Why the fuck is IQ shilled so hard? It's more like a measure of disability, failure, and autism than anything else, literal Golem tier bullshit.
People like feeling superior.
>>16845526Why was it ever let into schools, it's so stupid
>>16845530Helps identify retards and the socially challenged, which allows then allows them to be dealt with appropriately.
>>16845522Because it's a number artists can quote to "prove" their superiority, and people love being superior
>>16845535Thing is like, artists don't even go well with it, so what even is the point of taking it seriously when it's astrology tier>>16845533Makes sense, but wouldn't the challenged be those with high IQ themselves?
>>16845537Yes, though iq tests measure several abilities, with the socially challenged and mentally disturbed usually doing massively worse in at least one area.
>>16845522>it's another I Scored Low thread
>>16845526>People like feeling superior.But not as much as they hate feeling inferior. :^)
>>16845549Makes sense, I guess that's one thing about them.
It gives people something to brag about to other high IQ individuals. Some of the smartest people in the world hate mensa members. Figuring out your learning style and how to use if efficiently is far more effective than puzzling and crosswords.
>>16845522They have mistaken economic prosperity with racial prosperity. Easy to do so when early on (20th century), Europe was prosperous.
>>16845522You must be dumb as fuck the premise of IQ and g within the g factor suppose the nomenclature in which they rely on regression analysis’ to predict outcomes based on correlative events or variables. If you deny Iq you basically deny statistics It’s not for diagnosing autism cognitive profile analysis or diagnosis is a pseudo scienceEveryone’s profile looks roughly the same with perceptual reasoning being the highest then wm then psi then verbal
>>16845550>>16845535after a certain point the tests will probably have issues with accuracy.
>>16845886None of these words are in the bible
>>16845886No nigga IQ isn't denying statistics, it's just some wacko nonsense that people made up because they thought it would be a g-loaded test (it kind of is, but not really)
>>16845522IQ tests are good at weeding out the imbeciles, idiots and morons, including the kind that doesn't look visibly damaged.
>>16845522If you have read anything about biology, you would figure out pretty quickly that genes are the most important element in determining our phenotype, including IQ. This board has basically become unusable due to monkeys like you, who don't know shit about anything useful and ask these retarded questions day in day out.
>>16845886did you use chatgpt to write this?
>>16847657Interesting. What is the most accurate way of measuring g? If there is one.
ITT: brainlets seething
Dick waving contest
>>16845549they have a better test for measuring mental health, it's called the MMPI, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and it's so rigorous it's actually accepted as evidence in courts because you it has built in detection methods to catch false flags and other such ways of fooling the test. If you try to answer dishonestly your result is "invalid" and you have to take it again. It's also extremely long, over 350 questions, to make it harder for people to cheat, by making it harder for them to do so consistently.But the bottom line is that the US court system considers it legal evidence of mental disturbance. You can "objectively" prove someone is mentally unstable by having them take this test.
>>16847657it is lmao you are denying the fundamental correlation of the original g test which is MR >>16849492no, im smart as fuck 115 FSIQ anti memer
>>16845522It has a decently high correlation with things such as academic and professional success, and thus may serve as a predictor for those things
>>16845522There is a correlation between general life/financial success and ones intelligence both IQ/EQ. Intelligent people tend to find a way to gain some form of success (money ,status , and ect). Those successful people are far more likely to partake in delayed gratification , even as children. Delayed gratification noticed in children seems to be an indicator of future success - and in general this correlates to IQ aswell.
>>16845522it's a political campaign
>>16845550Kek! I came here to post this!The simplest explanation for refusal to believe in IQ testing is personal vendettas due to low test results.
