[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: bears.jpg (271 KB, 856x986)
271 KB
271 KB JPG
Wasn't global warming supposed to wipe out the polar bears?
>>
>>16490152
I'm still waiting for the three to five feet of sea level rise this century James Hansen promised in the 80s. Last I checked it was millimeters per decade and mostly natural. But I guess theres some *extra millimeters*.
>>
>>16490181
dark millimeters
>>
File: image[1].png (297 KB, 2650x2844)
297 KB
297 KB PNG
>>16490152
>Wasn't global warming supposed to wipe out the polar bears?

They're still on that projection. That population increase is only local.
Polar Bear numbers across the world have continued to decline - the population in your article is only true for the Southern Hudson Bay bears which have experienced 10 additional days of thick ice, whereas other populations across Canada have experienced 3-4 weeks less of thick ice.
>>
>>16490191
>Polar Bear numbers across the world have continued to decline
No they haven't, they're up over 300% during the last 50 years.
>>
>>16490221
prove it
>>
File: 1715645742550052.png (79 KB, 617x943)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
>>16490191
https://www.gzeromedia.com
>TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
Yeah this seems credible.
>>
>>16490223
Not the guy your talking to but this article claims a tripling of the population over 50 years, but it credits a hunting ban for the increase.
>>
>>16490242
Forgot link
https://www.thegwpf.org/publications/50-years-after-hunting-ban-polar-bears-are-thriving-new-report-shows/
>>
>>16490242
>>16490243
NTA but the population trend isn’t known because they’re not an easy species to track population stats of. It’s not totally accurate to say they’re continually declining, but an increase of only 20,000 after a 50 year hunting ban is pretty bad recovery. In comparison humpback whales were only at around 5,000 in the 60s, and have since jumped to 130,000+ despite having way longer generation times. It’s possible they recovered more since the hunting ban and then started declining more recently with habitat loss, we can’t say
>>
>>16490243
>posting a blog from a lobbying group
oh nononono....
>>
>>16490152
The paris agreements saved them, now the US is backing out and they will die again
>>
>>16490152
Polar bears are antisemitic
>>
>>16490189
Kek



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.