[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/mu/ - Music



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



Is this 10/10?
>>
>>81436607
6/10
>>
>>81436607
As good as Kid A imo
>>
>>81436607
11/10
excellent album, true love waits is beautiful
>>
>>81436607
yep
10/10
>>
i've only listened to it once, it was ok

worth it for true love waits
>>
>>81436607
It's unironically their best
>>
>>81436639
the AMSP version of that song kind of blows
>>
>>81436998
Wrong
>>
>>81436998
no
>>
>>81436607
It is one of their best.
>>
>>81436998
Your musical intelligence blows
>>
>>81436998
How can someone be so wrong?
>>
by radiohead standards yes
>>
>>81436607
It’s a 8, just under whatever you call the holy trinity of Radiohead albums that people circlejerk too. I think thr AMSP version of True Love Waits works just as well if not better than the original acoustic one, especially if you considering Thom’s personal life.
>>
>>81436607
honestly the album i was hoping they'd make. way better than the supposedly more "innovative" turn of the millennium stuff like kid a, which just sounds like pastiches of other more experimental acts
>>
Their worst since Pablo




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.