Starting in 2027, if someone 16 and under doesn't meet the following requirements, they must ride in a booster seat:>Sit with their back flat against the seat.>Bend their knees naturally at the seat’s edge.>Have the lap belt rest low across their hips, not the stomach.>Have the shoulder belt lie across the chest and shoulder, not the neck or face.>Be able to stay seated properly for the entire ride without slouching or moving out of position.Holy shit imagine how embarrassing this shit must be if you are 16 and still riding in a booster.
The bigger issue I see is that this law is clearly designed to move children's bodies up the back seat, so to speak. But when they turn 16, smaller kids don't suddenly grow up 4 inches. So if the law is about safety, what about grown ass women that don't meet these requirements?
>>28736089>imagine how embarrassing this shit must be if you are 16 and still riding in a booster.Not as embarrassing as being a future manlet
>>28736089my ex gf was 5'0 and needed a booster seat to drive.
>>28736089california speedrunning strayan/bong levels of nannyism
Seems like a backhanded way to make a next generation of people not like the thought of owning a car.
>>28736118Imagine dating Biological women under 6ft tall.What are you even doing?
children don't need special seats past 5.
This has to be AI slop from facebook designed to get retarded boomers riled up. I was 6'2 by like 14.
Momma said they was my magic shoes
>>28736199>californiait's because mexicans are so short>>28736118grim. my gf is 6' :)
>>28736089The only reason they put the number 16 in the definition of this law is because that's the minimum age you need to be to drive a car. In all practicality, no one will ever be cucked by the state into riding in a booster seat beyond the age of 3.
>>28736199>I was 6'2 by like 14.Same. I wish I would have stayed that height (or 6'3") forever. Fuck trying to find clothes at 6'6". FUCK.
>>28736089This law is ultimately meant for spics, nigs, and jeets
>>28736327>meant for spics, nigsThey're all slouching while driving anyway.
>>28736327>laws being enforced against nonwhitesLmao you wish
>>28736277i agree. i topped at 6'5 and not only did this eliminate any fucking chance whatsoever at racing, it also eliminated my ability to find a single piece of clothing that fit me. forever.i wonder if shopping in the netherlands is better.
>>28736262>the negative implications of this law will never happen, goyWe all saw what happened to “terrorism” laws like the so-called Patriot Act after 9/11:>drone assassinations of U.S. citizens whose only crime was preaching their religion, or being related to a preacher>secret prisons in Chicago, Guantanamo bay, etc where citizens were held without trial>Total information awareness mass surveillance>Used to censor & silence critics of the government>Used to de-bank, restrict travel, and communications of dissidentsetc etc
>>28736223she was fun to toss around in bed tho.>tfw 5'11" manlet.
>>28736193I'm fucking convinced that woman over 5'5 don't even exist, I'm 6 foot and they're all tiny.WHERE IS MY LADY DIMITRESCU
>>28736277>>28736358Kill yourself then.
>>28736555They do and are far more common here. I would love to have a shortstack to imagine around the house.
until they turn 16 they have to sit in the booster seat. after they turn 16 they have to sit on my face.
>>28736089I can see what they are trying to do here, however it should be based on weight and height, not age. Some kids don't grow much and others have a beard by 16.
>>28736350No see, it's written due to the behaviors of nonwhites, and expected to be enforced against the whitess
>>28736102Because under the age of 16 the child is not able to reasonably assess the risks of not using a booster if they don't meet the size requirements. Over the age of 16 you should make the choice to use it or not. It's like motorcycle gear being optional
>>28736555Go to Sweden.
>>28736582This dumbass clearly didn't read the post even as it is clearly based on height up to the age of 16
>>28736089The demographic shifts indicate that they're so short that they may need the booster seat well into adulthood as well.
>>28736089What about manlets? Asking for a friend.
>>28736277>Fuck trying to find clothes at 6'6". FUCK.Buy oversized, get it tailored. That's how I've seen tall folk cope on a budget.
>>28736089PFHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>28736580I am the booster seat
>>28736089All the police here are Mexican now and don't give a shit about the laws the Jewish/lillywhite legislature pass. They don't even enforce laws against violence or read up on new gay laws like this.
>>28736089americucks lmao
>>28736089Yeah show me the fucking car seats that fit a teenager. They don't exist.
>>28736089>Have the lap belt rest low across their hips, not the stomach.?Are Americans actually so fat that their lap belt goes across their stomach instead of along their hips and waist?
>>28736940Talking down to the world on how free they are from their government mandated fisher price drivey time safety seat
>>28737019The cuck safety seat
>>28736089while its still fine to ride motorcycle on the freewayno seatbelt no nothingthey cant see the hypocrisy
>>28736089meh, its ok. she can just sit on my lap for this ride. i'll hold her tightly
Short niggas btfo
>>28736089i grew in the the 70s, nobody ever used seat belts. there was no such thing as a child safety seat there were baby seats for infants that had a bar to keep them from falling out (no straps). you could fit six kids in a station wagon, just have them all jump in the back.now it takes 10 minutes to load up your kids in the car with all the stupid belts and you need a fucking escalade if you want more than 3 kidsthis is all part of the anti-natalist plot to make it increasingly difficult to have children.for every 1 child "saved" by car seats in an accident, like 100 children are never born because it's too much of a pain in the ass.i hate kikes and hysterical women voters so fucking much.
>>28737111
>>28737114imagine the smell
You dumb niggers will believe anything anyone says about California. (KGTV) — A meme going around claims a new California law will require kids 8-16 to sit in a booster seat in cars.That's very misleading.Under current state law, children must use booster seats until they turn eight or reach a height of 4’ 9”.In October, Governor Newsom signed a law modifying that to make sure smaller children stay safe.Starting in 2027, kids 8-16 must be able to answer yes to these five questions to legally wear a seat belt.Does the child sit all the way back against the seat?Do the child’s knees bend comfortably at the edge of the seat?Does the belt cross the shoulder between the neck and arm, resting on the collarbone?Is the lap belt as low as possible, touching the thighs?Can the child stay seated like this for the whole trip?If the child fails even one of these criteria, the driver could get a ticket and fines up to $490.But there will not be a blanket booster seat requirement for kids up to 16 years old.
>>28737144That isn't any better lmao what the fuck
>>28737144>this meme isn't true>but it's actually truefascinating
>>28736089It would be more embarrassing to not meet those requirements at 16.This is basically saying if you're an underdeveloped disabled midget you need a car seat
>>28737144You just reiterated exactly what the thread said about the law... No one thinks a 6' 14yo is going to be on a booster seat.My best friend 4' 8" till 14 1/2 when he finally shot up to his current 5' 6" over the course of highschool. Do you know how embarrassing it would've been for him to have to be dropped off to his first months of Highschool in a booster seat? You should be able to make the decision to not use one at least at 13. And my friend was a dude. There were girls in my school who were below 4' 9" well past that. Even though girls reach their terminal height quicker than boys, I know 5'-5' 2" women who were below 4' 9" into their junior year of high school when they got their final couple of inches. That would mean there will be teenage girls who have to wear them till 17. That's absurd.
>>28737186>>28737200You basically don't need a booster unless you're a <16 year old midget, I'm not seeing the problem here.
>>28736193>>28736223>>28736555What is this faggot psyop? Women should be petite and small, men should be tall and strong. Fuck off with your tranny shit.
>>28737205the problem is the government can go fuck itself. parents should be deciding what's best for their children, not a bunch of kikes and bureaucrats
>>28737205>I'm not seeing the problem here.Of course you're not, you're a brainwashed Californian that will do whatever daddy Newsom tells you
>>28736089"New California-"Stopped reading, kys Fagifornian
>>28737208>i want my son to be 5'worse fate than a happa son
>>28737299>comes into a California thread and posts about CaliforniaJealous behavior lmao.
>>28736199it is
>>28737208You sound like a woman. I'm 6'6 and women who are like 4'10 love me for some reason.
>>28736118>women will refuse to date short men because "I don't want my kids to be short">meanwhile she herself is 4'10
>>28736089>esl makes a post with no link
>>28736089Anyone short has to be in a car seat until they stop being short. (under 135cm 53" or under 12yo)UK anon here.
>>28737508>men (me) will refuse to date short women because I don't want my kids to be short>meanwhile I myself am 5'6"I still have a 6ft tall gf anyway and also a RWD V8 in the garage
>>28736166They got a lot of dangerous illegal alien drivers with no insurance out there though
>>28737334Sorry you have such pathetic genes that that would even be a possibility.
>>28736089Only white people would ever follow this.
>>28736089>>28736118>>28736193>>28736580>>28737098God I need a short GF so bad I'm going to post about it in every single thread that even remotely reminds me
>>28739224GodDAMN is that May Marmalade on my/o/???
>>28736089She needs a more supportive bra as well. California should pass a law for that too.
>>28736089Is this girl supposed to be under 16?? What the fuck are they putting in the water? She looks at least 19 to me Officer.
>>28739224What a desperate whore. Put your clothes on you desperate whore. Have some dignity.
>>28736089They should enforce a height limit, not an age limit.
>>28738144type of father who tells his 5'4 son to "just love yourself" after deriding manlets as subhumans who need to be cleansed on the internet for years
>>28739822nah he is fly over where his son is 3/4 his dna. that way he may overwrite the midget wifes genes
>>28736223>it's because mexicans Mexicans throw their extended family in the bed of a pickup truck. So, no.
>>28737144>kids 8-16 must be able to answer yes to these five questions to legally wear a seat belt.Short kids exempt from seat belt laws? Based California.
>>28739822I don't have genes capable of producing a 5'4 male offspring. Every man in my lineage was over 6 feet tall.
>>28739544Nigga das AI
>>28739224Yeah she's hot but why is she dancing in an empty closet
>>28736089what's wrong with this? booster seat applicability is based on body size, not age. there are some tiny 16-year-olds.having the law based on age was always stupid as there's a ton of variability in development.
By 2050, kids will be considered babies until they're 10 years old, and potty training by 13 will be the common goal for parents.
baby seat when i was too old saved me from possible harm once. we hit black ice and rolled the car on muh way to speech therapy. they had kept the baby seat in the car and my big dumb ass in it just because "too lazy to remove it" and no one ended up harmed. but since i was on my way to speech therapy because i was mute, the ambulance and triage went "HES HIGH RISK" and tied me to a stretcher with towels and whisked me away while everyone else was like "hes fine holy shit".anyways later it turned out i wasnt mute, i just didnt understand you need to "breathe out" to make noise, i was just making the lip movements and not exhaling. i had gotten so far being that dumb they had started teaching me sign language lmao
The democrats "We really care about people's lives!"
>>28740713She obviously can't afford clothes
>>28736572>t. manlet
>>28740876Nigga you dumbLike dumb dumb
>>28736089This isn’t true, first of all. Second of all, should companies be allowed to sell products that are inherently unsafe for children to ride in? And how unsafe should they be allowed to be? And who should make this decision? Your answer will be scrutinized by everyone reading it.
