[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pic 1.jpg (1.49 MB, 1920x1440)
1.49 MB
1.49 MB JPG
Here are some photos I took today. Started
photographing "properly" yesterday, so I'm open
to criticism.
>>
File: pic 2.jpg (2.05 MB, 1920x1440)
2.05 MB
2.05 MB JPG
>>4316216
2
>>
File: DSCN3074.jpg (1.62 MB, 3734x4824)
1.62 MB
1.62 MB JPG
>>4316217
3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON
Camera ModelCOOLPIX L340
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)447 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
White BalanceManual
>>
>>4316216
banger

>>4316217
a tad underexposed

>>4316218
feels claustrophobic due to the antenna of the tower being right up against the edge of the frame

Overall pretty good, the date watermark is weird, but I guess if you want it there, it's fine. You don't really have any issues, just keep developing your eye for compositions.
>>
>>4316220
Thank you, man. Appreciated!
>>
they look pretty good to my untrained eye, anon. What camera are you using? I'm looking to get into it too
>>
>>4316256
The third pic's exif data says it's a Coolpix L340
>>
trash. please stop.
>>
>>4316216
stop putting the date in the corner. That would help
>>
>>4316351
sure
>>
File: DSCN3103.jpg (1.4 MB, 3602x4822)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON
Camera ModelCOOLPIX L340
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)630 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
White BalanceAuto
>>
File: 421.jpg (4.83 MB, 5152x3864)
4.83 MB
4.83 MB JPG
>>4316366
5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: Cell Tower.jpg (2.9 MB, 5504x8256)
2.9 MB
2.9 MB JPG
>>4316366
>>4316218
Based cell tower photographer. This is my niche.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z 7_2
Camera SoftwareVer.01.61
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern34016
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5504
Image Height8256
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2024:04:16 16:17:20
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating64
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length120.00 mm
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4316280
>>
>dates in the photo
You're a woman aren't you?
>>
>>4317859
>>4316280
Please help me notice what's wrong instead of just saying "stop"
>>
>>4318393
No one is an authority on photography, it's entirely subjective meaning you don't need other people to tell you what's good/bad. Just look at your own stuff and notice parts of the photo you like and the parts that you don't like. Try to reproduce the stuff that works and avoid the stuff you didn't. I've never shown my photos or asked for advice, yet there is still a clear progression and improvement as far as I'm concerned, which is all that really matters
>>
>>4318397
thanks, man.
>>
>>4317785
that's great!
>>
>>4316218
would make for a good Japanese city funk vinyl cover famalam
>>
>>4316216
>>4316217
>>4316218
>>4316366
>>4316368
>dipshit with a camera start snapshitting random stuff
>cannot even tell us what he sees in the photos he supposedly "properly" took and why he shot them
Why is it always like this? Are you all mindless NPCs?
>>
>>4318778
what?
>>
>>4318797
>why did you take that photo
>duuuuhhhh.... I dunno man....
>what do you see in the photo that you took?
>duuuuhhhh...... I dunno man.......
>>
>>4318998
What do I have to explain about the photos to you?
>>
>>4319200
How can anyone critique anything without knowigmng what was your idea behind tbe photo?
>>
>>4318998
You can't recognize a duck??
>>
>>4318778
here's the (you), retard
>>
>>4319204
Why would the idea matter? Critique what you see, this isn’t Reddit pics where you need a life story with every photo to get your updoots.
>>
>>4320119
nta but as i understand it, judging intent against result is the basis of critique, generally
>>4316216
decent frames OP. i kind of like the datestamps
>>
>>4320121
For fine art paintings, maybe. These are snapshits. The story will hardly improve anything
>>
>>4320127
i disagree, and i'm not even going so far as 'story'.
i want to hear what OP aims to show or express with each photo
>>
>>4320127
>These are snapshits.
This is the point. Snapshits have nothing to critique



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.