Starfox SNES is better than 64
In some parts. Both are great.
i suddenly feel like a huge dipshit because i owned an n64 but inexplicably not SF64. to this day i tried it maybe once or twice, never even rented it. og Starfox is fun but have to be in the mood
>>12164542agreed, i loved the original but couldn't get into 64 even after trying it multiple times
>>12164542How is this even a controversial opinion? Like no shit the SNES game is better. It would be another thing if you said SF2 or the GameCube games were better. That's just pure tardation.
>>12164643>Game that runs at a shaky 2 frames per second>betterlmao
>>12164647yea it runs at low fps but it's still better isn't that funny
64 is way better and it's not even close. OG is like a tech demo.
>>12164658>is like a tech demo.people say this way too much anymore when their favorite is a later game in the series and they're trying to dismiss an earlier title
>>12164542OP is an insane fool.
>>12164660No, people say this when the game feels unfinished and uses a bunch of untextured assets, leftover geometry that isn't consistent with the world, and runs like shit.
can you make it run at a stable 30/60 fps by overclocking/with a rom hack?
>>1216454264 is cool and all but yeah I prefer SNES. The music is 100x better, less annoying voice acting, and I prefer the 3 route system rather than having to start the same levels over and over just to see different routes.
>>12164542I agree.
>>12164542Both hard mog cubie slop
>>12164542>>12164640>>12164643>>12164654What's better about it? It's shittier graphics? It's more simplistic control scheme? It's flat and narrow level design? It's Bland and sterile environments? It's actually mindless enemies? Its non-existent storyline? Its non-existent characterization?What the fuck is superior about it exactly?You could say you "like it more", but "better"...By what stretch of the imagination is Starfox SNES better? By every single metric it is inferior. One of the textbook examples of a game becoming irrelevant because of its sequel, the other being Metroid.
>>12164794This is a VERY badly written post.
>>12164913Writing in it is pretty standard. Only reason you'd have trouble with it is if you're an ESL.
>Starfox snes is better than 64!>Sonic 1 is better than 2!>SMB3 is better than SMW!>Dracula X is better than Rondo!>Adventure is better than Adventure 2!Contrarianism. Not even once.
in some regards. I really don't care for all range mode in 64, but all of the on rails parts are better than the SNES game.
>>12164930Adventure is better than Adventure 2 though.SA2 literally removed the "adventure" part of Sonic Adventure.
>>12164542The music and aesthetic of the first one is superior.
>>12164930>Starfox snes is better than 64!Perchance.>SMB3 is better than SMW!Not contrarian, highly debatable.>Adventure is better than Adventure 2!SA > SA2
>>12164930>>Adventure is better than Adventure 2!1 is better just because it lets you ignore the shitty parts if you're not going for 100%.
>>12164550fpbp
>>12164930>Sonic 1 is better than 2!yeschad.jpg
>>12164930Yes, no, no, no, yes
