>>94018122
this milquetoast shit got him warned?
in the first session of a still ongoing game, someone had made a black guy character which noone really brought any attention to until the GM asked us to introduce our characters to each other, and this motherfucker puts pedal to the metal with his AWH SHEEEIT IM SURROUNDED BY CRACKERS schtick, to mixed reactions (stunned silent gm, 'please fuck off' from another player, laughter from myself followed by repeating the 'fuck off with the memes')
he toned it down to be an actual character and not a memespouter

>>94018122
What the fuck is wrong with being barefoot? Your GM sounds like an asshole.

>>94018122
Is your GM an RPGnet moderator or something?

>>94018242
Here we observe the foot fag get irrationally angry and defensive at even the slightest hint that others may find fault with his fetish.

>>94018298
not this fag but being barefoot isnt necesarily a fetish thing. like with a druid it would be normal.
on the beach its normal.
if you emphazise on that repeatedly, but if a normal bare foot freaks you out i would recommend to stop watching porn

>>94018122
>We have a dude who tried to sneak in barefoot character art
you yourself are that very dude and you are doing the thing here and now

>>94018371
Except he didn't really sneak it, did he

My group bans me from playing any slime characters. They know I love me monster girls but strangely only the slime ones are off limits. I’ve never even played one before and don’t remember what I said to cause this rule to be set in stone.

>>94018394
They probably can guess what you'd do with such a character and don't even want to deal with it

>>94018371
>you yourself are that very dude and you are doing the thing here and now
>posts it openly and discusses it
>sneaking
i don't think you know what sneaking is, mate

>>94018122
There is literally nothing wrong with barefoot characters in RPGs.

Reminder that footfaggotry is literally a brain deformity. Its caused by overlap between the foot and genital areas in the somatosensory cortex

I have more respect for people into vore than feet because at least theres some element of domination and submission to justify vore as a fetish. Feet might as well be hands or elbows, its stupid

>>94018298
>>94018242
>>94018341
The only people who see that picture and think it's footfag fetish material are footfags themselves.
normal people just see an elf lady with fetal alcohol syndrome, who happens to not be wearing shoes.

>>94018122
Making fun of the GM still working on his doctorate for past 6 years. It's literally the only subject that will instantly kill the mood and will get you called out by everyone if the GM won't get pissed.
>inb4 lmao slacker
His wife died and that's the real reason why it's a very fucking touchy subject. Everyone who knows about it never brings the issue, and all the newcomers are told to shut the fuck up when by osmosis they learn he's stuck with his thesis for years

For context, just last game we were offering an infant to an unknown god the cultists were worshipping, on the logic that if there is a kid there and they were sacrificing adults. then the kid must be their own and thus no biggy for doing it.
Perma +1 to Agility, well worth it

I don't get the hate for footfags. Obviously people pushing for ERP are an issue, but just having his own character barefoot? what's the issue here?

ok /tg/ what's worse, a barefoot character or a character with those shoes that have toes

>>94019201
You retards can't read. This was a recurring trend. Once in a while is fine, two times in a row could be a coincidence. If it's your fourth time playing a barefoot character and you emphasize that fact, you're probably a footfag.

>>94019287
Toe shoes are creepier

>>94018122
this barefoot art thing is not an issue, this must be a joke. Who cares?

no man can play a woman or vice versa
no "i don't count ammunition like arrows or sling bullets"
no "why should i roll the dice i just hit them as they are asleep and automatically die" (they were not asleep but he assumed appearances and his assumptions are the only reality)
no "i wrote that in my record sheet so it must exist despite not telling the dm abou it"
no "i read in the monster manual that this monsters does this and that so you have to do exactly that"

and things like this, assuming they know what is happening and that they are the some sort of dmpc

>>94018394
They know that you are going to try to subtly rape them every chance you get.

>>94018122
>sneak something in and get caught?
one guy had snack in his huge ego, fought with everyone since day 1 for no reason whatsoever and we eventually kicked him out.

>>94018122
>Is there stuff that automatically gets you banned or warned in your group?
banned; not shutting their cell-phones when we are playing. Can't do that? out of the group.
warned and then banned; not role-playing as in saying nothing as the character like not even once per session.

example (from northman film actually) of two characters talking
King; How I’ve missed you, my son.
Queen; Will your brother not grace us with his presence?
King; Think not on Fjolnir.
King; He’ll soon be with us.

what the player pretty much did;
PC - i roll for diplomacy to convince him to help us in that manner.
DM - John the diplocacy skill its not a spell, you don't cast it nor are you telepathic. Talk and we will make the appropriate roll (which may or may not be diplomacy depending on what you say, could be diplomacy + lying out of your ass SKILL as well).
PC - time and space collapse and his existence ends as he cannot say anything that makes sense or anything at all.

the above is so impossible that even if his life was threatened he could not even properly speak. But if its talking to his cellphone or busting people's balls with rules exploitation he cannot shut up, rather coud not. Kicked out.

>>94018122
>sneak in barefoot character art
seriously are you kidding? i assume she wears shoes or boots when adventuring and the art was just to make her look refined or whatever. Who would care? In his right mind.

>>94018122
>barefoot character art
hold on dude, hobbits, some of them at least go barefoot and maybe some wild elves in some settings and some other races or specific classes.

Based dm. Anyone who forcibly pushes their fetish into a game should be told to fuck off.

Had to ask someone to leave the gaming club after they brought a Deus Vult type crusader character and kept making pointed racist jokes towards our black/brown club members.
True to form, I got an absolute earful from him, including lots of "but it's not wrong to hate orcs" bullshit, and then the club got a letter from his mother (he's an undergrad) asking that the "biased staff" be removed.
We wrote back saying his ban was permanent.

>>94019882
you are nogames

>>94019882
post letter from mother

>>94020008
I didn't keep it. It's a University gaming club, so it's probably been thrown in the GDPR hole by now.

>>94018122
No, because I play with my friends and if they do something cringe they'll get mocked for it and that'll be the end of it.

File: __frostnova_arknights_dra(...).jpg (553 KB, 1756x2479)

553 KB JPG

>>94018122
Half the players at our table are easily distracted and really into this one gacha game.
Our GM got fed up with this after a while, so ruled that any mention of Arknights causes your character to immediately lose 1 HP.
This has resulted in at least one PC death.

>>94021349
1 HP is too generous.

>>94019443
I'm sure you're not guilty of this but I've played with more theatre kid esque players and some people do need to understand that we don't need to act out every single conversation or go into extended scenes all the time. Games already take so fucking long, we don't need to talk to shopkeepers.

I don't agree with people make the false paralel that you're not expected to act out athletic feats to do athletic checks, why should we have to say dialogue to make persuasion checks tho.

>>94018122
I don't think this happened. I think you just wanted to share that picture to inform strangers on /tg/ that you're into feet, for some bizarre sexual reason I'd imagine.

>>94021349
Were they playing it at the table? This seems oddly specific.

>>94018122
I assume you refuse to watch any Tarantino movies

>>94018122
Forcing in a self insert that is too off theme for the RP is a generally common source of drama.

>>94019443
Your dm is a nigger.

my table is all just a bunch of old friends so there's not really any discipline. occasionally we bring in friends-of-friends and they either don't make it or everything's fine
if I were to run for randos I'd just leave it at "no phones, make your character for the setting and tone of the game I'm running, pay attention (no phones #2), don't roll outside of "I'm attacking" unless I ask you to, no context-less skill use i.e. "I diplomacy it," I'm not going to ask for in-character dialogue playacting but a description of how you're making your case is the minimum, no unnecessary electronic devices, don't rules lawyer (actual) and try to twist the specifics of text in the game into an illogical advantage, no phones, if you have a problem with something then talk to the table about it instead of being a passive-aggressive weenie, and no phones."
I'm sure there are horror shows of human beings out there I'd have to kick from the game regardless, but blanket rules aren't good solutions in a hobby as intimate as TTRPGs
>>94021349
that's wild. most of my group has some gacha or MMO addiction or another but we all keep it to pre/postgame chatter or during breaks
I guess one guy that didn't make it for long kept relating everything to fucking genshit impact and it was really wearing on my nerves. I'm glad he had something "come up" and then just never appeared again

anyway "warning" a player for having barefoot characters is either made up bullshit or idiot behavior. if he's not drawing attention to it or talking about his character's toes or whatever, it's non-disruptive
you can bring a fetish character if you don't bring the fetish with it and still play the character straight

>>94022507
quality post

>>94019443
ah, the classic case of "please provide the deal/lie/argument that you're rolling diplomacy/bluff/persuasion for".
that player deserved the ban, dumb bitch was trying to make an attack roll without defining the target.

>>94023327
my ancient board background on the jay prevents me from accepting this as an actual compliment in good faith, but potentially th-thanks
>>94023415
in my opinion as long as he's giving a third-person account of the rough idea he's trying to communicate it's good. like "sir markus attempts to appeal to the orcs' penchant for violence to draw admiration, telling a story about how he killed fiddy men to them and hoping to gain safe passage through their lands through respect." I don't require speaking first-person in-character, personally. it can be fun but it also really slows the game down sometimes and most people just aren't very good at it. as long as you're acting (not necessarily speaking) in character you're good to go, that's all role-playing is

>>94024865
>[...]my opinion as long as he's giving a third-person account of the rough idea he's trying to communicate it's good. like "sir markus attempts to appeal to the orcs' penchant for violence to draw admiration, telling a story about how he killed fiddy men to them and hoping to gain safe passage through their lands through respect." I don't require speaking first-person in-character, personally. it can be fun but it also really slows the game down sometimes and most people just aren't very good at it. as long as you're acting (not necessarily speaking) in character you're good to go, that's all role-playing is

You've given me a great idea, anon. And it solves a bit of a metagaming problem

>>94019306
Okay, but…why does it matter? Its a character with bare feet. Oh no. How horrifying.

Like it’s just so vanilla a thing that I’m not sure I’d even realize someone had a fetish for it even if they brought in a dozen characters who were barefoot, unless it was specifically pointed out to me, and even then I’d just probably say “okay” and then carry on.

Like if a fetish so so vanilla that pics of it are worksafe, then how could it possibly be causing problems?

>>94024969
internet guys love pretending to hate sex and see sex in everything
it's a product of 202X

>>94021890
NTA but when everyone's into the same piece of media it's really easy for off topic tangents and mood altering jokes to become the norm.

>t. Has a friend group (but not RPG group) where an accidental Hamilton reference will cause 5 people to break into spontaneous song

Your groups is crazy for being mad about that. They are not even good feet.

>>94025089
Possibility 1: OP is just a hornyposter who made up a story about angry gaming group in order to post the pic he considers to be sexy.

Possibility 2: The gaming group that OP talks about really does exist, and the alleged footfag is not him. Then we can assume that the footfag just kept being annoying and mentioning bare feet every few minutes.

>>94019306
I mean it really depends on how blatant it really was. That image looks pretty take for you to say it's the worst.
Was he describing his character's feet? Going out of his way to mention they're barefoot?
Honestly I'd prefer someone with a character who's art is a bimboified goonbeast but they roleplay seriously and stonefacedly, to someone whose art could be in a Christian picture book but can't do any scene without describing what his character's tits are doing.

>>94018122
>barefoot character art
Is this a euphemism for something?

>>94018122
No trannies. No faggots. No coomerism.

This is all hypothetical though, I've been gaming with pretty much the same group of mates since high school and we seem to have dodged the plague of mental illness and performative faggotry that seems to be the norm when it comes to the online half of the rpg community.

>>94018146
What a gay group. Another player's Black Dynamite ripoff was a highloght in our Shadowrun game.

>Don't be a cunt

Don't do things the rest of the table are upset by, and especially don't do things the GM is upset by. If you can't abide by that you gotta go.

>>94028622
I prefer keeping most of the jokiness out of character
Irony poisoning is fucking exhausting

>>94022507
>>94023327
>>94018591
>>94019201
>>94019274
>>94022357

Nobody wants to be subjected to your foot fetish, faggot. Normal people are repulsed by your autistic obsession.

>>94018122
>gm notices the feet gets UNCOMFORTABLE FOR TOTALLY NO REASON AT ALL
GM wasn't subtle in his closet either

File: 415bCg8sS-L._AC_SX569_.jpg (19 KB, 356x941)

19 KB JPG

>>94018122
Well done anon! You have to keep these perverts out of the game! We had a player who insisted that his female characters had their hair and faces exposed and not covered up like decent modest people! We got rid of that freak straight away!

>>94030988
Same

File: lebron-hammers.gif (2.13 MB, 498x454)

2.13 MB GIF

>>94018940
You fags are so weird.
>a fetish involving fantasies of being fucking eaten and digested is more normal than being especially attracted to a normal part of the human body
To add insult to injury, you act as if hands aren't sexy in the same post! It's proof you've never interacted with a woman! Every woman I've ever fucked is extremely attracted to hands, to the point they'll get wet from a picture of my toned, veiny hand. This ranges from normie college girls to silent hill playing femcels.

>>94031167
I fucking swear, anti-footfags are just as retarded as footfags. Sometimes even worse.

Once you learn that having a foot fetish is the result of the brain being wired wrong, footfags make a lot more sense.

>>94024865
>>94024913
honestly I don't think it's so much an RP thing as just... how those skills work.
if the skill is to pass off lies, you need a defined lie to pass off in the same way that if the skill is to shoot things with a gun you need a defined thing to shoot with a gun.
hence "please define the deal/lie/argument you're rolling diplomacy/bluff/persuasion for" and the comparison to making an attack with no target

If a player seems like he's getting sexual pleasure from anything in my game I ridicule him for it. Works fine.

>>94019882
Based
That guy honestly deserved a punch to the face
RPGs are some of the most open and accepting places on earth, people like that creature need to be reminded to crawl back in the hole they came from and never return

If it's something I've seen trending on youtube, reddit, or chink-tock, bring it to someone else's table.

>>94018122
You DM sounds like a total faggot and I aint even a footfag.

>>94018122
>>94044954
I aint a footfag, but every fiber of my being balks at the notion of covering/censoring feet, I would probably put up with a footfag player imposing his footfag art because that's less repulsive to me than the act of censoring human feet.

>>94021349
I like this.

>>94044972
>Now I'm no footfag, but can you imagine not having an endless buffet of feet? It's disgusting right? I don't even like feet but I need feet available to me at all times. Sucking toes is so weird, can I suck that characters toes? I'm not a footfag btw. Wait, did you say the farm girl is barefoot?

Being unknowingly complicit in getting somebody's rocks off is fucking disgusting anons. If there is even one iota of a chance that this is happening it ought to be shut down immediately. It's slimy and dishonest.

I'm saying this as a footfag myself.

>>94033480
>Every woman I've ever fucked is extremely attracted to hands, to the point they'll get wet from a picture of my toned, veiny hand. This ranges from normie college girls to silent hill playing femcels
Pics or it didn't happen.
On topic: "retards gonna reee"

>>94018122
That's it? They didn't do anyhing ban worthy yet.

>>94045100
>They are doing it in a way that is in no way harmful to the table
>Somehow you have to go and stop them from enjoying themselves
Why?

>>94044972
>>94045094
You sound like the kind of schizoid who constantly sees everyone inserting their fetishes everywhere because thats what you yourself do so any given time so the thought that a normal person would be alienated at the weird conclusions you draw is foreign to you.

Seek mental help.

>>94018940
>domination and submission
>fetish
DS LARP is literally just dumbfuck roleplaying that has no relationship to the erotic in even the slightest extent. It's not a fetish, it's not erotic, it's not even coherent. You are a clown.

>>94018122
Fat, disgusting slobs.

If you want to play with me you need to be able to bench body weight and run 10kms in under an hour.

I feel like I should be stricter as they're pretty basic fitness metrics

>>94018394
They probably read the /tg/ story about the slime rogue.
And even if they didn't slime characters are a terrible idea.

>>94018122
I like how this artist clearly traced a photo of a modern woman wearing heels
>>94019201
True
Only us footCHADS see each other
>>94024969
OP is obviously fictional and this whole discussion isn't about anything that actually happened. That acknowledged, I personally would never want to involve anyone else with my foot fetish unless we were fucking. It's just disgusting on a moral and sexual level. I don't want to do that to anyone.

File: 345347567.png (542 KB, 699x409)

542 KB PNG

Ok, but have you guys seen feet? I mean, come on boys

>>94018122
I have various beast races in my setting.
They are basically just humans with animal ears and tail. Maybe paws but that is pushing it.
If any player plays any of these races and asks if they can have more "fur" or "snout" or other such things they are immediately removed

>>94057434
But snoots are great, anon.

>>94018394
No one chooses to play a slime character with good intentions.

>>94019443
Forcing someone to talk ic in first person all the time is retarded, especially if the player is clearly anxious/avoidant about it. Roleplay=/= acting. Just ask his approach/strategy in general terms like a normal human being instead of forcong every interaction to be an improv excercise loke an autistic theater kid.

>>94018122
>We have a dude who tried to sneak in barefoot character art several times and our GM eventually told him that he wasn't subtle about it and should just knock it off. Picrel was the most blatant one.

That looks like a normal picture of a female druid. If your GM thinks it's fetish content he is probably a closet footfag and doesn't want to admit it.

>>94018122
only a footfag would look at this and notice feet and make a big deal out of it
your gm is a footfag

File: that makes me horny.png (164 KB, 432x581)

164 KB PNG

>>94018122
Nah, we're very libertine in our group. Bestiality, incest, loli-shota, ageplay, nuggets, even necrophilia are fine. The only thing we'd ban is maybe coprophagia/scat and explicit torture stuff.

>>94065136
Nuggets? Okayyyy

>>94053599
>>>94018122(OP)
>I like how this artist clearly traced a photo of a modern woman wearing heels
Fuck, you're right, can't unsee now.