[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 2220520261111.png (64 KB, 741x518)
64 KB PNG
*AND TEMPORARY VISA JEETS!
>>
>>535877264
The first few times you got called out when this fell through, I chalked it up to naivete.
At this point, I think you are deliberately trying to give people false hope.
>>
>>535877351
>fell through
It's in SCOTUS now, nigger
>>
>>535877264
You are dumb if you keep posting that this will be retroactive.
THE LAW DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY
YOU STUPID RETARD.
It will not be retroactive.
No new laws are retroactive.
Ffs.
>>
>>535877434
>no new laws are retroactive
SCOTUS does not "make law", nigger
>>
File: 1764062803991853.jpg (221 KB, 968x1183)
221 KB JPG
>>535877434
>You are dumb if you keep posting that this will be retroactive.

This ruling won't necessarily be retroactive. However, it will set the stepping stone in place to build further.
>>
>>535877469
Stfu you pedantic little sprite. you know wtf I mean.
>>
>>535877578
Hopefully.
>>
>>535878106
No, I don't know what you mean, retard
Do a quick web search for
>Are SCOTUS rulings on constitutional questions retroactive?
And tell me what it tells (You), nigger
>>
>>535877264
>retroactive
another thread where this retard displays his ignorance of the 14th amendment
>>
>>535878203
>And subject to the jurisdiction thereof
>>
>>535878166
I have absolutely had it up to here with (you)
>>
>>535878802
Oh did you look it up and now that you have egg on your face you want to blame me for your own ignorance, nigger?
>>
>>535878818
No. I did not.
ITS NOT RETROACTIVE.
ITS NOT HOW IT WORKS.
ITS NEVER HOW THAT WORKS.
>>
>>535878990
Do a quick web search for
>Are SCOTUS rulings on constitutional questions retroactive?
And tell me what it tells (You), nigger
>>
>>535877264
>>535877351
I feel the opposite after the recent rulings made
>You can only apply for green cards in your own country
>You need a birth certificate to open a bank account
Closing the loop hole for delayed birth registrations, which allowed illegals to bring over foreign born babies and registering their births here, would seal it.
>>
>>535877351
You are brown.
>>
>>535878990
Ex post facto can be retroactive if it is proven to caused undeniable harm to another human. This can include creating grounds for discrimination.
>>
>>535879188
Executive orders must be constitutional
Also Executive Orders just as laws passed by Congress and signed into law by POTUS cannot be retroactive because the Constitution explicitly forbids Ex Post Facto

SCOTUS on the other hand does NOT make law, nor do they have the power to amend or change the US constitution thus when they make their ruling on the Birthright Citizenship Clause in the 14th Amendment in June or July of this year that ruling will apply RETROACTIVELY all the way back to when the amendment or clause in the amendment was ratified which in this case would be July 9th, 1868.
>>
>>535879248
>when they make their ruling on the Birthright Citizenship Clause in the 14th Amendment in June or July of this year that ruling will apply RETROACTIVELY all the way back to when the amendment or clause in the amendment was ratified which in this case would be July 9th, 1868.
How could this even be enforced? Let alone researched to figure out who it applied to, and then employed accordingly?
Come on, now......
>>
>>535879366
So now you have moved the goal post from
>it cannot, will not, it is impossible to be retroactive
to
>how would they enforce it?
(You) are brown
>>
>>535879366
checked and btfod-pilled
>>
File: 1762958988262868.jpg (161 KB, 700x677)
161 KB JPG
>>535878990

you're missing the point, anon, while accusing others of missing the point.
>>
>>535877264
Not gonna happen.
>>
>>535877407
>>535879179
>denies reality
>y-youre brown!
pathetic
i cant wait till nothing happens and you hang yourselves HAHAHA
>>
File: 1098436420936170658.jpg (10 KB, 288x175)
10 KB JPG
>>535877578
>build further
not how the law works, but if you meant "scrutinize every fucking detail about how things got so bad" then yes.
I want to believe in SCOTUS but after 2012 Obamacare niggardry with Roberts, I am hesitant. This should be prima facie bang on but never underestimate commie (((jurisprudence))). they will do cirque du soleil level mental acrobatics to not rock the boat.
>>
>>535879366
Easy. Anchor babies under obama registered freely and so did all illegals immigrants under biden. Every school in America has legal status of students. That information is freely shared with department of education for funding…..

You do have a long form American birth certificate? Dont you? are you not a real american? Sorry time to self deport
>>
>>535878166
The Supreme Court is wildly inconsistent with whether or not their rulings apply retroactively or not. They usually considered the impact of making it retroactive rather than rule from Constitutional principles. In this case, it's highly unlikely they'll risk making tens of millions of people stateless by taking away their ill gotten citizenship.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.