trannies are trying too hard to force this term

File: 1752872019896136.jpg (49 KB, 300x392)

49 KB JPG

>>727686219

dumbest wikipedia article I ever read, literally zero cited instances of anyone intentionally using this lighting to represent bisexuality, every part of it is pure conjecture.

File: image-13.png (1.27 MB, 926x781)

1.27 MB PNG

even fucking donkey kong found a way to sneak the tranny lighting in. I get people associate this will cyberpunk and futuristic stuff, but this is a game about a monkey going ogaboga

>>727686531
it's just a visual trend, but it gets ridiculous once you start noticing it everywhere.

>>727686618
It's just a subset of the modernized 80s retrowave aesthetic, it has genuinely nothing to do with sexuality whatsoever. Even this dumbass wikipedia article makes no attempt to address this, the only citations are articles acknowledging that the lighting scheme reminds them of the bi pride flag, with no correlation cited at all from the people actually using this color scheme as a means to intentially signal bisexuality.

Some chucklefuck made a wiki page based entirely on conjecture from tumblr and twitter users.

>>727687175
based chucklefuck, we should edit it to say it's being used to manipulate kids into transitioning. I hate this fucking ugly ass trend.

File: 1738200923593095.jpg (2.67 MB, 2560x1440)

2.67 MB JPG

true

>>727687414
You could edit it to say fucking anything given that the only sources they're bothering to cite are tumblr/twitter, and articles reacting to what tumblr/twitter retards are talking about, with a couple of analysts and lecturers questioned about it (none of which agree that "bisexual lighting" is a real thing). It really is a bafflingly retarded wiki page.

Might as well make an article called Trans Bridges and post twitter users talking about how they plan to jump off a bridge, and how that now means bridges are trans representation.

>>727686219
>this fake article is still up even after having been debunked dozens of times