Has anyone written anything of note that legitimizes the mass murder of innocent human beings.Of course, no one is really "innocent" (see John 8:1-11, but you can also look outside) and therefore not really deserving of the protection of the state, but I mean it in the conventional (i.e. meaningless) sense.
>>24932006Concept Of The Political
>>24932006No, it's all Godless, incoherent arbitration.
>>24932006lowkey the Bhagavad Gita
>>24932006Benardete. Not so explicitly, but it's the obvious undertone of his axiology.
my diary, desu
>>24932006Yeah, there are few books dedicated to justifying America’s use of atomic weapons on Japan. “Downfall” by Richard B. Frank is one of them.
>>24932451Whomstve
>>24932471He said human beings, not the Japanese.
>>24932006It doesn't justify but offers how this comes to be but check out Homo Sacer by Giorgio Agamben
>>24932006
deathspell omega lyrics
>>24932006all political writing is just that
>>24932006The book of Esther
>>24932485Don't forget Darwin
>>24932006No but I have an idea for a script that touches on this concept. Ill write it someday for you anon.
>>24932006>has anyone written any fanfiction about my brain worms?yeah there are plenty of scifi and high fantasy novels that deal with that exact concept op!
>>24932478Seth Bernardete, his argument is basically the same as Thrasymachus in Republic, but writ large to include physics, and basically all sets, subsets and supersets of reality.
