[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How did the Germans and really general armies in WW2 repair battle damage? Was it possible without replacing the entire plate? Or were patches a temp job until a heavier field repair could be done?
>>
Pretty sure you just lay down weld until its full and then paint over it
>>
File: t.jpg (57 KB, 600x473)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
I've heard that they scraped off the splintered bullet holes, stuffed them, and patched them up. However, since they couldn't be heat-treated, they probably never regained full defensive power.
This may be one of the reasons why replaceable mantlets and sloped armor that deflected shells and didn't get pierced were preferred.
>>
Shells don't hit twice the same spot.
>>
>>64576588
Exactly, why even bother to fix it?
>>
>>64576523
You could do a real ad hoc heat treat in the field with what could be expected at a forward repair depot if you knew that alloy's proper coloration.
>>
>>64576644
a lot of the time they just didnt, which is why tanks in musuems are still covered in divots and impact craters
if they werent damaged enough to impact their performance, they would just go into battle and pray that a shell didnt hit the same spot twice, and that was usually a gamble that payed off

for shells that did penetrate, but didnt damage or kill anyone inside, then they would just stuff the hole and weld it shut as mentioned here
>>64576523
>>64576502
obviously, not as good as a proper weld job, but still better than having a hole in the tank

>Or were patches a temp job until a heavier field repair could be done?
this was the ideal, tanks couldnt be maintained at the front indefinitely, and they would eventually have to be rotated out
then Lt Col Abrams went through 5 different tanks in europe, when one tank got damaged enough to need a repair, he would send it back and get a fresh one while the damaged one was fixed

that being said, there is nothing more permanent than a temporary solution
as mentioned above, a lot of the tanks were just forced to keep going without major overhauls, resulting in them collecting a lot of battle damage until the war ended
no point in repairing them after the war, they were obsolete and due to be replaced anyways, so they were sent as-is to the musuems
>>
>>64576465
>>64576523
Imagine being inside when that strikes.
>>
File: 29AB11AD1944.jpg (63 KB, 800x501)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
Is this Zimmerit coating-like pattern a patch designed to prevent peeling, or is it just a trace of careful welding?
>>
>>64576688
It's a paste designed to prevent magnetic mine attachment, and was almost completely unnecessary.
The cross hatch pattern was to save weight, you only need peaks instead of a uniform surface to disrupt magnetic attraction.
>>
>>64576709
Fugg, I'm dumb.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.