[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/s/ - Sexy Beautiful Women



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




Vintage Thread
>>
File: Patricia Farinelli.jpg (1.23 MB, 2560x4881)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB JPG
>>
File: 1548290306041.jpg (361 KB, 1492x1000)
361 KB
361 KB JPG
>>21285142
>>
File: artemisfauna 1.jpg (1.22 MB, 900x1380)
1.22 MB
1.22 MB JPG
modern shoot in 70s style
>>
File: Roberta Vasquez.jpg (204 KB, 1207x2400)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
>>
>>21285147
>>
File: Rosalie Strauss.jpg (890 KB, 884x1707)
890 KB
890 KB JPG
>>
File: petra verkaik.jpg (69 KB, 528x800)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>
File: Debbie Jordan.jpg (2.11 MB, 1281x1757)
2.11 MB
2.11 MB JPG
>>
File: PetraVerkaik.webm (2.9 MB, 1020x700)
2.9 MB
2.9 MB WEBM
>>21285151
>>
File: 1449624988040.jpg (339 KB, 1728x792)
339 KB
339 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1632000804992.jpg (477 KB, 872x1249)
477 KB
477 KB JPG
>>
>>21285151

GOAT
>>
File: Meg Myles.jpg (69 KB, 679x702)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>
File: 1651488009518.jpg (75 KB, 506x808)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>>
File: 1651670986473.jpg (84 KB, 504x768)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
>>
File: 1651465848249.jpg (562 KB, 1710x2000)
562 KB
562 KB JPG
>>
File: 1651863772908.jpg (62 KB, 834x1200)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>>
File: nymph fest pool.jpg (3.05 MB, 2560x1600)
3.05 MB
3.05 MB JPG
Is 90s considered vintage?
>>
>>21285931
The fucking queen
>>
File: 1501385670587.jpg (205 KB, 541x947)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
>>
>>21285994
Source?
>>
Playboy september 1980
>>
>>21286636
>>
>>21286637
>>
>>21286638
>>
>>21285994
>Is 90s considered vintage?

Do those deformed boobs turn you on?

Aren't you worried about the rumors of trannies in Playboy and Victoria's Secret? That all happened in the 90s.
>>
>>21285994
Early 90's maybe
>>
>>21285931
What's her name again?
>>
File: 47887730_015_aa95.jpg (178 KB, 848x1280)
178 KB
178 KB JPG
>>21285994
Love the look 90's porn had
>>
File: 47887730_001_87c8.jpg (176 KB, 1280x848)
176 KB
176 KB JPG
>>21286659
>>
File: 47887730_011_8700.jpg (180 KB, 848x1280)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
>>21286661
>>
Japan Playboy, 1975
>>
>>21286732
>>
>>21286735
>>
>>21286736
>>
>>21286738
>>
>>21286740
>>
>>21286742
>>
>>21286745
>>
>>21286746
>>
>>21286748
>>
File: IMG_20220703_192224.jpg (809 KB, 960x1681)
809 KB
809 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_20220703_192214.jpg (811 KB, 960x1786)
811 KB
811 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_20220703_192203.jpg (642 KB, 960x1417)
642 KB
642 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_20220703_192148.jpg (687 KB, 960x1400)
687 KB
687 KB JPG
>>
File: Janis Schmitt.jpg (113 KB, 530x800)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>
>>21286567
Suze Randall, I think the set name is Nymph Fest
>>
File: _0020d.jpg (441 KB, 775x1064)
441 KB
441 KB JPG
>>
File: 05c.jpg (171 KB, 851x1170)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
>>
File: 028.jpg (575 KB, 1026x2135)
575 KB
575 KB JPG
>>
File: 107.jpg (166 KB, 670x1024)
166 KB
166 KB JPG
>>
File: 434.jpg (229 KB, 1000x830)
229 KB
229 KB JPG
>>
>>21286659
Who is this girl? I love the aesthetic of women with tanlines naked at the pool.
>>
>>21286498
This was from Cheri magazine, busted so many loads to this chick as a kid. They called her Buffy in the pictorial. Another issue had her in a lesbian shoot titled Buffy and Muffy.
>>
>>
>>21286002

Looks almost abstract. Upscaled?
>>
File: 1631739119599.jpg (181 KB, 1250x2049)
181 KB
181 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Lynda Weismeier.jpg (107 KB, 530x800)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
To me, vintage is black and white. I'm so old...
>>
>>21285929

Madonna: the early years
>>
>>21286647
Wtf are you talking about, you fucking schizo? Did you forget to take your meds today or something?
>>
>>21286647
fucking retard
>>
Anybody got any old PH from the early 80s?
>>
>>21285815
Sauce
>>
>>21286647
seek help
>>
File: Lynda Weismeier 3.jpg (207 KB, 555x770)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>21288880
>>
File: Lynda Weismeier 4.jpg (278 KB, 792x1728)
278 KB
278 KB JPG
>>21290251
>>
>>21285929
eww
>>
>>21286659
>Who is this girl?
>>21287381
She looks a lot like Brigitte Nielsen from the Rocky movie.
>>
>>21288099
Love me some Chrissy
>>
File: Lynda Weismeier 5.jpg (108 KB, 800x530)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>>21290254
>>
>>21285151
>>21285158
She's still doing nude photos and videos as recently as 2020 and holy shit she still looks good, especially for a woman in her 50s.
>>
File: 1643743470013.jpg (1.83 MB, 2700x1800)
1.83 MB
1.83 MB JPG
>>
File: nude art.jpg (46 KB, 1024x735)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>
File: 1920 flap q.png (515 KB, 1000x562)
515 KB
515 KB PNG
>>
File: 1920 flap 2.png (381 KB, 518x756)
381 KB
381 KB PNG
>>
File: 1920s flap 2.png (605 KB, 1008x712)
605 KB
605 KB PNG
>>
File: 1920 flap.jpg (102 KB, 634x1024)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: Tempest Storm - 1950s.jpg (146 KB, 1180x1204)
146 KB
146 KB JPG
>>
Natural tits, pubic hair, alluring without being slutty? I want to go back anons
>>
Why cant bitches look like this anymore?
>>
>>21291388
Some days I wished in the Eighties, but I definitely am glad that in my era 95% of the girls ive slept with have shaved or waxed their pubes
>>
>>21291461
You're posting in the wrong thread, Skippy. You'll find Loli on /b/ - here, let me give you a link
>>>/b/
>>
>>21291435
>>21284107
>>
>>21291435
>Why cant bitches look like this anymore?
Ultra processed food on tap 24/7, social media,d social acceptance of people getting fat and fat becoming normalised to the point when they don't know someone is overweight - the "thicc" culture
>>
>>21291788
You if you think that any female with a trimmed bush is loli then you need some help champ. I would suggest therapy
>>
>>21292054
Projection, the post
>You if you're only attracted to females with a shaved or waxed bush and therefore look like loli then you need some help champ. I would suggest therapy
FTFY. You're the one who likes the prepubescent look
>>
File: 1524107104657.jpg (883 KB, 1008x1500)
883 KB
883 KB JPG
>>
File: 1613672503235.jpg (1.14 MB, 1701x2340)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG
>>
File: 1613688313453.jpg (1.7 MB, 2364x1590)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB JPG
>>
File: Anita Ekberg.jpg (625 KB, 1280x1022)
625 KB
625 KB JPG
>>
File: Cassandra Peterson (1).jpg (497 KB, 1176x1577)
497 KB
497 KB JPG
>>
File: Cassandra Peterson (2).jpg (396 KB, 1069x1585)
396 KB
396 KB JPG
>>
File: Cassandra Peterson (3).jpg (1.26 MB, 1636x3284)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG
>>
File: TeH608.jpg (264 KB, 979x1363)
264 KB
264 KB JPG
>>21293415
>>21293420
Tessa Hewitt
>>
File: Debra Jo Fondren.jpg (850 KB, 1020x1427)
850 KB
850 KB JPG
>>
File: Margot Kidder (1).jpg (785 KB, 1069x1600)
785 KB
785 KB JPG
>>
File: Margot Kidder (2).jpg (611 KB, 1000x1381)
611 KB
611 KB JPG
>>
File: ec11.jpg (555 KB, 1046x1659)
555 KB
555 KB JPG
>>
>>
Marilyn Monroe, from a photo shoot called The Last Sitting by photographer Bert Stern, shot at the Bel Air Hotel in Los Angeles, June 27, 1962, she dies less than 6 weeks later.
>>
File: Sue & Louise Elvin.jpg (1.95 MB, 1920x1270)
1.95 MB
1.95 MB JPG
>>21293431
Thank you ...
>>
File: Tanya Roberts.jpg (1.59 MB, 2452x1622)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG
>>
>>21286638
Christ she's pretty
>>
File: LW34505.jpg (106 KB, 530x800)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>21293444
Lisa Welch. She and her husband own a winery in N. Calif.
>>
File: dani ashe 2.jpg (489 KB, 635x922)
489 KB
489 KB JPG
>>
>>21285818
In a heartbeat, brother. (Does anyone have a time machine?)
>>
>>
>>21290254
>>21291381
Wow.
>>
File: linsey-dawn-mckenzie.jpg (51 KB, 540x783)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
Linsey Dawn Mckenzie
>>
>>21294913
>>
>>21294913

I met her at her peak, which isnt saying much, she stank
>>
File: 3170593.png (1.31 MB, 980x1280)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB PNG
>>
>>21293451
Went to High School with her and double dated on Prom night. She was also in Revenge of the Nerds and a Mel Brooks movie.
>>
>>21294913
>>21294945
fuck me, thats a retro wank and a half
>>
>>21294135
I really wish her masturbation and lesbian videos used the actual sound and not that annoying background music. Still though, Danni had a great bod and I really like her outdoor nudes, especially the beach ones.
>>
File: 1485427435784.webm (676 KB, 640x500)
676 KB
676 KB WEBM
>>21294135
>>
File: SuburbanWifey.jpg (4.45 MB, 2427x3475)
4.45 MB
4.45 MB JPG
>>
File: BoardWoman.jpg (1.75 MB, 1000x1456)
1.75 MB
1.75 MB JPG
>>21296873
>>
File: 361576318.jpg (493 KB, 751x1200)
493 KB
493 KB JPG
>>21296875
>>
>>21296877
Nice
>>
File: img087 sub 2mb.jpg (1.69 MB, 2760x1897)
1.69 MB
1.69 MB JPG
>>
>>21285925
Melons
>>
>>21286656
Virginia Bell
>>
>>21290891
Looks nothing like Brigitte Nielsen.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>21291393
>>21291392

A shame the horrible shopped in smokes undercut these two pictures
>>
>>21291392
Was the girl on the left shaved or is that censorship? Middle's bush look pretty blurry.
>>
>>21291435
It's the hair
>>
>>21285140
How much vintage?
>>
File: 81698553197.jpg (562 KB, 1641x2536)
562 KB
562 KB JPG
>>21291416
nice
>>21291392
>oy, fancy a shag?
>>
File: Julia Lyndon.jpg (234 KB, 680x1024)
234 KB
234 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>21299280
LMD
>>
>>21299281
>>
>>21299283
>>
>>21299284
>>
>>21299286
the countdown to her posing topless on her 16th birthday was certainly an eye opener to me as a kid lol
>>
>>21299400
>her 16th birthday
Was that the aoc of the UK at the time?
>>
>>21299439
The age of consent is 16 as it was then, but you cant do what she did at that age now. The first two years of her work is now illegal, that is a lot of work lol
>>
File: 16568727864387.jpg (230 KB, 960x1400)
230 KB
230 KB JPG
>>21286811
>>
>>21300268
Jesus, thats fucking awful
>>
>>21300583
>Jesus, thats fucking awful
Fake boobs like this are horrendous! overall though, she's ok, just needs a better pose and photographer
>>
>>21300652
no wonder boomers are angry, really badly butchered bodies they had to wank over
>>
File: 1657767084674.webm (2.67 MB, 720x1280)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB WEBM
I never realized how much and how early the porn industry have supported the Bush family into POTUS.
>>
File: 999074489.jpg (55 KB, 537x728)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>
>>21285142
Perfect 10
>>
File: 1593610273006.jpg (437 KB, 1187x1536)
437 KB
437 KB JPG
>>21298355
Looks good to me.
>>
>>21293423
>>21293427
>>21293430
The Mistress of the dark!
>>
>>21301283
Our girls were natural, drug free, and disease free
>>
>>21302061
I'd hit
>>
File: 43e567456746.jpg (178 KB, 848x1280)
178 KB
178 KB JPG
>>
>>21302135
Lol. Good one.
>>
>>21285927
Always kind of a mindfuck that ancient rome down to WWI era photos women have a certain shape to breats, stomach, hips, butt.
And then all the lines just changed to something else.
>>
>>21285158
Webm is in /gif/ you idiot.
>>
File: 6756786598.jpg (139 KB, 1135x1200)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
>>
>>21285929
this is madonna at her best , lool
>>
>>21285994
Is 30 years ago, so yeah.
>>
>>21302151
I love that bush.
And Madonna and her bush too.
>>
>>21285994
Given that most people here were born in 2010, I'd have to say yes.
>>
Vintage Erotica Forum has loads of good stuff, but the site is very slow.
>>
>>21286647
Back to RetardEra, shoo.
>>
>>21302433
shut the fuck up
>>
>>21291435
TikTok, Shitter, OnlySimp, the Kardashians
>>
>>21291461
You and your generation ought to kneel down and worship these women's bushes with your tongues
>>
File: 7765c436524234.jpg (656 KB, 900x1659)
656 KB
656 KB JPG
>>
>>21302964
>>
>>
>>
File: 1105.jpg (438 KB, 1406x1902)
438 KB
438 KB JPG
>>
File: 8807.jpg (562 KB, 2407x3207)
562 KB
562 KB JPG
>>
File: 46584.jpg (355 KB, 1135x1732)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>
File: _0020f.jpg (340 KB, 1000x1491)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
>>
File: 72515.jpg (355 KB, 1038x1494)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>
>>21285146
Nice.
>>
>>21286647
In case you didn't get it... you're a dumbfuck.
>>
File: Carrie Walters 14.jpg (741 KB, 1044x1621)
741 KB
741 KB JPG
>>21293435
Hell yeah! Love me some hairy asshole.
>>
File: candy samples.jpg (266 KB, 973x1400)
266 KB
266 KB JPG
>>21296873
That filename lol! It's Candy Samples. A huge porn slut in the 70s. She was ugly and couldn't suck dick worth shit. Epic tits tho.
>>
File: Carrie Walters 02.jpg (475 KB, 1158x1124)
475 KB
475 KB JPG
>>21303516
>>
File: Carrie Walters 18.jpg (136 KB, 861x569)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
>>
>>21303524
That's so hot.
>>
File: 664EC03.jpg (227 KB, 974x1414)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
>>
File: 4e56ye54y34q2ty234w5yh.jpg (271 KB, 800x1240)
271 KB
271 KB JPG
>>
File: 1593603996721.jpg (362 KB, 1218x1560)
362 KB
362 KB JPG
>>21288101
>>
>>21303529
Is that Lillian Parker?
>>
>>21303564
Yes.
>>
>>21303565
Thanks. It's interesting that she opted for a clean shave back in the 60s. Were there any other models/actresses from back in the day that did a similar thing?
>>
File: 5675474574.jpg (355 KB, 1192x1706)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>21303579
I'm sure there were but she's the only one I'd know by name.
>>
>>21303581
Thanks anyway fren. I tried to find out more about her but there doesn't seem to be much info available. I was curious to know how old she was when she first did nude modelling.
>>
>>21303596
I did a bit more digging around. I dunno if the info is reliable but apparently she was born in the 40s and first posed nude when she was 21.
>>
>>21302889
Im sorry you are attracted to something that resembles the back of a boar. Must be tough for you
>>
>>21291461
>>21291788
>>21302889
>>21303692
Anons, is it not possible for us to have different tastes and be civil about it? The way I see it, every anon coming here to appreciate these vintage beauties has at least some semblance of good taste.
>>
>>21299280
>>21299281
>>21299283
>>21299284
appriciate it anon. but she ain't 18 in those.
>>
>>21286498
does anyone have more of her or a source
>>
>>21303800 She's Rowan Moore
>>
File: RoMo346.jpg (305 KB, 1240x1754)
305 KB
305 KB JPG
>>
File: Picture 047.jpg (947 KB, 1700x2338)
947 KB
947 KB JPG
ex wife
>>
>>21295149
great body
>>
>>21304245
>ex wife
Nice. Sitting on that Armco isn't doing her ass any favors, though.

A timewarp of my wife way back in the day is already ITT
>>
>>
>>21306498
>>
File: Claudia Beatty2.jpg (221 KB, 730x1024)
221 KB
221 KB JPG
>>21306500
>Claudia Beatty
>>
>>21291431
hindsight is 20/20. These women were considered so slutty at the time that if they were found out, they'd be social pariahs and brutally outcasted, or honor killed. By today's standards it seems classy, but this was the height of sluttery at the time
>>
>>21291461
Hey Anon, good on you for knowing how good you have it. Being a Gen X oldfag, my first experiences were with girls who didn't shave. While it can be visually appealing, the realities of getting hairs stuck on the back of your tongue and teeth, not being able to see her pussy to check that it's healthy, and the increased odor are all things that aren't as great as it may seem. It's honestly one of the improvements of the modern era that women today are more likely to shave and have better hygiene on average. So props for appreciating what you have rather than being one of these guys who is so bent on demonizing their current time that they miss how good they have it during the peak of their youth
>>
>>21307013
IDK about you, but I and my dates always showered before the nasty. True, it washes away some of the sex musk, but generally a lot more pleasant, IMO.
>>
>>21307013
Not that anon but I feel ya, oldfag. I was born in the latter half of the 90s and while I have a great deal of appreciation for the culture and aesthetic of the 80s and prior decades, the presence of shaved/trimmed women is one thing I prefer about the present times.
>>
>>21307005
>These women were considered so slutty at the time that if they were found out, they'd be social pariahs and brutally outcasted, or honor killed.
You're an idiot.
>>
>>21307295
Honestly, what's the big deal, I don't get it...
>>
>>21302964
You gotta chortle over the illusion her left thumb makes.
>>
>>21307005
Playboy was always considered classy you retard. That was how it took off.
You realize they modelled under their REAL NAMES back then, right?
Bettie Page's real name was BETTIE PAGE.

Shit, these women were safer back then than onlyfans thots are today.
>>
>>21307013
When ever you hear of an Oldfag getting hair in his teeth he's admitting he had no idea what he was doing. Better hygiene on average. You were never there.
>>
>>21308557
If you think that going down on untrimmed bush isnt going to give you hair/pubes in your mouth or teeth, then you havent been anywhere near vagina since you were born m8
>>
File: Connie Nielsen.jpg (319 KB, 827x1200)
319 KB
319 KB JPG
>>
>>21291388
Nobody is going to mention that this is Demi Moore? Who cares about her bush, she was so hot back then.
>>
Bush is such a surprise these days.
>>
>>21307895
Don't get what?
>>
>>21304108
sauce?
>>
>>21302061
cute
>>
>>21302274
Did it occur to you that it was underwear that changed? And that their shape changed back to normal with better designed underwear and a different diet?
>>
>>21303579
I imagine a lot did it to avoid having pubic hair peeking into the shot and switching it from soft to hard porn (as it would have been in the day). Thus they would take more shots, and thus more money to the model.
>>
>>21307013
Can confirm
>>
>>21308557
Listen, child, I was born in 1957. Pulling bush hair out of your teeth and off your tongue happened.

You'd know if you had ever been with a woman.
>>
>>21309485
Pardon my ignorance, but is the difference between soft and hard porn the visibility of pussy and bush? And if it was more beneficial to the photographer and studio why wasn't there more shaved girls in porn? Surely they would've encouraged it if they benefited from it.
>>
>>21309492
You had no idea what you were doing. And the girl knew it.
>>
>>21291461
Nah, bush is hot
>>
>>21308557
Hearty keks, thanks for declaring your virginity to us
>>21308599
>>21309492
Thanks, gents. Real knows real.
>>
>>21309782
Its generally considered to be hard if theres penetration and/or ejaculation. At least in American film. I've seen plenty of late night Cinemax with loads of bush, and very rarely even a pussy lip for just a second. Shockingly those arent always NC-17, some are actually R.
>>
>>21310668
Oh, so just like today's categorization. Sorry, I suppose that should've been obvious but I thought that maybe definitions changed over the years. So a magazine spread or film with a woman with shaved pussy would still be softcore so long as there's no sex/penetration right? Regarding theaters, would you be able to watch those R rated films in a regular, non-porn theater back in the day?
>>
>>21285994
Yes. Vintage ended when American girls started shaving all pubic hair.
>>
File: 6567.jpg (58 KB, 550x734)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>
>>21302433
Fuck off, choad. Content is content, and she is fine as FUCK.
>>
File: 02jhgh.jpg (106 KB, 741x822)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>
File: 1gota7owzd9z.jpg (1.15 MB, 2597x3385)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>>
>>21310941
When was this photographed? That resolution is way too high to be true vintage. Also, is this a parody or something? That hair would look ridiculous even at the height of the big-hair's popularity.
>>
>>21310950
Why don't you try doing a reverse image search instead of being such a huge fucking autist.
>>
>>21310941
>>21310950
its Emily Ratajkowski and its definitely not vintage. Its semi recent
>>
>>21311026
Thank you anon
>>
>>21308604
Wonder Woman's mom the queen of the Amazons. Cool.
>>
>>21309782
There actually was a difference back then, see below
>>21310668
Correct, for film. Not necessarily the same for photos back in the day. For photos, I think the distinction was legs spread open or not. Softcore tended to emphasize the whole body, boobs, and legs closed shots. Think Playboy. Hardcore tended to include legs open shots, more closeups, and since the 70s at least, some shots of women with men faking sexual positions but with no penetration. Think Hustler.

This is for the US, by the way. The standards were different in Europ, where penetration was shown in photos
>>
>>21310912
Well no, magazines are different.

The VAST majority of those softcore flicks were straight to video or cable, so no, you generally didnt see them in theaters.
One exception was Showgirls, which was NC-17 and went to theaters as is. It bombed horribly. After that nobody ever wanted to take a risk on a theatrical NC-17 release again. The first home video release was R, and it took a while to get the NC-17 version. Loaded with bush shots.

Flight was R and had a quick bush shot of whats her face, the woman from My Name is Earl. It was shown in theaters. Also Training Day with Eva Mendes.
>>
File: 18896710.png (903 KB, 620x1060)
903 KB
903 KB PNG
>>21308886
Rowan Moore.
pic unrelated.
>>
>>21310668
More precisely, for film, hardcore equates to explicit depiction of non-simulated sex acts. Softcore usually equates to porn with only simulated sex, although in the '70s in particular there were a lot of softcore edits of hardcore films (i.e., the sex is real, but you don't see penetration, etc., on screen). Softcore by this definition is mostly a dead genre now in terms of new production (internet porn eroded the market for it, and increasingly graphic "mainstream" material like Game of Thrones has essentially replaced it). Back in the day you had a whole class of softcore-only pornstars, but they're pretty much an extinct species now. Sometimes today explicit lesbian and solo female stuff is branded as "softcore," but that stuff really doesn't fit the traditional definition.

>>21311549
>Softcore tended to emphasize the whole body, boobs, and legs closed shots. Think Playboy.
Hef always tried to position Playboy as glamor, not porn. The standard for softcore magazines would be closer to old school Penthouse, IMO: by the mid-'70s this meant some open leg stuff but no Hustler-style pink shots. Mind you, by the late '70s, even Playboy was doing open leg shots, so the whole thing was a moving target from the beginning of the "pubic wars" onward, but it was always Playboy at one end, Hustler on the other, and Penthouse somewhere in-between until Guccione finally went hardcore in the late '90s.
>>
>>21312205
Possible brainlet moment for me but admittedly I'm still a tad bit confused. Would a film/magazine with explicit nudity but no sex (simulated, hardcore, or lesbian) or masturbation be soft or hard?

>and increasingly graphic "mainstream" material like Game of Thrones has essentially replaced it

The more graphic mainstream film and tv don't really do it for me. I'm not too interested in the onscreen sex and the nudity is usually too subtle for my tastes. While I enjoyed Rosario Dawson's nude walk in Trance, that level of explicitness is pretty rare in my experience.
>>
>>21312271
So, for film, it's pretty much all about whether there's explicit sex. That said, in practice most softcore-only performers didn't do super-explicit nudity (like spread pink shots) either, there's probably a grey area there.

For mags or other still photo material, it would depend on how explicit the nudity was. BDSM or other "hard" fetish stuff, spread pink shots, and open pussy close-ups would all, classically, have generally been considered hardcore.

OTOH, like I said, it's been a moving target over time, and I don't think that today most people would consider, for instance, METArt to be hardcore (except for the METArtX and SexArt stuff), even though it sometimes has very detailed pink shots. At this point, in practice, I think the definition of hardcore for photos has become petty much the same as for video.

>The more graphic mainstream film and tv don't really do it for me.
Yeah, I probably should have said "displaced," rather than "replaced." There's just no market for the old late-night Cinemax style of softcore anymore when mainstream content is often nearly as explicit and when hardcore porn is readily accessible online.
>>
>>21293435
This hairy hell deserves only one thing: a gas-powered weed-whacker.
>>
>>
>>21312724
Ah, I think I understand now. Thank you for breaking it down for me, anon.

Imo, hardcore and softcore stuff aren't necessarily in competition with each other as not everyone wants the same level of explicitness. For graphic tv and film, what I'd like to see more of is "unsubtle nudity" wherein the poses and movements are pretty tame but the lighting and camera angles are such that an actress's pussy and/or bush aren't intentionally hidden from the viewer. More of this I think would broaden it's appeal to the more softcore inclined crowd as mainstream stuff has the budget to bring a level of quality and production value not found in a porno.
>>
>>21285140
I learned about June Palmer for the first time a little while ago. She seems like a big deal back in her time. Was any of her stuff posted here as of now?
>>
File: d2.jpg (211 KB, 500x672)
211 KB
211 KB JPG
>>21303581
>>21303596
Lillian Parker aka Adrienne Stoute, one of the few nudists / models who loved a clean shaved snatch
>>
File: O_o.jpg (135 KB, 500x657)
135 KB
135 KB JPG
>>21313859
>>
File: MX_o.jpg (1.12 MB, 1231x1621)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB JPG
>>21313862
>>
File: knudsen.jpg (4.84 MB, 2064x3259)
4.84 MB
4.84 MB JPG
>>21313864
Dawn Knudsen
>>
File: Rosemary Henson_02.jpg (293 KB, 823x1213)
293 KB
293 KB JPG
>>21313872
Rosemary Henson
>>
Image limit reached, someone make an update thread, loads more to share
>>
>>21313891
Your prayers have been answered:
>>21313994
>>
>>21313859
While she's well known for her wood floors, there are some pictures of her with carpets. Lillian had an almost timeless beauty to her. She's one of those vintage girls who's look and style would fit right into today.
>>
>>21285994
Just look at that picture, i fucking love the 90's i wish i could go back instead i am stuck in this dystopian future
>>
>>21298024
looks like stupid censorship
>>
>>21291788
Absolutely disgusting. Some women even shave their legs and armpits. What am I, some kind of a pervert? It's not sex at all if I don't have at least a few pubes stuck in my throat by the time my dick is hard. Easy enough to get them out with a fork or a long strip of velcro.
>>
All men.
>oh wait, then women were real
>>
>>21313862
I'd hit that.
>>
>>21304108
I need that hairy pussy on my face asap.
>>
>>21313872
dirty grandma
>>
>>21286639
sauce for this cutie
>>
>>21313864
Saved.
>>
>>21321283
Don't you mean shaved?
>>
>>21321401
You are funny guy.
>>
>>21307005
Nigga this was made in america, not some shithole muslim country
>>
>>21304104
Very late but thanks alot Anon



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.