[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Post the armor, discuss the armor, touch the armor, wear thr armor, hug the armor, make love to the armor

Resources:
https://myarmoury.com/home.php

Common questions:
>Isnt that shit too heavy/cumbersome to be practical
No, its a little heavy and very loud, but properly made armor is more flexible than the human body, but you can do a full range of gymnastics in them with a bit of training
>Arent they easily defeated by longbows/crossbows/muskets
Generally no, armor is fairly effective at stopping shots but lucky shots can get through weaker parts, and the rise of plate armor very closely coincided with the developement of firearms all the way up into the 17th century, until the mass production of muskets
>I could easily just defeat someone in armor with a war hammer or mace
Also not the most effective choice, armor is very good at distributing blows across a large area or causing them to glance away
Theres a video somewhere of an idiot in full gothic kit getting slammed across the head with something blunt so hard he falls to the ground, and then getting right back up saying that it only winded him for a moment, despite the clear dent on the helmet, wish I could find it
The most reliable bet at defeating someone in armor is a well placed dagger, or of course a 9mm
>>
>>
>>
File: FB_IMG_1787256376320.jpg (456 KB, 1080x1171)
456 KB JPG
>>
File: she_her.jpg (142 KB, 736x1095)
142 KB JPG
>>
File: king of cuh.png (255 KB, 807x1010)
255 KB PNG
This is the legacy of all that history.
>>
File: 1782595437044338.jpg (28 KB, 500x605)
28 KB JPG
>>65473244
same vibe
>>
>>65473294
I want their tactical buckler so fucking bad. Talhoffer would be proud.
>>
>>65473627
uh just buy it? It's $195.
>>
>>65473244
>Can you see
Sometimes, depends on the helmet, not always important. I don't need to see all of your body to know what you're doing.
>Does armor make you slow
No, you can run a few miles in it if you're fit
>Breathing
Primary issue is good plate comes in at the waist in a manner similar to a corset. I can breathe, but I can't take a full, deep breath. The closest equivalent for someone without armor is the breathing technique needed in a PC and gas mask.

>Disadvantages
You can't hear a fucking thing if you're in a full harness and helm.

Or rather, you CAN, but not if you're moving quickly. If you're standing around, you probably won't hear someone quietly walking around. If you do, you can't really tell where a sound is coming from unless you look around and face the noise.
>>
>>65474169
>good plate comes in at the waist in a manner similar to a corset.
Lose weight or lose the buhurt Michelin man padding
t. Whiteharness wearerer

Your breastplate should end above your natural waist and nothing should be impacting your diaphragm or chest to manually arrest breathing. The big breathing thing is that CO2 builds up in a visored helmet like wearing a training mask, so mouth breathing and deep breathing will fuck you; controlled breaths and experience feeling oxygen starved comes with time in harness when you're conscious of it. Even trading your eyes and teeth by wearing a wolfrib bad breath control will gas you like in any combat sport.
>>
>>65474546
No padding and not fat, but I'm wearing a corrazina made of five distinct pieces, so it's adjustable and mine comes in very tight at the waist. I could wear it looser, but I hate the fit when I do.

Helmets don't bother me much, I do distance runs in my klapp.
>>
>>65475203
>5 piece corazina
i assume this is the one you're talking about, which actually isnt a historical shape, it was a victorian reconstruction from parts they had laying around and they needed some kind of chest armor for a complete kit
and to be honest i dont know if there ever was such thing as a "corrazine", as far as i can tell i've only ever seen brigandines with smaller plates or covered cuirasses (cloth riveted or tightly covering over a cuirass which gets confused a lot for brigandines)
>>
File: oh-you-2135436703.jpg (10 KB, 300x245)
10 KB JPG
>>65474169
>good plate
>>65475203
>I'm wearing a corrazina
>>
>>65475546
>and to be honest i dont know if there ever was such thing as a "corrazine", as far as i can tell i've only ever seen brigandines with smaller plates or covered cuirasses (cloth riveted or tightly covering over a cuirass which gets confused a lot for brigandines)
Coat-of-Plates, you mean? There seems to be a through line between coat of plates and italian styles of covered armour, so it's not completely odd to imagine that some of them had been constructed with structural rather than decorative coverings.
>>
>>65475568
coats of plates arent really the same, and I get the strong feeling that they kind of dissappeared in the late 14th century when solid breastplates became a thing, and sometime later eventually brigandines came around
I'm not well read on the topic though I'm primarily going off what I've seen in manuscripts and the fact I've never really heard much legitimate talk about corazinas
also arent corazinas supposed to be italian anyways?
>>
>>65475546
Nah, one of these. No weird Victorian fauld.
>>65475550
Pls no bully
My legs are good I promise
>>
>>65475778
i see yea, those ones that svan makes are still not the best shaped
dont get me wrong though i think they're cool and I've thought a lot about getting one myself, but remember that its buhurt armor, not a close fitting reproduction
>>
>>65475825
Yeah, I bought it because I'm poor and it packs well.
>>
>>65475662
Nah, they aren't the same, but there seems to have been a fairly linear progression from coat-of-plates to Churburg type harnesses.

If you can even call it that. Any smith who can raise a helmet bowl and make a CoP would find a Churburg breastplate well within their capabilities.
>>
>>65475203
Sounds like it doesn't fit. A pair of plates style brig doesn't need to be strapped that tight and shouldn't be constricting anything. The waist is in the wrong place at the least.
>>
>>65476790
It's just personal preference - I LIKE tight fitting kit. I could choose to wear it looser easily enough. I don't find the breathing restriction matters, as it's just causing me the breathe the same way I would anyway when fighting or running. In exchange the weight of it is all on my hips, to the point where it'll stay up and in place even with both shoulder straps unfastened.
>>
slightly related subject, i think people too often get the idea of what the earliedt guns looked like
you always just see a crude looking barrel on an unfinished block of wood when someone reproduces them, but with how expensive they were I seriously doubt even the really primitive ones wouldnt have atleast some kind of nice finish or paint on them, or as far as like brass or evony/ivory inlaying on the nicer examples
>>
File: 1757340807156675.jpg (168 KB, 640x955)
168 KB JPG
>>65473294
>>
>>65478174
Thanks, I hate it
>>
>>65475546
This with a hauberk or voiders/sleeves/vambraces, clamshells, and a good helmet would be ideal. I'm a huge fan of brigs
>>
>>65477936
Lots of original military matchlocks exist, albeit mostly 17th century ones
They were undecorated and spartan as fuck
Only fancy rich pipo guns got inlays and shit, why waste the effort on a utilitarian tool
>>
>>65478636
That's not a brig - it's a breastplate, split in half, abd the riveted to a racing garment to give it structure. Similar, but not the same- I here something similar, and my crmuriass, ignoring the faulds (the ones in that pic are made up shit) is 7 pieces total.
>>
File: images (2) (27).jpg (37 KB, 399x501)
37 KB JPG
>>65478679
shit in the 17th century was mass produced though, the 15th century was a wildly different time
that would be like saying the british army during the revolution wouldve had to have looked like they were in poverty and wore varying shades of gray and brown because confederates a hundred years later were so broke that they looked like that
do these look like rough hewn slabs of wood to you?
>>
>>65477936
I don't hold to your thesis because medieval firearm repros are expensive a shit bespoke items. You see s therifleshoppe wheellock gunsmithed together and your reaction isn't "wow this AA walnut sure is brown, how boring"
Landsnecht guys don't slouch either when they're the guy with the thousands of bucks invested in medieval rifles like that one.

Even handgonnes have a lot of work into them. No one is halfassing black powder firearms.
>>
>>65478823
The picture says brigandine
>>
elves
>>
File: famas.jpg (139 KB, 1155x1155)
139 KB JPG
>>65480187
Don't put all too much faith in file names.
>>
>>65480187
And it's not. You can actually SEE that's it not just from the rivets.
>>
>>65481931
>spandex undergarment
FUCK
>chainmail leotard
JUST KILL ME NOW
>maximilian fluted plate with gold inlay
*dies*
>>



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.