[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Embers.jpg (866 KB, 1901x1269)
866 KB
866 KB JPG
What is the science of red hot embers, that no longer burn, not rekindling new wood put into the fireplace and instead just turning them into more black embers, until you throw a match onto the fire and the whole thing is ignited? As if it wants to burn but is unable to kindle itself without another fire from outside.
>Newton?
>>
>>16476652
It burns as in running an exothermic redox reaction. There is just no flame, as the flammable gases have already been driven off, hopefully burned. A yellow flame is just glowing carbon that is not (yet) turned to CO2.
Depending on how you set up the firewood, you can get blue flickering (or "dancing") flames. This is from carbon monoxide that starts burning once it gets enough oxygen to complete the combustions.
>>
Just solid carbon smoddering with little gas phase.
>>
>>16477978
>>16476943
But why isn't the fresh wood burning until I introduce a flame?
>>
>>16479514
You need to ignite the flammable gases emitted by the hot wood.
>>
>>16479739
i.e blow air into them when you have new wood on top



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.