No, it's worse because they use techniques like modified uracil that break the normal biological protections against runaway translation. They got obsessed with the effective part and stopped caring about the safe part.

>>16482434
>mfw effective part still fails

File: line1_whistleblower_post_(...).png (2.83 MB, 1920x2500)

2.83 MB PNG

>>16482418
I hope you and your loved ones didn't get it.
There's a reason for the rise in cancer and for those mysterious menstrual abnormalities after vaccination.
Why are vasa praevia, SUA, hypertension and pre-eclampsia way more common now?
Why are there suddenly fewer cases of testicular cancers and way more ovarian ones than before the vaccination campaing?
Why do you think all that is?
https://x.com/Project_Veritas/status/1621274788734943233
https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1859109920081154055
https://x.com/dragonfishy/status/1858471011433496610
https://x.com/search?q=plasmid%20contamination
Every time you post this conspiracy theory the thread just dies.
Tons of responses to stupid graphene nanobot delusions, but none to this.
Dig and try to disprove it.
Just try.

>>16482418
the mRNA codes only the spike, not the whole virus ya dolt
Read a book

It is, and replication destroys mRNA in same way your own body slowly depletes your own DNA until your cells fail to replicate and start failing, resulting in your death.

>>16486233
The spike is the dangerous part, thoughbeit. Realistically, what makes me wonder is how different humans are, some might produce more efficiently longterm, others might produce faster in short period, that might cause unexpected deaths.

>>16482418
>I thought mRNA replication was really unstable, highschool bio said so
What do you mean? RNA synthesis through transcription is very precise. RNA synthesis through something like reverse transcription done by retroviruses is much less precise. Both are within highschool curriculum where I'm from.

>>16482418
no refunds

https://rumble.com/vhb537-i-remember-wen.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp