OK so realistically who can we report such blatant false advertising to? FTC? Some kinda users right bullshit?
No refunds, Drumfie.
>>220671367can somebody tell me why all there psychics were fucking bald
>>220671401bare head = less interference on psywavesjust like olympic swimmers wear those slick swimsuits and shave themselves to reduce attrition on water.
couldnt even have it just be a vision in one of his forced delusionsmeanwhile people using AI to create better endings online
haven't watched since season 2 but i couldn't believe the series ended without anything really happening. is it just 3 seasons of blackmail or what
>>220671416Is that explained? why isn't psylocke bald, or emma frost
>>220671367Lol u mad?
>>220671367More budget in this single promotional image than in the final fight lol
Has anybody sued for false advertising and won? I know there were those suits over Suicide Squad and Ana DeArmas not being in a movie when she was in the trailers
>>220671433>chuds want to sue a TV show now
>>220671429I don't think so, it's just one of these cultural osmosis things.And professor X's bald iteration is a very famous one in pop culture, which The Boys is partially a satire of when it comes to capeshit.Specifically I think they had Charles shaves his head to use that big brain machine in a movie but I thing he was just regular bald in the comics that inspired that look.
>>220671469chuds live in your head. no room for brain
>>220671469>suing a corporation is now considered chud-likei thought the "good guys" were all anti-corpo?
>>220671433they won when it was a real false advertisement in regards of a productand even then it's a case-to-case basis, it isn't just "i really didn't like how it works".
>>220671749The reason it feels like this never goes anywhere is corpos can afford lawyers that will help them design shit that is functional enough to legally not be a false advertisement if taken to court.The shit just smells fine enough.
>>220671600Anticorpo they/them: performative signalling.Anticorpo me(you): psychotic hatred
>Having to fucking admit that Preacher was a better TV>The embarrassingly blasphemous TV show where they build a caricature of God>humiliate him, murder him, and assume his position in the show>I have to now say it's better than this crappy TV show because it had balls, a better return of budget, and has popular approval over its last few episodes as being better
>>220671367I heard cases against movies where they added scenes to trailers that weren't in the movie itself. So a case could be made.
>>220671367Amazon doesn’t have any money . They couldn’t afford to show homelander going on his rampage after 5 seasons of build up
>>220671469>want to sue a tv showHELLO SAAR
>>220671433theres no point. the max damages are 2 months of Amazon prime. you dont get rich when you are a victim of false advertising. you get your money back
>>220671389If Homelander was supposed to be drumpf, then they should have renamed him Shalomlander. Get it? Because Trump sucks jew cocks.
>>220671433>Has anybody sued for false advertising and won? I know there were those suits over Suicide Squad and Ana DeArmas not being in a movie when she was in the trailersYes. The cases where people won against movie studios was when there was something factually misrepresented. Like a missing actor that was shown in the trailer but not the movie.Movie studios tried to argue that movie trailers and advertising are protected forms of free speech and are just artistic expressions. The courts rejected this argument. I haven't seen people sue over movie posters though. The courts ruled it's possible, but no one has seriously tested it in court. So if you have money to burn...go ahead and try it.
>>220671367Not your personal army, chud
>>220671433wasnt there a case about drive because the trailers made it out to be an epic car action movie
>>220671367You can sue and win pretty easily but you only get refunded like your Amazon prime membership and only if you didn't use it for anything else. When people sue for movies they often win but the only pay is their movie ticket cost back. FTC doesn't care enough because it's not cut and dry or related to radio.
>>220672905Can you prove that you paid for Amazon prime to only watch the boys? I think that's a big hurdle
