>RTX 3060 12GB
no i won't
>>727771808Palit RTX 5070 TiRuns well, and cool.
>>727771808
>>727771808This is a GPU i have
>GTX 970
>>727771808Nice try FBI
>>727771808>Valve Claims Steam Machine Outperforms 70% of Current Gaming PCs>https://www.techpowerup.com/342970/valve-claims-steam-machine-outperforms-70-of-current-gaming-pcsThe Steam Machine is notably weaker than the PS5 and has 8GB VRAM, which is even less than the Switch 2's 12GB VRAM. Since 70% Steam users have inferior specs to the $400 PS5, this thread will follow what the PC monopoly leader has to say about the average PC user on /v/ that is to say GTX 1050 or RX 560, a GPU without raytracing, and 4GB VRAM probably. And a bunch of ini tweaks to play pirated games with injected AMD FSR at 720p native or whatever the /v/ PC fags from Brazil/Southeast Asia/Eastern Europe/other third worldies use to pirate 30 year old console games.
>>727772896Most good games don't actually need a PS5 tier performance.Even on PS5 itself, most people are probably just using 30-50% of the machine's power level, specially CPU wise.This will change with GTA6 of course, but right now, they're all half asleep.
>>727771808most pointless thread on /v/ awardretarded teenager awardtoo much free time award
Jewish data collection thread
>>727773004I will be very fascinated by GTA6's PC specs when it releases in 2027 PC. I think it will require a Raytracing GPU because making a game engine to be compatible with 13 year old PC GPUs without RTX capabilities is a waste of resources. If we use the PS5 as a baseline then RTX 2070 Super GPU or even just RTX 3060 Ti minimum. The 8GB VRAM models because this game will ship on Xbox Series S in 2026. But this could not launch at a worse time, don't you think? With Crucial leaving the PC market this also means the competition for VRAM on GPU vendors will be tougher.All very fascinating brave new world for the PC market in a couple months. When GTA4 released on PC it was way too demanding for PCs back then too, I know because I was there maxing out the VRAM lol.
4070, non super
>>727773146t. snoy/tendie/xdrone
Just upgraded from an EVGA 3070
5090
>>727774602i dont even know what that means
>>727774760newfag
>>727774772i know what that means
>>727771808>9060xt 16gb
>want a 5090>shit costs $2000 more than a 5080>hardware prices will remain FUCKEDThis 5090 better last me a decade.
>>727774901Been thinking about getting this one too or the XFX model.Or maybe a 9070 (XT) but then I'd have to upgrade my PSU as well
>>727771808Managed to snag a 5070 for 700 bucks a few days ago. Just before the crash would happern
>>727773232I have no clue on how things will be by 2027 to be honest.
>>727775305I can help you out. Imagine RTX 6060 4GB VRAM. Just use the new OpenAIVRAM feature, it involves closing your eyes and imagining more frames being rendered.
>>727773004>>727775305So, why are games running like shit?It would be one thing if they focused on graphics or focus on the mechanics/game design but that's not the case either
>>727771808got this for $300 burger bucks during the sales, but gotta wait till Jan 6th. Is it decent? my 2060 Super is saying it's tired boss.
>>727776023its decent anon have fun
>>727775625In terms of actual performance, it's fine.There's not many games that run like a Xbox 360 game on the PS5 anymore.They look like smeary shit because they're using the unreal engine that thinks that using TAA is a good idea.
>>727775625>So, why are games running like shit?Unreal Engine 5
RTX 5070 Ti (Laptop)
GTX 1080 TI, am I cooked chat ?
>>727777186You should upgrade to at least a 3000 series, it's cheap and my name isn't Chat.
4070SIt's ok
>>727777186depends on if you want to play most things that have come out in the last decade or will come out in the future
>>727777283No you're right gng, Any recommendations for my next card ?
>>727771808RX 7900 XT
>>727777186You're still at the top king.
>>727777446You'd probably have to buy a whole new computer so it mostly depends on your budget and use case.
>>727777446Budget and resolution? If you want to play modern games you want anything above 8GB VRAM. If you have no intention to play modern games then you can get away with 8GB VRAM. You said GTX 1080 which had like 10GB VRAM, so for you to upgrade to something less than that...see the issue? 16GB GPU cost like 600 dollars now for a good one. If you're just upgrading to play something that requires Raytracing then you can get away with a 400 dollar 8GB VRAM GPU, just know it's not going to last as long as the GTX 1060/70/80 family because they were very strong and budget price.If you bite the bullet and go with AMD cards because they're cheaper, well, you're on AMD FSR AI upscaling and all you need to know is DLSS and FSR are just blur filters for not playing at native resolution. I personally detest AMD FSR. NVIDIA has 80% market on Steam Hardware Survey, AMD cards are not popular no matter how much /v/ /g/ third worlders rationalize their 3rdies budget PC Vegans builds.
>>727777578That's all I needed to know, don't care about gay tracing and 4k memes. I can still play Armored Core VI and other trash games at 1080p.
>>727771808GeForce II MX
>>727777186>>727777809>16GB GPU cost like 600 dollars now for a good one.Budget king is the 9060 XT and costs like $350, 5060Ti has 16GB as wellWhy they made a 8GB and a 16GB version for current gpus is just shameless
>>727775220>Or maybe a 9070 (XT) but then I'd have to upgrade my PSU as wellThis is what annoys me with upgrading. Anything that would be a worthwhile upgrade would mean I would have to also replace my psu and maybe the cpu.
>>727778017I think the only game I couldn't play so far was Rebirth because my card doesn't support DX12Ultimate.The Indiana Jones game doesn't run either.So it's possible that future releases are fucked, even at 1080p because many of them rely on the fake frames tech
