[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1751131312734062.jpg (103 KB, 500x388)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
thoughts?
>>
>>727725193
Retroarch was a cunt to get used to but i do like it now
>>
Two totally different programs.
>>
Use both
>>
File: freelook-newhome1.png (436 KB, 2010x1696)
436 KB
436 KB PNG
Disgusting, I hate frontends that combine multiple emulators. When I want to play a GC game I launch Dolphin, when I want to play PS2 I launch PCSX2. I put ROMs/ISOs in the same directory as the program and will NEVER get MAME to work.
>>
duno what is playnite. retroarch is fine on hacked consoles if there's no native support
>>
>>727725692
lmao i use retroarch for everything except ps2 and gamecube because those two emulators are peak and RA adds nothing to them.
>>
I'm trying Batocera on my pi
>>
The only good thing about Retroarch is that some 3rd worlder somehow used it as the basis for a stripped down version with limited cores and the video output option I actually want on Wii (the normal Retroarch Wii with all the generic options is fucking unusable)
>>
I finally started using Playnite recently and it's a lot better than I expected.
>>
>>727725193
I've never heard of the top one. I like standalone emulators and mednafen better than retroarch.
>>
>>727725193
I used Retroarch recently after years of using regular emulators, it has a lot of filter options but holy shit navigating the menus is a nightmare, I need to search in like 3 completely different places to find the graphics setting I want only to find out my core doesn't support it
>>
Playnite is really hard to convince people to use despite how intuitive and simple it is to set up. I can't make sense of why that is, maybe it's just always going to be overlooked.
>>
>>727728373
not really simple to set up, or at least to properly customize, it's been around for years and it's still missing many obvious features and when asked about it the devs just answers "idk, make your own addon"
launchbox is better but it's not entirely free
>>
>>727728373
Most people don't actually need it, even if they already use it. Having a lot of games on Steam plus a few on GOG/Epic/Battle.net/whatever plus an occasional emulated game does not mean you need something like Playnite. Having an actual lot of games (or planning to play i.e. using it as a backlog list) from every source does.
Plus, unfortunately is still sucks as another anon said.
>>
>>727725193
Playnite is useless, and I use Retroarch for systems that don't have good standalone emulators. I'm not a cultish faggot, though.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.