[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hq720.jpg (71 KB, 686x386)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
Are AR glasses any good for playing on a couch or on the bed connected to a switch for example?
>>
If AR glasses that small were any good Apple, Meta and Google would be producing them right now, not solely chinkshit companies selling them on Amazon
>>
>>727673968
Google already tried this and dropped it. They spent a lot of time and money only to confirm the shit doesnt work for humans.
>>
>>727673454
I saw lots of ecelebs shilling these things for about 2 months (all at the same time, of course) and after that obvious advertising window none of them have ever spoken about them ever again.
If they were as good as they claimed at the time they'd still be using them and still be talking about them.
>>
>>727673968
I hear ya, I saw a couple reviews but since they are sponsored is hard to trust the reviewer so I wanted to check if anyone here already tried them and check their opinion
>>
>E-celeb image

Next time just google AR Glasses and use a generic image instead of a faggot like Jack.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.