>>727674256
And I know how this sounds: old good, new bad. But this time it's different

I like ray tracing and my computer can run it, what's the problem?

Path tracing adds shadows to every object in the game while raster have like 6 shadows in the entire game
Another rx480 jeet thread btw

The only thing worse than a graphicsfag is an ant-graphicsfag.

At least the graphicsfag is jerking off over something objectively superior. The anti-graphicsfags is a delusional retard actually trying to convince us (and themselves) that worse graphics is somehow actually better.

>>727674383
It halves the fps. Back in the day we never used msaa x8 because it ruined performance, same goes here.
>Just don't use it
...

>>727674383
Fake frames and upscaling is not exactly running it bro

File: compare.jpg (1.5 MB, 3840x2160)

1.5 MB JPG

1. Path tracing and Ray tracing are different technologies.
2. Try actually playing some games with RT/PT before stating your useless opinions.

2019 was peak then it started regressing and getting lazy

CP2077 with PT looks amazing. Stop being poor and angry.

>>727674937
>arguing with the voices in your head

File: 1760209640791504.jpg (1.02 MB, 3231x1440)

1.02 MB JPG

>>727674256
Why would I choose to play with worse graphics when I have a PC that can handle RT in video games ?

>>727674937
it's tracing the path of rays of light. it's the same thing. it uses RT cores in nvidia graphics card to do the path tracing

>>727675117
yeah ok, PT is more a advanced form that traces complete light paths from more sources

Why don't you have a gaming PC which can run ray tracing?

>>727674256
taste still matters 10x more than polys
but you can't buy taste

comparisons are always open world slop where they don't bake anything

complainers are always third worlders

>>727674937
Is the gameplay better on the right?

>>727675064
Yeah too bad nobody has seen it rendered without fake frames and AI interpreted nonsense(at higher than 15 fps)

>>727675407
is the gameplay better at 4k than it is at 360p?

>>727675454
I can run path tracing 1440p native at 60fps

>>727675407
you always play on low settings I assume, pretty cool

>>727675096
im viewing the screenshot on the right on an intel integrated graphics from 2010 so that means it can be done without RT

>>727675454
Retard.

>>727674256
The future of gaming is going to be shit.

Hardware prices are going to keep rising, this will shrink the high level gaming population and so make it less likely for any companies to pander to you.

One the numbers get low enough, there will be no reason to own high level pc hardware at all.

Smooth, high framerates are more important than shadows or reflections. I PLAY games, not stare at stills or random environments for hours.

>>727675514
You know you have to restart the game to apply all the settings right? Dlss was on

>>727675617
You know that I have the hardware here and you don't right? DLSS wasn't on

>>727674937
Truth be told it's not always super noticeable, but in CP2077 with all those neon lights and shit? A game changer.

The real issue with RT/PT isn't even that it's too expensive for what it gives graphically, the issue is that all good implementations are proprietary software.

>>727675748
>>727675514
>He bought 10k PC to play at 60 fps
Grim

>>727675748
In my experience buyfags aren't the brightest.
Fond memories of losers hooking up their first 144hz monitor (default set to 60hz and they are too dumb to notice)
>"Woah it's so smooth the picture just pops!"

>>727674937
>fps literally halved

>>727675617
Is DLSS supposed to be a bad thing ?

>>727674256
>It also taxes the consumers.
Shant be boughtering, simple as
See Monster Shitunter flopping

>>727675548
Devs will have the tech, and they'll still make their games based on whatever 7090ti or whatever they have at the time, while the consumer will still be stuck with a 3060 8gb.

I don't think anyone will argue that ray/path tracing doesn't look great. It's that the performance cost makes the visual uplift negligible. I have a 4080 Super and my experience is always the same. I play with ray tracing for a few minutes, think 'huh, neat', then turn it off and go back to actually playing with a decent framerate and no DLSS bullshit necessitated by RTX.
I think HDR is a much more impactful visual upgrade that won't half your FPS.

>>727674256
cyberpunk looks like dogshit with or without a 300000$ gpu

if you renamed the raytracing setting to fancy reflections no one would turn it on seeing the fps drop
literally the only reason people give a shit is because of the name recognition

>>727675981
yup

>>727675825
>>727675907
i love the way poorfags just instantly try and justify their low end computers
>b-but it's only 60fps
while yours can't do 5fps

>>727674256
>Path tracing needed for reflections on cars
I hate the antichrist

>>727675117
Why would they be the same thing if they make the game completely different looking? Rt have no shadows on 60% of the content while pt has it on everything.

>>727676376
>i bought a 4k 60fps monitor in 2025 but it's okay!!! i-i-i didn't need that framerate anyway!!!

Cyberpunk2077 was able to properly show off raytracing and then Pathtraced lighting because it was completely built with it in mind.
for a lot of games they're just tossing raytracing in to save dev time. the devs themselves don't give a shit, and don't do anything to make raytracing look impressive they just implement it so they don't have to spend weeks of devtime on baking shadows.

>>727676452
>nobody can run path tracing native higher than 15fps
>I can run it native at 60fps
>"ha ha you can only run it at 60fps"
eating out of dumpsters is rotting your brain anon

>>727676385
You dont need pt for reflections you get that with rt. Pt just improves lighting everywhere making it look less flat since every object and clutter now cast shadows.

>>727676092
HDR could have been a game changer if not for the devs not ever giving a shit about it.
So many games come out with either broken ass implementations or baffling decisions like raising the black levels so the picture just looks sdr.
Genuinely a surprise when a game actually looks better with HDR and not like someone barfed on the colors.
Screens make a big difference too, a lot of computer monitors still have fake HDR implementations that only have the minimum specs to be considered HDR. It's why I play on an oled LG tv.

>>727674256
RT/PT is objectively better looking when properly implemented, it's just not worth the massive performance loss.
Also in some games, primarily multiplayer, the better shadows can actually degrade the gameplay by reducing visibility.

File: 1735787283586748.webm (1.55 MB, 1080x1080)

1.55 MB WEBM

games already looked good without ray tracing
and no this isn't RT version

>>727676609
post images of these good games then

gaytracing is soulless
all games look the same now

>>727676592
The shimmering is still an issue even on well implemented RT.
I don't know what's worse, the shimmering on RT or the missing reflections and halos SSR has.
It's still in the trade-off stage right now, not strictly better in my opinion.

File: image_2025-12-06_142022456.png (180 KB, 517x271)

180 KB PNG

>>727674937
huh

>>727676787
Gaytracingfags btfo

>>727676550
You don't need any of those kike technologies for proper lighting and reflections, the only reason the "after" image looks that much better is because the "before" image is gimped to hell and back in order to sell the tracing bullshit and cars not having proper reflections in the first image is literally the perfect example of this, considering we've been able to do them since like 20 years ago

>>727676787
RT bros, it's over.....

>>727674256
The biggest thing for me about this screenshot is a shadow under a car.
But
Why the fuck it requires RT, when games did it for decades? It's just a shitty shadow on the left, not groundbreaking tech on the right.

>>727676670
>>727676872
>Gaytracing
do Poorasterization fags really?

>>727674256
>Another fucking thread of womanly insults like we're comparing handbags

>>727675096
But can it handle PT, which you posted?
No. Nothing can.

now that AI is buying up so much product maybe they can stop grifting gamers with these buzzwords and go back to making good graphics

>>727675096
left looks natural, on the right everything is plastic

>>727676545
60fps is unplayable for anyone with a functioning set of eyeballs

>>727676787
>ray tracing shows up bugs with floating characters on uneven terrain
lol

>>727676936
>proper reflections
>disappear entirely when you move the camera or we render the scene twice
>proper lighting
>why yes i want my games to permanently have static lighting
Rx480 user right there

>>727677198
I run it 4k path traced with DLSS at about 100fps though

>>727675981
And latency nearly doubled.

>>727677215
Tale the same screenshots in a faytime scene with raster. And take a shot in an alley full of clutter on the ground in raster. The npcs and clutter hover above the ground because there are no shadows.

>>727677198
>muh image quality at 60hz
>in a ray tracing thread
>while arguing against ray tracing
you really are silly anon

>>727674256
this game is so fucking ugly

>>727677242
>disappear entirely when you move the camera or we render the scene twice
How is that not proper? A game doesn't have to function exactly like real life to achieve good looking results
>static lighting
Dynamic lighting exists in games since the PS3/360 era

File: 1762122883971361.jpg (532 KB, 2560x1440)

532 KB JPG

>>727677094
looks like I can handle it. now what

File: 1755124501630.jpg (338 KB, 1280x719)

338 KB JPG

>>727676936
BRO WHAT THE FUCK THE PS3 HAD RAY TRACING OMG

File: Cyberpunk 2077 Screenshot(...).jpg (719 KB, 3840x2160)

719 KB JPG

>>727677317

>>727677415
>go to a pond or lake
>look down slighlty
>reflection is gone

File: 1_gtavpc_03272015.jpg (1.11 MB, 3840x2160)

1.11 MB JPG

>>727674256
Why GTA 5 can have shadow and reflections while 2077 requires RT/PT for this?
Maybe polish fucks are just cheap whores, who sold their asses for nvidia money?

>>727674937
Unironically both look like shit. If ray tracing is supposed to do light bouncing then the interior would be lit much brighter because of how bright the outdoors are.

>>727677251
that's still unplayable and now you get unstable framerates that shit themselves when things happen

>>727677318
it's a thread shitting on raytracing and you'd rather have the game less playable because you stare at puddles lmao

>>727677621
I can tell youre using a lut lil bro shadows in vanilla arent pitchblack.
Try again without mods this time

>>727677645
>100fps isn't playable
You don't hit 100fps without ray tracing

>>727677674
no mods are used. just path tracing preset enabled

>>727677628
>A game doesn't have to function exactly like real life to achieve good looking results
Do far away objects morph into low quality shapes in real life as well? Retard

>>727677692
keep coping eyelet

>>727677645
Rt pt anons play games
Youre busy seeting on v about things you can and never will experience cause youre on a 10 year old rx480

>>727677719
>you're coping
>while being able to play path traced games perfectly fine at 4k
>while I can't
lol

>>727677716
My response said raster you brainlet. Retard cant even read.
>>727677717
Why do you cry so much about how other people play games?

>>727677768
why would I want to turn off path tracing?

>>727677639
it's called a cubemap, they exist since forever but only render a designated texture not the actual map.
also gta5 was actively being worked on while CP2077 was rushed out at the last minute by incompetent peoples

>>727677768
>Retard cant even read.
meanwhile
>"Tale the same screenshots in a faytime "
retard is slobbering while he types

>>727677768
>No rebuttal
I do not care about how others play their games I care about the fact that games are literally being made worse just to sell some overpriced hardware

>>727677796
My response was to the guy making fun of pt are you fucking retarded or a malfunctioning bot?

>>727677868
that was me. I wasn't making fun of PT I was stating the game was showing a bug of a floating character. Jesus you're a fucking idiot

>>727677748
>perfectly fine
massively upscaled with frame generation
all because you insist on enabling the save jeets dev time option

>>727677852
Why dont you type on your phone? And why are you suddenly defending the pt anon? Are you falseflagging itt?
>>727677865
>optional thing is making a game worse
Anon is poor and still on a rx480

>>727677918
And i asked you to post raster pics showing how much worde it is there? Brainlet posted pt instead. Lmao. Also pt shadows arent pitchblack without using a black level fix lut.

>>727677926
no frame gen required.
>massively upscaled
and it still looks 100x better than anything your toaster can do.
keep sobbing into dell windows 98 laptop

>>727677951
I have a PC? why would I type on a phone? I'm not a thirdy

>>727678029
how would you know, you're having to type like a slobbering mong on a phone

>>727677951
It makes the game worse because the developer just goes "if you want any sort of lighting and reflections turn on the goycattle settings" because they're too inept to do proper lighting like we've had for years and years before they decided to sell their overpriced tech

>>727678032
lol
raytracing is so indefensible that you need to throw out the muh poor cope like your life depends on it
and it does
enjoy nvidia stock crashing when the ai bubble pops jeet

>>727678114
>it's indefensable
your only argument is you can't afford to run it.
>nvidia stock crash
I don't have stock in Nvidia so who cares?

>>727678101
Sounds like youre mad. Didnt you argue earlier thst rtpt looks the same as raster? Why are you even crying.
>>727678032
>>727678064
Uhoh samefagging

>>727678164
>indefensable
lol jeet
thanks for affirming that saar

>>727678214
>replying more than once in a thread is samefagging
this is what happens when slobbering mongs are given internet access

>>727677805
>it's called a cubemap, they exist since forever but only render a designated texture not the actual map.
While raster 2077 got fucking matte car with no shadow.

>>727674937
That's a shit-tier comparison.
Yes, games designed with raytracing as a focus are going to half-ass the rasterization and thus it's going to look like dogshit.
The whole psyop with raytracing is devs started fucking up their lighting to make raytracing look 'better' but it's only because they shot the non-raytraced mods in the kneecaps to make it 'fair'.

>>727678215
>you made a typo that means you're indian
>while I can't afford a modern computer so I'm clearly white
no you're not.

>>727674937
he looks chinese on the right. Left is unironically better

>>727678214
>Sounds like youre mad
Not an argument, I accept your concession.

>>727678297
>typo
those two keys are about as far apart as they can get on a keyboard
no, you're genuinely this retarded and it lets people see into the minds of rtx niggers
you don't care about playing games, you take screenshots

>>727678416
>i win because your spelling reeee reee reeeeeee
reddit tranny by any chance?

In a perfect world all of this tracing bullshit would be a developer exclusive tool used to simulate the lighting as a template for them to do the baked lighting on top of, such a shame that jews took that future from us

>>727678498
did the jews also make you too retarded to be able to afford a nice computer?

>>727677308
Yes, thats how FPS works, retard. Less frames per second means more time between each one. Do you often post shit that someone else just said?

>>727678536
Sounds like you're the one who's mad

File: 534849cd-befb-45e9-b8bf-7(...).png (211 KB, 2660x2664)

211 KB PNG

>>727674256
>car clearly has matte paintjob (also it's black which barely reflects light at all)
>reflects like a perfect mirror

>>727675548
Are people really pretending that the dawn of PC gaming wasn't people upgrading every year in order to play new games? Just because everyone got comfy during the 7th gen consoles being able to play on the same hardware for 5+ years doesn't mean it's the norm for PC gaming.
It's fine to game on a budget, but the amount of poorfags going all sourgrapes on every new tech that comes out is just fucking ridiculous.

>>727678496
>i sunk cost fallacied myself into calling everyone else poor i win REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
there's a reason every single raytracing coper has to post pictures side by side for people to even notice

the issue is the "upgrades" in this case are not worth cutting fps by like half or more

and new games are made with these features in mind because it's easier for lazy devs. so you have to "upgrade" to get overall worse experience than a few years ago

>>727678760
>It is new therefore better
Low IQ mindset

>>727676787
HUH!
I GUESS PATH TRACING IS NOT AS GOOD AS THEY SAY AFTER ALL!

>>727678765
why do poorfags always cry about the tech they don't have. You're never complaining about how shit your computer runs, or admitting you made bad computer part purchases, it's always some fault of the devs for not bending over and making their game run on your shit hardware, or some evil company for pricing the hardware for more than you can afford with your traffic light window wiping business.
Everyone who can afford it and uses it without any issues is some "sucker" or "idiot" , but not you, the dumb fuck who can't get a good job to buy nice things.
lol

>>727680075
>why are you complaining about tech that's currently ravaging performance to save jeets dev time saar
your mindset is directly responsible for ue5 slop running at 100fps at 4k on a 5090

>>727679089
>A way for a dynamic rendering of light in real time is bad just because it takes a while for the hardware to catch up

File: performance-3840-2160.png (91 KB, 560x1410)

91 KB PNG

>>727682073
actually nevermind, make that 45

>>727682216
>it's your fault this one game has bad performance
cherry picking much. Why don't you look inwards and see that your shit computer is at fault 95% of the time?

>muh RT graphics
>no RT sound
Hate this gay earth.

>>727682302
>rt audio
only works well on phase aligned headphones.

File: 1736073109373397.png (102 KB, 592x519)

102 KB PNG

>>727674937
>>727675096
I really don't give a fuck about goy nor penis tracing when it nukes my fps.
Also it seems to glitch out in a lot of games so I just leave it off. Maxing out everything at 100+fps native 1440p is neat. Can't do that with the nvidia gimmick on.

>>727682272
your strategy is identical to randy pitchford's, that is being butthurt about criticism and calling everyone poor
every single game should have a raster/raytracing switch for people who want to actually play the game and not take screenshots

>>727682216
>badass
Amerimutts are so fucking cringe.

>>727682518
>every game should cater to my junk computer
when you have old or shit hardware you can simply choose not to buy the game.

>>727674256
gay tracing is just a way to keep ''new'' GPU's relevant.

most game don't even need all that computing anymore but they keep forcing in this fucktarded costly shit into the engines so it runs badly on older, still vastly sufficient hardware

>>727682536
Randy is special.

>>727682216
Be honest. How close to the bottom are you?

>>727675548
Consoloids = crabs in bucket

>>727682649
>every game should have a jeet dev option so we can gain izzat
there is no competent raytracing implementation retard
it's all wasting cycles on recalculating shit that could easily be baked with raster

>>727682820
>he didn't look within
Games work fine for me. It's your PC being shit.

>>727682842
>fine
lol
the 5090 gets 90 fps in borderlands 4 at low settings at 4k
this is a future only jeets want

>>727674937
Left light and shadows looks more realistic than right jackass

what is there on the PS3 that's worth emulating now that never got a native PC port

>>727676787
real light as light in real life doesn't behave like that or even leather shading

>>727682820
>be baked
I mean, generally the point of the tech was to enable real-time illumination rather than relying on baking, since baking requires level geometry be static, and the age of baked lighting produced a generation of games with functionally no interactivity with the world itself because nothing could be allowed to move.

Of course now we have memetracing and it doesn't matter because devs have all forgotten how to design interesting and dynamic levels anyway, so it doesn't do anything but day-night cycles and flashlights.

Path tracing in Cyberpunk is the best looking game I've ever played

but at this point I would say the performance cost is still a bit steep, even with framegen to compensate. I've got a 5080 and a 9800x3d and with framegen, yes, I'm sitting at like 200 fps with everything maxed out but just speaking as a general rule, the tech could use refinement.
It is crazy how it lifts all of these flat surfaces to actually look 3D though and brings out details like the veins on a character's arms and other things which were not previously visible.

File: Need For Speed III_ Hot P(...).jpg (900 KB, 3840x2160)

900 KB JPG

>Only play old games
okay

>>727683330
literally minecraft my guy
if something this dynamic can have random people make shaders for it that don't destroy your performance to the level pathtracing much simpler and static elements does then actual professionals who get paid for it don't have an excuse

>>727683330
Quake 2 and Unreal will always be the deadline of how to make good lightning and shadows that lasts forever, Quake 4, HL2, Crysis 1, Mirror's Edge PC and Doom 3 literally the endgame of said techniques.

Sadly we will never see this again because the retards leaving college to work on gaming were brainwashed by anti C code tard wranglers who hates math and always sucked on physics class because it took their weed and buttsex hours at the humans club.

>>727682995
>but this one game...
and all the other 200,000 games are good to go.

>>727685363
>this one game that perfectly encapsulates my mindset and is representative of the degeneracy and incompetence plaguing the industry doesn't count!!!!

>>727685687
yes, it doesn't count. It isn't the norm. You're coping.

>>727685753
more like you're fucking blind and optimistic about something that's degenerated into a development shortcut

>>727685948
what game took a shortcut with ray tracing?

>>727674256
I activated ray tracing in GTA V and I don't see any difference
ray tracing is a meme

games look slightly better than they did 10y+ ago, and the require 4x the resources, there's no reason to play new games, in fact old games with ray tracing end up looking worse because it ruins the art direction

It does improve graphics. RT is just in early stage, most gsmes shouldn't be using, especially people who don't have resources to make their own engine and use unreal slop.

>>727686146
every single piece of garbage on ue5 that uses lumen and nanite?

>>727686690
lumen and nanite aren't rtx ray tracing.

>>727686741
>real raytracing has never been tried!!!!
your opinion doesn't fucking matter
lumen and nanite exist directly because of nvidia shilling it

File: DyingLightTheBeast RT.webm (3.92 MB, 980x550)

3.92 MB WEBM

>>727674256

>>727686835
lol you haven't a clue what you're seething over.
Your pc is too shit to run UE5. Ok. fair enough.
That has nothing to do with ray tracing you silly sperg

>>727686858
HAHAHAHAHAH

>>727686893
>no you don't get it, me, a shill, has actual pull in the industry!!! this stinker was just a fluke!!!
>ignore the real world impact of raytracing shilling!!!
unlike you throwing out guesses i can guarantee your pc can't run ue5 lmao
borderlands 4 runs at 90fps at 4k low on a 5090

>>727674902
Why not?

File: IMG_0456.jpg (126 KB, 1024x646)

126 KB JPG

>>727683224
>real light as light in real life doesn't behave like that or even leather shading

>>727687129
>ray tracing is bad and is used as a shortcut
shortcut to what? Devs still have to place light sources , direction, hue and intensity.
>but your PC can't run Borderlands4.
But neither can yours. Mine runs it better than yours so it's not really a win is it.

>>727677165
>It is realistic that every car and trash can has underbody lightning.

>>727687406
raytracing is faster to do than competent raster dumbass
the cost is offloaded to the player

funny how despite your insistence that it's not real raytracing you still defend a shooter running at 90 fps at the lowest settings on on $2000+ hardware

>>727676609
Games looked good before RE2 remake so it shouldn't exist?

>>727687631
how is it faster? you mean the light emits correctly so devs don't have to go around and fix bugged flicking light sources fighting with each other?
>funny how despite your insistence that it's not real raytracing you still defend a shooter running at 90 fps at the lowest settings on on $2000+ hardware
I'm not defending anything. I'm responding to your dumb as fuck statements. You're the one going on about borderlands. I've put about 15 minutes into the first one and thought it was shit.

>>727686858
Left is literally the pine fruit shadows here at the street, right was made by shit smelling indians from canada who poops on starbucks or park seats.

>>727687838
you're a genuine waste of oxygen
imagine spending it defending industry enshittification because you need to obsess over marginally better shadows

>>727687595
>retarded devs cant even make a shadow works

>>727688013
idsoftware fixed this problem years ago

>>727688013
why don't you ever reply to what I post without resorting to "you're a stupid shill huh huh", you come across as gormless.
>ray tracing is better shadows
and more. Every single AO, bloom, indirect lighting, global illumination, reflections, specular and diffuse etc effect used in games is done to simulate the effects of what ray tracing does, yet you just don't like it because whining poorfag

>>727688318
ah yes, shit no one cares about is why we should all be forced to play on screenshot mode
listen faggot, i don't want raytracing gone, i want rasterisation to be mandated by fucking law for people who actually want to play games because 90fps on low on the most powerful hardware you can buy isn't fucking cutting it

>>727688415
>I don't want it gone , I just want devs to cater to my shit computer
lol no. why should they. It's like demanding Sony release all PS5 games on the PS3. You're a fucking idiot.

>>727688494
>why should they put in more work to benefit the consumer
at least try to put the mask on retard, you're not even trying

>>727688565
Your computer is underpowered. Why should anyone cater to you? There are plenty of games without ray tracing so just play those instead.

>>727688267
they have bulldozed it since
a 5090 runs the dark ages at 178 fps on 1080p and you only gain 20% from switching from highest to lowest settings
can't even sate the entry level 1440p 240hz oled

>>727675407
spectacle is the only thing modern games are good for, if youre not playing shit like assassins creed or cyberpunk at high settings you may as well not play at all

>>727688626
look visajeet, i understand that your culture encourages throwing money at things but in real life you need to actually have conscious people fixing the problem

>>727688893
how can any dev fix the issue of your pc being dogshit?

>>727674937
>fps 142
>fps 75
this image isn't the own you think it is

If only games I gave a shit about had this technology.

>>727689117
i don't consider 90fps on lowest settings on the most powerful hardware available playable visajeet
i understand that the malnutrition over there in hyderabad is a serious problem but my eyes still work

>>727689306
>I don't consider 90fps playable
lol you don't have a powerful pc , the only games you're hitting 90fps in are old shit like morrowind

>>727689361
that's an exceptionally poor attempt at lowering my izzat visajeet
go on, tell me you like playing shooters at 90fps so you can finally put the nail in your coffin

>>727688708
Tiago Sousa brought Cryengine to life, he knows his shit and a good follow up of carmack's ideas.

>>727676787
returning my 5080 now, cant unsee

File: Screenshot 2025-12-06 160023.jpg (639 KB, 2521x1632)

639 KB JPG

>>727689723
I don't play shooters. I also never have any issues running games.

>>727690901
>i don't play games that require functioning eyeballs but i still feel the need to give my input on them
then just shut the fuck up?

>>727674937
>retard shilling immature tech that rapes performance for minimal gains
>posts Cybershart
Every time. Now post about how good DLSS4 is.

>>727691094
>i can't run games. I just spend my life crying about it
Have you considered getting a job?

>>727691161
>all i do is take screenshots and i'm upset at the prospect of someone wanting to make the games playable to someone with functioning eyeballs

>>727691294
do you often fantasize how people use their computers?

>>727683126
>>727689186
>>727691142
OPs point was there's hardly any difference to the graphics, which is absolutely comical
get fucked

>>727690901
>half life 2 rtx

>>727691365
you're so fucking retarded and solipsistic that you don't understand why anyone would want their game to play like a game and not a film

I bought a really cool nail gun that can get my construction done 20x faster. I've only built a shed before this year.
My dad has built houses for over 20 years and has never used a nail gun.

>>727691594
> you're retarded because I can't play games
I can play games fine. Buy a better PC. I'm not your mom. I don't give a fuck if you can't run something.

>>727691669
you can't play games lmao
otherwise you wouldn't be defending running games below the bare minimum of 120hz

>>727691726
>You can't play games
If I can't play games then what are you doing?

File: Screenshot_20251206_161908.png (7 KB, 459x33)

7 KB PNG

>>727691764
actually playing them sanjeet
because i use a proper monitor made for functioning eyeballs and not a hand me down tv from my parents like you lmao

>>727692075
oh you're the retared who has a pc which my console looks better than. the one with the 250hz monitor who can't run any games at 250hz

>>727692128
literally no one gives a shit about the opinion of a zoomer retard with a tv for a monitor lmao

>>727692208
tell me what games you're running at 250hz on your tiny screen

>>727692259
tell me about one game you play at 120hz on your shitty beat up tv

>>727692286
>shitty beat up tv
my monitor cost 3x yours lol

>>727692316
and you can't even run a humane framerate on it lmaoooooooooo

>>727692359
neither can you and you're only running 1440p , what a tit

>>727692393
250hz is a lot easier to reach once you get some taste and don't expose yourself to raytraced slop
meanwhile you actively want the industry to be worse due to your horrible jeet eyesight

>>727674383
If you like getting cucked there is no problem at all

>>727692449
how would you know what 250hz is like. The only thing you're running at that fps is the desktop.
Name a game you're playing 250hz

Overwatch 2 is playable at 250Hz

>>727692496
name a raytraced slop game that reaches 120fps without heavy upscaling then we can talk

>>727692601
I'm not the one wanking myself silly over being a retard and buying a dogshit tiny 27" monitor all because it goes to 250hz and then having a PC which can't run any games at 250hz. lol

>>727674256
>jewvidia forced devs/gamers to adopt this shit only to go full ai bubble
we should go back

>>727675548
sony always wins

>>727692682
you're wanking yourself silly over replacing sophisticated tech with bruteforce because your curry diet fucked your eyes so you can't see motion anymore

>>727692837
>bought a tiny 1440p 250hz monitor to play games at ultra-low settings
no wonder you hate ray tracing. You can't even run raster games never mind ray traced ones. You're a joke, possible the biggest moron I've had the pleasure of laughing at on this board.

>>727692968
>bought a slow as shit and high input latency tv to play games with heavy upscaling and frame gen
no wonder you hate raster. your eyes have been fucked beyond repair. you're a joke, possibly the biggest moron I've had the pleasure of laughing at on this board.

File: cry3.jpg (1.31 MB, 1920x1080)

1.31 MB JPG

>>727674937
wow, they finally caught up with 2013 graphics and all it took was hardware that is 5000x more powerful in order to get 40fps with dips, amazing
>>727675096
>put zero effort into making your game look good so you can collude with Njudea and sell raytracing to retards later

>>727693091
post some screenshots of your games running at 250hz

>>727693251
post some screenshot of you playing a non movie game

>>727674937
How can they not just increase the brightness of the sun and make the dark darker on the left?

>>727693279
You can't can you. Every post is a deflection. You really are a huge mong with nothing other than to seethe over other peoples gear.

>>727693404
you're seething over people wanting to actually play their games and not just screenshot them
it's okay if you like jeetslopped rtx with fancy puddles and shadows, just accept that not everyone is blind as a bat and they can perceive motion
we can both have our cakes here, you're defending cost cutting

>>727674937
maybe stop chasing realism 400milliondollas dragon

>>727676787
DONT LOOK THERE

what's better at exposing poors, PT or VR?

>>727676060
You think so? You think companies are gonna keep making games no one can play?

>>727693547
nobody is seething apart from you. I'm happy with how games are and how they run.
You want to lower games to the level of your dogshit PC rather than push it forward.

>>727697174
and here i was thinking you were reasonable and decided to drop it
no, you're a genuine retard that projects his eye damage onto others
last i checked pushing something forward involves sophisticated solutions and raytracing is bruteforcing everything