Seething because he knows he's a lame duck already and it's just going to get worse when midterms roll around.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/09/trump-election-california-fraud-claims
I have yet to be given a coherent explanation as to why it takes a week to count the votes for one city in California.
>theguardian.comlol, lmao. all they talk about is american politics, way way more than british politics
>>536719880he doesn't need to invent it, it's flagrantly apparent to anyone who isn't a brainwashed communist faggot
>>536719992And I've yet to be given a coherent explanation as to how that's somehow proof of fraud
>>536719880>A reality TV dimwit with no platform who ran as a conservative lost in a city that has had one Republican mayor in the last 65 years>THIS MUST BE FRAAAAAAAAAAUD!
California,The state trying to pass laws requiring ID and age verification to read facebook,but stands firmly against checking ID to vote.
>>536719992That's because the only coherent explanation is the one everyone knows but they cannot give. That's why they can never answer the question except just to repeat scripted lines like "it's better to be accurate than fast" and etc. Everyone knows the actual reason, especially the ones who deny it.
>>536719880>sure we have trillions in hospice and homeless fraud and we sign illegals up to vote>elections?!?! how dare you question the integrity!!!
>>536720097Don't know why you even bother interacting with these disingenuous, often 1pbtid, threads. Hundreds get made daily pushing a narrative and nothing else, they're paid to post.
>>536720080It's not proof but it's evidence. And your refusal to acknowledge the evidence is more evidence.
>lol
>>536719880No other city, state, province, or nation in the world takes longer than a day to count votes.Why does California get to act like its special?
>>536720413The implication is that the Democratic party is so unpopular right now that they need fraud to win even in supposedly blue shitholes like LA.
>>536719992I read that 80% of the ballots are mail-in.And something about the postmarked date and they're not allowed to begin counting until 3 days after election day.
How does it feel to know no one cares about your fake screeching over ElEcTiOn FrAuD?I didnt even hear about this until yesterday, guess everyones just ignoring you dishonest weirdos
>>536720547How have they been able to flip seats in state legislatures in red states like Florida, Arkansas, and Texas if they're so unpopular they have to cheat to win in Los Angeles?
>>536720789Fraud takes time and you need to know how many fake ballots you must come up with. That's why there's such a push for delayed election results. I remember the media trying to normalize this hard in 2024, insisting that we might not know the outcome of the election for "weeks" and this was totally normal and the system working as intended.
>>536720960Because of how popular trans children issues are with red state normies. And how angry they are at the GOP for removing gay porn from elementary school libraries and being mean to Somalians who just need to eat. Every position the Democrats take is super popular, like keeping boys in girls sports. That's such a winner issue it's amazing to me that the Republicans take the losing side lmao.
>>536721163So you can't answer why Democrats have been flipping seats in deep red states when they're so unpopular they have to cheat to win in Los AngelesGot it
>>536719880Oh you're in for some serious pain. You and your fraudmasters are about to get your shit pushed in so deep even your shill legacy media mockingbird conglomerates won't be able to hide it. Cheers!
>>536720789>>536721009There's a reason nowhere else on Earth has this retarded system even within the United States. Everyone in the world understands that you need to count the ballots as fast as possible to reduce fraud vectors and ensure public confidence. That's the whole point of democracy.But California is subconsciously understood to be a one-party dictatorship, so it can get away undermining the single core tenant of democracy because no one actually thinks it's a democracy.
>>536721291I just did retard.>>536721375>Everyone in the world understands that you need to count the ballots as fast as possible to reduce fraud vectors and ensure public confidence.Of course, and that's exactly why the Democrats push the opposite, same as opposing voter ID or any other fraud preventing measure. They just robotically insist over and over that "there's no meaningful fraud" while also doing everything to make fraud as easy as possible. They're not honest people and lying is a major part of their politics because their actual beliefs and desires cannot be stated openly. For this same reason, they support political violence and fraud as a means to an end. There was a Rasmussen poll from a year or so ago on this. It's shocking how many Democrats (and especially educated "elite" Democrats) very openly tell pollsters that they support fraud and other criminal measures if it wins them elections.
>>536721588>I just did retard.You didn'tBecause you can't articulate a political thought that you didn't read on twitter and there wasn't a tweet available to readily explain why Democrats have been flipping seats in deep red states when they're so unpopular they have to cheat to win in Los AngelesSo now you're being a coy faggot and avoiding the question
>>536721936No I answered the question very directly and you got angry and now are even more angry.
>>536722020Your genuine take is the Democrat stance on issues are so popular in deep red states that Democrats are flipping seats, but so unpopular in Los Angeles that they have to cheat to win
>>536722288Yeah obviously, what else could it be? Election fraud is a conspiracy theory, except in 2016 when Russia hacked the election.
>>536722364What are you even getting out of this?
>>536722288>Your genuine take is the Democrat stance on issues are so popular in deep red states that Democrats are flipping seatsHe was obviously being sarcastic, but I totally get that the people paid to shill on mongolian imageboards would not have a strong grasp on the nuances of English.
>>536719992so they can commit fraud
>>536722424(You)s
>>536722364Stop it, you're just bullying the jeet at this point. He's not going to learn about sarcasm as an illustrative tool until at least his English 2 or maybe 3 crash-course. Which will come closer to election season.
>>536722491Right, but he was being sarcastic in order to avoid answering the question of why Democrats are flipping seats in deep red states when they're so unpopular they have to cheat to win in Los AngelesAnd now he's doubling down on not answering the question by being coy
>>536719992Los numeros es muy dificil senooooor
>>536722586I think it's a chink. The low verbal IQ is how you can tell.
>>536722573Look, if you're fine looking retarded and bumping this thread about a Guardian article showing how Trump is just making shit up about fraud in California every time you get one, I'll keep feeding you (You)s
>>536722764>I'll keep feeding you (You)sgood girl
The percentage of registered Republicans in California is 25.14%. Spencer Pratt received 25.8% of the vote.Oh, but the Democrats cheated...
>>536719992A lot of ballots were mailed at the last minute.And you KNOW how slow the US Mail can be.
>>536719992How were only democrat votes coming in after a certain point? How do they possibly reasonably explain that?
>>536722923Sure. They're clearly very important to you.
>>536723127How come your boy Donny has to be a whiny little bitch every time he loses?
>>536719992That's anti-semitic
>>536721291didnt they board up the election office in maricopa county in Arizona and not allow election watch officials in?
James O'Keefe just posted a video about the corruption LOL
>>536723159Thanks
>>536723127Looking at the vote totals over time, it looks like Pratt got almost ten thousand votes in the batch that put Raman in the lead over himWhere are you seeing there were only Democrat votes in that timeframe?
>>536723325No problem.
>>536719992>>536720106>>536720222The answer is that the law allows all mail in votes to be counted that are postmarked by election day. Hope that helps.
>>536723491Why would it be a problem?>>536723612The question was why it takes so long to count them though anon.
>>536723714>Why would it be a problem?Fair point
>>536719880It's obvious the jeeta cheated, now it goes to prison then back to India where it belongs.
>>536719992Who cares how long it takes? It’s not illegal
>>536719880Note: she says “coordinators’’ meaning its way more than just her doing thisBrenda Lee Brown Armstrong, 64, of Marina del Rey, also known as "Anika," entered a plea to one count of paying another person to register to vote, a federal charge that carries a penalty of up to five years behind bars.Sentencing was scheduled for Aug. 31.According to her plea agreement, for nearly 20 years, Armstrong periodically worked as a "petition circulator." In that role, she was paid by coordinators to collect voter signatures on official petitions that qualify initiatives, referendums and recalls for California state ballots. Prosecutors said Armstrong drove around the Los Angeles area to find registered voters to sign the petitions.After gathering enough signatures, Armstrong returned the petitions to her coordinators, who then paid her a set amount for each registered voter's signature. The amount she was paid varied depending on the specific ballot initiative. Because her coordinators only paid for signatures attributable to registered voters, Armstrong endeavored to ensure the people who signed her petitions were registered voters, court papers show.
It's not "fraud" per se, they just legalized ballot harvesting.
>>536723714>The question was why it takes so long to count them though anon.Because there is a multi-day delay between when a letter is postmarked by the post office and when it is actually delivered, anon. How often do you mail a letter with same day delivery? So they have to leave a window of time long enough to reasonably account for slow mail delivery, otherwise they don't know how many ballots have yet to be counted. Is this a bad system? Yeah, probably. But its not nefarious.
>>536723127Each candidate's added vote totals are announced individually in batches. The "impossible" 24,000 to nothing vote announcement was followed up literally a minute later with a who-cares to nothing vote announcement for Pratt that MAGA for some reason never calls out as equally impossible.
>Indian woman is polling in the single digits>concedes on election day>all of a sudden 5 days after the election, gets a random surge of mail in ballots>suddenly she's winning the race>strangely the other democrat didn't benefit from this ballot surge
>>536720080If you had a brain you'd know why a slow count allows manipulation, you fuming leftshit.
>>536719880"Baseless""Impossible""No evidence"
>>536724576It's the homeless industrial complex. She bribed shelters with donations to get their fraudulent mail in votes.
>>536724406>How often do you mail a letter with same day delivery?I never mail letters anon. Lmao.
>>536719880No more claimsNo more maybesOnly one of them can be rightGet your fucking shit together Trump
>>536724936Or it's just indians being indians. And california being california
>>536724936>She bribed shelters with donations to get their fraudulent mail in votesIt was her NGO that ran the shelter lmao. That's how brazen this shit was.
>>536725415It's NGOs being NGOs.
>>536719992Why a week long to rig exactly?
>>536725512Surely Bass wants Spencer to win over Raman. Old black lady vs racist white MAGA chud is an easy victory for her, no matter how many times he embarrasses her in debates or AI commercials. Communist brown Raman with her army of college supporters and redditards poses an actual threat to her reign of bullshit>from LA, I hate this hellhole
>>536725675They needed to know how many mail in votes to manufacture and send through the postal system.
>>536725776Yeah it's going to be funny. Two brown commie foids who will now spend the next few months accusing each other of being insufficiently radical and practically MAGA.
>>536725952I wish the feds would step in and prosecute but know they won't because Orangeman is a limpwristed coward with no balls.
>>53671988024,000 votes all for one candidate, zero for anyone else. That's fraud. Mark Elias was shitting his pants in anger yesterday. Looking forward to that disgusting jew hanging from a noose after a short trial. That one doesn't get to run off to a hidey hole.
>>536720889They still care, and trying to say they don't is jewish magic that doesn't work anymore. Like those chemicals that simply can't be made anymore because there's a novel catalyst that causes them to fail every time.
>>536725776That's my thought as wellWouldn't Bass/ the California Democrats/ the DNC/ whoever are the masterminds behind this nefarious scheme to get a Democrat elected in LA want the "conservative" reality TV bozo with no actual platform to be the one to go against the incumbent liberal, rather than have two liberals fight it out and potentially damage both of them as candidates?The fraud claims don't make sense at their most fundamental level: Who benefits from going out of their way to steal the election from a weak conservative candidate in a liberal stronghold?
>>536726121See>>536723445
>>536726069The constitution gives States very significant sovrenigity over their elections.
>>536726361No. I'm saying Karen would rather face Bass than Raman. She might use her network to provide info to the feds about Raman cheating so she faces Spencer instead. Otherwise I don't see why the NY Post and other media are priming us with all this info about how obviously rigged it was for commie Raman.
>>536726676>Bass*Pratt
>>536726440It was the next day. There was *a* batch that came in that was 24,000 votes explicitly for Bass. Then we get a bunch of mail ins only benefitting *one* of the Democrats, it defies statistical possibility. Its obvious fraud and Elias shitting his jewish pants over being exposed shows they're not comfortable. They're trying to say no one cares when all of the polling shows more than half believe in mass fraud now. Elias and the rest of the jewish legal industrial complex will hang like the traitors they are.
>>536719992Doesn’t understand population sizes> miggers are truly cattle.
>>536726759>There was *a* batch that came in that was 24,000 votes explicitly for Bass.No, leaf. Those were votes for Bass and Raman, allegedly with not a single Spencer vote.However I have not seen any evidence to support this. That said al the libtard propaganda media rags are writing fact check articles saying this didn't happen, leading me to believe that it did.
>>536719880Lol they are scared. Democrats know if their mail-in ballot fraud gets shut down they will no longer be competitive in national politics.
>>536720080in the absence of good reasons it takes more than 12 hours to count votes in 1 city, you have to assume fraud
>>536727009Bah I saw it in a thread when it happened, someone posted the evidence. *Might* be able to find it searching for "24,000".
>>536727024They know they're untouchable and have activist judges protecting them. Otherwise they wouldn't have done it.
States need better Constitutions to prevent a few large cities from rigging the entire election against the interests of everyone else in the state
>>536727172Was it actual evidence or a screenshot of a tweet of someone claiming it? I believe it happened but I haven't seen any actual proof.
>>536727236States want it to be that way.
>>536727071https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190The BBC regrets publishing this now.
>>536727264I'll check 4plebs it had a link.
>>536724666a fast count allows for a lot more manipulation>yes we counted all the votes in 4 hours and finalized the election>no you can't look at what we were doing while we were doing it, we were just too fast teehee :3
>>536726676So Raman is cheating, Bass knows it, and she's letting it happen so she can bust her and go up against Pratt?How would that even work? Once Pratt is off the ballot, is there a mechanisation for putting him back on it?>>536726759>It was the next day. There was *a* batch that came in that was 24,000 votes explicitly for BassI haven't seen that in any of the vote count data I've looked at, where are you seeing that?
>>536727071how stupid - LA largest vote district in the U.S., takes time to count millions of votes ... must check envelope for errors/faults, check signature to match, then open envelopes and feed ballots into machines - all done open and in full view of observers and media
>>536719880>Inventing>Well-worn playbookI hate trump but pick one faggot>GuardianKys
>>536719880the whole western seaboard is owned by china and populated by foreignersits mere existence is fraudulent and the fact that they participate in national elections, more egregiously sothey have extra seats in the US House of Representatives because they allowed unfettered access to their land
>>536727438Nothing will happen but if it did I think the Bass team would be doing everything they can to help the feds prosecute the Raman team.
>>536727529Even India can hand count their federal elections faster than LA does. Peru too.
>>536727963>dude these indian workers are so much more efficient!>4 years go by>you find out they were just lying about everything and holding it together with tape
>>536727529>check signature to match,Actually, an automatic system checks the signatures, and set to only require 40% accuracy (yes really)
>>536720080the only reason civilizations even run elections is because is the common denominator of what the people find acceptable between a satisfying way to elect a leader and fairness.the only point is that the people are willing to accept the result.the moment you have a significant portion of the people, 30%+ that believe there is fraud, then the election are a fraud.is up to the authority to provide evidence that the election is a fraud and is legit, not the opposite.
>>536727529How come the more technology we have for voting the longer it takes?
>>536728053In the UK they get their election counting done over night, and every single ballot is filmed while it's being checked and anyone in the public is allowed to watch the footage as observers.
>>536728213We used to be able to do that with paper ballots.
>>536728213not true
>>536727427Okay, I think I see what you're talking aboutHere's a post showing how the claim came from a deliberately misleading screenshot of voting datahttps://web.archive.org/web/20260606174007/https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-06-05/how-simple-mix-up-fueled-false-conspiracies-about-la-vote-countAnd here's a Trump appointed member of the Department of Justice saying they had investigated the claim and that it's not truehttps://x.com/usattyessayli/status/2063108426461270199?s=46As always, screenshots of tweets are not valid sources of information
>>536728455Yeah but the image showed the vote totals changing for Bass and not for Pratt. Maybe they went back and changed something by the time it was looked at officially, there's really no other explanation for that. It was +24,000 (*exactly) for Bass and Pratt didn't move.
>>536728172Electronic voting machines made by Venezuela just make elections easier to rig. It takes a long time because they manufacture and mail the fraudulent ballots after the first day results are in, once they've calculated how many votes they need to rig things plausible.
>>536728349It's true.
>>536719992Because USPS is incompetent, the mail in ballot system is retarded anachronism that should have been replaced with something less dumb and honestly voting should be counted by machine or done online anyway. The whole system is retarded >NOOOOO BUT THEY CAN CHEAT COMPUTER VOOOOTSand allegedly they can cheat hand-counted ballots too so idk why morons are so against joining the 21st century. Keep coping about stolen elections and retarded delays otherwise.
>>536728296Paper ballots and voter ID make elections much harder to rig. That's why they got rid of it as soon as they could. It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes.
>>536728781Right, the article I posted explains thatThere was a second update from AP less than a minute later that showed him getting thousands of votes and Bass getting noneThe screenshot of the first update was used to create the narrativeWhy would one of Trump's own DOJ appointees put out a statement saying it was a hoax if there was even a hint of a chance of it being true?
>>536729093They can remotely hack in to the electronic machines and systems very easily. Block chain voting is the hardest to rig.
>>536725830Why not just incinerate republican ballots?
>>536720080>THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD>ALSO WE AREN'T GOING TO LOOK THAT HARD AND WE ALSO ONLY STAND TO LOSE FROM FINDING IT
>>536719880>experts warnlmaooooooo
>>536729120No they don't. Nothing stops you from "miscounting" or stuffing the ballot box as long as it balances with the shitty voter roles books. Idk why you morons keep saying this. Human systems are always going to be cheated.
>>536729184I'm guessing they just realized their fuck up and sanitized it. The exact 24,000 doesn't make sense in the first place for any data entry.
>>536719880Democrats should be equally against loose election laws and election fraud as anybody else. Its not a Republican vs Democrat issue.
>>536729028it's not
>>536729294And electronic systems are trivial to cheat.
>>536729371They will never be, because the democrat party exists largely due to fraud. They'd be a regional california party without it.
>>536719880
>>536729642Based on what? Controls have significantly less dependencies. You just need to trust the software and the retard who has administrative access to it. Apple showed it's possible to make systems that are hands-off as well. A computer voting system would objectively be less bad than what we have now, by a lot. >I-i'll just hack itYa, ok.
>>536729300And Trump's own DOJ saying "No, we looked into it and this is some twitter bullshit?"
>>536729093>create or dispose of hundreds of thousands of physical ballots at a speed and from places that make mathematical sense while inside a room that has people who are responsible for watching for fraud>poof them into existence using a computer system Which seems more difficult?
>>536730075>mathematical senseYou're retarded alright.
>>536729245Many Pratt voters are alleging their ballots weren't counted and they weren't given a chance to fix it, but who knows if that's true. They probably are destroying Spencer votes though, it's not like anyone would stop them and ballot counting centers are generally full of libtard activists.
>>536730243I accept your concession
>>536730352>but who knows if that's truewe all know thats not true
>>536729294It's still harder to cheat with hand counted ballots than electronic voting machines.
>>536730443It might be but we'll never know the truth.
>>536730075The computer system tells them how many fake ballots to manufacture and mail in.
>>536730603Ive lived long enough to know that MAGAts are always lying.
>>536730441You're literally fucking retarded. Statistics are irrelevant for cheating. You retards keep screaming about bellwethers like they meant anything the last time. You assume that having a process full of people is somehow safer than a process, that properly set up, could have virtually no people. Your system assumes observers observe every aspect, from the ballots (and the MACHINE COUNTS) are somehow under custody that can't be subverted.
>>536719992>I have yet to be given a coherent explanation as to why it takes a week to count the votes for one city in California.This, also why so many dead people vote Democrat in CA, why all people who died suddenly vote Democrat >dead voter rollsAnd why all homeless suddenly vote Democrat. Have yet to hear a coherent explanations.
>>536730869Dominion voting systems were designed to be easily rigged.
>>536720000>>theguardian.com>lol, lmao. all they talk about is american politics, way way more than british politics>0000 British mi6 glownigger propaganda rag. They all hate Trump, republicans, white american men , and all have TDS.
>>536720222>And your refusal to acknowledge the evidence is more evidence.this nigga thinks he's arguing with a LA election worker.
>>536730878They also make it illegal to check the voter rolls and activist judges block the feds from viewing them.
Your fucking election laws are retarded, it's probably not fraud, it's systematically set up to benefit one side over the other. Fraud would imply that it's cheating or breaking rules, but your laws are so fucking retarded that the party in charge makes the rules so they don't need to break them, just design them in a way that's beneficial for them.
He should've kept his mouth shut because once midterms rolls around he's going to look like the boy who cried "election fraud"
But every American election down to town council level has been fraudulent since the 70’s. Who is being defrauded, the citizens that were never going to be represented?
>>536730944And yet no evidence of this. My city regularly tests them and the counts come out the same with sample ballots. Hand recounts are always within 0.5%, even in the controversial Georgia thing. The machine is not the problem. The problem is the paper and the many inputs where it comes from.
>>536722364Holy fuck just kill yourself you embarrassing faggot jesus
>>536730869>b-but if they set it up to be perfectly secure it’s way better than having real people verify their attendance Except they won’t, retard. They will set up the system to be easy for the manufacturer and their chosen beneficiaries to cheat and then cover it up.
>>536720000Yeah because American ad agencies pay more then UK ones.
>>536719880i just assume everything trump says is a lie unless it's an evil sort of truth
>The right that cheats is projecting the left cheats once againWhy shouldnt you all just be miserable and lonely again? Youre clearly not human
>>536719880A Democrat is winning in Los Angeles?!? That's unprecedented! Clear fraud going on.
>>536719992Cool it with the antisemitism.
>>536729942Doesn't mean shit. Look at Todd Blanche, a literal Democrat. Trump hires retards. There's no reason for the numbers to jump on everyone except Pratt. None. Except fraud.
>>536731961>Kim Jong Un is winning in North Korea?!? That's unprecedented! Clear fraud going on.This is what you sound like. When the people already in control win in suspicious-looking ways the likelihood of fraud is extreme.
>>536730352>They probably are destroying Spencer votes thoughI dont think they are destroying Pratt ballots, at least not by the tens of thousands.It looks like Raman bought ~100k mail in votes, most of which were processed in the 06/04 dumps.
>>536719992More citizens than many states have in one city.
>>536731961the mayor let a good section of the city burn down a year ago. people want her out.
>>536732486South Dakota's capital of Pierre has a population of 14k. My shithole English town has a population of 107k. The US is a stupid place.
>>536732175Ok. Prove it.
>>536732797There are demonstrable ways to commit election fraud in California. That's all the proof needed to show that their elections aren't secure and no result can be trusted.I hope you fucking die painfully and soon.
>>536732160>There's no reason for the numbers to jump on everyone except Pratt. None. Except fraud.Or the reasons that were laid out in the article I linked that you didn't read that also show an update where only Pratt got votesThis is the problem with social media being the primary source of "information" for peopleWhen given the choice between >There's a massive conspiracy that goes so far up and becomes so all encompassing that the original basis for the conspiracy I presented becomes diluted and ultimately meaningless because it even implicates the people that are the wronged parties of the conspiracy or>I got duped by a twitter screenshotMost people double down like you're doing right now
>>536719880I keep seeing people spout it's the number of votes that take time, yet we don't even know turnout.They're basically saying it takes California 15 times longer to count their votes compared to New Mexico because of their population differences.
>>536731961Thanks, Reagan
>>536732672There were 85,000 in the cities affected by the Eaton and Palisades fire. LA county has 9 million residents.
>>536732774>The US is a stupid placeThe median household income in Mississippi the poorest state in the US is 22% higher than the median household income in the UK.The median household income in South Dakota is about 65% higher than the UK so shut your nigger mouth before you talk about South Dakota you broke bitch.
>>536732922That fraud could be committed isn't proof that it was.
>>536733465Go fucking kill yourself. I'm serious.
>>536733621>Getting this hysterical about a mayoral race in a foreign countryNGMI, Madame Bong
>>536733901You'd be surprised at how calmly I can wish death upon ontologically evil Marxists.
>>536720080All the seething replies to this post STILL can't explain how it's proof of anything untoward
>>536733965>asking for proof is marxism Lmao go have a chippy and sort your life out retard
>>536719880As a Californian I will never vote because it's literally pointless. this has reinforced my opinion further
>>536719880>critics say
>>536719992There’s no cheating in California you bigot.
>>536731305Plenty of evidence. Judges simply refuse to hear the cases.
>>536735710Yeah, it's like how I have so much evidence trump rapes kids, but judges refuse to hear the case
>>536731424That's because American consumers have so much more money than Euro consumers.
>>536719992Because they must first determine how many registered voters did not vote. Secondly, they determine how many Democratic party votes they need to secure the election. Lastly, they need to fill out and cast enough ballots for the people who hadn't voted, ensuring the Democratic party wins.
>>536736713They do the same thing in texas to make sure Republicans win
>>536736366Pretty similar actually
>>536727024They're already at that point. Go look at how many states with voter id Kamala won over Trump. Heck, look at how many Democrats won anything in those states. They are a fringe, niche party, with generally unpopular ideas.
>>536738787They're a Potempkin political party. They use the media and social media to gaslight the public in to believing they're more popular than they actually are.
>>536719880>inventing
I swear no topic makes Democrats start deploying bots to derail the discussion harder than election fraud. It truly is the topic they fear people discussing more than anything. Wonder why...
>>536739475Their power is built on election fraud and illegally harvesting ballots from hobos and illegal aliens.
