Unless you’re specifically concerned aboutcritical issues like job security or cognitivedecline, your reaction to advancements in artificial intelligence is ultimately a humility test.If you’re excited to see how sophisticated and capable AI can possible get, you passed.If you’re malding over your skill/knowledgepotentially becoming more accessible orless relevant, you failed.Generally speaking, truly intelligent people cansee the futility of pride.
>>16984536>If you’re excited to see how sophisticated and capable AI can possible get, you passed.I would have been, but the fun of it is spoiled by malicious parasites trying to inject AI slop into everything and unleashing mindless hordes of human replacement fetishists to sing their praises everywhere all the time.
>>16984536Yeah I wanted it to advance science not make ugly bizarre "art"
>If you’re malding over your skill/knowledge potentially becoming more accessible or less relevant, you failed.But that's directly tied to job security. I think people who see math being solved and go "omg i'm trembling with fear rn" are really concerned about being thrown to the streets.
>>16984536I'm most acutely concerned with AI turbocharged malware bringing down the critical infrastructure that keeps electrons and water flowing. Also, if the overall cognitive decline of humanity isn't an additional apocalypse level threat to you, you haven't adequately thought through the direct impacts and second order effects.
>>16984536https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWmEXCJIIZ4
>>16985272>>16985227
>>16984536black and white thinking is a sign of low intelligence
>>16984536Thank you for affirming I am so humble. Being so humble, I needed to hear that, because I am so humble. Most people can't recognize how humble I am, in fact.
>>16985327Systematizing is "input = output". Gray is just poorly defined or categorized. Black and white is literally the best possible outcome.
>>16985270>>16985327People on this board are primarily concerned with bragging rights. If you state otherwise, you’re being dishonest.>>16985340The statement stands on its own merit.
>>16985343unintelligible drivel
>>16985351He's right you know.
>>16984536Wrong. Only talentless lazy diots or the people making money off of AI are excited.Talentless idiots are happy because their talentless lives and laziness to develop actual skills may soon be validated by having the plagiarism machine steal the hardwork of more talanted and hardworking humans.You seem like you're happy about it, so I'll just assume youre someone with very little achievement irl, and so are happy you're incompetence will soon be rewarded by AI
>>16985377You're not understanding.People who develop skills for the sake ofenjoyment have no reason to feel negativelyabout advancements. Most of them just thinkit's cool they figured out how to make a computerdo it.Also, how the premise "wrong?"There are plenty of skilled people who haven'ta monetary incentive to like AI who are excited.Look at how many vulnerability researchersreacted to Mythos finding zero days.(ignoring the safety implications)Or how high ranking chess players react to chess bots.
