and the chick has two assholes, a double clit, or an anus too close to her tail? It fucking pisses me off so much. I wish AI shit was just banned from every porn website. It's nightmarefuel
>>64576331We had all better fucking hope not.A.I. if it continues as this means the end of objective truth. What is stopping someone from making A.I. that can construct video of you committing a crime, and then write it's code in such a way as to fool people and A.I. into believing the video is not in fact a product of A.I.
>>64576403>Pepperbox in 30mm short.FUND IT
