[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/qa/ - Question & Answer



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: 1541253768586.png (644 KB, 1400x1206)
644 KB
644 KB PNG
What's a good alternative to steam chat now that nazi jannies have killed it for /qa/?
>>
>>2409012
T you’re overreacting again
>>
Modsare SHIT
>>
>>2409016
Delete this.
>>
>for /qa/
Go back to your spinoff.
>>
>>2409020
What spinoff?

Say it.
>>
I don't know how serious this thread is
but livechan is an option for chat with images
you can post anonymously and without registration
there are two sites running it listed in imageboard.json but it's open source so you can always start your own if you want
>>
>saturnine peed self
heh what a bitch.
>>
File: 1526916739901.png (314 KB, 454x603)
314 KB
314 KB PNG
>>2409029
Tell me about it.....

Yikes.....
>>
Jesus he never shuts up does he? What an eyesore.
>>
File: 1540035171422.jpg (29 KB, 225x234)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>2409032
>never shuts up
>eyesore

Do you hear through your eyes....?
>>
>>2409027
Sounds like discord
>>
reminder that we're drama free here

https://discord.gg/QSbUdkx
>>
>>2409097
>discord

Also not even /qa/. It's an /r9k/ channel.
>>
>>2409097
>/r9k
>>2409101
the pinnacle of all normalfaggotry
>>
At least they don't have t-dork in there.
>>
Steamteens think they're better than discordteens...
>>
>>2409030
Ellipses only have 3 dots.
>>
>>2409115
Ellipses have a space between each period.
>>
no they dont theyre consecutive
>>
the server is so flawless they have to make things up to attack it
>>
>>2409121
Wrong!
>>
Just use IRC like everyone else, duh
>>
>>2409113
What's wrong with dorks?
>>
File: 243523.jpg (78 KB, 768x1136)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
this thread, it's very good
>>
>>2409212
shut up
>>
>>2409122
It's dead.
>>
File: 11.jpg (9 KB, 200x200)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>
>>2409217
Please hand in your steam chat resignation letter
>>
don't treat /qa/ steam as a discord, you're going to attract your teenbro cult
>>
File: 1527753831253.png (166 KB, 952x982)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
>>2409222
>>
File: 1541253768586.png (228 KB, 985x854)
228 KB
228 KB PNG
You're not missing much. Join discord instead.
>>
>>2409222
We also don't want to repeat the history of /intl/.
>>
>>2409217
it's night time in god's country
>>
>>2409256
>god

yikes
>>
the steam user fears divinity
>>
>>2409299
the fuck you talking about?
>>
>>2409245
what? /qa/ is the antithesis of those 8gag teens
>>
>>2409308
¥used as scapegoat by raiders
¥conflicts with moderation
¥"heh"/"take it easy"
¥spamming
The biggest divergence is that the /intl/ crowd played the boogeymen they were portrayed as, whereas the people on /qa/ who wanted to do that were found to be playing both sides and lost credibility.
>>
>>2409331
what a gross mischaracterization
where are you from?
>>
>>2409331
/qa/ dosent raid other boards
its the consequence of a raid
>>
>>2409341
I said "used as a scapegoat by raiders," that is, people raiding /qa/. Although fortunately that sort of thing hasn't happened as much lately.
>>
He's here.
The obsessed guy.
>>
>>2409381
Am not.
>>
a very good thread
>>
File: 1487807420411.jpg (1.28 MB, 2147x3508)
1.28 MB
1.28 MB JPG
>>
>>2409537
fuck off necrobumper
>>
>>2409537
trace on necrospermer
>>
>>2409549
Are you seriously encouraging the necrobumper?
>>
>>2409551
take it easy, It's only an anime forum
>>
>>2409552
lol you wish it was still just an anime forum but the politics overtook it and made you obsolete a long time ago, none of that makes necrospamming a good thing.
>>
Obsessed...
>>
File: 1541681882306.png (383 KB, 1412x939)
383 KB
383 KB PNG
>>2409012
>>2409243
Yikes what is this ugly discord ripoff.

>>2409554
Big yikers, go take a break at the_donald before you upset yourself anymore.
>>
File: 1379789174394.jpg (625 KB, 928x1488)
625 KB
625 KB JPG
>>
>>2409664
They only fixed bugs from a month ago yesterday lmaaaaao
>>
>>2409664
>take a break from the_donald
Why would I? 4chan is the source for most of the stuff on there anyway.
>>
>>2409664
and they shriek about discord being bad for some reason
>>
>>2409101
>It's an /r9k/ channel.
where does this narrative even come from? isn't it the steam group that's falling apart from whining and attention whoring?
>>
>>2409685
heh
>>
>>2409792
at least bump the thread.
>>
>>2409814
why? It's shit.
>>
>>2409815
no. this is a very, very good thread.
>>
>>2409814
my reply did absolutely nothing for the thread, why should i bump with it?
>>
>>2409817
for the same reason you would post something that does nothing for a thread which is absolutely none, hence my "at least"
>>
>>2409820
no, i'm not going to change how i post for you. entitled faggot
>>
>>2409220
>>2409815
this
>>2409816
stop forcing your fake community
>>
>>2409824
if you don't like these people you would be a fool to not see this thread as valuable
>>
>>2409828
It;s a discussion they should be having on /ota/ like most of the rest of their threads. This has nothing to do with /qa/.
>>
File: Global_Rule_2.gif (22 KB, 400x300)
22 KB
22 KB GIF
>steam groups
>discords
>spinoffs
why do normalfags feel the need to do this shit
>>
>>2409832
they are free to express themselves here.
>>
>>2409828
it isn't. only people that are in the loop would get what is happening here. it's misleading to everyone else
>>
>>2409839
or it's just T shitposting, ever consider that?
>>
>underaged boogeyman
20-25 year olds are usually worse. usually pretentious, usually obsessed with the idea of the teen menace
>>
>>2409839
all any standard /qa/ swingin dick that doesn't cling to spinoffs sees here is a circlejerk pooping on itself in public
>>
>>2409837
Not having been banned yet is not the same as free to express themselves.
>>
>>2409845
isn't it though
>>
>>2409847
According to whom?
The deleted archive page proves you wrong.
>>
File: 45748010_p0.png (911 KB, 1000x1367)
911 KB
911 KB PNG
>>2409845
If you really wanted to follow the /qa/ standard set by mods, you'd be posting more masculine /qa/ boys.
>>
>>2409848
someone who isn't banned demonstrates freedom of expression on an objective level until banned
>>
>>2409849
I might be wrong but I think I_AM_ABIB would disagree with you. Maybe you should ask him.
>>
>>2409851
Uh, he's the one who endorsed posting big buff boys, dummy.
>>
>>2409850
The joke's on you, they've all been permabanned here dozens if not hundreds of times. It's only means more bragging rights and street cred to the weeb mafia.
>>
>>2409848
wew
>>
>>2409852
Sorry I don't hang out in the IRC sucking mod cock like some others here do. I doubt that but if you have a screenshot you'd like to share, by all means.
>>
>>2409856
I guess you missed the dozens of other pages full of weebspam and cherry picked out the 5 frogs.
>>
>>2409857
do you not use /qa/ or something? the evidence is right here dude >>2409069
>>
>>2409858
there are clearly six in that image alone.
>>
>>2409858
that was literally what i see when i open the deleted archive, what's under it doesnt matter much since that's the first thing anyone going there will see
>>
>>2409859
If we are going by that thread then we should be singling Dragonball songs right now. Are you seriously trying to pretend like the /ota/teens aren't from /ota/?
>>
File: hmm.png (11 KB, 508x83)
11 KB
11 KB PNG
>>2409856
trying to sell your false flags huh?
then what say you to this?
>>
>>2409860
And they are statistically irrelevant compared to the bulk of the rest of the deleted posts.

>>2409861
Actually it matters quite a lot that the rest of the deleted archive is weebspam besides those 5 or 6 threads but nice try at downplaying.
>>
>>2409863
That's not the deleted archives.
>>
File: 56365.png (202 KB, 417x548)
202 KB
202 KB PNG
>this thread
>>
>>2409866
deletion ≠ ban
>>
>>2409868
deletion = unwanted/illegal/rulebreaking content
>>
https://my.mixtape.moe/yasptf.jpg
i'm not sure what I should take away from this, things on /qa/ get deleted?
>>
>>2409870
ban = unwanted/illegal/rulebreaking content so much you've pissed the mods and everybody else off
>>
>>2409871
You aren't sure because you're being purposely obtuse.
https://desuarchive.org/qa/search/deleted/deleted/page/2/
https://desuarchive.org/qa/search/deleted/deleted/page/3/
https://desuarchive.org/qa/search/deleted/deleted/page/4/
You can clearly see a trend emerging...
>>
>>2409872
I don't know what your point is considering most of them brazenly brag about ban evading and switching IPs.
>>
>>2409873
that's like 90% bots and barneyfag, am i really supposed to sort through all that when i can just look at the OPs for a more clear picture as to what is not blatant ban-evading/botting. just because it displays different from what you believe doesn't mean you should disregard this valuable evidence that things on /qa/ get deleted no matter who posts it.
https://my.mixtape.moe/lsshpa.png
i mean, what do you have to say for these op deletions? you can't just ignore what i present to you here
>>
you guys are so fucking mad about something so fucking trivial
>>
>>2409878
sorry forgot the rest
https://my.mixtape.moe/ajehqf.jpg
>>
steam/discord threads are always a huge success we definitely need more of them
>>
>>2409889
You can blame T for this one. I dunno why you guys hang out with him.
>>
>>2409878
It's 90% weebspam (including asukaspammer), 9% barneyfag, and 1% frogposting. Get it right.
>What do you have to say for these op deletions? you can't just ignore what i present to you here
I can and will ignore them because they don't happen nearly as often as weebspam gets deleted. And to think that the mafia narrative is that mods don't come here at all.
>>
Awful thread. Why is /qa/ cursed to have a retarded weeb mafia squatting on it?
>>
>>2409902
>>999998
>>
>>2409899
dude, you know when someone gets banned all there posts get deleted and show up on the deletions archive right? so most of that's probably from a couple people being banned. i dont see why i'd want to take the time to sort through who's who when i can just look at the ops.
>>
>>2409910
I'm sorry you can't be bothered to take the time to look yourself, but you shouldn't count on everyone else being as lazy as you are. If you were to keep going beyond page 10 in the deleted archive you would see what the status quo really is. Don't take my word for it, see for yourself at a random time.
>>
>>2409915
yeah and it's probably 99% of the time just qajp's posts since he's always targeted by mods. how that has any bearing on what anyone else posts is beyond me
>>
>>2409917
>targeted by mods
/qajp/ rightly deserves every single ban he earns. You shouldn't get mad at mods for doing their jobs. He isn't the only one mods are constantly having to clean up after, though. In fact that particular mafia don only seems to come around on weekends when he wants to spam his stream.
>>
>>2409925
>only seems to come around on weekends when he wants to spam his stream
damn, don't know how else to respond to this delusion aside from one word: lol
>>
imagine giving this much of a fuck about dumb shit
>>
>>2409929
i dont know about the guy angry about weebs, but i'm just bored and eating breakfast here
>>
>>2409933
well don't forget to bump the thread while you munch on your cocoa puffs
>>
>>2409927
That's when he tripfags. I don't know what there is to be deluded about. Are you saying you have some insider knowledge of /qajp/'s activities?

>>2409929
lol you must be new here
>>
>>2409936
gee, i can't believe you don't know that qajp is one of the top 5 most active posters on /qa/
>>
>>2409933
Weebs =/= The weeb mafia. Actual 4chan crossboarders from /jp/ and /a/ can't stand them either.
>>
>>2409942
who cares about what retards from those boards think, seriously.
>>
>>2409940
Maybe he likes to think he is, but as far as I'm concerned he's one of the minor mafia dons. The guy who used to tripfag as GR15 is much more prolific.
>>
weebs > frogs > spinoff weebs
>>
>>2409946
lol
>>
>>2409945
/qa/ cares. This is the 4chan meta board. Discussion of all 4chan boards is welcome, but /ota/ isn't one of those.
>>
>>2409949
they are free to express themselves.
>>
>>2409952
We've already been through this. When they get banned (which they always do eventually) it proves how they were never free to express themselves in that way.
>>
cant imagine being like this guy, who's been spending almost 2 years fighting people that have no care in the world for him, and he barely has figured out anything about them
>>
>>2409956
t. mad weeblet
>>
>>2409956
>it's always that one guy
ffs
>>
>>2409956
If anyone had actually been here 2 years studying you fools then this wouldn't be the first time they have seen you type out passive-aggressive non-argument posts like that one.
>>
>>2409957
>>2409960
dude just stop you're just going to embarrass yourself in front of any of your peers with even the slightest bit of knowledge
>>
>>2409953
that is objectively false if they are not banned and expressing themselves.
>>
Look out guys, the schizos who can't differentiate between anonymous posters on 4chan are here.
>>
>>2409967
now you're either that dense or simply trolling
>>
>>2409971
I bet he caught you square
>>
>>2409972
not an argument. if they are expressing themselves freely and they are not banned, that is an objective, tangible demonstration of this boards freedom of expression. it can be nothing but delusional to think otherwise, which is probably why you presume I'm trolling because that's easier than confronting your own cognitive dissonance.

this board's freedom of expression is it's strong point. if you don't like it, you don't fit in.
>>
>>2409978
>this board's freedom of expression is it's strong point.
Not really. This is just what you tell yourself as an excuse to shitpost so much. In reality this is the 4chan meta board, where people come to complain. One of the chief complaints is that you people shit up /qa/ too much.
>>
>>2409983
people express themselves here in a way that you dislike, and other people express themselves in a way contrary to them, and all of this is allowed regardless of your fragile feelings.
>>
>>2409978
so how is ban evasion and heavy use of proxies now considered as "freedom to express oneself"?
>>
>>2409992
it isn't, which is why people sometimes get banned here. it has nothing to do with the content of their posts, which is allowed.
>>
>>2409989
If it were allowed it wouldn't keep getting banned and/or deleted. Also you're acting under the false pretense that the spammers care if they are permabanned/rangebanned. Constantly challenging mods authority doesn't go very far.
>>
>>2410000
ban evasion isn't allowed, and posts of people ban evading are usually deleted. this has nothing to do with the content of their posts. you are ranting.
>Also you're acting under the false pretense that the spammers care if they are permabanned/rangebanned
nothing I am saying has anything to do with the feelings of people who ban evade.
>>
>>2410008
posts are sometimes deleted without the poster getting banned
how do you disprove that?
>>
File: Untitled.png (719 KB, 1097x2018)
719 KB
719 KB PNG
>>2410011
If you want bans, then here I guess.
>>
>>2410032
I'm sorry. You went out of your way to handpick these only 5 obvious spam/garbage threads for a cap while intentionally avoiding the fact that you had to go through dozens of banned weebspam threads. Do you realize this?
>>
>>2410053
There's no point in arguing with dishonest people.
>>
File: 1540614105932.png (79 KB, 1169x387)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
>>2410032
He might not realize it due to self-delusion, but don't worry, everyone else does.
>>
>>2410053
Alright, so I went to the list and crossed off each post banned for ban evasion and proxies because those have nothing to do with the contents of ones post, and then I highlighted each "animeposter" ban with blue. The rest are from others, and every ban I highlighted in that picture is in this one as well.
>>
>>2410063
Forgot my image
>>
>>2410011
janitors act up sometimes. you get what you pay for.

>>2410058
arguing with people who are dishonest with themselves is interesting. when something they are saying is demonstrated as being completely wrong in plain language and they still desperately cling to the idea that they are correct, driving their argument into pure obscurity.
>>
>>2410063
>we'll just conveniently ignore the fact that animeposters are ban evading shitposters
nice
>>
>>2410063
so it's pornography that you're upset about him posting?
>>
>>2410069
Well what does a person ban-evading have to do with anime in general not being allowed on /qa/?
>>
>>2410071
umm, no one is saying that sweetie, just that you spinoff cucks should fuck off
>>
>>2410067
>driving their argument into pure obscurity.
wxample: saying /ota/ drama threads aren't allowed devolving into posting weird lists of people getting banned for posting NSFW on a blue board
>>
>>2410073
they are free to express themselves.
>>
>>2410075
no, /ota/niggers deserve the rope
>>
>>2410073
I'm not the one that brought it up.
>>2409832
>>2409848
>>
>>2410063
>I went to the list and crossed off each post banned for ban evasion and proxies because those have nothing to do with the contents of ones post
According to whom? The content of the posts is why they were banned originally in the first place. All of the red markings should be counted as the weebspam they are.
>>2410071
Nobody ever said anime wasnt allowed on /qa/. The weebspammers always seem to try to conflate weebspam with normal meta threads with an anime image.
>>
>>2410076
I don't particularly care for them and I wish they would leave but my feelings nor your feelings change the fact that they are free to express themselves here.
>>
>>2410077
that poster is clearly stating that /ota/niggers should fuck off
>>
>>2410071
>derailing attempt
yep. done for
>>
>>2410077
You also cherry picked only the most recent posts at a time when the pseudo-barneyfag is on, ignoring that the default state of /qa/ is being raided by /jp/ spinoffs for the last 2 years.
>>
>>2410080
Well he's clearly stating that there's something bannable about what people are posting, no use in damage controlling because you can't weasel you're way out of this one.
>>2409845
>>
>>2410079
they are still niggers that spam, and spam isn't allowed(pro tip: the ban evaders are either barneyfag or /ota/niggers)
>>
>>2410079
They are not free to express themselves here. This is the 4chan meta board for 4chan posters. /ota/teens have nothing to do with that.
>>
>>2410083
I don't get it. are you saying that people who aren't banned and are freely expressing themselves are not free to express themselves? that's oxymoronic.
>>
>>2410083
You never had a valid point in the first place. If what they were doing was allowed they wouldn't have been banned to start with. You are incorrectly assuming the content of their posts had nothing to do with why they got banned.
>>
>>2410085
they actively demonstrate their ability to express themselves here. something the owner of this website has explicitly stated is allowed on this board. even some global rules are largely ignored here, such as criticism of moderation staff.
>>
>>2410086
Do you have me confused for someone else? I'm saying that people are free to express themselves.
>>2410087
They were banned for reasons that had nothing to do with discussing japanese culture or anime on /qa/.
>>
>>2410090
>They were banned for reasons that had nothing to do with discussing japanese culture or anime on /qa/.
Are you a mod? No? Then shut the hell up. If the content of their posts didn't give away who they were then mods wouldn't have banned them (again and again).
>>
>>2410087
posting NSFW on a blue board isn't allowed anywhere on the website. what does that have to do with /ota/ not being allowed to infight here? they are free to express themselves.

this post? >>2409949 this is what started this discussion. I don't see what someone posting NSFW has to do with this.
>>
>>2410092
I'm not a mod, but you don't need to be one to find out why many of the big trips were banned. Ironically for two of the main ones it was for complaining about mods on /qa/, some meta board this is lol.
>>
>>2410092
hiro himself said people are free to express themselves here.
>>
>>2410094
>posting NSFW on a blue board isn't allowed anywhere on the website
Really? I guess >>2404400 didn't get that memo. Maybe when he gets banned for posting NSFW on a blue board you will try to say his ban had nothing to do with the NSFW anime content he posted but everyone else here knows better.
>>
>>2410090
they were banned for being ban evading spamming niggers, and they should keep getting banned
>>
File: 2391733.png (64 KB, 1129x298)
64 KB
64 KB PNG
>>
>>2410101
Like i'm going to read some psychotic's schizo ramblings.
>>
>>2410099
if he gets banned for posting NSFW I will presume that the reason for his ban is for posting NSFW. why would I presume anything else?
>>
>>2410104
you have but you won't admit it
>>
>>2410095
You're missing the point that the only thing that mods have to go on as to who those people are is the content of their posts. They switch IPs constantly.

>>2410097
Hiro was talking about 4chan users, not outsiders on a crusade to turn this board into their personal 2DRandom shitposting board. They already have multiple spinoffs for that but they keep insisting on doing it here.
>>
>>2410108
Managers, maybe some moderators, can see IP ranges and ban people using the same range. Also they can check for VPNs/Proxies.
>>
>>2410108
but they are 4chan users. they are literally using 4chan. you disliking them doesn't change anything about that fact. they are free to express themselves and you are unable to turn up any evidence to the contrary. people getting banned for ban evasion or NSFW content have nothing to do with that.
>>
File: 1512239935252.jpg (601 KB, 1440x1127)
601 KB
601 KB JPG
>>2410092
Please explain this publicly available picture to me.
>>
>>2410110
/ota/teens are 4chan spammers, not 4chan users. You have been presented multiple arguments as evidence but you keep insisting, despite all logic, that >they are still welcome here
It sounds like your self delusion is so deep that you actually believe spammers from other sites are welcome here.
>>
>>2410113
Please provide evidence that every person that posts anime on /qa/ is a spammer, or any further arguments of yours will be ignored, and you will have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
>>
>>2410112
What is there to explain? That guy stopped using his trip when mods publicly made an example of him. Now he lurks /qa/ anonymously. The only way mods know who he is is by the way he posts. I don't know what point your trying to prove but that guy is a horrible example to use, he's probably the worst weeb mafioso here.
>>
>>2410114
Go ahead and ignore me. I didn't say that anyway and you're obviously one of the spammers yourself. Next time mods ban you don't say I didn't tell you so.
>>
>>2410117
Please provide evidence that every person that regularly posts anime on /qa/ is a spammer, or any further arguments of yours will be ignored, and you will have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
>>
>>2410118
Nobody anywhere ever said every person who regularly posts anime on /qa/ is a spammer. In fact I could point to threads where /a/ or /jp/ crossboarders called out the spinoff weeb mafia spammers for being the unwanted outsiders they are.
>>
>>2410120
Please provide evidence that every person that regularly posts anime threads on /qa/ reminiscent of those on spinoffs:
>>2406555
>>2356551
>>2334376
>>2400767
>>2400917
is a spammer, or any further arguments of yours will be ignored, and you will have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
>>
>>2410122
The ironic thing is that everytime proof gets posted, one of the mafiosos gets mad and spams the thread off the board
>>2378484
>>2385393
>>2389692
>>2398836
But of course you knew that, being one of them.
>>
>>2410123
Please provide evidence that every person that regularly posts anime threads on /qa/ reminiscent of those on spinoffs:
>>2406555
>>2356551
>>2334376
>>2400767
>>2400917
is a spammer, or any further arguments of yours will be ignored, and you will have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
>>
>>2410114
>>2410118
>>2410122
>>2410124
You're spamming at this very mnoment.
>>
>>2410124
You've already been given more than enough proof. Too bad your standards of proof are impossibly high because you know deep down I'm right.

I don't know who you think is going to believe your delusions, but to everybody else but you, the spammers are well known. Lurk moar and maybe you too will figure it out like the rest of 4chan.
>>
>>2410129
>>2410130
Please provide evidence that every person that regularly posts anime threads on /qa/ reminiscent of those on spinoffs:
>>2406555
>>2356551
>>2334376
>>2400767
>>2400917
is a spammer, or any further arguments of yours will be ignored, and you will have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
You will continue to receive this reply until you are able to reply to me with actual evidence in this thread.
>>
>>2410132
>gets btfo
>starts spamming
LIKE A CLOCKWORK
>>
T has set the guy off
>>
>>2410132
eager to see more
>>
>>2410113
>not 4chan users.
they are 4chan users. they literally use 4chan. you couldn't complain about their posts otherwise. you are once again making an oxymoronic statement. aren't you embarrassed?

>You have been presented multiple arguments as evidence
such as? all you've done is post ban lists of people being banned for ban evasion and NSFW. link me to your arguments. you haven't made any that are actually relevant that aren't self-contradicting(people that use 4chan do not use 4chan, people that express themselves freely are not free to express themselves, etc.)
>>
>>2410132
You are being ignored, since you have essentially admitted you are incorrect.
>>
>>2410148
They do not use 4chan, they spam 4chan. Big difference. I understand that you might be confused about that difference if you are one of the spammers, though.

>>2410123
>>
>>2410150
I don't get it. is it "spam" just because you don't like it? because their threads are definitely allowed, and you have posted absolutely zero evidence to the contrary, only screencaps of random people being banned for breaking global rules.

and once again, if someone is using 4chan, that makes them a 4chan user. semantically, observably, objectively. your feelings about them do not change reality.
>>
File: 1534120924209.jpg (95 KB, 427x720)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
if spinoff threads aren't allowed, how are you in one right now
>>
>>2410150
>They do not use 4chan, they spam 4chan
so they're like the frogposters here
>>
>>2410156
We all know what the spam looks like apparently except you. By your definition we should just invite /leftypol/ and /mlpol/ and 162 back to spam as much as the /ota/teens, because all spinoff niggres are welcome, right? Get the fuck over yourself. Hiro was talking to 4chan users when he said be yourself, not teen spammers from spinoffs.

>>2410160
There is no frog mafia like there is a weeb mafia.
>>
>>2410163
you're talking about the guy with the scripts that comes in and makes a bunch of anime threads with no text? maybe he's from a spinoff, probably. spamming is against global rules, of course.

I don't see what that has to do with people making non-spam spinoff threads, which don't get banned, as they are free to express themselves here.

>Hiro was talking to 4chan users when he said be yourself
but they objectively, observably use 4chan. you would be physically incapable of being upset by their 4chan posts otherwise. how can you feel good about yourself while directly contradicting yourself? do you have no shame?
>>
>>2410158
CONSPIRACY
>>
>>2410158
he has repeatedly demonstrated that he thinks making a statement that contradicts itself is somehow a good argument, so he probably hasn't noticed or thinks that this thread existing somehow proves that it isn't allowed to exist as he's been saying things that are on that level of retarded.
>>
>>2410168
I'm talking about the group of guys from /ota/, formerly /hima/ and elsewhere, who treat /qa/ like it's their personal blog and 100%OJ lobby. When they aren't doing that they are here fapping together in some roleplaying imagedump thread nobody but them wanted. You can keep telling people those types are welcome here all you want, but don't be surprised when people laugh at you for actually believing that, and also don't be surprised when those types get banned for not being as welcome here as you thought.
>>
lmao this board
>>
>>2410170
The thread's existence is just further evidence of how annoying the spinoff nigs are. Even T can't stand you faggots for more than a brief timespan.
>>
>>2410173
>I'm talking about the group of guys from /ota/, formerly /hima/ and elsewhere, who treat /qa/ like it's their personal blog and 100%OJ lobby.
and as long as they aren't breaking global rules they are free to express themselves. you have provided zero evidence to the contrary. all you've done is say you don't like them, posted screencaps of random people being banned for breaking completely unrelated global rules, and contradicted yourself in excess.

I mean, how do you even account for this thread's existence? have you zero intellectual honesty? or maybe you are stuffed inside such a tight cognitive dissonance box that you aren't aware that you're posting in a thread that contradicts everything you are saying
>>
File: 1514544510230.gif (622 KB, 600x338)
622 KB
622 KB GIF
Uh.....

This thread was supposed to be a joke......
>>
>>2410182
>I'm going to keep saying you have provided zero evidence, despite >>2410123 and >>2410101 and >>2410059 and the mountain of other evidence in the archive
Good strategy. I assume it's worked for you somewhere else but here.
>>
>>2410178
this threads existence is evidence that you are wrong, and that spinoff threads are welcome here.

I don't use spinoffs, by the way. I find them detestable, even. your lazy boogeyman whining misses me entirely. I am only pointing out that hiro has explicitly stated that people are free to express themselves here, and their shitty threads as long as they don't break global rules are protected by that statement, and this is actively demonstrated by the moderation of this board.
>>
>>2410183
I hope your father is proud of you, T.
>>
>>2410188
that ain't him
>>
>>2410185
you linked to a list of people complaining about threads they don't like in a schizophrenic manner, a schizophrenic rant, and a screencap of people being banned for breaking a global rule.

so no, you have provided zero evidence supporting the claim that spinoff threads that do not break global rules are not welcome here. do you actually have any?
>>
based teenbros bringing the epic
>>
File: IMG_20160925_044410.jpg (749 KB, 802x451)
749 KB
749 KB JPG
>>2410188
Why wouldn't he be?
>>
>>2410186
Who do you think you are fooling? Literally nobody likes spinoff teens except other spinoff teens.
>I don't use spinoffs, by the way. I find them detestable, even.
I find that extremely hard to believe. Nobody else but one of the spinoff teens themselves would have the motivation to defend them so vigorously with bad arguments.
>I am only pointing out that hiro has explicitly stated that people are free to express themselves
Yes, 4chan people, not /ota/teens. Why stop with /ota/? Why shouldn't 8gag think it's okay to come back to 4chan? Nobody here wants that except apparently you, especially not Hiro.
>>
>>2410190
No I linked to direct evidence of you and your ilk's faggotry. Good luck trying to convince people that spammers from spinoffs are welcome here. No worries, I'm sure some of the other spammers will rally to your cause.
>>
>>2410195
I don't see the point in trying to convince you I'm not a spinoff weeb, it makes no difference whether or not I am. I'm just letting you know that your boogeyman rants are completely missing me.

>Nobody else but one of the spinoff teens themselves would have the motivation to defend them so vigorously with bad arguments
I'm defending this board's freedom of expression, nothing else. that's why I use /qa/. I don't like the spinoff weebs, but I will not delude myself into thinking that they are somehow not allowed to post here, despite regular demonstrations of the contrary.

and what is "bad" about my arguments? use quotations, explain the way I have explained your oxymoronic statements.

>Why shouldn't 8gag think it's okay to come back to 4chan
there are 8gag users who are also 4chan users. your feelings towards them do not magically make them not 4chan users.
>>
>>2410197
I mean do you have any actual evidence that spinoff threads that don't break global rules are not allowed to be posted here? that is your claim, after all. >>2409949 here's the post in question.

do you have any evidence or not? this thread existing is certainly evidence that you are wrong...
>>
>>2410200
/ota/ niggers spam the board and that's why they aren't welcome
>>
>>2410202
any spam isn't welcome, it's against global rules. that's why there are deleted frog spam threads, it's not just spinoff weebs.

regardless of that, spinoff threads that do not break rules are welcome, and you have posted no evidence to the contrary.
>>
File: FFS.png (1.06 MB, 1500x1300)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB PNG
>>2410190
This is it. This is fucking it. I'll spell this out for you.
Fuck.
Off.
Back.
To.
Your.
Spinoff.
>>
>>2410203
frog threads are almost excluesively deleted for garbage outside of /b/, meanwhile /ota/ niggers spam the board every day
>>
>>2410204
Most of these threads are mine
>>
>>2410204
But what does that have to do with such threads being allowed or not allowed on /qa/? You just posted a collage of threads/posts from ota.

>>2410206
Doesn't that mean that those threads are actually being labeled unwelcome by the staff?
>>
>>2410200
>it makes no difference whether or not I am.
It does make a difference because it means that you already know what you are doing is wrong but you don't care, vs. not knowing what you are doing is wrong, which means you're just a clueless idiot who shouldn't be posting. It isn't a boogeyman when you can see their weebspam threads in the catalog right now.
>I'm defending this board's freedom of expression,
Ahahah that's hilarious. The problem is you think this board is 2D/random and /qa/ stands for Quality Anime.
>what's bad about my arguments?
Well for one thing multiple people posted proof and you ignored it and spammed the same comment more than once. That's just for starters...
>there are 8gag users who are also 4chan users
There are also redditors who are 4chan users but good luck trying to tell other 4chan users not to complain about 8gag or reddit interlopers.
>>
>>2410207
And you should go back to your spinoff.
>>
>>2410208
why it's simple
raid
>>
>>2410208
it means that posting threads about hating niggers can get you banned on /qa/
>>
>>2410206
that changes absolutely nothing about the argument I presented you. you simply said that not all frogposting that gets deleted is deleted for spam reasons, and then repeated information already available in my own post. do you have an argument or not? how about evidence? this thread is still sitting here, still not deleted, still proving you wrong every minute it's up.
>>
>>2410214
You do realize you are conversing with approximately three different people, right?
>>
back 2 le spinoff
>>
>>2410210
No, I like it here.
>>
>>2410214
You said spinoff spammers are welcome here and then everybody else laughed at you.

>>2410218
That's always been the problem.
>>
>>2410209
>It isn't a boogeyman when you can see their weebspam threads in the catalog right now.
it's your boogeyman when you accuse me of being them just because I'm attacking your arguments.

>Well for one thing multiple people posted proof
what posts show proof that spinoff threads that don't break rules get deleted? that hasn't happened once. link the posts right now.

>and you ignored it and spammed the same comment more than once.
no I did not. you might be confusing me for someone else, I'm not the only one who's pointed out that you're not making sense.

>there are also redditors who are 4chan users but good luck trying to tell other 4chan users not to complain about 8gag or reddit interlopers.
disliking redditors, 8gag users, or spinoff weebs using 4chan doesn't change the fact that they are using 4chan and are therefore 4chan users. how are you able to contradict yourself like this and feel okay with yourself?
>>
>>2410214
So ">tfw voted for trump just to spite libtards" threads are now allowed on /v/?
>>
>>2410215
that wouldn't change a thing about anything I've said.

>>2410220
>You said spinoff spammers are welcome here
quote me. spamming is against global rules. spinoff threads that don't break global rules are welcome here. I'm also not aware of any posts laughing at me, I think you might be imagining them to make yourself feel better.
>>
>>2410222
why would they be? how is that relevant at all? it's not related to /tv/.

however, on /qa/, hiro has explicitly stated that people are "free to express themselves", "otherwise" from discussing 4chan meta. it's literally in the sticky.
>>
>>2410222
But those go against the off topic rule of /v/? Here, look at this rule which clearly states those kinds of threads are not allowed.
>>
>>2410221
Wrong, I'm accusing you of being one of them because it would take being that to have that much suspension of disbelief and cognitive dissonance necessary to think Hiro saying 'be yourself' means faggots from spinoffs are welcome to spam anime or anything else as much as they want here.

>what posts show proof that spinoff threads that don't break rules get deleted?
Literally 85% of the all deleted archive pages are that.
>that hasn't happened once. link the posts right now.
You're truly hilarious. Either you are totally new here and genuinely clueless or it's amateur night at the troll cave and you haven't gotten your delivery down yet.
>no I did not. you might be confusing me for someone else, I'm not the only one who's pointed out that you're not making sense.
I'm not the only one telling you how wrong you are if that's what you mean.
>using 4chan is the same as shitposting ad nauseum on 4chan
I'm sorry, I will never agree with this and I don't think most 4chan posters and/or staff would either.
>>
>>2410227
I never said hiro allowing freedom of expression here allows people to break global rules. quote me.

I did however say they are allowed to post spinoff threads that do not break global rules, which is observably true(you're in one), and you have provided zero evidence otherwise.

>Literally 85% of the all deleted archive pages are that.
post proof. you haven't so far, you've only posted examples of people getting banned for breaking global rules.

do you have the proof or not? post it, link it as you claim it's already been posted in this thread. this thread that's proving you wrong every minute it's on the board.
>>
File: more.png (7 KB, 1131x92)
7 KB
7 KB PNG
>>
File: 3453453.jpg (27 KB, 480x480)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>2410227
>suspension of disbelief and cognitive dissonance
careful when using words you don't understand
>>
How the HECK did this thread get so big
>>
>>2410232
Well I've asked you in other threads what your diagnosis was at the psychiatist's office but you refuse to tell me.
>>
>>2410235
T is a master jimmy rustler.
>>
>>2410235
well I really like how embarrassing this thread is to the spinoff weebs so I see active participation in it as beneficial to the community. even though I'm apparently a spinoff weeb myself somehow according to this extremely buttmad gentleman.
>>
>>2410235
That's the effect T has on people.
>>
>>2410239
If you don't want to be accused of being a spinoff weeb then stop trying to justify their shitty behavior. There is no justification. They are not welcome here.
>>
>>2410242
but they literally are, as long as they are not breaking any global rules. this thread's existence is proof. people are free to express themselves here, that's why I like this board and I will defend that aspect of this board. I don't care if you accuse me of being one to feel better about losing an argument, I don't know why it would make a difference whether I am one or not. the fact remains that they are free to express themselves and you have failed completely to post any evidence to the contrary, while simultaneously posting in a thread that is evidence that you are wrong.
>>
if you want a board with heavy moderation that actively tries to remove things you don't like, you picked the wrong board, more likely the wrong website.
>>
File: _qa_2017-09-09-15-29-28.png (1.47 MB, 1498x949)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB PNG
>>2410246
Just the fact that they are permabanned and evading is reason enough for them not to be welcome, and that doesn't even get into the content of their posts, which is another worthy reason.
I'm not going to link you to the proof for the fourth time when you're just going to ignore it again and arbitrarily declare that I haven't posted proof. This thread is meta. I don't know why you keep pointing it out as an example of weebspam. I know you are smart enough to know what weebspam really is. See if you can figure out why those threads keep getting deleted.(protip: it isn't because of their history, they change IPs. Also >>2410157 counts as spam as much as >>2360290)

>>2410251
I want a meta board that doesn't have pic related on it. I'm not the only one.
>>
Just remember that 99% of so-called "spinoff" posters are also current or former 4chan users. That's literally why they're called spinoffs: because they're derived from 4chan.

Speaking for myself, my main reason to visit /qa/ used to be /jp/ and /a/ threads (one instance when I was particularly active on this board was in Oct-Nov 2016, when there was a general crackdown on /a/ and I made several posts arguing in favor of moving the Daily Japanese Thread to /jp/), but over time /qa/ became my most frequented board and most of the time now I just use it to post whatever I feel like.

I am also a semi-regular poster on other imageboards, don't have any permanent bans to my name (feel free to report this post if you don't believe me) and have no intention to stop posting on /qa/ in the foreseeable future.
>>
>>2410256
you haven't posted any threads being deleted for reasons other than global rules being broken. not once. link the posts, provide proof.

neither of those posts you linked are spam, they are people expressing themselves. that's why they aren't deleted. I don't think you know what "spam" means. the cirno posting in your image is spam, presuming they were all made within a short time period. the threads you linked are not.

post a single screenshot, one screenshot of someone being banned for posting spinoff related material without breaking a global rule. if you've already done so, link one post. last time you linked posts you linked three posts that had absolutely nothing to do with people getting banned for non-rule breaking spinoff threads. was that dishonesty or are you insane?
>>
>>2410256
>I want a meta board that doesn't have pic related on it
then you picked the wrong board because that's not going away. half of what's in that image doesn't even break any rules.
>>
>>2410256
>I want a meta board that doesn't have pic related on it.
Did it occur to you that maybe you don't fit in here, and would be happier being somewhere where you weren't constantly exposed to thinks you dislike?
>>
Oh wow, the whole group chat is here now.

>>2410260
Yep, there you go again. All I can say is good luck with that opinion. I don't think too many people are going to buy into it but who knows. I certainly don't.

>>2410263
What are you talking about? It goes away all the time when they get banned. There are golden hours when /qa/ is slow and only meta threads at the top of the catalog but then the outsiders always return to continue the raid.

>>2410266
No because I've always been here. I've watched you try and fail to turn this place into something else for years. It's getting to be like watching a soap opera, watching you all get banned so much.
>>
>>2410269
>There are golden hours when /qa/ is slow and only meta threads at the top of the catalog but then the outsiders always return to continue the raid.
more likely there are golden hours when america is asleep
>>
>>2410269
I've only been banned once for three days here and I deserved it. I don't use spinoffs, though. I'm just pointing out that it doesn't make any sense for you to be here if it just makes you angry.
>>
>>2410269
>All I can say is good luck with that opinion. I don't think too many people are going to buy into it but who knows.
well the mods seem to, as they leave the threads you don't like up.
>>
>>2410274
This board is for complaints and customer service, and I'm all out of service.
>>
>>2410279
But they don't though. They delete them and publicly permaban the people who make them. See >>2410059 or 90% of the ghost posts on desuarchive.
>>
>>2410283
those people are breaking a global rule, criticism of moderation staff. usually it doesn't get you banned here but sometimes it does.
>>
>>2410285
Nice spin but they were not banned for global rule #8, they were banned for #9 and #10, respectively.
>>
>>2410289
lolwut >>2410112
>>
>>2410315
Valid point. However that wasn't the first or last time they were banned that night. The overwhelming majority of them were for GR9 and 10.
>>
delusional
>>
File: spinoffs.png (43 KB, 1103x137)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
>>
this thread had like 10 posts 2 hours ago lol
fuck
>>
My friends are on Steam
>>
>>2410481
I'm not on steam.
>>
anyone here homu
>>
File: 16804700_p0.jpg (782 KB, 1000x1250)
782 KB
782 KB JPG
im homu and im here
>>
homu
>>
File: searching_for_you_00.jpg (1.39 MB, 1055x1500)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_01.jpg (255 KB, 1004x1500)
255 KB
255 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_02.jpg (736 KB, 1004x1500)
736 KB
736 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_03.jpg (470 KB, 1004x1500)
470 KB
470 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_04.jpg (602 KB, 1004x1500)
602 KB
602 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_05.jpg (468 KB, 1004x1500)
468 KB
468 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_06.jpg (527 KB, 1004x1500)
527 KB
527 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_07.jpg (613 KB, 1004x1500)
613 KB
613 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_08.jpg (573 KB, 1004x1500)
573 KB
573 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_09.jpg (529 KB, 1004x1500)
529 KB
529 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_10.jpg (563 KB, 1004x1500)
563 KB
563 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_11.jpg (441 KB, 1004x1500)
441 KB
441 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_12.jpg (471 KB, 1004x1500)
471 KB
471 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_13.jpg (476 KB, 1004x1500)
476 KB
476 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_14.jpg (613 KB, 1004x1500)
613 KB
613 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_15.jpg (549 KB, 1004x1500)
549 KB
549 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_16.jpg (408 KB, 1004x1500)
408 KB
408 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_17.jpg (569 KB, 1004x1500)
569 KB
569 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_18.jpg (649 KB, 1004x1500)
649 KB
649 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_19.jpg (571 KB, 1004x1500)
571 KB
571 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_20.jpg (386 KB, 1004x1500)
386 KB
386 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_21.jpg (423 KB, 1004x1500)
423 KB
423 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_22.jpg (592 KB, 1004x1500)
592 KB
592 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_23.jpg (538 KB, 1004x1500)
538 KB
538 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_24.jpg (386 KB, 1004x1500)
386 KB
386 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_25.jpg (434 KB, 1004x1500)
434 KB
434 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_26.jpg (509 KB, 1004x1500)
509 KB
509 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_27.jpg (552 KB, 1004x1500)
552 KB
552 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_28.jpg (773 KB, 1004x1500)
773 KB
773 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_29.jpg (728 KB, 1004x1500)
728 KB
728 KB JPG
>>
looks like the steam thread caused a lot of steam
lol
>>
File: searching_for_you_30.jpg (446 KB, 1004x1500)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_31.jpg (421 KB, 1004x1500)
421 KB
421 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_32.jpg (250 KB, 1004x1500)
250 KB
250 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_33.jpg (918 KB, 1055x1500)
918 KB
918 KB JPG
>>
File: searching_for_you_credits.jpg (228 KB, 1004x1500)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
>>
Postan in a epic bread
>>
the steam user hides his shame with a forced bump limit
>>
Already at bump limit...
so this is the power of T





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.