Is there any reason to go beyond 60hz?
yeah
Yeah
>>727637040Yes but 90 is enough I can't tell after that
>>727637040if you have working eyes, yes
Not at all
>>727637040most people seem to prefer it, i don't really care myself. i have 60hz, 144hz, and 180hz monitors, and i wouldn't mind at all being limited to 60 again. it's nice i guess but you get used to 60 or 180 within a few seconds
>>727637040NaMost tvs are 60hz
>>727637040I can see a double image at 60hz, its awful.120hz is the sweet spot where it finally goes away.
>>727637149I can but 90 is a really good compromise in general
>>727637164>most people seem to prefer itNo, most people are retards, poor, or console niggers.
>>727637617i mean most people that have tried it prefer it
>>727637040Having played console games locked at 30, "standard" games at 60, upgrading to 165 and now at 360, yes. I will never nuy another monitor below 240hz. Retarded tendies need not reply.
>>727637040yes, around 100-144hz is all you ever need. After that refresh rate just becomes a marketing scam and meme. 60hz is clearly not enough, never was but we didn't knew better because the jewish electronics industry never bothered to offer something better.
>>727637040Going above 60hz like giving yourself a death grip. Your gains are short-term, for long-term you're just invalidating most things you would've enjoyed, because they're not good enough.
>>727637164>>727637617Even 100 dollar monitors come with 144 today. Only way you end up with 60 is if you buy some boomer office monitor.
>>727637318Pretty much, 120hz is really all you need. 4k 120hz oled is peak
>>727637979i noticed. wanted to get the cheapest 1440p monitor as my third monitor when my old one broke a few months ago and the cheapest i could find was 180hz. what a waste of components
>>727637040>Is there any reason to go beyond 60hz?I mainly play fighting games, so no. Hard lock 60fps is the standard.
>>727637040If you arent an fpsfag, no
>>727637040>yesyes.
>>727637040No, OP. It's a meme. Same as ray tracing, 4k, AI gen frames, TAA, more than 16GB of RAM, ddr5 RAM and upscaling. Just another shitty marketing ploy and something you are not missing at all and it should be among the last to consider. Color gamut, panel type and backlight type are million times more important
>>727637658Again, anybody that has tried more than 60hz and still prefers it falls under the category of retard.
>>727638934i wouldn't say i prefer it, i just don't even think about it after i've used either for a few seconds, either is good
>>727637040yes but I find going back to 60 isn't nearly as jarring as like 30fps
