>modern women simultaneously think men are evil for jerking off to porn and women are brave and valid for becoming porn stars make it make sense
>>83103559hi, anti porn fembot here. to answer your low iq confusion, no, the two demographics of women you are talking about are not the same people and this would not have been difficult to conclude if you weren't retarded. the retards who think porn is empowering don't think men are evil for being coomers. the based queens who are against men being coomers surely do not think porn is empowering. duh. you go learn how to make sense.
>>83103577disingenuous postthere are countless examples posted over the years on this board of literal porn stars who are "reformed" admonishing men for watching pornbeing anti-porn is anti-male anyway, your solitary objective is to control male sexuality kill yourself wretch
>>83103577Porn is obviously unhealthy but it isn't "evil" or should be banned like you retard puritan authoritarians think it should be. Its a vice, just like alcohol, drugs, unhealthy food, sexual promiscuity, etc. You're dumb if you think you can eliminate EVERY bad habit people do, ever. That just leads to literal totalitarian communism.In essence, tits or gtfo
>>83103577how much for your nudes?
>>83103577>anti porn fembotHow do you feel about hand drawn or CGI pornography that doesn't involve a human actress?
women aren't principled>>83103577if you backed up a brinks truck with 13 million dollars to this bitches house she'd fuck five crackheads on camera
>>83103559>make it make senseThe solution is to not give a shit.
>>83103577>Anti porn fembotWhy is it that countries where porn is legal seem to have less sexual assault than countries where porn is banned.
>>83103986wouldnt everybody do that? even straight men suck dick on camera for money sometimes lmfao
>>83104071not everybody, all women and some men
