[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0150.png (68 KB, 700x370)
68 KB
68 KB PNG
2025 is the ugliest year on record for automotive esthetics.
>>
>>28739329
everything looks the same
utter slop
>>
>>28739329
>2025
isn't picrel a 2019 rav4?
>>
>>28739376
you can't even tell unless you see them up close they are like purposely trying to make the new one look like the old one, same with 4runner
>>
File: citroen-basalt.jpg (218 KB, 1280x720)
218 KB
218 KB JPG
It only gets worse
>>
File: bmw.jpg (869 KB, 2413x2415)
869 KB
869 KB JPG
>>
>>28739379
It comes and goes. The late 50s was one such era of some damn ugly and ridiculous-looking cars.
>>
>>28739329
cars from ~2015 to 2025 all look the same to me, but I've noticed the newest cars are mostly noticeably uglier.
>>
>>28739394
Yeah i agree American cars of that era were often "overdesigned" but still better than new garbage besides back then the designs were different and unique you could clearly tell the difference between Italian,german,french or american cars and such
>>
File: Nu-sclass.jpg (265 KB, 1600x1066)
265 KB
265 KB JPG
>>28739329

$150k car btw
>>
arr rook same
>>
most 100k+ non sport cars look kinda stupid to me but it's still a big "fuck you i got money lol" flex
>>
File: file.png (1.67 MB, 1051x1050)
1.67 MB
1.67 MB PNG
>>28739387
>>
>>28739401
I mean its bad but its less bad than the GLS
>>
>>28739387
why do the chinese think this looks good?
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (180 KB, 1280x720)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
>>28739397
>cars from ~2015 to 2025 all look the same to me
not all
>>
File: file.jpg (111 KB, 1436x806)
111 KB
111 KB JPG
nu supra looks fine i guess but its a bmw underneithghlelelrlerlerl
>>
>>28739329
>>
>>28739329
And I'm here to reveal that it's all OP's fault.
>>
>>28739329
Toyota jjst doesn't have a clue what looks good. They try to blend basic looks with over the top ridiculous Transformer looks. Ends up looking like a trannymobile. Everything would look better if it were just basic and utilitarian, that's why trucks sell so well among men. Car companies are in a race to outdo themselves in ridiculous designs it seems, someone is getting paid just to make things look different just so they can say they're new. It's the same slop but just looks gayer and gayer every 5 years.
>>
>>28740534
Always did that. The late 50s was another atrocious period when designers got carried away and spawned a major backlash so that 60s cars generally looked far more minimalist. Trucks however weren't a viable alternative yet, they were still crude bare bones work vehicles.
>>
>>28739329

I don't mind it so much desu, everyone else's electric NPCmobiles make my S197 Mustang really stand out.
>>
>>28740534
Trucks have extremely loud and obnoxious designs though
>>
>>28739602
looks like every other suv but with chinky plastic bling



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.