[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>is that...a liminal space? oh god don't move we're all gonna die!
seriously?
>>
>>215583996
Book was better
Tarkovsky should have gone to gulag for mangling Strugatsky brothers and Stanislaw Lem's works
>>
>>215584097
>idealismslop
>better
No.
>>
File: 1745852776517083.png (220 KB, 495x435)
220 KB
220 KB PNG
>>215583996
>is that... a film i actually have to watch instead of being on my phone
>seriously?
Soviet kino is the biggest filter of latinos and zoomers.
>>
>>215584350
a latinxian director could easily make stalker better with maraca ambience and sombrero anomalies
>>
Sand bumps??!!! Ahhh I'm going Insane!! Nigger man!!! Help!
>>
>>215584350
>is that... a film i actually have to watch instead of being on my phone
how i feel with 95% of the movies i watch. i am a midwit.
>>
>>215584097
>what if aliens were an analogy for capitalism or something
Kind of kino for starting the commie post apocalypse genre, but it's not a good book
>>
>>215584363
>stalker but they have a party with women to celebrate reaching the wishmaker
no thx.
>>
I had to try way too hard to enjoy this film

There were some cool scenes. But overall very boring movie
>>
>>215584379
>muh caaaaapitaliiiiism
fuck off
>>
>>215584398
Commieslop isn't meant to be enjoyed in a traditional turn your brain off burgerslop sense. It's for the kino visuals and plots that unironically really make you think.
Both styles have their benefits, but it's understandable some people can't into both genres.
>>
>>215584417
It was a sarcastic reductionist criticism of the book, you reading comprehension challenged retard
>>
>>215583996
had some good character dynamics and locations, but a lot of the movie also felt like they were jumping at shadows and there was nothing actually there

i didnt hate it, but it felt like it took the "less is more" mantra a bit too seriously
>>
>>215584450
>twas actually a 'ist and 'ism criticism
common language please, i work for a living.
>>
>>215584428
>It's for the kino visuals and plots that unironically really make you think
is stalker REALLY any deeper then a nolan flick?
>>
>>215584506
All the pretentious bullshit aside, it's interesting to pick inside the mind of slav directors. For slavs it's probably nothing, but it's neat to see how slavs think from the outisde.
>>
>>215584506
a movie designed to send the artists message can never be topped by a movie designed to obtain broad appeal. it's simply impossible.
>>
>>215584289
>>215584428
Does slop mean anything nowadays?
>>
File: QSRriOk.jpg (161 KB, 660x495)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
>>215583996
This is the most slavic film ever made. Three russian guys just walking through barren decrepit industrial wasteland and wading in poisonous chemical detritus. Even at their most meaningful and sentimental, they are still just loiterers in a crumbling concrete hell.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.