[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 74 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


is it good now?
>>
You tell me.
>>
Slide thread
>>
>rural folk
new code word?
>>
No
>>
>>1671485
Apparently paradox still haven’t bothered to add the 1848 revolts or the carlist wars yet
And the economy is still an unsalvageable cookie clicker
I don’t think even 3 more years of expansions can save it, every mechanic in this game is fundamentally flawed
>>
>>1671485
It's still shit, and always be shit with current warfare system.
>>
>>1671485
never was, never will be, it's fundamentally fucked like HOI4/CK3.
>>
>>1671870
CK3 is getting landless gameplay, between that and the big titty eugenics mechanics there is no reason to play CK2 anymore
>>
>>1671485
No, and between the bad foundations it's on and Paradox's incompetence in modern period realism (they are marxists, after all) it probably never will be.
>>
>>1671878
for a bunch of marxists, they sure have a cartoonishly greedy capitalistic business model
>>
>>1671878
you don't know what marxism is.
>>
>(they are marxists, after all)
>>
>>1671886
marxism is when a company makes a video game I dislike
>>
>>1671886
neither do marxists given they've been coopted by idpol like everyone else
>>
>>1671929
you're confusing amerifat liberals with marxists
go to any leftist space and you'll find marxists calling out idpol for the distraction tactic that it is to pull people away from class warfare
>>
>>1671931
that's crazy because any "leftist space" I go to is actually screeching about trannies, le racisme, body fascism, or palestinians. Not too different from the right wing equivalent ngl, just inverted
>>
>>1671934
again, your problem is that you're an amerifat that thinks socialism is when the government collects taxes
>>
>>1671936
No it isn't lmao
>>
>>1671936
Actually marxists have been extinct a long time anon, I'm sorry you had to find out this way
>>
prussians were ethnic poles
>>
>>1671485
It won't be good until they fix the abysmal navy system. Then it will be good.
>>
>>1671485
it is okay, still has a way to go imo but it's playable now
>>1671578
this isn't /pol/, there is no slide threads here
>>
>>1671485
No and it never will be, unless they replace all core mechanics which they won't
>>
>>1671485
buy an ad
>>
>>1671485
nope
still broken
>>
>>1671872
>landless gameplay
No-one cared about this parashill.

They cared about the game being too easy, but they'll never be changed.
>>
File: XtAPtnO.png (1.04 MB, 2434x2110)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB PNG
>>1671934
Not even leftypol does this, so you must be picking some twitter-tier spaces to see this.

>>1671929
picrel
>>
>>1671485
I think it's fun, definitely not perfect yet if it ever will be but it doesn't have bad ideas baked in with DLC like Crusader Kings 3. The only reason I'm not playing it right now is because they announced a new update that looks really good and as a result I am no longer interested in the current patch.
>>
It’s pretty fun now. The sim warfare system is significantly better than moving the stacks of toy soldiers around. Anyone wanting vic2 combat system is just filtered. The economic/building system is fun if you play with intention. If you don’t learn how it works you will get filtered and cry about the building loop. Laws and politics are much better than they were at launch but still require work but at least they are in an okay state. Diplomacy is the only thing that feels like shit. Everything is either in an okay or enjoyable state besides diplomacy so all around the game is fun and worth playing, not sure if I would call it good yet but it’s fun.

tldr: better than ck3 by a significant margin, on par with vanilla vic2
>>
>>1674087
>hurrrr in my 20 people radical tankie discord we totally hate idpol
>that means most leftists are totally not retarded trannies
i'm not even a rightoid but this is cope
>>
>>1671868
>Play Japan
>Try to invade Korea opportunistically during one of China's wars with Britain
>Send out my massive navy to secure the sea between us
>Declare war
>Can't move my army to begin the naval invasion until after declaring war, takes weeks
>Army finally moves into the sea area
>Koreans send out ten rinky dink wooden hulls
>This somehow fucking stalls my navy and the naval invasion for 5 months
>Finally push their navy out of the sea
>My army is invading a totally undefended Korea
>Spend another month not advancing the invasion at all
>Korea's recalled farmers with pitchforks finally get back from dying in Burma
>I have a fully equipped WW1-era infantry corps with professional officers and artillery
>Have to fight and win four battles before I'm allowed to actually set foot on the Korean peninsula
>Win one easily
>INVASION NOT PROGRESSING DUE TO LOW ORGANIZATION
>Have to wait three fucking months for my army to reach 100% organization again
>Win another battle
>Three more months
>Next battle only 1/10th of my army actually fights the enemy totally randomly
>Lose
>Set back to 25% progress
>Three more months
>My former friend Britain decides it now hates me and wants my land despite me fighting their enemy
>Embargos me
>Economy collapses
>My peasants now hate me and start revolting over literally everything
>Uninstall
>>
>>1671485
Did they ever fix the Texas bug where they always lose the war with Mexico? Yes, I know, historically etc. etc., but they put in a whole mechanism for the capture of their general and the USA inviting Texas to the union. Evidently some people can get it to fire some small percentage of the time, but it was a reported bug last I checked.
>>
>>1671485
needs nationalism revolts, mixing many ethnicities from different continents together should create massive turmoil (looking at you, Austria), Africans from the bumfuck middle of the jungle shouldn't be able to mass emigrate as soon as they get colonized, there's no reason to go the ethnostate route ingame when those were the strongest nations IRL in the late game timeframe, make slayery viable- allow industrialized slavery, part of the reason for the american civil war at that exact time was the south was starting to put slaves in factories and the effect that would have in the balance of power in america, that would be a fun alt history.
>>
>>1674713
it flip flops, sometimes, mexico wins, sometimes it loses. I think it goes a lot better if America supports it with money but not sure.
>>
>>1674693
>no true Scotsman, lmao
also
>nooo, Merkel is not a right-wing conservative, she is totally a leftist globocommunist, nooooo
>>
>>1674852
And what exactly did Merkel conserve?
>>
>>1674855
The social strata
>>
>>1674852
The only no true scotsman here is you towards the vast majority of the left and self-proclaimed marxists (i quote : "you're confusing amerifat liberals with marxists")

I never said you weren't a real leftist, I said you weren't even remotely representative, you are isolated and your ideas have little weight in your political camp.
It's like if a /pol/ turbo-nazi pretended the average Merkel voter was racialist and antisemitic. At some point you have to call him out and ask him if he is on crack or what.


>nooo, Merkel is not a right-wing conservative, she is totally a leftist globocommunist, nooooo
Ok
>nooo, Mélenchon is not a left-wing communist, he is totally a center-left idpol capitalist stooge, nooooo
>>
>>1674880
Merkel is just an example. I could use Meloni, Milei and Netanyahu.
All rightwingers. It's funny how these based right-wingers are so semitic and in case of Meloni even pro-refugees, yet they are voted in by racists anti-semites. And I tell you, this happens because you don't apply those rigid standards you apply to the left on yourself.
Every leftist has to stand trial for the crimes committed by idpol, but every rightist gets a free pass, when they vote in yet another broken right-winger into power. And if they don't do what they want, you just disinherit him or her and do it again.
But what they all have in common is their hatred towards the lower income strata. Just call them lazy and entitled. And this is what conservatives truly conserve. Make the rich richer, make the poor numerous. In every fucking crisis.
>>
>>1674891
Ah, I see what you're saying. It's like there's this whole dynamic where certain right-wing figures get a pass on some sketchy stuff, but if someone on the left sneezes the wrong way, they're dragged through the mud. It's like there's this cognitive dissonance where some folks are cool with their chosen politicians doing whatever, but if it's someone they don't like, it's open season. And yeah, the whole "make the rich richer, blame the poor" playbook is getting pretty tired. We gotta call out hypocrisy wherever we see it, whether it's from the left or the right. It's like, come on, let's hold everyone to the same standard.
>>
>>1674891
Speak for yourself, ESL commie. I have never voted for a kikeservative candidate.
>>
>>1674897
>hurrrr in my 20 people altright discord we totally hate kikeserfs
>that means most rightoids are totally not retarded kikeserfs
i'm not even a leftoid but this is cope
>>
>>1674891
>It's funny how these based right-wingers are so semitic and in case of Meloni even pro-refugees, yet they are voted in by racists anti-semites. And I tell you, this happens because you don't apply those rigid standards you apply to the left on yourself.
You are preaching to the choir. You don't know how many arguments I've gotten in for saying that, even got in trouble irl once.

I think there are about as many people on the right who hate those kikes as there are people on the left who hate idpol, the difference is we are not deluded enough to pretend we are the majority.

>Every leftist has to stand trial for the crimes committed by idpol, but every rightist gets a free pass, when they vote in yet another broken right-winger into power. And if they don't do what they want, you just disinherit him or her and do it again.
I don't even care about tankies. And I've never advocated voting for the kosher right.

>>1674907
lol ok but i do acknowledge that most rightoids are retarded kikeserfs and i don't pretend otherwise
>>
It'll never be good, it doesn't have good bones
>>
>>1674860
by that definition then almost every ruler in history was a conservative
>>
>>1674891

You clearly know nothing of german politics if you unironically think that Merkel is a right-wing conservative. Merkel got voted in and won 4 elections because she was able to mobilize middle-left voters, while still maintaining enough middle-right voters without implementing any actual conservative policies but simply due to being in the supposed "conservative" party.

Merkel got us open borders, gay marriage, nuclear phase out, therapy required to be trans affirmative by law and many more leftist policies.

The only actual conservative party in germany right now is the Afd. Every other party is pushing different degrees of leftist idpol.

My country is being economically buttfucked and we havent seen such a spike in poverty since the end of the war and the reason for that is not "conservative" politics but 24 years of leftist rule, 60 years of leftist subversion of societal institutions and the abolition of anything that could even remotely resemble meritocracy or common sense.

People like you are at best useful idiots for the neomarxist idpol retards. If you actually cared about genuine "vulgar" marxisism aka classic leftism, you would be fighting against the neomarxists as well instead of trying to put the blame on some conservative strawman that you build yourself.
>>
>>1675002
There's nothing more conservative than being a cuck and give ground step by step.
>>
>>1674087
> Not even leftypol does this
This actually isn’t true anymore, a liberal made it onto the mod team and invited those “uwu are trans people welcome here?” Trannys that take over everything and started banning people going against it. The leftypol of today isn’t the same leftypol as it was 4 years ago
Your living in the past anon
>>
>>1674891
Are you fucking retarded, or something? Most people blame the left for the shit on the radical left, because "regular" lefties either support it, defend it or enable it. I mean, there's a reason literally all media is far left, and it's not because of some tiny, insignificant group on the left. It's because it's the mainstream on the left. There is virtually no resistance, and the few people on the left who speak up (who are usually older liberal comedians) are called out as bigots or boomers with outdated and ignorant views. If a centrist or conservative speaks up against the radical left, then "regular" lefties will call them nazis.
As for people on the far right voting for milquetoast "conservatives" and populists, it's simply a result of voting for the lesser evil, when there are no other options. Most people on the far right are very vocal about how much they hate the people they have to vote for, which has in fact been such a defining feature of the right that people use it to infiltrate and subvert the far right. Hating any figure on the right for not literally being Hitler is extremely common, and the left loves that shit, because it makes it so easy to cause infighting or to discredit people on the right that they see as a potential threat.
>>
>>1675054
To be fair he is probably an old school marxist ussr fanboy not a moderate leftist. He is also probably a straight white guy and if he spoke his mind about trannies or islam or blm in the average "leftist space" he'd get called a nazi and be banned immediately. That's why he has to hang out with far righters on 4chan.
I know these types, they are deluded and should switch sides already.
>>
>>1674891
This is true to some extent, the right voter base is way too permissive when their leaders cuck out to jews and globalists.
>But what they all have in common is their hatred towards the lower income strata.
lol, this is how I know you've never worked a low income job in your life. If you truly knew low income people you'd come to hate them too, they're all so lazy and whiny, they're basically niggers. Those who work hard never stay low income for long. I was one of them and met some people like that too.
>>
>>1675406
Poor men south of Richmond.
If you ever talk to a poor person, you will discover that they are ridiculously stupid. They are in fact cartoonishly stupid. It is like talking to a parody. They are also very whiny, and talk constantly about themselves and their problems – usually, they have multiple women demanding child support and various substance abuse issues, including (but not limited to) alcoholism, pill addiction, and marijuana addiction.
>>
File: hoi4_telemetry.png (6 KB, 1174x172)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
>>1674082
>They cared about the game being too easy
No, they did not.
>>
>>1675428
hoi4 players aren't human, they're all wehraboos or [random second or third world "nation"] nationalists
>>
File: 0a6.jpg (30 KB, 303x335)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>v2fags still mad they can't keep the game at speed 5 all the time and blob around with krakow anymore

>>1675428
>that very_easy

Holy shit
>>
>>1675439
>kym filename
how about you kys instead
>>
>>1675428
Only like 20% of players have ever once played a single ironman game which is pretty sad
>>
>>1675428
>playing on anything but normal
Mental illness. Fuck, there alot mentally ill in ranks of hoi4 players, thinking of it.
>>
>>1676466
I think casuals are the issue here, like playing a big country in those games is already an easy mode, why would you need to play in very easy if you are already playing in what is objectively easy mode?
>>
>>1675440
>kym filename
What does kym mean?!
>>
Wanting to make history and geopolitics in a game simulator is ultimately a doomed endeavor huh
>>
>>1675428
i wish very hard mode was default or there was just easy and hard mode. i feel like if i put things on hard mode all the ai get bonuses and game cheat codes and stuff. i don't mind the game being harder, but it feels less immersive. Feels like you only need two settings for the two types of players.
>>
>>1674705
this sounds like a problem, although i'm not sure what type of problem. can someone who is an expert at identifying types of problems please chime in?
>>
>>1674705
What's wrong? I thought all of you faggots hated "map painting" so Wiz gave you a game where projecting millitary power is not such a simple task and you all hate it? I'm confused? Could it be that Paradox has at this point built up a low IQ fanbase that just wants to blob and get easy dopamine? Oh no Paradoxbrüders, how could this have happened?
>>
>>1677680
But you're replying to low IQ blobbers and map painters?
>>
>>1674891
>Meloni
>pro-refugee
Lowered arrivals of refugees by 200% in one year.
>Milei
Never has been a right-wing conservative, he's a libertarian.
>Netanyahu... is Semitic?
I don't think nazis voted for the prime minister of Israel.
>yet they are voted in by racists anti-semites
It's called being the least worst option, when the alternative is state-enforced negrophilia, homosexuality and the destruction of the middle class.
>but every rightist gets a free pass
People get shamed when this happens actually.
>when they vote in yet another broken right-winger into power. And if they don't do what they want, you just disinherit him or her and do it again
>you have to keep the politician who betrayed his promises because... you just have to, okay?
I know leftists put loyalty to party before everything else, but not everyone is actively suicidal. Everytime this happens people get more radical anyway.
>>
>>1677979
>Lowered arrivals of refugees by 200% in one year.
this is copium
there are still vast numbers of negroes materialising in the mediterranean and sinking their own boats to force the italian coast guard to pick them up
>>
>>1677981
It's a start for once. Biggest decrease in arrivals since the League-M5S government and all without any actual seizure, which would attract the attention of the politicized judges. Quite impressive if you think about it.
>>
>>1677680
it's a spectrum and there's plenty of options between opms world conquests and an objectively inferior nation being unrealistically too strong to be conquered (something that hadn't happened historically in this case).
>>
>>1677981
>sinking their own boats to force the italian coast guard to pick them up
Why don't they just not pick them up? Problem literally solves itself.
>>
>>1678873
HUMAN RIGHTS IN A DEMOCRACY OF WHO WE ARE
>>
>>1674891
Merkel was an unironic member of the communist party you fucking retard
>>
>>1678873
in most cases it isn't the italian coast guard, but judeo-american NGOs (actually state sponsored) that have already arranged a meetup.
>>
>>1674935
You're starting to learn, good.
>>
>>1679008
Marxoid historiography is retarded.
Funny beard man was only correct about Industrial Revolution-era capitalism.
>>
>>1677042
acronym for the website 'know your meme', supposed to be a meme website but most of the 'memes' are shit like bowsette or the animal crossing cat, it's really just a softcore r34 site
>>
File: libtard illness.png (136 KB, 633x630)
136 KB
136 KB PNG
>>1675020
But enough about leftards
>>
>>1678873
americans are anti-Whites and they're funding ngos that help africanoids
>>
>>1674705
>>1677306
>although i'm not sure what type of problem
It's pair of cocks overreacting to the old meta of just navally invade the capital lmao by making naval invasions almost impossible instead of actually fixing the problem that is it's impossible to have a war that doesn't last years because the ai won't peace out until it's automatically over in a few weeks via capitulation because you have to either occupy the capital or every wargoal, some of which have goals that are lmao occupy the capital, or you won't even enter the second phase of a war where it's actually possible for the war to end in anything but a stalemate. and sometimes you have to basically fully occupy the nation to occupy the capital without a naval invasion.
>>
Another day, another Vic3 thread is basically a /vst/'s old /political/

>>1674705
That...
actually sounds like irl, to the point I weren't sure if you weren't meming.
>>
>>1677680
thank god Paradox got rid of ahistorical bullshit like the Japanese empire annexing Korea
>>
>>1677306
It sounds more like an issue to me
>>
>>1680624
Shill...
that actually sounds nothing like irl, to the point I weren't sure if you weren't meming.
>>
>>1680643
There is this weird notion with Paradox fans like you that seem to think that whatever the country did "historically" should be just handed to them for free e.g. Prussia should face no challenge forming Germany, Japan should face no challange annexing Korea.
>>
>>1681493
there's a challenge and then there's artificial difficulty, shill-kun.
but bro like turtle ships lmao
>>
>>1680643
Japan did not invade Korea, as that would have been a non-trivial task and would have possibly resulted in a Peninsular War-style boondoggle like int the anon's greentext. They annexed it by dominating economically, slowly bullying more and more concessions out of them, exploiting their internal divisions and infiltrating their ruling classes, until they finally annexed them outright.
>>
>>1681494
Do you think that invading a country with half of your population, separated by sea, should be an easy task? Why did Japan feel the need to dominate them economically while slowly stripping their sovereignty from them instead of just invading them irl?
>>
>>1681510
By god, Japan invaded their ass centuries prior and did it so easily that they almost had the entire damn country before China and the greatest admiral ever turned them the other way.
This was during the age of shoguns as well. Further consider Japans historical success invading China in the future. Finally, a fantasy-historical Japan with player guided tech advancement, as in the original anon's post has feasibly very little to struggle against.
Also just gonna throw in that the systems governing warfare and specifically naval invasions seem frustrating to deal with, so the complaint was always primarily about the game design to begin with.
>>
>>1682048
Never heard of it. Your schizo delusions don't represent reality, chud.
>>
>>1681508
alright when can we do this in victoria 3
>>
>>1682048
>Finally, a fantasy-historical Japan with player guided tech advancement, as in the original anon's post has feasibly very little to struggle against.
So you just don't want to the game to have challenge, ok.
>>
>>1682048
>they almost had the entire damn country before China and the greatest admiral ever turned them the other way.
So they did not succeed, is what you are saying?
>>
>>1682048
>Further consider Japans historical success invading China in the future
HAHAHA
>>
>>1682048
Stop shidding your pants, and build a fleet of the same size as your invading army.
>>
>>1682253
can you please answer >>1682113
>>
>>1682101
>>1682253
>>1682256
>>1682257
>>1682260
Schizo, stop bumping the thread so desperately. Vic 3 is hardly worth discussion or such fanatical obsession.
>>
File: que.jpg (27 KB, 732x146)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>1682322
>>
>>1682337
A cluster of angry or disparaging response posts within less than five minutes total, all against the same post in a low activity thread. Right, no schizo here.
At any rate, man this thread got some mileage out of a single anon complaining about annoying naval invasion mechanics.
>>
>>1682363
Most people are lurking on vst, from what I understand. When there's nothing to discuss, there's nothing to discuss, but when there's retardation afoot they wake up.
>>1681510
From what I remember, in the first invasion (The one where they wanted to go to China) what happened was equivalent to Korea getting a "threaten war" for military access, and not believing it, to the point of not even sending out their fleet when they were effortlessly landed on, and only raiding the enemy after that first invasion happened while also getting help from China. They fought until the leader of the whole operation died in Japan, (he presumably wanted to war not that much for any military gains, but to get the very numerous nobler military forces in the country left from the civil war out of the country, so they wouldn't be an internal danger just sitting around)
The second invasion by a much more modern Japan, where they tried to make Korea not really a colony, but a sort of puppet which they could industrialize alongside their own country, started a chain of coups and counter-coups between pro-Japanese and pro-Chinese factions in Korea, supported by Japan and China militarily(also we see there a very early military non-intervetion treaty between asian powers, shame it didn't last very long) until it broke into full-on war between China and Japan, and it's during this war, due to breaking many treaties by the Qing, and their ruthless executions of the prisoners, that provoked Japanese into treating Chinese(and Koreans got hit by association) worse and worse as the war progressed (an attitude that tragically got cemented with time long after Qing government fell) and measures taken by the Japanese during the war on their "allies" turned Korea into de facto colony of Japan.
>>
>>1674705
Sounds realistic
>>
>>1682113
Never
>>
>>1684283
oh okay so you're forced to do the ahistorical invasion if you wanna do korea
just take over their economy lmao (you can't)
>>
>>1674705
All of the things that went wrong here are (You) problems. EVERY pdx game has complex mechanism, I bet you did not check organization before the invasion, landing penalty, fleet size, admirals and generals and a lot of other stuff. Also what shitty economy did you have that it collapses just by having Britain embargo you?
>>
>>1684392
Retard probably overbuilt, overtaxed, overspent, and could only be solvent by exporting all the shit he's built, because his jacked up taxes meant he sure as shit wasn't going to consume it all domestically.
>>
>>1676454
pointless stat because not playing ironman doesn't equate to cheating or savescumming
>>
>>1685953
It does, because playing ironman doesn't equate to NOT cheating.

*looks at own steam achievement list*
>>
>>1685953
Ironman is the way its meant to be played and without it enabled you can pull up the console at any moment and just annex all of the UK when they naval invade you
>>
>>1685956
>>1686011
again you may be subhumans and be unable to comprehend this; not picking ironman doesn't mean you're going to cheat, it means you didn't pick the ironman option
most adults have the discipline not to cheat and do not need to be physically forced into not doing so, people didn't just universally cheat before paradox came up with this option
>>
>>1686023
If you're not going to cheat, then just click the button, then. :^)

Prove it.

I literally had to unlearn that habit, because Victoria 3 has a tendency to OOF save-&-exit saves.
>>
>>1686011
>>1686025
Imagine being 12 and posting on adults-only site
>>
File: 271.jpg (31 KB, 500x534)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>1687909
One button. Are you intimidated by one button?
>>
>>1687909
please stop cheating and learn to make port guards
>>
>>1671825
yeah it's a codeword for "useless nigger", only somewhat better than landlord which is a codeword for "spitefull nigger"
>>
>>1671485
>watch Bo play Vicky 3 on stream
>France gets a coalition of the entire world against itself
>coalition forces land in France simply because there aren't enough generals in the defending army to do battle with the landing forces
>despite having all the colonies and half of the mainland occupied, French war exhaustion couldn't tick below 0 because France had no war goal, someone took war reps as a goal and they couldn't take Paris to enforce it
>a revolt broke out in Vietnam which made it unable to be taken over by the coalition, and since it was a war goal as well it also prevented French war exhaustion from ticking
>after like 2 years all the majors drop out of the fight due to ticking war exhaustion from unfulfilled goals
>at the end all that was left of the coalition was Egypt, which actually came out victorious since only their enforced war goal was left on the table
No.
>>
>>1688098
Why didn't Napoleon just do that? Was he stupid?
>>
>>1688105
Napoleon couldn't do that because there were no wars in the 19th century.
>>
>>1686025
until they fix the wars, as in YOUR ALLIES joining against you in a war against a remote OPM that has not even any kind of diplomatic relations with your allies, inability to call ANYONE into your wars because you can't literally do anything to make them interested, GB randomly intervening in EVERYTHING and so on, ironman is just too unsatisfying to play. It's like pre-favors EU4 but with random people, including your fucking allies, intervening against you. They need an EU4-like favors-trust system. I know it's gonna be implemented somewhen as a paid feature in a future DLC. Ironman will be truly worth then.
>>
When are the re-fixing warfare? Massive frontline wars in the 1830s/40s with millions of casualties is just retarded.
>>
>>1688520
Are you a bot? How many times did you ask this very exact question?
>>
>>1688525
>How many times did you ask this very exact question?
Twice. Answer the question Wiz.
>>
File: 1659204720326263.jpg (99 KB, 795x799)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>Are you a bot?
It is literally impossible for bots to circumnavigate captchas
>>
Why the fuck do they always release the new patch on a Tuesday? I'm off this weekend I want to play it but it's pointless with a new patch coming out
>>
>>1688530
>It is literally impossible for bots to circumnavigate captchas
Nobody tell him.
>>
>>1688517
>GB intervening
>random
And, thus, the non-ironman shitters reveal themselves as the low skill map painters they are. Shocker.
>>
>>1688628
I had them intervene vs me even in situations where they had no interest in both me and my target, in exchange for nothing. No obligation, no trade agreement, sometimes not even a war goal. have multiple thousand hours in most pdx games, playing ironman in all of them, no alt+f4, and Vic3 AI is the only one that does this kind of bullshit.
>>
>>1674109
Last time I played the warfare was in shambles. Like they had some good ideas, but any war resulted in an infinite back and forth with 6 million dead from attrition.
>be Russia, start war with China
>my army is far superior in every way, they don't even outnumber me that much
>everything is going well, but slow
>Finland arrives at the main front as my ally
>their dinky stack gets annihilated by the Chinese
>China gains territory through this win
>Finnish army is routed, almost at zero strength
>Chinese keep spamming fights against the Fins, completely ignoring my huge stacks
>they conquer all of Siberia by repeatedly routing a dozen Fins in the Siberian forests
>close the game
>>
>>1674109
+15 crones
>>1688906
This. Ai is retarded and Vic3 warfare never ever be good.
>>
>>1674109
any mods?
>>
>>1688906
They fixed that in the next patch
>>
>>1688906
That was fixed recently. The same with convoy raiding bricking your entire country by having your enemy teleport forward in time to blow up convoys that haven't been constructed yet.
>>
File: 1707737035746910.jpg (32 KB, 480x480)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
>have absolute naval superiority along enemies coast
>AI can still just ship hundreds of thousands of troops to wherever the fuck they want
>>
File: ova.jpg (17 KB, 354x342)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>do a naval invasion of zululand
>army travels to it by ship
>once it's in the correct sea node it just turns back to base at home which takes like 3 months
>after it lands back home it starts a naval invasion of zululand
>while in Rome
I wish I was joking.
>>
>>1689718
But you know what wasn't fixed?
Prussia spamming unification wars every second.
>>
>>1689718
>>1689732
>game is still literally in early access
>>
>>1690009
I honestly don't get how things like this make it into public release. A single campaign being played once the patch is deemed completed would have shown how convoy raiding destroys convoys that literally don't even exist yet which permanently bricks you country because you can't ship resources or trade with anyone before you rebuild convoys you've never had.
>>
>>1688022
In reality, it's all codewords for "weird niggers"
Last play, I had a liberal party that consisted of intelligentsia, petite assholes and rural folk. Opposed by free trade of imperialist and natsoc wank of militarists. I didn't even aim for the landowners to disappear, but homesteading was way fucking better than serfdom, so guess what: in a decade landowners went from 80% clout to fucking marginalised 1%
>>
>>1688105
They didn't own Vietnam yet, and it's integral part of this strat
>>
>>1690729
>A single campaign being played
Hahahahaha... I love your optimism.
They don't have playtesting department since 2019 in PDX.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.