71% of girls got this correct compared to only 39% of boys. 82% of black students actually got this correct./pol sexist racists btfo'd yet again.
>>535582212Nobody cares about your false dichotomy, stop wasting time you parasite.
All of them?
>>535582354yup
>>535582212Nice source and research kiddo.
>>535582212>"hurr look at these stats I just made up">6 millionth faggot bait threadDo we even have mods anymore?
>>535582212This kind of material written by DEI hires is why i homeschool my kids.
>>535582427>Do we even have mods anymore?Sure we doThey're the ones posting these threads
>>535582212So the question is intentionally misleading because the first left 2 are smaller than the right 2. They all demonstrate the correct fractions.
>>535582212Bad question but C is implied
>>535582212both A and B look correct?
>>535582212Wtf is that kind of handwriting, zoomers need to be cleansed off the face of the planet.
>>535582354>>535582397C is the only one with the same areas. even tho the others depict a similar condition it is not exactly technically ackshually
>>535582212>71% of girlsThe joke here is that women pays attention to size
This question is a test for reading subtext, not mathematics
>>535582538The fractions remain the same. That's an invalid reason. The answer is A because the shaded positions are the same, best showing the concept requested for illustration.
>>535582427The sign is a subtle joke.
>>535582212>random stats you made up to bait /pol/>it actually works and no one sages yousad state of this shithole
>>535582612Technically C shows 1/6 and 1/3
>>535582966>1/6explain
>>535582212>C shows cubes
>>535583090It’s a cube. A cube has 6 sides.
>>535583090Cube
>>535583223the other one is also a cube, just not transparent
>>535583223>>535583225theyre both cubes though?one is just split into 2 trianglesim quite confused, the shaded areas look equal to me
>>535582880I was over at my dads house today helping with some household chores. He lives in a very rural area of a very red state. At the end of the work we went to one of the nearby country bars. It’s the kind of place that farmers, truckers, legit cowboy boot wearers and the working class go to unwind with a cold one.Vice President Harris was on the TV and the local gun store owner said to his auto mechanic (friends since high school),“You know what? She ain’t so bad. The economy is recovering, nobody’s rioting, and we’re standing up on the world stage again. Can’t believe I’m saying this but Ol’ Oakland Kam’s got my vote this year.”I looked around and all I saw were heads nodding in agreement. I heard a few calls of “Yes sir” and “Damn Straight” from the men around me. Even saw the lonely ball cap wearing farmer in the corner raise his drink with a nod.
>>535582354C is misleading since the second shape looks like a cube, which would imply 6 sides or 1/6 in the test framework.
>>535582354nah here two things are only equal if they have the same areaTo allow scaling would be presupposing the thing you are trying to 'prove'.It's lazily worded and in general i dislike testing the intermediate thought process, since it just confuses people.Instead they should have kids optionally annotate shapes to demonstrate ratio equivalence or straight up ask which ratios are equal
>>535583225>>535583223nevermind i see it now, i didnt actually interpret as a cube, more as a hexagonregardless even if it is a cube, the shaded portion is the same, right? its just that the cube has more faces of the same size
>>535583327>theyre both cubes though?>one is just split into 2 trianglesThe intuitive reading is never that some lines are meaningless. That's always a stupid assumption.If the C1 shape was a 3D object, it would be 12-sided.
C is probably the best answer. Same area.
>>535583527nah im just retarded i didnt actually see the cube initially, i just saw a hexagon
>>535582212Niggers all have 2000000000000 IQs too hahahaha yeah
>>535583490The answer is A, or arguably all 3 with C being the most ambiguous despite the invalid size argument.
>>535582212c)
>>535583566since those are all two dimensional images seeing a cube is adding something not there
>>535583598No it isnt, the sizes are completely different, and no, its not invalid2/6=1/3 has to be the case for the answer to be correctIf 2/6*(a) =/= 1/3*(b), then they arent equivalentYou're just forcing a silly interpretation for the last one, its a hexagon not a cubeRegardless, the shaded areas are equal
>>535583764The sizes don't matter, the fractions are still represented. You fell for a red herring, and the cube observation is irrelevant.
>>535582212>wrong>doesnt give you the correct answerI used to argue with my teachers over this in class as a kid. This shit irritates me to no end, seeing as every single one can represent 2/6=1/3, but there is a "more correct" answer. Come the fuck on, this is gaslighting bullshit.
>>535583884The fractions need to be equivalent, thats what the equals sign means in the question
>>535583669>all two dimensional images...and pic rel is not animated. Knowing the trick doesn't stop your brain from reading the lines like the common way to draw a cube almost automatically.
>>535583925bruh
>>535583925Abstract thought is a White-exclusive skill. Why even enter these threads?
>>535583344It's true though. I live in the most conservative part of a really red state but I've never seen so many "I regret voting for Trump" signs in lawns. Everywhere I look, not one Trump supporter who doesn't regret it. It's crazy because everybody here voted Trump 3 times in a row, but it's obvious that this time, it was a mistake. We call him "Trump the Mistake" in my house.I was at a bar in town on Saturday night. It's the kind of place where working class guys, truckers, and farmers go to unwind after an honest day's work, a real salt-of-the-Earth type of place. We were watching a local high school football game on the TV and one of the players happened to be named Harris, which prompted people in the bar to start talking about Kamala Harris. My dad (a coal-miner) says "y'know, I've voted red since the Reagan administration but I really should have given her a chance. I'm a fool for being so racist and sexist that I couldn't vote for a Brown woman, she was clearly the best choice." Then the local gun store owner, who is also the head of the local KKK chapter, said “I can’t believe I’m saying this, but we need to impeach Trump and Vance and replace them with Kamala.” I look around and my face is stunned. All of these hardcore Trump supporters are shaking their heads in agreement. I heard a couple “yes, sir” and “damn straight”. Everyone started nodding and agreeing, and we were talking about how she's not a billionaire so she understands the plight of the middle class. We all call her Middle Class Kamala around these parts.She was the best candidate for the job, and the only reason she lost is because we were too racist and sexist to realize it. She was basically President for the last 4 years and our economy was booming. We call her Queen Kamala and praise her Kamalaconomy. Anyways just thought I'd throw in my two cents on the matter.
>>535582212I would like to see the mathematical notation for a or b.
>>535583327If the second image was a cube you'd be incapable of confirming the status of the bottom or two back sides and the equation would be pointless anyways. Of course that's always been the purpose of symbolic math, to play fuck fuck games with ambiguous interpretations to look smart. The fractions already represent 2/6 and 1/3, you don't need to draw one like a shoe so you can just decide who got it right based on making browns feel special.
>>535583925>>5355838841/3 of pizza pie is not equal to 2/6 of a slice of pizza. You stupid fat child
>>535582354yes, but correct answer is probably A, because it's on the same side
>>535582538Also C can be misread as the surface of a cubeSo despite them all being the "correct" answer, it's like they purposely made a troll question
>>535583967I saw the divided hexagon before the cube because that's what is there. making it three dimensional is an additional step.
>>535584083>of a slice of pizzawhere do you get this from?they're same shape, a hexagonone of them is just split into 6 section and the other into 32 of the sixths is equivalent 1 of the thirds
>>535584083>vehemently rejects cube reasoning>employs the same flawed reasoning to image size
>>535582612Fractions are "proportional", which is what I assume the question SHOULD be demonstrating; 2/6 = 1/3 of a pizza == 1/3 of a cake, but they're still 1/3 nonetheless. The question doesn't ask "which has the same (surface) area"
>>535583630I know i shouldnt answer this crap but i m in the mood.
>>535584103Perhaps its indeed a troll question. Dickheaded syllabus and problem creators mad with common core.
All of them are wrong, op is wrong a b and c is wrong, the person who wrong the question is wrong, the person grading it is wrong. The only correct answer is "nigger"
>>535583223It's meant to be a hexagon from context I'd imagine, but it's most readily visually interpreted as a cube
>>535584053>>535583344i love these just fyi i hope they keep getting longer & more elaborate
>>535582212>82% of black students actually got this correct.And yet here we are, smothered with black ingenuity.
>>535582212C shows that 1/6 = 1/6, anyone who picks C or argues that C is correct unironically should be euthanized
>>535582212but they’re all wrong? 2/6 of a small rectangle/circle is not equal to 1/3 or a larger rectangle/circle. And #3 isn’t a hexagon, it’s a cube showing 1/6 = 1/6 (maybe, can’t be sure due to the second illustration not showing all the info).
>>535584275>The question doesn't ask "which has the same (surface) area"it actually does, the fractions need to be equivalent for 2/6=1/3 to be effectively demonstratedagain 2/6(a) = 1/3(b), if a and b differ, the equivalence of the fractions hasnt been demonstrated
>>535583344>>535584053Wtf bros im ridin with biden nowKamala has my vote !
>>535584372again with this horseshit, its a hexagon, not a cubethis is just forced cope because you got the answer wrong initially
>>535584377>And #3 isn’t a hexagon,why not?why would they create a problem which has no answers?this is just retarded the only interpretation which makes sense is that its a hexagon
It's C.I actually believe white kids did poorly in this because unlike niggers and women they actually have abstract thinking skills and the horrible presentation of the problem leads exactly to question the solution in this case.
Girls can only think in 2 dimensions, that's why they got this "right". A woman must have made this test. Clearly all three can be right.
>>535582966>>535583090>>535583099who the fuck knows, because they didn’t specify. c1 could be a transparent square or a hexagon (either 2/6 or 1/6 depending on which). Then c2 is eaither a differently drawn cube or a differently drawn hexagon (either 1/6 or 1/3).
>>535584111>making it three dimensional is an additional stepNah, nobody moves in incremental dimensional steps when parsing some lines into a coherent meaning. Nonsensical take. With the segmenting lines, it's simply not easily read as a flat pentagon and rather looks like a cube at a glance
>>535582354No, the assignment is actually "all of these are to scale but the lines have zero area, and you need to pick the two shapes with the same area of dark and light" but that would require too much of the child so its better to just mark them down.
>>535584372Ladies and gentlemen : the IQ of an average Nick Fuentes -wannabe / follower of Fuentes (Latinx man who identifies as the savior of the white race).
>>535584547Its a hexagon, the first has been divided into sixths, the second has been divided into thirds2 sixths is equivalent to one of the thirdsthe cube nonsense is just invented to confuse people
>>535584478it’s a fun troll to take retarded questions and then tweak them slightly so there’s no right answer and then post on /pol/ to argue about. It’s fun, you should try it sometime. The matrix uses this to identify and eliminate high-IQ autists.
>>535584053This reads like a page from an elementary fiction novel. It’s just not believable whatsoever. Try harder next time.
>>535582212The education system is designed to cater to girls. That is torwards obedience and obeying orders. This would also explain why the niggers are doing so well. Their race is bred for servitude. BTW B is also correct. I understand that the teacher wants them to pick A. But they're being marked down for picking the answer they didn't want them to pick. I.e. the teacher is selecting for obedience not for correctness.
>>535584208Sorry I didn’t mean to direct that to you>>535584271You’re the retard. I mean that scaling matters. To make it more clear for you. 1/3 a round personal 8” pizza is not equal to 2/6 of a round large 22” pizza
>>535584444The hexagon is made to look like a cube to confuse anyone above 60 IQ. If you chose the (((correct answer))) then congratulations, you're a nigger.
>>535583352>C is misleading since the second shape looks like a cubebut B does not look like a pyramid/cone?and A does not look like prism seen from the side?
>>535584792Yeah im sure thats true and they created the problem with no intention of it having a correct solutionYou figured them out
>>535584616normal tests would specify whether it’s a cube or a hexagon, because it could be either according to test. And if it’s a cube, none are correct. The joke is that only white boys could visualize a cube in their heads and rule out C (most women and all niggers were incapable).If both are hexagons then C is correct.
>>535584823I bet we could ask 10k people and most of them would ask you why you're a faggot who pretends he doesn't understand the obvious.
CONCLUSION>82% of black students are smarter than 90% of /pol/>71% of girls of all races are smarter than 90% of /pol/Sad!
>>535584784Neither the scaling or cube matters, only the positioning of the shading. The question is which shows 1/3 = 2/6, this is modeled by A, or all 3, the only justifiable answers.
>>535584915I think its fair to assume they created the problem with an intended solution
>>535582354C is the only one where the 2 shapes are equal sizes. A and B have different sizes for the shapes and are therefore not equivalent fractions.
>>535584986Scaling matters. 1/3*1=2/6*1 but 1/3*2 does not equal 2/3. It’s a stupid trick question.
>>535585205Does not equal 2/6. It’s a stupid….
>>535585205There you go adding nonexpressed data like cubeniggers
>>535584547Already answered here >>535584079The point is to leave it ambiguous so the teacher ultimately has control of what is right or wrong in order to keep things balanced for the sake of brown retards being able to keep up. There is an image that floats around here one of those boomer "chinese kids go to school 73 hours a day and can do these INSANE math problems in their heads!" memes. The pic is a bunch of random objects, usually a fat chinese guy, with various articles of clothing and items arranged in a way that provides as many pointless variables as possible to obscure an easy math problem. Humanity already made symbols to represent numerical values. Obscuring rhe number 3 by drawing it as a fat guy wearing one shoe, a pocket watch and with his sweater tied around his waist doesn't add any mathematical value. It does however allow people to feel smart by changing the rules to trick others so they can call them stupid. Same thing here. You choose A or B because they represent 2 out of 6 shaded areas and 1 out of 3. Teacher says you're wrong because the majority chose C so she looks better. You respond with C is a cube. All are correct but she's submitting the grades and now Jamal, Jose and Stacy don't look like retards because they chose the "correct" answer and the school went from 25% passing rate to 75%. We already playesd this game with word problems ans how many apples you have left, that gets people thinking about abstract applications of values in the same way but uses concrete numbers so you can fudge the answers when people get it wrong.
>>535582212This question isnt even about math, its a language question, and it allows one who does not understand the fractions to get the question right. If you could literally not read numbers, but understood equal, you could get the right, its actually confusing to those who understand fractions and operators, this is a leftist way of actually making people go "Oh this is physically larger than this, i mathed" rather than needing to understand fractions, this is a grounder for the foreigners and minorities who literally cant speak the local language, if you know math or speak english you get confused. Wow. Does not demonstrate understanding of math. What was the point of the question? What are we testing for here? dumb
>>535584947B is a correct answer. Area is a euclidean invariant. You can rotate any object and the area is preserved. Again there are two right answers. Both A and B are correct. The teacher is only testing for obedience and conformity rather than correctness.
>>535585295*can't fudge the numbers
>>535584792(((They))) created the problem with the intention of having niggers, whose simian brains do not allow them to parse the problem as anything other than "compare the size of the dark areas in each option and pick the one where they're equal" outperform everyone else. And (((they))) succeeded. Think of the amount of research that must've gone into engineering such a problem, holy fuck. It's actually impressive, in the worst way possible.
>>535585452hey white man, you over thought that-- the picture is bigger of the circle, the hexagon thing and triangles are the same size. Euclidian panties? what?
>>535582752The reasoning why C is correct:You have to write proofs in mathematics. A big part of writing proofs is that you have get your point across accurately. Yes, both A and B mean 2/6 equals 1/3 - to you and me: because we already know this concept. But if we want to provide a mathematical proof of why 2/6 equals 1/3 to a stupid gorilla, this concept can best be supported by drawing 2 figures with the same area. Doing this will better illustrate why 2/6 equals 1/3, than A and B because they have dissimilar area. Hence C is correct, since similar area shows the concept more accurately.>>535582314>>535582354>>535582397>>535582414
>>535585295Simple fix; when we win we send accomplished male scientists to berate and humiliate these teachers in front of their students.That's how you deal with cheating retards. Humiliate them, take away their sense of control.
>>535584550>nobody moves in incremental dimensional steps when parsing some lines into a coherent meaningI'm a draftsman, that's exactly what I do.
>>535584391the people who would get this wrong are the ones who understand implicitly that 2/6 = 1/3, and are rushing to complete the test under the time limit. also this exact question was probably covered in class, so it's a way of rewarding kids for staying awake. not for being smart or understanding fractions, which should be the goal. this is obviously a test for first graders, just look at the writing to the right.
>>535585136True autist like me
>>535585490this guy gets it
>>535582212Obviously C. One side = another side on the same cube. Get fucked first grade retards.
>>535585290The question asks for Which of the following shows 1/3=2/6It doesn’t ask>which shows 1/3 and 2/6 It explicitly asks =, therefore scaling matters here. Sometimes it’s ok to admit you’re wrong.
>>535582212everyone keeps posting this acting smart. The truth is, the way I see it, all 3 are technically correct. I suppose you could see the 3rd selection as being a cube and in that instance it would be incorrect because it would be just one side of the cube shaded....so I figured maybe it wants something more specific, like the same shaded area, so since answer 2 has a different shaded area, the answer to the teacher's satisfaction must be answer 1 since it's the only true literal interpretation of the equation.pseudo intellectual assholes keep posting it on 4chan acting like we're all stupid
>>535585490You’re retarded if you believe the context of (op). Most people would pick the one that is the same size. I can’t believe how many stupid people are in this thread.
>>535584688It was a crisp fall morning in the small town of Cornfield, USA, where the annual pumpkin weigh-off usually took the spotlight. But this year, the buzz was all about politics, something even more shocking than Farmer Joe’s 800-pound gourd. Visiting from the city to help my grandma Ethel, I found myself at the local diner, overhearing a group of staunchly traditional townsfolk animatedly discussing the upcoming election. Earl, the unofficial leader of the pack, declared he was voting blue this time, citing "Cameltoe Cam’s" promises to help farmers and small businesses. My coffee nearly went flying – Earl, the epitome of rural conservatism, voting for Kamala Harris?Curiosity got the better of me, and I cautiously approached their table. Earl and the others, usually die-hard supporters of the opposite side, were now praising Harris for her guts and common sense. They didn’t agree with everything she said, but they respected her stance on the issues that mattered to them, especially after being disillusioned by Trump’s immorality. As they invited me to join them for a slice of Mabel’s famous apple pie, I realized that even in the heart of traditional America, times were changing. Over pie, I marveled at the surprising turn of events and the open-mindedness of these steadfast townsfolk, realizing the world was far more unpredictable—and interesting—than I’d ever imagined
>>535585784yes, if you are a grammer nazi and not good at math, you would get this right.If you are actually retarded, cant read good and cant do simple fractions, you would get it right by looking at the size of the shaded area, needing to know only what equal meant, and minorities are always being brow beaten about equality so they really get that operator, and probably would get the fraction question wrong if it was about the wrong fraction proportions, which would demonstrate understanding of fractions, not language or simian understanding of size before abstract concept of number and fractionselects for leftist aligned, excludes true math minds. unfair question
>>535585736that would be 1/6
>>535585996I have a PhD in engineering you enormous faggot. I am god at math. You’re just seething because the context of op. And since you’re retarded you don’t question op, and get angry at the question.
>>535584053>We call her Queen Kamala and praise her Kamalaconomy.
>>535582612But that isn't part of the question. The answer is all of the above. The question was formatted poorly.
>>535585545I have a degree in mathematics, have taken atleast 20 hours of just mathematical theory, and everything you said is ridiculous nonsense.
>>535582799so jewish
>>535585625I agree, its a weird question and the fact its caused confusion among literal adults is a bad sign
>>535586097That's how you can tell these people are niggers. How the hell they can see 1 side of a cube as being 2/6 when a cube (die) has 6 sides is beyond me.
>>535586106how far are the objects from the viewer? There is no depth or explanation about depth, there is not enough information to assume they are 2D objects You have a PhD and are a minority likely funded by a minority access to science grant so you love this shit. btw, those 5 years after college are when they didnt want minorities breeding. You sure bud? Simian mind with a Phd--I'm not saying its less than any other mind, its really specialized for the selective pressures of the enviornment it was made in. Nothing wrong with that. Why do we have questions that define success based on the type of brain architecture one has? And there is only one dimension of score, % based? Wouldnt it make more sense to have a multidimensional test then? Oh wait, thats a psychology test and not a math test.
>>535586106>SAAAR>I HAVE PEE AYCH DEE SAAAR>YOU VILL BE OF GIVING RESPECC SAAAR
>>535585921Which of the following shows that two is to six as one is to three?A) These two rectangles, one with 2 out of 6 equally sized sections of its interior greyed out, and one with 1 out of 3 equally sized sections of its interior greyed out.B) These two disks, one with 2 out of its 6 equally sized sections greyed out, and one with 1 out of its 3 equally sized sections greyed out.C) These two cubes, one with 1 out of its 6 sides greyed out, and one with 1 out of its 6 sides greyed out.Jamal: "Sheeeit nigga dey look same in C, finna pick C muh nigga."Professor Shlomo: "Brilliant. I award this young scholar one full point."
>>535582414
>>535586106Lol. No you dont. >t. Actually has a degree in mathematics.
>>535585592>I'm a draftsman, that's exactly what I do.Since you can't tell the difference between your learned habit and kids being acculturated by their textbooks to read a segmented pentagon as a cube, I'm sure you're extraordinary at your job.
>>535586612He doesnt have a degree. Thats a lie. What he said was complete nonsense. Every one of them indicates that 1/3 = 2/6. "Scaling" of a fucking image on a math test isnt a thing. If it was a ruler would be supplied and you'd be able to measure it. What hes saying is entirely made up.
>>535582212good luck then with your BMWF society retard.
>>535585592Im guessing you use some kind of ruler or are you suggesting youre some kind of god of spacial awareness?
>>535584391Why do they have to be equal if not specified? If I have a cocaine fueled party and want it to be 90% women and 10% midgets, thats 9/10 of the party is female non midget quests and 10% dwarves, how do you produce a proof that it is correct amount of guests? you abstract the numbers from the two groups and make the ratio of numbers 90% and 10%, but some fucking moron woman decided to add area to the calculation and now i have 78% fucking midgets at my party.A ratio of a smaller group can be compared to a larger group in the abstract of fractions without area, and with wildly different areas, why the fuck add area to it without specifying it...?
Question asks about Fractions being represented.Thread full of retards arguing about the area of 1.Poorly worded questions for the sake of fishing for a wrong answer are peak modern female teaching.>The blacks and the girls got it right!And yet no one coming out of highschool can work a fucking cash register without the computer doing everything for them.>That's $15.11 anon.>Hand over $20 bill a dime and a penny.>Literally have to get some boomer manager to come explain to zoomie monkey slut that yes I do indeed get and entire $5 bill back.Nightmare world has been earned.
>>535587166no, first I accept it for what it is. a two-dimensional image of a hexagon with lines connecting the corners. then I extrapolate the image's limitations for displaying three dimensions and create the object in my mind. but it's still just some ink on paper, at it's heart.
>>535588257Ah yes. And you make calculations of area based on zero measurements? So youre just bullshitting and have zero clue what we're even talking about, but felt the need to larp?Pro-tip: larping only works when youre talking to other larpers.
>>535586978I don't know if you notice Hans, but this only ever happens in Los Angeles.
>>535585136Equal sizes but also equal shapes, the left one is mirrored and transparent version of right, the are both cubes with 1 dark side, so it can't be 2/6 and 1/3 because they are both 1/6.
>>535582212A woman probably wrote the test.
>>535588354all I'm saying is if I had to recreate that image I would draw a hexagon and then connect the corners with lines. I wouldn't draw a cube. it doesn't make sense.
>39%They're all correct. The boys probably assumed the test was multiple choice and only chose one answer which leads to a 33% chance. The 6% of boys is statistical noise or realizing it wasn't multiple choice. Women and blacks are varying degrees of stupid and can't systemize so they just circled all of them, or they realized it wasn't multiple choice.
>>535583967>pic rel is not animatedYes it is I can clearly see it moving
>>535582354circle is right because 1/3 is 0.333333333 infinity and only circle can be forevers...
>>535582212All of them but "A" is the most accurate.
>>535588968... recreating the image isnt the prompt.
Only C is set to scale. Therefore the answer is OP is a 3pbtid faggot!
>>535583352i could not see it as anything but cubes. i could not process anyone cutting a shape like that, other than a german cutting a pizza.
