>I am having a blastWhat is it about this phrase that IMMEDIATELY signals you are dealing with an NPC?
frogposters are NPCs as well
*Shill.Even NPCs aren't this blatant.
Article/journalist phrasing. They likely read articles on the internet. It's a fairly artificial phrase you wouldn't say naturally.
>Someone is having fun in le VIDYA GAYMES???
>>727753356Generally its posted in the face of some kind of criticism of a particular game, so basically the scenario is typically this>"I dont like X game because of A, B and C, therefore I dont think its a good game">"I LIKE IT."Basically its just completely ignoring the original points and not engaging with the conversation at all, and that's pretty annoying.
>frogposter>is a racist incel piece of shitunsurprising, really
It's such a retarded non argument anyway"shooting up heroin is bad""Why? I am having a blast"
>>727753856>everything has to be analyticalNah you're a pretentious twat.
>>727753356It's because it's completely become corpo salesman speak. Real people stopped using this phrase over a decade ago.
If anything it immediately signals a shill pretending to like a game. They'll never mention anything specific, even if you press them. Shills also really hate it when you point this out like >>727753674
>>727753356Stupid frognigger
>>727753964OP's post never mentioned anything about reviewing games, he just casually throws in that term and it can be applied anywhere INCLUDING people just having fun on the weekends. Not everyone is going to dissect every game they play, not everyone has free time outside the weekends, you dumb worthless fuck.
>>727754148It's clearly on /v/, you autist.
>>727754198>autistBut I'm not the one who's getting upset with terms like "I am having a blast" in a video-game. Get your priorities straight, manchild.
>>727753356Can npc talk be interesting? I'm aware that it will be soon ai generated.
>>727754261You wouldn't be so upset over the phrase being not taking seriously unless you had something to gain by saying it to manipulate people. Just use a different phrase.
I am having a blast.
>reviewer scores high>user scores low>blast posting intensifies
Context: OP's bully who beats him up was asked about his summer vacation in class today and he replied "I had a blast."
>>727754413Who says I'm upset about said phrase not being taken seriously? I'm just mocking people such as yourself who hates others who enjoys video-games casually, and who doesn't over-analyze every nook and cranny in games. <- That's the point.You're trying too hard and failing at it.
>>727753825
>>727753919you're a brit, the lowest form of life on the planet
>>727754589>who hates others who enjoys video-games casually, and who doesn't over-analyze every nook and cranny in gamesThis never happened. What the fuck are you even talking about?
>>727753356i don'r know
>>727754589nah I agree with himit's like the Xoomers who downplay all the struggles Millenials and Zoomers are going through these days because they were the ones who managed to phase into all the comfy lucrative ex-boomer jobs and because they're personally managing to tread water successfully they don't give a shit about what anyone else is going throughit's this pervasive "fuck you, got mine" mentality cancer that is infecting every aspect of generational interaction and critical avenue. Yeah that's great you're having fun retardmaxxing little Timmy but that doesn't mean critical analysis can just be thrown away like it doesn't mean anything. Subjective perception never trumps empirical objectivity and to believe as much just makes you an invalid with zero valid opinions
>>727755042>Subjective perception never trumps empirical objectivityDoes for boomers>fuck you, got mineThis leads to eu clowns overtaking the zombie nato and waging war against Russia. Rubio dreaming of the presidency and starting an expedition to vuvuzela is as xoomer brained.
>if you have fun you are CRINGE AND NPC
>>727754851>taking issue with terms like "I am having a blast">immediately assumes it's a shill and not some casual>gets called out for being a tryhard >immediately enters defensive mode and starts playing dumb>>727755042This thread is about games and me mocking tryhards who mock others who don't over-analyze entertainment -- Who just want to have fun. Keep your tirade regarding the current status of the social-economical situation elsewhere, you've no rebuttal regarding the original topic so you tried a desperate move? Pathetic at your part.I never said you can't apply critical analysis on video-games, like I've said I'm mocking people who attempts to mock others who aren't interested in methodologically analyzing games. Get this in your head.
>>727755368>>immediately assumes it's a shill and not some casualBecause it literally is every time if you weren't a newfag.
the fact is normalfags have a blast because their brain is wired that way (after being randomly generated that way). yes it's meaningless feedback for a game desu
>>727755730More like you're so terminally-online that any phrase that causes you discomfort is immediately a "shill" or whatever buzzword you want to apply to it.
>>727753356It's usually in response to excessive seething about a game that comes off as disingenuous
>is incapable of enjoying things and even if he did, will strictly deny itIs there a clearer sign that you're dealing with a 4channer?
>>727755808>you're so terminally-online that any phrase that causes you discomfortTotal lack of self awareness. This stuff is just evident to non-retards, you don't have to understand it.
>>727753730It's fear. If you can't acknowledge something's flaws and still tell a hater to fuck off, you're too afraid of your own feelings to have a conversation. Not that you need to capitulate to every niggling bullshit thing someone brings up. It's a line you cross when you absolutely refuse to engage as you say. At the same time, you don't need to give every crying nigger attention...
>>727754483It’s gotten to the point reviewer scores are more accurate than user scores>0/10 game isn’t hard if you played the series for 20 years
>>727756069It’s more likeI’m not gonna spend every thread about a game I like engaging with some “debate me bro” autist. A lot of the criticisms people will levy against games are so subjective they can’t actually be argued against and one of the favorite lines these people will use against any explanation of a story beat or game mechanic they don’t like is>so it’s shit on purpose :))))I got better shit to do than engage with that disingenuous crap. I’m having a blast.
>>727753825Spotted the nigger
be honest /v/, have you EVER had a blast?
>>727753674I look like this
