What separates great men like the founding fathers who fought a war for their beliefs and the masses of faggots who yap about politics but do nothing?
Courage, opportunity, upbringing.
>>536697147>who fought a war for their beliefs That's just a nice story but it's not true. They wanted to be the elite, that's why after the revolution taxes went through the roof
>>536697147They were not individuals
>>536697147Masonic and banker support.
Actions?One is all talk, the other does something. Too bad palantir is spying on your every move so if you mobilize you will be caught right away.
>>536697429Then how did this happen?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
>>536697147realizing no one is coming to rescue you. suddenly you don't hold back anymore because its either you make it or you die trying. as long as men are sheltered from reality and use escapism, alcohol and drugs to cope with reality they won't do shit. if you are alone with no family you have nothing to lose and you will go all in every time
>>536697147Boys fear death , men fear meeting God a coward
>>536697147Being able to operate in secret and knowing to look out for traitors from the very beginning
>>536697285
>>536697850Ok, your claim was that ALL the founders opposed a central bank, yet one got created right away
being richfags
>>536697147The inability to affect change through peaceful means.>But muh elections are lies and don't work!They don't work for young people because young people don't vote, therefor people running for office who win are the ones who pander to the boomers.Founding fathers didn't have a pathway for peaceful reform.
There's an old Greek story where there's two islands, they know of each other, tolerate and trade etc... One year one island has a drought, and people go hungry, the other island is fine. The island with the troubles finds out the other island is fine, and some people start to blame them for cursing their island. Everyone gers all angry and a mob forms, and demands they send armed men to raid the other island. A few days pass by and some of the more reasonable people talk sense into everyone and they realize they made a mistake so they send another boat to stop the armed men. But it's too late at that point. Back before telephones and internet and such, I imagine there was a lot of angry and uppity people talking politics and sending messengers and militias all over the place and then getting a level head later on. More action was taken to send a message, in todays world we can just send an angry message over some social media platform and then meet up in person to hash things out. Action in todays world requires immense pressure.
>>536697537>he doesn't know how unpopular this wasI want to physically hurt people who speak with this much authority on American history while also being so fucking wrong.
>>536698219Lol I'll meet you in the street any time pal. Of course I know it was unpopular with the people, that's why it didn't last. But the fact that it got set up right away pretty much proves that most of the founders didn't have a problem with it, doesn't it
>>536697909What do you expect a government to do with all your tax money anyway? Deposit it directly into the Head of State's bank account?Some form of national bank is a necessity but that's not the same as the Federal Reserve you godless ape.
>>536698328Everybody lookout, we got a real badass over here.
>>536698430You're the one who threatened me because your rose colored narrative of the American founding doesn't stand up to scrutiny
>>536698389They used to print money as they needed it, they could just burn it if there was too much money in circulation. The system worked too well and the kikes didn't want it to catch on so they started the revolution to get control of the usa.
>>536697334This. There’s also a misunderstanding that you need to redpill the masses. Impossible, and useless. 3% of the country fought the American revolution. The masses are reprogrammed by the next power in control. They never “wake up.”
>>536697147>>536697195>>536697429>>536697585>>536697623>great men>freemasonic lodge jew worshipping judeophilic pedophile anglosActually laughed out loudI have absolutely ZERO doubt you masked and vaxxedYou wore a mask for 2 years because you are a weak coward in real life and submissive whore of the state
(1) You need a vision of the future that differs fundamentally from the present. This is the motivating force. The FF wanted to establish enlightenment ideals on the world and create an entirely new system (the idea they were in any way "tyrannized" is ridiculous, pre-revolution American colonists had the freest and best lives of any humans to walk the Earth, before or since. But they did a good job of making the people imagine there was tyranny occurring, and concoct mass grievance). Just the grievance alone will not necessarily provoke revolution.(2) You need an actual vanguard of leaders, not anonymous randoms yapping online. Those who can direct and organize the mass of yappers. This is the most difficult step in modern revolution, as the system is now so good at subverting would-be leaders.(3) You need the backing of an existing network of secret societies, underground organizations, a dissident movement, etc.
>>536697147There's two key factors to consider.First, these men were warlords, revolutionaries, etc. They were capable of harming their enemies.But, when they sat down, they showed great intellect as well.I doubt it has anything to do with keeping a population enslaved, but we are living in a specialization world where it is discouraged to pursue multiple fields of expertise at once. On that specific topic, I recommend reading Voltaire's Bastards.Secondly, the system was built to keep uprisings to a minimum. I will not make the entire list of their tactics, but the core idea is to isolate and eliminate.First step: you are alone.Second step: if you figure out you aren't alone, they isolate the groupThird step: they dismantle it using various tactics.Notice they never allow any organic movement to gain more than 10-20 members. If they didn't stop them that early, then it would gain traction.To come back to the isolation part. Notice how easy it is to find extremely racist content online. Yet, on the outside, you never see those people?They exist, you see them every day. They simply shut up or dilute their opinion to pass. Most people are scared of being socially executed (job, etc.) if they say that outloud.That fear is what they play on.Basically, a man, alone, can't take down the system.Thus, they keep men alone. Always.
>>536698628>rose colored narrativeFar from that, but keep strawmanning my position if it makes you feel better.
>>536699307Your biggest obstacle is actually globalism and what comes after the revolution, such as navigating the world order and preventing domestic interference (Canada is already struggling with this badly). You'll become like Afghanistan or North Korea unless you can gain legitimacy fast.
>>536698818Australia's most enduring global legacy is a zookeeper and a fictional character from some movies. When you produce men who are revered around the world for their accomplishments on the same scale as the Founding Fathers you can talk shit.
>>536697147>great men like the founding fathersall of them were extreme racists, my grandpa was in the SS and he would have trouble keeping up with themjust read a book you mixed raced mutt
Spengler addresses this question in Decline of the West. He distinguishes between the Statesman and the Intellectual and differentiates them mainly by thought, discussion, and action vs just thought and discussion. The statesman acts, even if by the simple acts related to the legal authoring, while the intellectual just talks. A Founding Father fights and legislates, while an intellectual just talks about what the founding father does.
The internet broke humanity's mind, spirit and will. It's all noise and no substance as we tumble further down the rabbit hole of technological hell.
>>536697147 The evolution between contemporary ideologists and the founding fathers presents complex differences. In the modern era, we find a global surveillance state controlled by corporate structures, themselves influenced by a central banking system that creates money digitally and owns companies, thus controlling surveillance itself. Any planned revolution is now infiltrated due to foreign occupation.Contemporary psychological manipulation, leveraging AI and various methods, divides and conquers the masses. The founding fathers believed America's size prevented one organization from controlling press freedom, but this limitation was lifted in the 1960s as money, electricity, and global thought control took hold.During the COVID-19 pandemic, parents restricted their children's bodily autonomy, then championed women's reproductive rights, and kneeled for George Floyd – all politically orchestrated movements are covertly manipulated.The political machinery of the state has no avenues, leading to violence as an option, but in an age where minds and police serve foreign interests over constitutional oaths, organizing with people becomes challenging due to trust issues.In this climate, censorship is claimed to prevent citizens from understanding their oppressive state. As obedience is rewarded, law enforcement is replaced with more compliant personnel, leading to disarmament of the populace as minds are manipulated, ethnic replacement occurs, and cultural erasure becomes challenging.Lone wolf shooters emerge, followed by ridicule to justify increased surveillance and power due to their actions. In contrast to the founding fathers' era where enemies could not hear or see everything, we live in a world where pedophiles exploit surveillance to target vulnerable children, with networks embedded within government, police, and law enforcement – all serving a paper money deity controlled by foreign occupiers who create money from nothing.
>>536699623That's not an obstacle that hinders the common man from rising up.While it must not be neglected if you want a state, nobody goes:>Today I will not commit political violence because once I'm done, I'll have to find legitimacy on the international stageI don't even understand where you're going with this.
>>536697147Talking about politics is what 99% of revolutionaries do with most of their time. No revolution happened because some people randomly decided to start shooting, it always happebns because they are right and most people support them. The primary difference is that modern states are much stronger than anything in 1700's, you need lot more support for anything and it's actually very much possible to change things simply by voting.
>>536697147Physical comfort is literally the biggest factor
>>536700093You haven't thought far enough ahead then.
