[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
09/05/24(Thu)03:57:06 No.16361678
File: file.png (702 KB, 628x731)
702 KB
702 KB PNG
Anonymous 09/05/24(Thu)03:57:06 No.16361678 Archived
do we have any idea why the gauge groups are what they are? why would a new particle accelerator help in that?
>>
Anonymous
09/05/24(Thu)04:17:10 No.16361688
Anonymous 09/05/24(Thu)04:17:10 No.16361688
>>16361678
I work in string theory so this isn't my expertise but here goes:
While we don't know why the specific interaction values are what they are or where the choice of strong groups come from, the choice of electroweak and higgs gauge groups are pretty basic consequences of 3+1D geometric symmetries whether you allow for extra dimensions or not. The best intro papers without string theory are Naka and Umezawa's original work, but IIRC Karananas wrote a survey article about the state of our understanding.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.